>>I noticed that he incorrectly identified the Odio visitors, but I thought
>>his analysis of the statements of Marina was good, among other things.
>>He also makes good use of much newly released information, and got
>>some good tips from a fine British researcher, Malcolm Blunt.

> Do you think it was Seymour who was the "Oswald" figure?

> He claims to have documents that prove otherwise, but I haven't looked
> them up.

>>Martin

>>"Anthony Marsh" <anthony_ma...@comcast.net> wrote in message
>>news:GOadnaeStOZ9dG7anZ2dnUVZ_qTinZ2d@comcast.com...
>>> Martin Shackelford wrote:
>>>> Very interesting book. A few errors, but some fine analysis.

>>> I picked it up Saturday. As usual I go to a couple of specific topics
>>> right away. He was confused about the acoustical evidence. For example
>>> he
>>> writes that both DPD radio channels were recorded on Dictabelts.
>>> He did have a couple of new tidbits, but not very well documented. So I
>>> may be asking people here if anyone can document those.

>>>> Martin

>>>> "Peter Fokes" <jp...@toronto.hm> wrote in message
>>>> news:frolu3hlv76kief31edke8milsr8bng20q@4ax.com...
>>>>> http://www.hup.harvard.edu/

>>>>> See link on the page above.

>>>>> Requires Adobe Acrobat

>>>>> Peter Fokes

> .John
> --------------
> http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/home.htm