Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
alt.assassination.jfk
+ new post
About this group
Subscribe to this group
This is a Usenet group - learn more
Message from discussion Book including Oswald
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Anthony Marsh  
View profile  
 More options Oct 1 2012, 4:20 pm
Newsgroups: alt.assassination.jfk
From: Anthony Marsh <anthony.ma...@comcast.net>
Date: 1 Oct 2012 16:20:59 -0400
Local: Mon, Oct 1 2012 4:20 pm
Subject: Re: Book including Oswald
Print | View thread | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author
On 9/30/2012 10:55 PM, John Reagor King wrote:

> In article <5066774...@mcadams.posc.mu.edu>,
>   Anthony Marsh <anthony.ma...@comcast.net> wrote:

>> On 9/28/2012 10:31 PM, Bud wrote:
>>> On Sep 26, 9:53 pm, Richard Ferguson <senorcorre...@gmail.com> wrote:

>>>>    For me, that has never been satisfactorily explained, that and the
>>>> incontrovertible fact that Kennedy was knocked back by the head shot hard
>>>> enough that he bounced off the back seat cushion.

>>>     Bullets don`t do that.

>> You know nothing about bullets.

> There you go again with your silly claims to other posters that start with
> "You know nothing about..."  You told me the other day that I knew nothing
> about this assassination, when I have been demonstrating otherwise for
> nearly a decade.  If the previous poster even knows what a bullet *is*,
> then that person does indeed know *something* about bullets, Anthony.  If

So by your logic if a person knows what a violin is that makes him an
expert, a virtuoso?

> the person knows that a bullet can be fired from a gun, then that person
> knows something more about bullets.  If that person knows that a bullet
> fired from a gun can injure or kill a person, then that person knows even
> more about bullets. ;-)

He doesn't even know that the caliber of the bullet must match the
caliber of the gun, or the exceptions to that rule.

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2013 Google