Received: by 10.66.75.164 with SMTP id d4mr3782705paw.10.1352438908779;
        Thu, 08 Nov 2012 21:28:28 -0800 (PST)
From: Jason Burke <Burke_Ja...@comcast.net>
Newsgroups: alt.assassination.jfk,alt.conspiracy.jfk
Subject: Re: 9/11 Required Reading: "500 Days"
Date: 9 Nov 2012 00:28:28 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 40
Approved: jmcad...@shell.core.com
Message-ID: <k7hik3$obd$5@dont-email.me>
References: <5071a65e@mcadams.posc.mu.edu> <fba60ba2-0fcf-4d5f-9add-bdbabfdf370c@c2g2000yqe.googlegroups.com> <5097d2b3$1@mcadams.posc.mu.edu> <b2594b4d-c601-4f8b-8189-28f35b9ec9e0@c17g2000yqe.googlegroups.com>
Return-Path: <n...@eternal-september.org>
X-Original-To: aa...@panix.com
Delivered-To: aa...@panix.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121026 Thunderbird/16.0.2
In-Reply-To: <b2594b4d-c601-4f8b-8189-28f35b9ec9e0@c17g2000yqe.googlegroups.com>
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
X-Auth-Sender: U2FsdGVkX1/2Zw+wHEjM7UQs0HYJv52A8piP/nRdy1JGj9SzStdDjQ==
X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 121108-0, 11/07/2012), Outbound message
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Lp2uaZ126umM6iA8u3ZTb7L/9bQ=
NNTP-Posting-Host: 166.84.1.3
X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: 166.84.1.3
X-Trace: mcadams.posc.mu.edu 1352438908 166.84.1.3 (8 Nov 2012 23:28:28 -0500)
X-Original-Trace: 8 Nov 2012 23:28:28 -0500, 166.84.1.3
Path: 6ni70101pbd.1!nntp.google.com!npeer01.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!novia!newspump.sol.net!mcadams.posc.mu.edu!panix3.panix.com!not-for-mail
Bytes: 3040
X-Received-Bytes: 3088
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 11/8/2012 2:20 PM, curtjester1 wrote:
> On Nov 6, 1:00 am, Anthony Marsh <anthony.ma...@comcast.net> wrote:
>> On 11/4/2012 6:56 PM, curtjester1 wrote:
>>
>>> On Nov 3, 10:10 pm, Anthony Marsh <anthony.ma...@comcast.net> wrote:
>>>> On 11/3/2012 3:48 PM, curtjester1 wrote:
>>
>>
>>>> Longer does not equal hotter.
>>
>
> I am not sure what you mean by this steel compromising example from Nat
> Geo, and your theory of trusses, so I'll let Mainframe weigh in on that or
> see if you can clarify.
>
>
>>> It is said that oxygen fires are hotter, and when something is burning at
>>> length as opposed to some of these WTC short term fires, it must be looked
>>> at as improbable that these fires were having that type of theorized
>>> impact.  Some of these other fires where 'no fire has ever brought down a
>>> steel-beamed structure before' were not affected by all this inferno type
>>> fire that was engulfing the whole buildings.
>>
>> I have no idea what you THINK you mean by that.
>
> The gist is that buildings of steel do not get hot enough to burn down in
> fires, and before 9/11, none had.  The steel stays intact.  I would think

I wonder how steel is formed. Is it by magic?

> these steel-structured buildings had enough steel to be such that a Nat
> Geo experiment would not get them to compromise.  Are you saying the Nat
> Geo experiment was in comparison to the trusses?  And what if the trusses
> were compromised?  Wouldn't the greater and main steel beams just remain
> intact, while 'THEY" just fell?
>
> CJ
>