>> <deafjeffda...@gmail.com>  wrote:
>>> There is a marked difference between how lone gunman and conspiracy
>>> theorists handle data surrounding the third week of November of the
>>> year 1963.

>>> Over the long span it is notable that there are arrows on one side and
>>> there are ellipses on the other.

>>> The arrows consistently point to a single individual. The ellipses
>>> scatter about like dandelion parachutes into the air. They are always
>>> adrift.

>>> In short, hard facts and evidence are far more reliable than wild
>>> speculation and conjecture. They’re just not as fun. After awhile, the
>>> former don't move much, but the latter are always taking on new forms
>>> and exciting possibilities.

>> Well . . . the responses you got on The Nuthouse are trememdously
>> revealing.

>> But your analogy is a good one.  Conspiracy theories lead in 15
>> different directions, and each contradict the other.

>> But history really only happened one way.

> And which of the SB scenarios does McAdams espouse?