Message from discussion Question For Ben Holmes
Received: by 10.181.12.101 with SMTP id ep5mr2651668wid.1.1348610536456;
Tue, 25 Sep 2012 15:02:16 -0700 (PDT)
From: Bud <sirsl...@fast.net>
Subject: Re: Question For Ben Holmes
Date: 25 Sep 2012 18:02:16 -0400
Injection-Info: a7g2000yqo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=184.108.40.206; posting-account=m9ygJAoAAADodrMzQHwCTY_pcLb5nd8z
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0) AppleWebKit/537.1 (KHTML, like
Gecko) Chrome/21.0.1180.89 Safari/537.1,gzip(gfe)
Injection-Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 21:42:41 +0000
X-Trace: mcadams.posc.mu.edu 1348610536 220.127.116.11 (25 Sep 2012 17:02:16 -0500)
X-Original-Trace: 25 Sep 2012 17:02:16 -0500, 18.104.22.168
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
On Sep 24, 11:45=A0pm, Ben Holmes <ad...@burningknife.com> wrote:
> In article <02f1d0b9-ea23-4952-a348-2a217bc8a...@o8g2000yqm.googlegroups.=
> Bud says...
> >On Sep 24, 3:47=3DA0pm, Bud <sirsl...@fast.net> wrote:
> >> =3DA0 Not that I expect an answer but more because I enjoy seeing Ben =
> >> I shall pose this question To Mark Lane`s biggest fan...
> >> =3DA0 =3DA0Mark Lane clearly lied when he stated that CE399 was "undef=
> >> Why would the truth need lies to support it?
> > =A0As expected Ben ran, and I got my enjoyment.
> I see you snipped my response... here it is again:
I didn`t snip anything. My response appeared before yours did, is
> Forgetful, aren't you?
> I told you to go read Chapter Five, then get back to me when you could
> tell me what the topic was.
Has what to do with whether Lane lied? Since when does the truth need
lies to support it?
> You seem to think that it's okay for *you* to duck questions, but demand
> answers from others.
You seem to be confused about the process. You are putting ideas up for
consideration. I can challenge *any* of these ideas you are presenting
that I like. I can ignore what I like and address what I like. Right now I
like focusing on the lie Lane told about CE 399. Why are you running from
> I'll answer this in full as soon as you provide the answer to *MY*
Doesn`t work that way. You are producing Lane`s work. You have been
challenging LNers to shows lies in this work. When lies are shown, you
> Fair enough, right?
> Or would you like to keep running?
Why should I be misdirected by your strawmen?
> Ben Holmes
> Learn to Make Money with a Website -http://www.burningknife.com