<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/alt.assassination.jfk</id>
  <title type="text">alt.assassination.jfk Google Group</title>
  <subtitle type="text">
  JFK Assassination Discussion. (Moderated)
  </subtitle>
  <link href="/group/alt.assassination.jfk/feed/atom_v1_0_msgs.xml" rel="self" title="alt.assassination.jfk feed"/>
  <updated>2009-11-30T05:27:54Z</updated>
  <generator uri="http://groups.google.com" version="1.99">Google Groups</generator>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Peter Fokes</name>
  <email>pfo...@rogers.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-30T05:27:54Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/alt.assassination.jfk/browse_frm/thread/a07a29f4931a65b8/8e99c5dd47ea1a1a?show_docid=8e99c5dd47ea1a1a</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/alt.assassination.jfk/browse_frm/thread/a07a29f4931a65b8/8e99c5dd47ea1a1a?show_docid=8e99c5dd47ea1a1a"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Did a CIA/FBI informant mail Oswald the Lamont pamphlets?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  On Mon, 30 Nov 2009 00:15:39 -0500, Peter Fokes &amp;lt;pfo...@rogers.com&amp;gt; &lt;br&gt; wrote: &lt;br&gt; Excuse my posting the original item twice. It did not appear on my &lt;br&gt; regular newsreader so I sent it again. Now I see my post appears twice &lt;br&gt; on Google. &lt;br&gt; PF
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Peter Fokes</name>
  <email>pfo...@rogers.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-30T05:15:39Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/alt.assassination.jfk/browse_frm/thread/a07a29f4931a65b8/59be5e57a9745c81?show_docid=59be5e57a9745c81</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/alt.assassination.jfk/browse_frm/thread/a07a29f4931a65b8/59be5e57a9745c81?show_docid=59be5e57a9745c81"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Did a CIA/FBI informant mail Oswald the Lamont pamphlets?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  On 29 Nov 2009 23:44:11 -0500, &amp;quot;Mitch Todd&amp;quot; &amp;lt;recipien...@gmail.com&amp;gt; &lt;br&gt; wrote: &lt;br&gt; I went through the same thought process. &lt;br&gt; Peter Fokes, &lt;br&gt; Toronto
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>robert harris</name>
  <email>reharr...@yahoo.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-30T04:44:56Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/alt.assassination.jfk/browse_frm/thread/a1a46f3b649ec710/02fe1a848150f011?show_docid=02fe1a848150f011</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/alt.assassination.jfk/browse_frm/thread/a1a46f3b649ec710/02fe1a848150f011?show_docid=02fe1a848150f011"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Why Does Tomnln Continue To ....</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  In article &lt;br&gt; &amp;lt;7f566f98-6b09-4bd4-912a-6d9e8 290f...@a39g2000pre.googlegrou ps.com&amp;gt;, &lt;br&gt; Let me see if I understand your reasoning CD. &lt;br&gt; Since there are different theories about the assassination of JFK, your &lt;br&gt; theory must be the right one??? &lt;br&gt; My reasoning is that the theory which is best supported by the evidence
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>robert harris</name>
  <email>reharr...@yahoo.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-30T04:44:33Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/alt.assassination.jfk/browse_frm/thread/2c787b90284e0723/64576673364bf5a6?show_docid=64576673364bf5a6</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/alt.assassination.jfk/browse_frm/thread/2c787b90284e0723/64576673364bf5a6?show_docid=64576673364bf5a6"/>
  <title type="text">Re: New Video Presentation</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  In article &lt;br&gt; &amp;lt;800b49ea-dd60-4be2-8dce-97e77 7745...@33g2000vbe.googlegroup s.com&amp;gt;, &lt;br&gt; David, this is not at all subjective. &lt;br&gt; Oswald&#39;s rifle was tested by experts commissioned by the HSCA, who placed &lt;br&gt; microphones at varying distances from the alleged SN and then fired test &lt;br&gt; shots from a rifle that was identical to Oswald&#39;s.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Mitch Todd</name>
  <email>recipien...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-30T04:44:11Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/alt.assassination.jfk/browse_frm/thread/a07a29f4931a65b8/a375d4cb107912d3?show_docid=a375d4cb107912d3</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/alt.assassination.jfk/browse_frm/thread/a07a29f4931a65b8/a375d4cb107912d3?show_docid=a375d4cb107912d3"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Did a CIA/FBI informant mail Oswald the Lamont pamphlets?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Yeah, I read it, but I don&#39;t understand how the author goes from Oswald &lt;br&gt; asking for pamphlets from the FPCC to &amp;quot;a receipt for 45 of these pamphlets &lt;br&gt; from the CIA Acquisitions Division.&amp;quot; I&#39;m assuming that Simpich uses &lt;br&gt; &amp;quot;these&amp;quot; to refer to the same pamphlets, rather than different sets of the &lt;br&gt; same publication.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Peter Fokes</name>
