I will (again) admit that the BOH situation is my #1 snafu (if I may
be allowed to call it that) in the whole case. And I don't have all
the answers (quite obviously). It's a toughie, no doubt.

But you said something the other day that makes me curious too.....

You said that you'd be willing to accept the idea that a larger-sized
(non-entry) BOH wound at the back of JFK's head was only about the
size of a "quarter". But how would a small BOH wound of that
particular size equate to a much-larger wound that so many Parkland
witnesses claim they saw?

Seems to me there's still a large gap between Parkland and Bethesda if
you're willing to accept merely a "quarter"-sized BOH (non-entry)
wound.

So I'm just wondering how you can reconcile (in your mind) a "quarter"-
sized BOH wound AND the Parkland witnesses who saw nothing nearly that
tiny (per their accounts of the wound)?

I'm still leaning toward the scenario I put on the table earlier (and
has probably been postulated over the years by many other people too
that I am unaware of) -- and that is the very real possibility that
the Parkland witnesses equated the blood and gore that was pooling to
the back of JFK's head to there being a "wound" in that BOH area of
the head.

Now, given that scenario, we're still left to ask another very
important question, and that is this -- Why in the world didn't any of
those Parkland witnesses ALSO see the ACTUAL large "chiefly parietal"
exit wound on the FRONT/RIGHT/TOP of the President's head?

How could every Parkland witness totally MISS seeing the actual exit
wound that we can easily see here?.....

http://www.jfklancer.com/photos/autopsy_slideshow/images/AUT10_HI.jpg

How could some PH witnesses possibly NOT comment on that obvious
disruption at the right/front of JFK's head? It just doesn't make
sense.

UNLESS -- As fate would have it, the rather-incredible scenario
occurred that was outlined previously, i.e., Jackie Kennedy literally
DID PIECE JFK'S HEAD BACK TOGETHER (temporarily anyway, using that
"hinged" flap we can see in some of the autopsy pictures) during the
drive to Parkland Hospital, thereby re-arranging the way the right/
front exit wound appeared to the witnesses inside the Parkland
emergency room....in essence, masking the wound's existence entirely.

I'll admit, that explanation doesn't fully satisfy me either, just as
it probably won't satisfy anyone else. Because even if Jackie DID
"piece" the head back together again in some jimmy-rigged fashion (as
she did say she attempted to do), I'd STILL think that the disruption
of the skull would have been noticed by at least a few Parkland
witnesses on November 22...even WITH the "hinged flap" put back in its
proper place on the head.

But, since we weren't in that Parkland emergency room that day, it's
impossible to know for sure just exactly what JFK's head looked like
to the witnesses who were there.

I'm just trying to use the physical evidence of the President's body
and the autopsy photos (and Jackie's own words as well) to piece
together some kind of logical explanation where, in effect, EVERYBODY
CAN BE RIGHT -- from Parkland to Bethesda.