Judyth on Facebook

John McAdams

unread,

Nov 25, 2009, 12:28:13 PM11/25/09

to

http://hi-in.facebook.com/topic.php?uid=14933122702&topic=4631

See especially this:

Talk about sophisticated control, let me tell you what happened to
this writer two days ago. I'm Judyth Vary Baker (see
judythvarybaker.com and also, Ed Haslam's Dr. Mary's Monkey)...my
friend, Allan mattsson, became a minor editor on Wikipedia (150
articles or so) and eventially, after meeting me, entered LHO's
biography and made some minor, important edits to the Wikipedia
'official version' screed there. Specifically, added that Lee Oswald
got his GED while in the Marines (with reference), that some people
considered him not only a violent and moody child but ADDED that some
others considered him quiet and thoughtful (with reference). The third
addition he made (all of this in good English--he's Swedish, so asked
my help for grammar, etc)---was the ARRB, its hearings, new evidence
and new witnesses, that have caused much controversy and interest. All
three changes were erased in ONE day, and he was told "mainstream
believes Oswald alone shot Kennedy" and that all cnspiracy ideas are
;fringe' and 'do not belong in Wikipedia." as if the GED is
'conspiracy' info! Then Allan found out that Wikipedia editor
"shutterbun2" went to (The Men Who Killed Kennedy)--TMWKK Judyth Baker
The LOVE AFFAIR --the documentary banned by the History Channel along
with The Gulty Men and The Smoking Guns --episodes 7,8,9 on YOUTUBE
and posted there that I, Baker, have no eidence or witnesses even
though this same editor DELETED same form my Wikipedia biography.
Next, because Allan and i were friends, suddenly my Wikipedia
biography was slated for deletion. They deleted it (it had been uop
about 6 years) along withb all evidence files, day befor eyesterday,
then wrote nasty cmments on the YOUTUBE docmentary on segment 4...God
knows what else they have done. The Wikipedia editors involved called
themselves "Fences & Windows" and Shutterbun2, but an administrator
had the final decision (name of Gamaliel, who recommended McAdams,
that same Paul Nolan who runs a huge disinfo website against LHO and
also against me)...folks, do not trust Wikipedia's biographies. Their
editors support ONLY The OPfficial Version. They said they were
thinking of removing Judith Exner, Chauncy Holt, George
deMohrenschildt, Guy banister, David ferrie, Mary Sherman, etc.
because they are 'fringe' ---and would let Mcadams decide what to do
about where to put (hide) my name. "Conspiracy theories" was
suggested. these people saw living witnesses tapes (Anna Lewis, Edward
Haslam), saw dr. Mary's Monkey, saw my book coming out (Me & lee) in
No=vember, saw History Channel documentary The love Affair--then said
there was no evidence. Even said at first I did not exist, then said I
was dead, then said I was a hoax (as protests were entered by
readers). In the end, they decided I sinply didn;t deserve space on
Wikipedia and delted my biography. After that, they deleted me from
the list of American artists, American writers, and American poets --
because i didn't have a biography.

However, "babushka lady" will be retained... thank you for caring
about the reputation of Lee Oswald. Yes, I knew Lee. i consider each
of you a friend, and thank you for your good sense and decency. Judyth
Vary Baker, witness. p.s. sorry about typos...vision problems..I'm 66
and live in exile due t threats...not fun)

.John

--
The Kennedy Assassination Home Page
http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/home.htm

ShutterBun

unread,

Nov 25, 2009, 11:46:27 PM11/25/09

to

Haha! Glad to see she's still got it in for me. For what it's worth, I
made my first Wikipedia edit EVER tonight (with regard to the movie "Ruby
and Oswald" in the Jack Ruby article there) Glad to see she is just as
kooky as ever.

Coondog

unread,

Nov 26, 2009, 10:42:34 AM11/26/09

to

If you will notice most kooks do not improve with age. If anything
they get a bit kookier. I'm not sure there is any cure for kooky.

Bill Clarke

ShutterBun

unread,

Nov 27, 2009, 11:32:41 AM11/27/09

to

Well, a "kook getting kookier" might be considerd an improvement, so
to speak.

jfk...@gmail.com

unread,

Nov 28, 2009, 12:54:21 AM11/28/09

to

Of course, Judyth doesn't have to hide behind an alias in order to
make a point, so just who is 'kookier'? :-0