Possible Sniper Location

[Robert Harris]

Here is another one that the more fanatical nutters can pretend that
they can't see:-)

http://jfkhistory.com/forum/index.php?topic=2014.0




Robert Harris

[claviger]

Well there you go, case solved. Must be a black guy to blend in with
the sign. Now all you have to do is match trajectory angles to this
corner.

[bigdog]

Yes, I see the sniper too. She is wearing a bright red polka dot dress
with a big Minnie Pearl hat and she's smoking a cigar. How did we miss her
all these years?

[Bill Clarke]

In article <1f9f6849-13d1-4eed...@googlegroups.com>, bigdog
says...

Holy smokes! That was J. Edgar Hoover in drag!

Bill Clarke

[markusp]

On Friday, August 10, 2012 1:48:46 AM UTC-5, Robert Harris wrote:
> Here is another one that the more fanatical nutters can pretend that
>
> they can't see:-)

Robert -- I looked at it, and yes, it appears that something is there. I'm
not a subscriber to the forum, but have you done photogrammetic testing on
it? Given the line of sight, it could be smaller than a human figure. I'd
be interested to hear your thoughts on it.

Even if it turns out to be easily explained, this demonstrates the need
for continued scrutiny of images. It wouldn't be surprising to me if
indeed some TSBD employee went up there, watched the motorcade, and never
said a word about it. Thanks! Respectfully,

~Mark

[Robert Harris]

In article <668d295d-2410-4894...@googlegroups.com>,

markusp <marki...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> On Friday, August 10, 2012 1:48:46 AM UTC-5, Robert Harris wrote:
> > Here is another one that the more fanatical nutters can pretend that
> >
> > they can't see:-)
>
> Robert -- I looked at it, and yes, it appears that something is there. I'm
> not a subscriber to the forum, but have you done photogrammetic testing on
> it? Given the line of sight, it could be smaller than a human figure. I'd
> be interested to hear your thoughts on it.

Since I posted here, there has been more discussion and photos in the
JFKhistory forum. According to officer Baker there was a wall about 5
feet tall on the roof, but there were pipes suspended roughly two or
three feet in the air, leading into that corner, which someone could
have been standing on.

There is also another photo I'm going to post taken a few seconds after
that one, which also shows someone or something in that corner, so this
was not a photographic anomaly.

It's just hard to think of anything other than a human being that we
could be seeing there.



Robert Harris

[John Fiorentino]

Robert:

Who owns the negative?

John F.



"Robert Harris" <bobha...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:bobharris77-56DD...@70-3-168-216.pools.spcsdns.net...

[Bud]

On Aug 11, 8:05 am, Robert Harris <bobharri...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> In article <668d295d-2410-4894...@googlegroups.com>,
>

>  markusp <markina...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > On Friday, August 10, 2012 1:48:46 AM UTC-5, Robert Harris wrote:
> > > Here is another one that the more fanatical nutters can pretend that
>
> > > they can't see:-)
>
> > Robert -- I looked at it, and yes, it appears that something is there. I'm
> > not a subscriber to the forum, but have you done photogrammetic testing on
> > it? Given the line of sight, it could be smaller than a human figure. I'd
> > be interested to hear your thoughts on it.
>
> Since I posted here, there has been more discussion and photos in the
> JFKhistory forum. According to officer Baker there was a wall about 5
> feet tall on the roof, but there were pipes suspended roughly two or
> three feet in the air, leading into that corner, which someone could
> have been standing on.

That doesn`t seem likely, it takes two hands to operate a rifle,
leaving none for balance or grip on the wall.

And why would a shooter stay in this position for so long, risking
being seen or photographed? Wouldn`t they jump down as soon as the
limo went out of sight?

> There is also another photo I'm going to post taken a few seconds after
> that one, which also shows someone or something in that corner, so this
> was not a photographic anomaly.

Pigeon?

> It's just hard to think of anything other than a human being that we
> could be seeing there.

But you will never in a million years be able to establish it is a
human being, so this just another one of those things with nowhere to
go, isn`t it?

[Anthony Marsh]

Which roof are you talking about? SHOW us instead of just making up crap.
BTW the acoustical evidence finds no matches with a rifle on any roof.

