Received: by 10.216.234.135 with SMTP id s7mr1412027weq.8.1349889861117;
        Wed, 10 Oct 2012 10:24:21 -0700 (PDT)
From: Robert Harris <bobharri...@yahoo.com>
Newsgroups: alt.assassination.jfk
Subject: Mcadams "error" of omission
Date: 7 Oct 2012 11:15:55 -0400
Lines: 47
Approved: jmcad...@shell.core.com
Message-ID: <krWdnaAQ_oLDGezNnZ2dnUVZ_rednZ2d@earthlink.com>
Return-Path: <pos...@giganews.com>
X-Original-To: aa...@panix.com
Delivered-To: aa...@panix.com
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120909 Firefox/15.0.1 SeaMonkey/2.12.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-DF-Seen-By: ms
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
NNTP-Posting-Host: 166.84.1.1
X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: 166.84.1.1
X-Trace: mcadams.posc.mu.edu 1349622954 166.84.1.1 (7 Oct 2012 10:15:54 -0500)
X-Original-Trace: 7 Oct 2012 10:15:54 -0500, 166.84.1.1
Path: q10ni65074066wif.0!nntp.google.com!feeder1.cambriumusenet.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!85.12.40.130.MISMATCH!xlned.com!feeder1.xlned.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed6.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newspeer1.nac.net!news.mi.ras.ru!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!news.mixmin.net!news.albasani.net!mcadams.posc.mu.edu!panix1.panix.com!not-for-mail
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Earlier this year I challenged mcadams re: his statement in his book 
that Mrs. Connally didn't realize that her husband was hit at frame 223.

That much was true enough, since he basically usurped that fact from my 
posts going back to 1995:-) But John's explanation omitted the fact that 
she stated quite clearly that it was the next shot, fired after she 
looked back at the President and before the fatal head explosion that 
she mistakenly believed, wounded her husband.

John's "reply" was that my theory was not popular enough for him to have 
to address the issue. Setting aside the many millions of views on my 
Youtube presentations, his argument fails because it is not my theory 
that demands an explanation. It is Mrs. Connally's statement.

I'm sure he would like to tell us that she was simply mistaken, but the 
problem is, that she reacted to that shot by spinning around to her 
husband and then pulling him back to her - exactly as she testified.

And that reaction began at frame 291, a third of a second after frame 
285 and in perfect unison with every other surviving passenger in the 
limousine. John also claims that I am the only one who can see these 
reactions, and refused to reply when I pointed out that numerous other 
nutters have tried to argue they were caused by a backfire, a siren, or 
the limo rapidly decelerating.

These are the reactions that John claims are a figment of my imagination:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7GH5pGQy6yI

And this brief presentation explains them in more detail:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cv7Lz25Xyno

Reactions like that are only seen immediately following 285 and 313. 
None of the early shots were loud enough to startle anyone and only one 
was loud enough to be heard at all.

Oswald did not fire all the shots.




Robert Harris