Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
alt.assassination.jfk
+ new post
About this group
Subscribe to this group
This is a Usenet group - learn more
Message from discussion Mr. Reitzes, why won't you respond?
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
John McAdams  
View profile  
 More options Oct 1 2012, 9:07 pm
Newsgroups: alt.assassination.jfk
From: John McAdams <john.mcad...@marquette.edu>
Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2012 20:07:23 -0500
Local: Mon, Oct 1 2012 9:07 pm
Subject: Re: Mr. Reitzes, why won't you respond?
Print | View thread | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author
On Sun, 30 Sep 2012 15:12:39 -0500, John McAdams

<john.mcad...@marquette.edu> wrote:
>On 30 Sep 2012 16:10:39 -0400, Robert Harris <bobharri...@yahoo.com>
>wrote:

>>blackbu...@aol.com wrote:
>>> On Thursday, September 27, 2012 11:12:25 PM UTC-4, Robert Harris wrote:

>>>> What David did not mention however, was that Estus Morgan was 56 years old

>>>> in 1963. The notion that he looked enough like Oswald to fool those

>>>> witnesses is beyond ridiculous, and the obvious reason why David omitted

>>>> the man's age.

>>>> Robert Harris

>>> ???

>>> I just read the article, which contains this:

>>> "[Foster's]...friendship with Estus Morgan (who died in 1966) was
>>> confirmed by Morgan's second wife, Nellie Louise Morgan. Morgan would have
>>> been 56 in 1963."

>>LOL!! Well, it contains that *now*.

>>It took John and David almost a week to add those words, and even then the
>>sentence was ambiguous, sounding much like it was Morgan's wife who was
>>56.

>You *are* the typical buff, Bob, shouting about evidence fakery when
>you silly theory is shot to hell.

>Never heard of archive.org, have you?

>That essay has not been changed for a decade or more.

Had you heard of archive.org, Bob?

If so, why didn't you bother to check it?

.John
--------------
http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/home.htm


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2013 Google