DAVID EMERLING
tomnln
"tomnln" <tom...@cox.net> wrote in message
news:H1dXl.1966$OV3....@newsfe04.iad...
> You SURE are a Dumb one David;
>
> Oswald supposedly ordered a 36 inch rifle
>
> The rifle found in the TSBD was a 40 inch rifle.
>
> I'll bet you won't even go NEAR Holster for the 38.
>
> SEE>>> http://whokilledjfk.net/damage_control.htm
I SURE called this one Right ! ! !
Three weeks and, No Response from David.
> "davidemerling" <davide...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:2cea3a07-a5c7-437e...@y17g2000yqn.googlegroups.com...
> On May 7, 10:47 pm, "tomnln" <tom...@cox.net> wrote:
>> http://whokilledjfk.net/testimony.htm
>>
>> MORE TO COME
>
> Is it your opinion that Oswald DID own a rifle but that he sold it
> prior to November 22, 1963?
>
> Is that the point you are trying to make?
>
> So, Mr. Scholarly Researcher, what conclusion are you drawing from
> this? Or - are you just throwing it out there, like you usually do,
> and let the inference do all the work? Your modus operandi seems to be
> that you HAVE NO POINT.
>
> Despite this interesting aside, I'd be curious to know your position
> on the following points:
>
> 1. A Mannlicher-Carcano was in evidence, the same type of rifle that
> there are records of Oswald purchasing.
>
> 2. Whatever happened to that "camping equipment" that Oswald had
> wrapped up in that blanket in Paines' garage?
>
> 3. If Oswald sold his rifle in April 1963 -and- if Oswald is supposed
> to be a "patsy" -and- you accept the silly notion that a Mauser was
> actually found on the 6th floor that was ultimately swapped out for a
> Carcano - why would the conspirators (ostensibly framing Oswald) use a
> rifle to implicate him when, in fact, Oswald sold it months
> beforehand?
>
> Again, you allow yourself to get distracted by the oddball stuff that
> inevitably happens in a vast investigation like this. You find this
> VERY important when the vast majority of the evidence tells you that
> it does not hold up to scrutiny when you consider the wealth of other
> corroborating evidence and testimony that tells us Oswald DID own
> C2766 at the time of the assassination.
>
> David Emerling
> Memphis, TN
timstter
> "tomnln" <tom...@cox.net> wrote in message
>
> news:H1dXl.1966$OV3....@newsfe04.iad...
>
> > You SURE are a Dumb one David;
>
> > Oswald supposedly ordered a 36 inch rifle
>
> > The rifle found in the TSBD was a 40 inch rifle.
>
> > I'll bet you won't even go NEAR Holster for the 38.
>
> > SEE>>> http://whokilledjfk.net/damage_control.htm
>
> I SURE called this one Right ! ! !
>
> Three weeks and, No Response from David.
>
That's nothing! Some poster by the name of *tomnln* hasn't responded
to THIS thread since late May:
I posted OFFICIAL records and evidence/testimony from the WC and this
*tomnln* poster ran!
It appears that he FEARS official records and WC evidence/testimony!
Concerned Regards,
Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia
*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
timstter
>
> I posted OFFICIAL records and evidence/testimony from the WC and this
> *tomnln* poster ran!
>
> It appears that he FEARS official records and WC evidence/testimony!
>
> Concerned Regards,
>
> Tim Brennan
> Sydney, Australia
> *Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
BUMP!
tomnln
tomnln has responded over a Dozen times with Official Citations.
AGAIN, SEE>>> http://whokilledjfk.net/well.htm
It was Bringuier who notified the media in advance of the altercation with
Oswald.
"timstter" <tims...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:31e7cf6a-47f9-4d57...@j9g2000prh.googlegroups.com...
timstter
> tomnln has responded over a Dozen times with Official Citations.
>
> AGAIN, SEE>>> http://whokilledjfk.net/well.htm
>
> It was Bringuier who notified the media in advance of the altercation with
> Oswald.
>
LOL! Er, tomnln, would you care to point to these dozen refutations using
official documents? All I've seen from you is multiple repostings of the
same, single, now debunked HSCA document that you've just posted AGAIN in
your response.
To recap, your document shows the HSCA's Tanenbaum claiming that Oswald
was filmed passing out FPCC leaflets with an anti-Castro Cuban and that
Carlos Bringuier had called WDSU TV to have this incident filmed.
Only problems are that a) the guy in the film is NOT an anti-Castro Cuban,
he is a businessman named John Alice who worked at the Trade Mart and b)
Bern Rotman from WDSU said that Oswald rang him about leafletting AND
Rotman's name and phone number is in Oswald's notebook. Links to OFFICIAL
documents showing this can be provided again if you need them, tomnln.
Your source, Tanenbaum, is completely debunked, yet you simply keep
reposting the same document anyway. You'll have to do better than that,
tomnln. Come up with some actual proof supporting Tanenbaum's claim, or
take the document down from your website.
As it stands, Tanenbaum's nonsense is THOROUGHLY debunked by *official
records* and/or *evidence/testimony*, tomnln. Why you keep reposting it is
a mystery to me. Don't you like *official* records & *evidence/ testimony*
anymore?
timstter
BUMP! Yoo hoo, tomnln! Where are your dozen refutations?
BTW, is it true you have referred to David Emerling in previous postings
as Davis [sic] Emberling [sic] ? You couldn't even get THAT bit right,
tomnln, LOL!
timstter
BUMP! YOO HOO! TOMNLN!
Where are you're [sic] dozen <snicker> *refutations*?
Did you miss replying to this thread because it wasn't entitled DAVIS
[sic] EMBERLING [sic] me ol' tomin [sic] mate?
You should run for the US at the next Olympics, tomnln!
KUTGW, tomnln!
LMFAO Regards,
tomnln
"Imitation is the Highest form of Hero Worship".
Which one told you of my Attributes?
Bimbo or, Bimbettes?
"timstter" <tims...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:b380aee7-4f45-48fb...@g1g2000pra.googlegroups.com...