Newsgroups: alt.assassination.jfk, alt.conspiracy.jfk
From: mainframetech <mainframet...@yahoo.com>
Date: 10 Nov 2012 22:07:55 -0500
Local: Sat, Nov 10 2012 10:07 pm
Subject: Re: 9/11 Required Reading: "500 Days"
On Nov 9, 10:20 pm, Bud <sirsl...@fast.net> wrote:
> On Nov 9, 12:08 pm, mainframetech <mainframet...@yahoo.com> wrote:Nope, won't do. Poor little buddy is now an expert on steel and its
> > On Nov 9, 12:28 am, Jason Burke <Burke_Ja...@comcast.net> wrote:
> > > On 11/8/2012 2:20 PM, curtjester1 wrote:
> > > > On Nov 6, 1:00 am, Anthony Marsh <anthony.ma...@comcast.net> wrote:
> > > >>> On Nov 3, 10:10 pm, Anthony Marsh <anthony.ma...@comcast.net> wrote:
> > > >>>> Longer does not equal hotter.
> > > > I am not sure what you mean by this steel compromising example from Nat
> > > >>> It is said that oxygen fires are hotter, and when something is burning at
> > > >> I have no idea what you THINK you mean by that.
> > > > The gist is that buildings of steel do not get hot enough to burn down in
> > > I wonder how steel is formed. Is it by magic?
> > > > these steel-structured buildings had enough steel to be such that a Nat
> > > > CJ
> > There is some truth in the question of the trusses falling while
> They did stay up when the planes hit them, even though the planes
> > As long as the outside 'cage' of supports was intact to some degree,
> Weakened by fire.
various modes, as well as an expert on the WTC tragedy. I guess he has
wider orders than we figured. Read this article showing that the
softening point of steel could not have been reached:
> > To accomplish that weakening, an incendiary chemical could be used
> > Page down a bit to find the picture of the steel.
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.