[bigdog]

On Saturday, August 11, 2012 8:05:37 AM UTC-4, Robert Harris wrote:
> In article <668d295d-2410-4894...@googlegroups.com>,
>
> markusp <marki...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Friday, August 10, 2012 1:48:46 AM UTC-5, Robert Harris wrote:
>
> > > Here is another one that the more fanatical nutters can pretend that
>
> > >
>
> > > they can't see:-)
>
> >
>
> > Robert -- I looked at it, and yes, it appears that something is there. I'm
>
> > not a subscriber to the forum, but have you done photogrammetic testing on
>
> > it? Given the line of sight, it could be smaller than a human figure. I'd
>
> > be interested to hear your thoughts on it.
>
>
>
> Since I posted here, there has been more discussion and photos in the
>
> JFKhistory forum. According to officer Baker there was a wall about 5
>
> feet tall on the roof, but there were pipes suspended roughly two or
>
> three feet in the air, leading into that corner, which someone could
>
> have been standing on.
>
>
>
> There is also another photo I'm going to post taken a few seconds after
>
> that one, which also shows someone or something in that corner, so this
>
> was not a photographic anomaly.
>
>
>
> It's just hard to think of anything other than a human being that we
>
> could be seeing there.
>

You really think that is hard?

[John Fiorentino]

Tony:

That's because the "acoustic evidence" was a sham.

John F.



"Anthony Marsh" <anthon...@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:502676fb$1...@mcadams.posc.mu.edu...

[Robert Harris]

In article <50264d66$1...@mcadams.posc.mu.edu>,

"John Fiorentino" <jefior...@optimum.net> wrote:

> Robert:
>
> Who owns the negative?

Hi John. Has your scheduled loosened up enough to look at frame numbers
yet:-)

I would presume that Mel McIntyre or his family owns the negatives, if
they are still in existence. What I really would like to find is a better
copy of his second picture, taken just a couple seconds after the first.


Robert Harris

[Robert Harris]

In article <4031d576-688a-42b5...@googlegroups.com>,

Yes.




Robert Harris

[Anthony Marsh]

So, what do you claim it is, a tree trunk?

[Anthony Marsh]

On 8/11/2012 5:10 PM, Bud wrote:
> On Aug 11, 8:05 am, Robert Harris <bobharri...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> In article <668d295d-2410-4894...@googlegroups.com>,
>>
>> markusp <markina...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>> On Friday, August 10, 2012 1:48:46 AM UTC-5, Robert Harris wrote:
>>>> Here is another one that the more fanatical nutters can pretend that
>>
>>>> they can't see:-)
>>
>>> Robert -- I looked at it, and yes, it appears that something is there. I'm
>>> not a subscriber to the forum, but have you done photogrammetic testing on
>>> it? Given the line of sight, it could be smaller than a human figure. I'd
>>> be interested to hear your thoughts on it.
>>
>> Since I posted here, there has been more discussion and photos in the
>> JFKhistory forum. According to officer Baker there was a wall about 5
>> feet tall on the roof, but there were pipes suspended roughly two or
>> three feet in the air, leading into that corner, which someone could
>> have been standing on.
>
> That doesn`t seem likely, it takes two hands to operate a rifle,
> leaving none for balance or grip on the wall.
>
> And why would a shooter stay in this position for so long, risking
> being seen or photographed? Wouldn`t they jump down as soon as the
> limo went out of sight?
>

Supposedly Deputy Sheriff Harry Weatherford, the best shot in the
department was assigned to the top of the County Records building by
Sheriff Decker to protect the president.

>> There is also another photo I'm going to post taken a few seconds after
>> that one, which also shows someone or something in that corner, so this
>> was not a photographic anomaly.
>
> Pigeon?
>

I forget the name of that scifi movie where radiation causes pigeons to
get as big as people. Was that Food of the Gods?

>> It's just hard to think of anything other than a human being that we
>> could be seeing there.
>
> But you will never in a million years be able to establish it is a
> human being, so this just another one of those things with nowhere to
> go, isn`t it?
>

The kooks never have to prove anything, just raise questions.

[Bud]

Best shot and the best he could do was hit Connally in the wrist?

> >> There is also another photo I'm going to post taken a few seconds after
> >> that one, which also shows someone or something in that corner, so this
> >> was not a photographic anomaly.
>
> >    Pigeon?
>
> I forget the name of that scifi movie where radiation causes pigeons to
> get as big as people. Was that Food of the Gods?

That was giant mutant rats. Not the worst CTer idea I`ve heard.

> >> It's just hard to think of anything other than a human being that we
> >> could be seeing there.
>
> >    But you will never in a million years be able to establish it is a
> > human being, so this just another one of those things with nowhere to
> > go, isn`t it?
>
> The kooks never have to prove anything, just raise questions.

It amazing how all the good stuff falls just out of range of
photographic capabilities, always in the realm of interpretation and
speculation. The conspirators must have just known that no camera was
going to get a clear picture of all the stuff they were doing. In fact
they were banking their lives on it. Yet they still left the person
they put so much effort into framing stand out front with everyone
during the assassination and had shooters all over in an area with
plenty of cameras and home movies. Incredible guts and incredible
luck, if conspiracy ideas have any merit.