Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Anthony Marsh still won't admit...
7 views
Skip to first unread message
John Reagor King
Oct 5, 2012, 4:19:42 PM10/5/12
to
...that he was not necessarily the first person to prove that the
Zapruder film is authentic. He still hasn't replied to my article from
Sunday in which once again I reminded him that someone just might have
had all the same materials to evaluate prior to the release of the MPI
video, so I will repost that again here.
In article <5067...@mcadams.posc.mu.edu>,
Anthony Marsh <anthon...@comcast.net> wrote:
> On 9/29/2012 4:40 PM, John Reagor King wrote:
> > In article <50654f24$1...@mcadams.posc.mu.edu>,
> > Anthony Marsh <anthon...@comcast.net> wrote:
> >
> >> but it was probably a cheap one since I was not
> >> yet convinced there were enough movies out on DVD yet. I was still using
> >> the old LASER video player. But I suspect that I had a DVD player for a
> >> couple of years before the DVD of IOAA came out. Then I bought a combo
> >> VHS-DVD recorder.
> >>
> >> But now most of us just play the DVDs on our computers.
> >
> > Yes, yes, all that is fascinating, Anthony, but it still doesn't prove
> > that you were the first person, ever, to prove that the Zapruder film is
> > authentic. Four days ago I asked you this:
> >
> > "And why couldn't someone else have proven the Zapruder film to be
> > authentic before the MPI video was released? You've still said nothing,
> > posted nothing, which proves you were the first to ever do it."
> >
> > Your answer of the following day was this:
> >
> > "Because they could not see the detail and the context. Why do you think
> > I didn't figure it out until the MPI video was released and then the
> > moment I saw it I figure it out within 5 minutes?"
> >
> > So I shall ask you yet again, Anthony:
> >
> > Can you not think of anyone who saw ALL of that same detail and context
> > BEFORE the MPI video was released? No one at all? No one? ;-)
>
> Not anyone smart enough.
Hahahahahahahahahaha! Oooooooooo, rrriiiggghhhttt. No one, not one
person, who was, ah, "smart enough," had all of that same detail and
context before the release of the MPI video.
Then how did the video get released in the first place, Anthony? ;-)
> And remember that we had all been studying the
> frames in the WC volumes for almost 34 years. I had been debating the
> authenticity with those kooky alterationists for several years.
> But I also had something which none of them had. Actual home movies with
> ghost images in the sprocket hole ghosts. My aunt had worked at a film
> lab repairing ordinary home movie customers Double 8 mm film which got
> damaged. So while Lifton and Fetzer claimed that the ghost images are
> never produced on ordinary home movies, I held in my hands several feet
> of examples of ghost images in the sprocket hole area.
>
> I had something which no one else had.
Oh, I think "someone" had that material well before you did, and had it
forms removed by far fewer generations from the original as well. ;-)
Zapruder film is authentic. He still hasn't replied to my article from
Sunday in which once again I reminded him that someone just might have
had all the same materials to evaluate prior to the release of the MPI
video, so I will repost that again here.
In article <5067...@mcadams.posc.mu.edu>,
Anthony Marsh <anthon...@comcast.net> wrote:
> On 9/29/2012 4:40 PM, John Reagor King wrote:
> > In article <50654f24$1...@mcadams.posc.mu.edu>,
> > Anthony Marsh <anthon...@comcast.net> wrote:
> >
> >> but it was probably a cheap one since I was not
> >> yet convinced there were enough movies out on DVD yet. I was still using
> >> the old LASER video player. But I suspect that I had a DVD player for a
> >> couple of years before the DVD of IOAA came out. Then I bought a combo
> >> VHS-DVD recorder.
> >>
> >> But now most of us just play the DVDs on our computers.
> >
> > Yes, yes, all that is fascinating, Anthony, but it still doesn't prove
> > that you were the first person, ever, to prove that the Zapruder film is
> > authentic. Four days ago I asked you this:
> >
> > "And why couldn't someone else have proven the Zapruder film to be
> > authentic before the MPI video was released? You've still said nothing,
> > posted nothing, which proves you were the first to ever do it."
> >
> > Your answer of the following day was this:
> >
> > "Because they could not see the detail and the context. Why do you think
> > I didn't figure it out until the MPI video was released and then the
> > moment I saw it I figure it out within 5 minutes?"
> >
> > So I shall ask you yet again, Anthony:
> >
> > Can you not think of anyone who saw ALL of that same detail and context
> > BEFORE the MPI video was released? No one at all? No one? ;-)
>
> Not anyone smart enough.
Hahahahahahahahahaha! Oooooooooo, rrriiiggghhhttt. No one, not one
person, who was, ah, "smart enough," had all of that same detail and
context before the release of the MPI video.
Then how did the video get released in the first place, Anthony? ;-)
> And remember that we had all been studying the
> frames in the WC volumes for almost 34 years. I had been debating the
> authenticity with those kooky alterationists for several years.
> But I also had something which none of them had. Actual home movies with
> ghost images in the sprocket hole ghosts. My aunt had worked at a film
> lab repairing ordinary home movie customers Double 8 mm film which got
> damaged. So while Lifton and Fetzer claimed that the ghost images are
> never produced on ordinary home movies, I held in my hands several feet
> of examples of ghost images in the sprocket hole area.
>
> I had something which no one else had.
Oh, I think "someone" had that material well before you did, and had it
forms removed by far fewer generations from the original as well. ;-)
Anthony Marsh
Oct 5, 2012, 9:55:55 PM10/5/12
to
On 10/5/2012 4:19 PM, John Reagor King wrote:
> ...that he was not necessarily the first person to prove that the
> Zapruder film is authentic. He still hasn't replied to my article from
> Sunday in which once again I reminded him that someone just might have
> had all the same materials to evaluate prior to the release of the MPI
> video, so I will repost that again here.
>
No one else had the real home movies with ghost images in the sprocket
> ...that he was not necessarily the first person to prove that the
> Zapruder film is authentic. He still hasn't replied to my article from
> Sunday in which once again I reminded him that someone just might have
> had all the same materials to evaluate prior to the release of the MPI
> video, so I will repost that again here.
>
holes.
John Reagor King
Oct 6, 2012, 4:44:00 PM10/6/12
to
In article <506f7c9c$1...@mcadams.posc.mu.edu>,
the people who *made* the MPI video, Anthony? How would they have been
able to put that on the video if they didn't already have it?
Sheesh.
Oh, and still waiting, and waiting, and waiting for you to admit that I
have never once said that JFK had his fists up by Z225. In your pitiful
attempts yesterday to, uh, "catch" me on that, you only quoted a sentence
in which I *didn't* say that, ROFL!
Anthony Marsh <anthon...@comcast.net> wrote:
> No one else had the real home movies with ghost images in the sprocket
> holes.
Lol, no one else had them before the release of the MPI video? What about
> No one else had the real home movies with ghost images in the sprocket
> holes.
the people who *made* the MPI video, Anthony? How would they have been
able to put that on the video if they didn't already have it?
Sheesh.
Oh, and still waiting, and waiting, and waiting for you to admit that I
have never once said that JFK had his fists up by Z225. In your pitiful
attempts yesterday to, uh, "catch" me on that, you only quoted a sentence
in which I *didn't* say that, ROFL!
0 new messages