  <email>pfo...@rogers.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-30T04:09:07Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/alt.assassination.jfk/browse_frm/thread/bced51fe95abd3e4/655f0fce976c4ffc?show_docid=655f0fce976c4ffc</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/alt.assassination.jfk/browse_frm/thread/bced51fe95abd3e4/655f0fce976c4ffc?show_docid=655f0fce976c4ffc"/>
  <title type="text">Re: PROOF that the Zfilm was altered!</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  On 29 Nov 2009 22:49:36 -0500, Robert Harris &amp;lt;reharr...@yahoo.com&amp;gt; &lt;br&gt; wrote: &lt;br&gt; Robert, &lt;br&gt; You might want to buy Vol 4 of Doug Horne&#39;s series (just released). &lt;br&gt; He apparently discusses alteration of the Zapruder film. &lt;br&gt; Here is a preview by Bill Kelly: &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://jfkcountercoup.blogspot.com/&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; Regards, &lt;br&gt; Peter Fokes, &lt;br&gt; Toronto
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Peter Fokes</name>
  <email>pfo...@rogers.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-30T04:04:12Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/alt.assassination.jfk/browse_frm/thread/d194b22e0414d501/a6d6378f610c350f?show_docid=a6d6378f610c350f</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/alt.assassination.jfk/browse_frm/thread/d194b22e0414d501/a6d6378f610c350f?show_docid=a6d6378f610c350f"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Whew, good thing they made them check their umbrellas...</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  On 26 Nov 2009 10:41:16 -0500, The Dutchman &amp;lt;kks44910...@gmail.com&amp;gt; &lt;br&gt; wrote: &lt;br&gt; Warren Adler comments on this event: &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.redroom.com/blog/warren-adler/the-chilling-path-assassination&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; Peter Fokes, &lt;br&gt; Toronto
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>The Dutchman</name>
  <email>kks44910...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-30T03:50:15Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/alt.assassination.jfk/browse_frm/thread/faeec55ecd4ea6d7/4693def24115ae62?show_docid=4693def24115ae62</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/alt.assassination.jfk/browse_frm/thread/faeec55ecd4ea6d7/4693def24115ae62?show_docid=4693def24115ae62"/>
  <title type="text">Re: The Truth About the JFK Assassination. Signal Processing Tells</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Is this conversation necessary?
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>David Von Pein</name>
  <email>davevonp...@aol.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-30T03:49:59Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/alt.assassination.jfk/browse_frm/thread/2c787b90284e0723/5e2a7b27537e5b4c?show_docid=5e2a7b27537e5b4c</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/alt.assassination.jfk/browse_frm/thread/2c787b90284e0723/5e2a7b27537e5b4c?show_docid=5e2a7b27537e5b4c"/>
  <title type="text">Re: New Video Presentation</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  screaming, diving to the ground, and generally jumping out of their &lt;br&gt; skins.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;&amp;lt;&amp;lt; &lt;br&gt; LOL. &lt;br&gt; Subjectivism is Bob Harris&#39; very best friend. Without it, he&#39;s a lost &lt;br&gt; soul.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Robert Harris</name>
  <email>reharr...@yahoo.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-30T03:49:36Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/alt.assassination.jfk/browse_frm/thread/bced51fe95abd3e4/192967c1d0c211ce?show_docid=192967c1d0c211ce</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/alt.assassination.jfk/browse_frm/thread/bced51fe95abd3e4/192967c1d0c211ce?show_docid=192967c1d0c211ce"/>
  <title type="text">PROOF that the Zfilm was altered!</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Well Ok, I admit that I can&#39;t see it myself, but the film must have been &lt;br&gt; altered, and not back in &#39;63, but during the last 14 years! &lt;br&gt; And how could I know that? &lt;br&gt; Well, back in 1995 when I first started posting about the reactions by the &lt;br&gt; limo passengers following frame 285, the unanimous reply by the nutters
