Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Question about the moderating policies of this NG

2 views
Skip to first unread message

Ramon F. Herrera

unread,
Feb 4, 2012, 9:18:55 PM2/4/12
to

(1) Who are the moderators (in addition to Prof. McAdams)?

-Ramon


Ramon F. Herrera

unread,
Feb 4, 2012, 9:56:13 PM2/4/12
to
On Feb 4, 8:18 pm, "Ramon F. Herrera" <ra...@conexus.net> wrote:
> (1) Who are the moderators (in addition to Prof. McAdams)?
>
> -Ramon

(2) Are there any moderators from the liberal ideology and/or CTs??

-Ramon


Raymond

unread,
Feb 4, 2012, 9:56:57 PM2/4/12
to
On Feb 4, 9:18 pm, "Ramon F. Herrera" <ra...@conexus.net> wrote:
> (1) Who are the moderators (in addition to Prof. McAdams)?
>
> -Ramon

The Director of the Central Intelligence Agency David H. Petraeus

Ramon F. Herrera

unread,
Feb 5, 2012, 12:04:59 AM2/5/12
to
Come on, Raymond, I have a serious issue with the policies of this NG.
Let's not be paranoid. We can always post in alt.conspiracy.jfk, which
seems to be SPAM-free these days. The response is lightning fast. No
censorship.

-Ramon

Ramon F. Herrera

unread,
Feb 5, 2012, 12:05:12 AM2/5/12
to
On Feb 4, 8:56 pm, Raymond <Bluerhy...@aol.com> wrote:
That is not possible, because the responses that I have tried to post
(and have been censored) are 100% in support of our president, which
is the boss of General Petraeus.

-Ramon

Ramon F. Herrera

unread,
Feb 5, 2012, 12:08:11 AM2/5/12
to
On Feb 4, 8:18 pm, "Ramon F. Herrera" <ra...@conexus.net> wrote:
> (1) Who are the moderators (in addition to Prof. McAdams)?
>
> -Ramon

Oh, that was pretty fast. May I ask what happened to the several
messages I posted (about 24 hours ago) in the "GOP rhetoric risk
inciting a potential assassin, says Jesse Jackson" thread?

Thanks,

-Ramon


John McAdams

unread,
Feb 5, 2012, 12:12:51 AM2/5/12
to
On 5 Feb 2012 00:08:11 -0500, "Ramon F. Herrera" <ra...@conexus.net>
wrote:
We moderators have closed the thread. It was off topic, having
degenerated into people (mostly you) bashing people with different
political views.

I tried to write you, but you apparently don't post with a valid
e-mail address in your header.

.John


The Kennedy Assassination Home Page
http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/home.htm

Ramon F. Herrera

unread,
Feb 5, 2012, 2:06:16 PM2/5/12
to
On Feb 4, 11:12 pm, john.mcad...@marquette.edu (John McAdams) wrote:
> On 5 Feb 2012 00:08:11 -0500, "Ramon F. Herrera" <ra...@conexus.net>
> wrote:
>
> >On Feb 4, 8:18=A0pm, "Ramon F. Herrera" <ra...@conexus.net> wrote:
> >> (1) Who are the moderators (in addition to Prof. McAdams)?
>
> >> -Ramon
>
> >Oh, that was pretty fast. May I ask what happened to the several
> >messages I posted (about 24 hours ago) in the "GOP rhetoric risk
> >inciting a potential assassin, says Jesse Jackson" thread?
>

> We moderators have closed the thread.

Who are these moderators?

-Ramon

Ramon F. Herrera

unread,
Feb 5, 2012, 2:06:32 PM2/5/12
to
On Feb 4, 11:12 pm, john.mcad...@marquette.edu (John McAdams) wrote:
> On 5 Feb 2012 00:08:11 -0500, "Ramon F. Herrera" <ra...@conexus.net>
> wrote:
>
> >On Feb 4, 8:18=A0pm, "Ramon F. Herrera" <ra...@conexus.net> wrote:
> >> (1) Who are the moderators (in addition to Prof. McAdams)?
>
> >> -Ramon
>
> >Oh, that was pretty fast. May I ask what happened to the several
> >messages I posted (about 24 hours ago) in the "GOP rhetoric risk
> >inciting a potential assassin, says Jesse Jackson" thread?
>

> We moderators have closed the thread.  It was off topic, having
> degenerated into people (mostly you) bashing people with different
> political views.

Respect to the bashing, I replied to a poster: "Do you know about
Google and Wikipedia? They are really cool!". That was the ONLY post
remotely qualifying as bashing, is that correct? I withdraw it with my
apologies.

Let the record show that I have NEVER used terms like "idiot", etc. or
ANY personal insults which are VERY COMMON around here.

-Ramon

Sandy McCroskey

unread,
Feb 5, 2012, 6:15:10 PM2/5/12
to
The closed political thread was started by the one (1) other moderator,
Peter Fokes, of Toronto.

Last I heard, anyway, he was still a CT!

/sandy

Anthony Marsh

unread,
Feb 5, 2012, 6:22:35 PM2/5/12
to
On 2/5/2012 12:12 AM, John McAdams wrote:
> On 5 Feb 2012 00:08:11 -0500, "Ramon F. Herrera"<ra...@conexus.net>
> wrote:
>
>> On Feb 4, 8:18=A0pm, "Ramon F. Herrera"<ra...@conexus.net> wrote:
>>> (1) Who are the moderators (in addition to Prof. McAdams)?
>>>
>>> -Ramon
>>
>> Oh, that was pretty fast. May I ask what happened to the several
>> messages I posted (about 24 hours ago) in the "GOP rhetoric risk
>> inciting a potential assassin, says Jesse Jackson" thread?
>>
>
> We moderators have closed the thread. It was off topic, having
> degenerated into people (mostly you) bashing people with different
> political views.
>

And yet you think stories about JFK having a teenage mistress are on
topic?

> I tried to write you, but you apparently don't post with a valid
> e-mail address in your header.
>

I thought you said we are not allowed to mention the fact that posters
are using fake e-mail addresses?

claviger

unread,
Feb 6, 2012, 5:42:14 PM2/6/12
to
Peter Fokes is an advocate of all things Liberal.


Pamela Brown

unread,
Feb 9, 2012, 11:31:03 AM2/9/12
to
Mods such as McAdams and Peter can post whatever they want, as can Barb J
who retains that perk even though she is no longer a mod. Others may feel
their posts are severely and unfairly censored. That's just the way it is.

If you are a CT your posts may be given extra scrutiny. Try not to take
it personally. Any post that is rejected you can post to acj. Other posts
may go into a black hole. These you can revise and resubmit until,
eventually, your wording may be bland enough to get through the censoring.

Just keep in mind the old adage from ANIMAL FARM (a book LHO happened to
like): "all animals are created equal, but some animals are more equal
than others." :-)

Pamela Brown
www.in-broad-daylight.com

0 new messages