Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Re: Mark Lane #109

8 views
Skip to first unread message

Bud

unread,
Oct 12, 2012, 5:42:11 PM10/12/12
to
On Oct 12, 9:43 am, Ben Holmes <ad...@burningknife.com> wrote:
> In the previous paragraphs, Mark Lane showed that there's evidence that Brennan
> was actually a Grassy Knoll eyewitness, and the WCR failed to examine this
> evidence. Interestingly, not a *single* kook dared to reply to it.

Lane lies and you pretend he doesn`t, what could matter less?

> "One witness, however, offered testimony which, if accurate, would create the
> possibility that Brennan thought the shots originated not at the Depository
> window but on the knoll. That person was Howard L. Brennan. Seated on the top of
> an ornamental concrete wall directly across the street from the Depository,
> Brennan said that as he heard the final shot he was 'diving off of that firewall
> and to the right for bullet protection of this stone wall'. Commission Exhibit
> 477, a photograph showing Brennan seated on the wall, demonstrates conclusively
> that had he dived to his right he would have landed in clear view of anyone in
> the southeast corner window of the sixth floor. The wall could have afforded
> Brennan protection from bullets originating only at the knoll or at other points
> west of the Depository Building."

Brennan saw where Oswald was shooting. He moved away from where
Oswald was shooting. It where the bullets land that counts.

> Mark Lane is showing that there was more evidence that Brennan was actually a
> Grassy Knoll witness... and the kooks remain silent.

If you want to misrepresent and misinterpret there is no end to the
conclusions you can come to.

> --
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Ben Holmes
> Learn to Make Money with a Website -http://www.burningknife.com


Ace Kefford

unread,
Oct 12, 2012, 9:14:05 PM10/12/12
to
I love the classic mistake of taking how someone reacts in a stressful and
unexpected situation and giving an armchair assessment with some supposed
certainty of what that "must have meant" about what the person saw and
thought or even worse as proof of their lying. That doesn't mean that
some stories are not transparently ridiculous, but in general this form of
"reasoning" is anything but useful.

Anthony Marsh

unread,
Oct 13, 2012, 12:11:02 PM10/13/12
to
On 10/12/2012 5:42 PM, Bud wrote:
> On Oct 12, 9:43 am, Ben Holmes <ad...@burningknife.com> wrote:
>> In the previous paragraphs, Mark Lane showed that there's evidence that Brennan
>> was actually a Grassy Knoll eyewitness, and the WCR failed to examine this
>> evidence. Interestingly, not a *single* kook dared to reply to it.
>
> Lane lies and you pretend he doesn`t, what could matter less?
>
>> "One witness, however, offered testimony which, if accurate, would create the
>> possibility that Brennan thought the shots originated not at the Depository
>> window but on the knoll. That person was Howard L. Brennan. Seated on the top of
>> an ornamental concrete wall directly across the street from the Depository,
>> Brennan said that as he heard the final shot he was 'diving off of that firewall
>> and to the right for bullet protection of this stone wall'. Commission Exhibit
>> 477, a photograph showing Brennan seated on the wall, demonstrates conclusively
>> that had he dived to his right he would have landed in clear view of anyone in
>> the southeast corner window of the sixth floor. The wall could have afforded
>> Brennan protection from bullets originating only at the knoll or at other points
>> west of the Depository Building."
>
> Brennan saw where Oswald was shooting. He moved away from where
> Oswald was shooting. It where the bullets land that counts.
>

Moved away? Show me and prove it. You may have some strange little
theory buried deep in your head, but you can not explain exactly what
you mean.

Bud

unread,
Oct 13, 2012, 10:59:44 PM10/13/12
to
On Oct 13, 12:11 pm, Anthony Marsh <anthony.ma...@comcast.net> wrote:
> On 10/12/2012 5:42 PM, Bud wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Oct 12, 9:43 am, Ben Holmes <ad...@burningknife.com> wrote:
> >> In the previous paragraphs, Mark Lane showed that there's evidence that Brennan
> >> was actually a Grassy Knoll eyewitness, and the WCR failed to examine this
> >> evidence. Interestingly, not a *single* kook dared to reply to it.
>
> >    Lane lies and you pretend he doesn`t, what could matter less?
>
> >> "One witness, however, offered testimony which, if accurate, would create the
> >> possibility that Brennan thought the shots originated not at the Depository
> >> window but on the knoll. That person was Howard L. Brennan. Seated on the top of
> >> an ornamental concrete wall directly across the street from the Depository,
> >> Brennan said that as he heard the final shot he was 'diving off of that firewall
> >> and to the right for bullet protection of this stone wall'. Commission Exhibit
> >> 477, a photograph showing Brennan seated on the wall, demonstrates conclusively
> >> that had he dived to his right he would have landed in clear view of anyone in
> >> the southeast corner window of the sixth floor. The wall could have afforded
> >> Brennan protection from bullets originating only at the knoll or at other points
> >> west of the Depository Building."
>
> >   Brennan saw where Oswald was shooting. He moved away from where
> > Oswald was shooting. It where the bullets land that counts.
>
> Moved away? Show me and prove it. You may have some strange little
> theory buried deep in your head, but you can not explain exactly what
> you mean.

Yah, I am obscuring my meaning using small, common and easily
understood English words.

But I`m more than willing to talk down to you if you ask. Heres the
concept...

Brennan was sitting on the wall and dove to his right. Bullets were
hitting people to his left. By going to his right he was moving away
from where the bullets were hitting.

Jackie, incidentally was also trying to move away from where the
bullets were hitting.
0 new messages