Answering Herberts Boo Boo !
cdddraftsman
Now are you ready to throw the SBT in the garbage heap with the
nonphysical eye-witeness testimony ?
TL :
No I'm not and I don't think anyone serious about solving this case is
either :
http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/sbt.htm
http://karws.gso.uri.edu/JFK/issues_and_evidence/Single-Bullet_theory/The_SBT.html
http://www.jfkfiles.com/jfk/html/concl1.htm
Perhaps you can address the conundrum that is left in the wake of the
train wreck it leaves us if we accept your working hypothesis and try to
push it along to the tentative hypothesis stage , which IMO , it's not
close to being ready ?
tl
Herbert Blenner
> Herbert Blenner :
>
> Now are you ready to throw the SBT in the garbage heap with the
> nonphysical eye-witeness testimony ?
>
> TL :
>
> No I'm not and I don't think anyone serious about solving this case is
> either :
Interested readers may like to see how cdddraftsman takes text out of
context to pretend that the issue is something else.
Initially, cdddrafsman labeled eye-witness testimony as "notoriously
unreliable." I countered by pointing out that the SBT is
overwhelmingly dependent upon the eye- witness testimonies that
documented six of the seven wounds attributed to CE 399.
.
cdddrafstman:
From what I've read about eye-witness testimony I would of thought
that was the last thing a person would want use to undergird any point
he was trying to make due to it being notoriously unreliable . Look
Herbert every eye-witness testimony has parts in it that are not born
out by the solid physical evidence . I don't think any closure will
come to this case as long a people use the evidence they want to back
engineer a predispossed conclusion .
End of quotation.
hb:
You are slitting your own throat. Eye witness testimony is all we have
to document six of the seven wounds attributed to CE 399. A surgeons
knife destroyed the small roundish hole in President Kennedy's neck,
the 15 mm elliptical wound on Governor Connally's back, the large
chest wound, both linear wounds of the wrist and most importantly the
thigh wound that reportedly stopped CE 399.
Now are you ready to throw the SBT in the garbage heap with the
nonphysical eye- witeness testimony?
End of quotation
The above quotations show that cddraftsman doubted the accuracy of
eyewitnesses while I reminded him of the paramount importance of
eyewitnesses to the SBT.
This background provides a basis to evaluate the reply by cdddrafsman
to the one sentence that he took out of context.
Now are you ready to throw the SBT in the garbage heap with the
nonphysical eye-witeness testimony ?
TL :
No I'm not and I don't think anyone serious about solving this case
is
either :
When removed from context, the single sentence gives the incorrect
impression of disputing the value of eyewitnesses and the reply by TL
affirms the value of eyewitnesses.
Herbert
Anthony Marsh
> Herbert Blenner :
>
> Now are you ready to throw the SBT in the garbage heap with the
> nonphysical eye-witeness testimony ?
>
> TL :
>
> No I'm not and I don't think anyone serious about solving this case is
> either :
>
Then you need to work harder to create a SBT which works.
cdddraftsman
> cdddraftsman wrote:
> > Herbert Blenner :
>
> > Now are you ready to throw the SBT in the garbage heap with the
> > nonphysical eye-witeness testimony ?
>
> > TL :
>
> > No I'm not and I don't think anyone serious about solving this case is
> > either :
>
> Then you need to work harder to create a SBT which works.
>
>
>
> >http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/sbt.htm
> >http://www.jfkfiles.com/jfk/html/concl1.htm
>
> > Perhaps you can address the conundrum that is left in the wake of the
> > train wreck it leaves us if we accept your working hypothesis and try to
> > push it along to the tentative hypothesis stage , which IMO , it's not
> > close to being ready ?
>
> > tl
IMO
What the JFK Assassination
debate needs is not a better
SBFact
but a better refutation of the
SBTheory .
Don't forget it is the official position of the USG of The US of A
. And seeing I wholeheartedly agree with it I wouldn't want to change a
thing .
tl
Anthony Marsh
Don't forget that the official position of the USG of the US of A is
conspiracy, as determined by the HSCA. You lost. We won. Now move on
with your life.
cdddraftsman
This just in from Yoda :
"A acoustics report debunked makes a conspiracy that is not"
tl