I'll probably be made to suffer (by certain CTers) for saying what I'm
going to say next; but I'll say it anyway. (And, actually, I think I've
probably said it previously to this aggregation at one time or
another.).....

But I really don't care very much where on the back of the head the
entry wound was located. (To the EXACT inch or millimeter, that is.)

And the reason I say that is fairly simple. I wrote about this very
topic in a post over in the unmoderated forum just minutes ago. I'll
repeat some of it here. .....

As anyone SHOULD know....it really doesn't matter where ANY witness
places the large wound on JFK's head....because the following fact will
never EVER change.....

THERE WAS JUST ONE ENTRY WOUND ON JOHN KENNEDY'S HEAD! JUST ONE! AND IT
WAS IN THE REAR OF THE SKULL.

Hence, JFK was shot just ONE time in the head, FROM BEHIND. And this is
an irrefutable, ironclad, proof-positive fact that will never change.
It's been proven via the autopsy report, which says that very thing
(i.e., JFK was hit one time in the head and one time only); and it's
proven via the autopsy doctors, who have never ever wavered from their
stance (whenever they've talked about the NUMBER OF ENTRY HOLES IN
KENNEDY'S HEAD) -- it's always been ONE...and that entry hole was IN
THE REAR of the head.

And it's also proven via this photo.....

http://www.jfklancer.com/photos/autopsy_slideshow/images/autop04.jpg

There's never, ever been a single grain of medical evidence that proves
John Kennedy was shot in the head from the front.

But will that irreversible fact deter the WC critics? Probably
not...because I think it's fairly obvious that many, many CTers have a
vested interest in WANTING to keep the JFK case "unsolved" and (more
importantly for them) "unsolvable" as well.

The "BOH" matter, as I've repeated numerous times on various forums
since 2003, is and has always been the #1 item on my short list of
"Things I'm Most Anxious To Have Vincent Bugliosi Reconcile In His
Upcoming JFK Book".

And I'm fully confident that VB has, indeed, reconciled those many BOH
witnesses to his own "LN" satisfaction. Otherwise, there's no way Vince
would have uttered these strong words in 2001.....

"My conclusion is that I believe beyond ALL doubt that Lee Harvey
Oswald killed Kennedy, and beyond all REASONABLE doubt that he acted
alone." -- Vince Bugliosi

Now, I suppose, it's possible that VB's position re. the many BOH
witnesses is similar to what I wrote in my first post in this thread
(i.e., the witnesses saw the blood pooling to the BOH area and thought
the major wound was back there); and it's possible, as I said before,
that the loose "flap" that can be seen in some of the autopsy pictures
was not in that "outward" posture when JFK arrived at Parkland, with
the flap, in effect, hiding a goodly portion of the parietal/temporal
blowout to the eyes of the Parkland witnesses.*

* = I certainly favor this explanation over Jim Moore's in his 1990
book....wherein he is basically saying that every Parkland witness
couldn't tell SIDE from REAR simply because the patient was lying flat
on his back! And that's just plain goofy, IMO.

Or, maybe Vince B. will have something different to offer from his
unique POV. I don't know. But I do know the following.....

No matter how many "BOH witnesses" exist, the medical/autopsy evidence
is not going to change....and that evidence CONFIRMS FOR ETERNITY that
President Kennedy was shot just once in the head....from the rear.

And to believe that ALL THREE autopsists are rotten crooks who would
deliberately falsify the AR of a POTUS is just outright nutty thinking,
in my view. And, of course, all of the photos and X-rays (per CT
beliefs) would have to have been faked a great deal too, to align with
the 3 doctors' "lies".

How likely is it that BOTH of those things actually occurred in 1963 --
i.e., three rotten, no-good autopsists AND some kind of underhanded
plot to falsify all of the President's autopsy pictures and X-rays
(which, somehow, were verified as genuine and "unaltered in any manner"
by the HSCA in '78)?**

** = So now we're up to at least two dozen lying SOBs, including the
several people on the HSCA who said those photos were not forgeries.