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Peter Fokes</name>
  <email>pfo...@rogers.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-30T03:34:36Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/alt.assassination.jfk/browse_frm/thread/a07a29f4931a65b8/1336076e9dc52f4f?show_docid=1336076e9dc52f4f</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/alt.assassination.jfk/browse_frm/thread/a07a29f4931a65b8/1336076e9dc52f4f?show_docid=1336076e9dc52f4f"/>
  <title type="text">Did a CIA/FBI informant mail Oswald the Lamont pamphlets?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  &amp;lt;quote on&amp;gt; &lt;br&gt; When Lee Harvey Oswald wrote his first letter to the Fair Play for &lt;br&gt; Cuba Committee HQ in New York in April 1963, he asked for “forty to &lt;br&gt; fifty” free copies of a 40 page pamphlet. &lt;br&gt; In a remarkable turn of events many years later, the author of the &lt;br&gt; pamphlets turned out to be holding a receipt for 45 of these pamphlets
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>cdddraftsman</name>
  <email>cdddrafts...@yahoo.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-30T01:56:30Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/alt.assassination.jfk/browse_frm/thread/b5c5599b17d9a82e/7be7924a503b24b3?show_docid=7be7924a503b24b3</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/alt.assassination.jfk/browse_frm/thread/b5c5599b17d9a82e/7be7924a503b24b3?show_docid=7be7924a503b24b3"/>
  <title type="text">Re: June Oswald interview</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  She apparently has some of the same traits as her father too : &lt;br&gt; Creepy ex-boyfriend of June Oswald ....! &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://groups.google.com/group/alt.assassination.jfk/browse_thread/thread/164318509d4599fd&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.dazereader.com/24001071.htm&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; After watching part of a JFK assassination conspiracy documentary on the
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>John McAdams</name>
  <email>john.mcad...@marquette.edu</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-30T01:52:49Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/alt.assassination.jfk/browse_frm/thread/b5c5599b17d9a82e/0fc3fc6c438ad0a4?show_docid=0fc3fc6c438ad0a4</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/alt.assassination.jfk/browse_frm/thread/b5c5599b17d9a82e/0fc3fc6c438ad0a4?show_docid=0fc3fc6c438ad0a4"/>
  <title type="text">Re: June Oswald interview</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  She is thoughtful and articulate. She&#39;s also not at all dogmatic &lt;br&gt; about her dad being innocent. &lt;br&gt; .John
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>cdddraftsman</name>
  <email>cdddrafts...@yahoo.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-30T01:38:48Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/alt.assassination.jfk/browse_frm/thread/b5c5599b17d9a82e/9fb6960f55d17a13?show_docid=9fb6960f55d17a13</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/alt.assassination.jfk/browse_frm/thread/b5c5599b17d9a82e/9fb6960f55d17a13?show_docid=9fb6960f55d17a13"/>
  <title type="text">Re: June Oswald interview</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  IMO she looks more like her father and just as scheming . Notice the &lt;br&gt; treacherous upturned lips at the corners . Her termerity and insistance &lt;br&gt; that everyone think independently , thus causing mass confusion in order &lt;br&gt; to vindicate and exonerate her dad . BTW I posted this video some weekd &lt;br&gt; ago . &lt;br&gt; tl
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Robert Harris</name>
  <email>reharr...@yahoo.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-30T01:37:33Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/alt.assassination.jfk/browse_frm/thread/2c787b90284e0723/cbfe9242862cb2ad?show_docid=cbfe9242862cb2ad</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/alt.assassination.jfk/browse_frm/thread/2c787b90284e0723/cbfe9242862cb2ad?show_docid=cbfe9242862cb2ad"/>
  <title type="text">Re: New Video Presentation</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  In article &amp;lt;4b130a0...@mcadams.posc.mu.ed u&amp;gt;, &lt;br&gt; Yes Tony, I was indeed, not talking about Zapruder filming members of his &lt;br&gt; family at home. I was talking about him filming the President, which began &lt;br&gt; at frame 133. &lt;br&gt; And I do in fact, corroborate the claim that the first shot was fired &lt;br&gt; prior to that instant.
  </summary>
  </entry>
</feed>
