Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
alt.assassination.jfk
+ new post
About this group
Subscribe to this group
This is a Usenet group - learn more
Message from discussion Where is Baker's book?
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Chad Zimmerman  
View profile  
 More options Jul 5 2006, 8:18 pm
Newsgroups: alt.assassination.jfk
From: "Chad Zimmerman" <Doc...@cableone.net>
Date: 5 Jul 2006 20:18:13 -0400
Local: Wed, Jul 5 2006 8:18 pm
Subject: Re: Where is Baker's book?
Print | View thread | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author

<pamel...@mindspring.com> wrote in message

news:msvka2lomeea5g9ct4t474l4u8vpp9pek9@4ax.com...

> On 4 Jul 2006 01:24:34 -0400, "Chad Zimmerman" <Doc...@cableone.net>
> wrote:

>><pamel...@mindspring.com> wrote in message
>>news:dfvda25ovkib5foe7d027ljfbanq6t6njq@4ax.com...
>>> On 1 Jul 2006 10:02:00 -0400, "Kenneth A. Rahn" <kr...@uri.edu> wrote:

>>>>Pamela,

>>>><pamel...@mindspring.com> wrote in message
>>>>news:l1gaa29lhocb5019p90u6css7622kfslqd@4ax.com...
>>>>> On 27 Jun 2006 01:26:27 -0400, "Kenneth A. Rahn" <kr...@uri.edu>
>>>>> wrote:

>>>>> >Steve,

>>>>> >"SDL" <sdl2...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>> >news:44a0839f$1@mcadams.posc.mu.edu...
>>>>> >> From the Trafford web site:

>>>>> >> "Sorry! That item is not available at this time!"

>>>>> >> http://www.trafford.com/06-0632

>>>>> >> What happened?

>>>>> >See Dave Reitzes's posts below for a pretty good guess.

>>>>> >Ken Rahn

>>>>> And why is Ken Rahn apparently comfortable jumping to any sort of
>>>>> conclusion regarding these posts from Reitzes which anyone can see are
>>>>> merely trolls?  :-0

>>>>I'm not sure that offering factual information should be considered
>>>>trolling.
>>>>Further, I said "pretty good guess."

>>>>Ken Rahn

>>> Ken,
>>> You are far too sophisticated a scholar to consider Reitzes posts
>>> 'factual information'.  I am a bit surprised.

>>Pamela, have you factually rebutted anything Reitzes has written? No. You
>>pleaded with him to read the book first, then post. You, yourself, had no
>>idea what the book contains. I also venture to think that you still don't.

> Oh, thanks for jumping into the thread and making my point for me.

Someone had to.

> Reitzes has not read the book either, and yet is comfortable making
> misstatements about Judyth and publishing them as 'fact' in such a way
> that even Ken seems to have bought in on it.

Several researchers had read an initial draft and had read many of her
emails
and claims through various sources, Pamela. His critique is based on
Judyth's own
words, from her own mouth (or hands).

> I hope I  have a good working knowledge of Judyth's statements and of
> the environment of NOLA in the summer of 63, as I have been
> researching them for the last year or so.  Anyone could do that
> through the information already available.

Yep, which she has also done a ton of...

 One would have to be

> hopelessly naive not to see the distortions Reitzes pages present.

Name 3 distortions and explain why they are distortions without using
Judyth's words
as testimony to the fact.

>>> And yet, your support of them tends to confirm my hypothesis that the
>>> more running around in circles that's going on about Judyth's book,
>>> the more value it must have.

>>More speculation without reading the book, which is essentially what
>>you've been a critic of.

> Indeed, I am discussing the reaction of this ng to the publication of
> Judyth's book.

No, you're complaining about Dave's webpage, using the book's publishing as
a crutch in this post.

Ken has not read it, and is comfortable supporting

> Reitzes erroneous pages.

Name the errors.

You have at least looked at its covers and

> have yet to post on its contents,

I have, but not much. There are some things that I won't discuss yet.

 saying that you need more time. and

> yet you seem to have lots of time to post here...

Yes. Book at home. NG at work. 700 pages takes lots of time (plus 1353
source notes), typing
a post doesn't. Funny that you equate the two very different things.

Chad


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2013 Google