Republican operative claims LBJ arranged JFK’s assassination

[PF]

<quote>

Legendary Republican operative Roger Stone claims in his new book that
Lyndon Johnson arranged John F. Kennedy�s assassination, and that
Richard Nixon and Johnson had a documented relationship with Lee
Harvey Oswald�s killer, Jack Ruby, years before Ruby shot Oswald in
the basement of Dallas police headquarters in 1963.

<quote off>

http://dailycaller.com/2013/05/10/roger-stone-lbj-had-kennedy-killed/

PF

[Jason Burke]

On 5/13/2013 3:26 PM, PF wrote:
> <quote>
>
> Legendary Republican operative Roger Stone claims in his new book that

> Lyndon Johnson arranged John F. Kennedy�s assassination, and that

> Richard Nixon and Johnson had a documented relationship with Lee

> Harvey Oswald�s killer, Jack Ruby, years before Ruby shot Oswald in

> the basement of Dallas police headquarters in 1963.
>
> <quote off>
>
> http://dailycaller.com/2013/05/10/roger-stone-lbj-had-kennedy-killed/
>
> PF
>

Dick and Lyndon liked to go to strip clubs? That's a new one on me.

[Anthony Marsh]

On 5/13/2013 6:34 PM, Jason Burke wrote:
> On 5/13/2013 3:26 PM, PF wrote:
>> <quote>
>>
>> Legendary Republican operative Roger Stone claims in his new book that

>> Lyndon Johnson arranged John F. Kennedy?s assassination, and that

>> Richard Nixon and Johnson had a documented relationship with Lee

>> Harvey Oswald?s killer, Jack Ruby, years before Ruby shot Oswald in

>> the basement of Dallas police headquarters in 1963.
>>
>> <quote off>
>>
>> http://dailycaller.com/2013/05/10/roger-stone-lbj-had-kennedy-killed/
>>
>> PF
>>
>
> Dick and Lyndon liked to go to strip clubs? That's a new one on me.
>
>

Read for comprehension. He specified "years before." As in before he had
the strip clubs. There is nothing to the allegations, but don't try to
dismiss them by misrepresenting the claim.

[curtjester1]

On May 13, 6:34 pm, Jason Burke <Burke_Ja...@comcast.net> wrote:
> On 5/13/2013 3:26 PM, PF wrote:
>
> > <quote>
>
> > Legendary Republican operative Roger Stone claims in his new book that

> > Lyndon Johnson arranged John F. Kennedy s assassination, and that

> > Richard Nixon and Johnson had a documented relationship with Lee

> > Harvey Oswald s killer, Jack Ruby, years before Ruby shot Oswald in

> > the basement of Dallas police headquarters in 1963.
>
> > <quote off>
>
> >http://dailycaller.com/2013/05/10/roger-stone-lbj-had-kennedy-killed/
>
> > PF
>
> Dick and Lyndon liked to go to strip clubs? That's a new one on me.

and party's too!

http://web.newsguy.com/mcclung/tsbd.html

CJ

[Anthony Marsh]

On 5/14/2013 7:41 AM, curtjester1 wrote:

> And LBJ had an historic tie-in with Malcomb (Mac) Wallace who wore
> dark horned-rim glasses and whose finger print was found on a box at
> the Sniper's Nest..
>
> http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/JFKwallaceM.htm
>
> A man in a sports coat seen with glasses was seen in the sixth floor
> before the assassination, seen leaving in a hurry out the back of the
> TSBD at about 3 minutes, and seen getting in a Rambler station wagon
> with Oswald and others and taking off.
>
> (See The Man in the Dark Sports Coat) by William Weston).
>
> CJ
>


Nope.

[curtjester1]

On May 13, 6:26 pm, PF <pfo...@rogers.com> wrote:

[Ace Kefford]

On Monday, May 13, 2013 6:26:09 PM UTC-4, PF wrote:
> <quote>
>
>
>
> Legendary Republican operative Roger Stone claims in his new book that
>

> Lyndon Johnson arranged John F. Kennedy�s assassination, and that

>
> Richard Nixon and Johnson had a documented relationship with Lee
>

> Harvey Oswald�s killer, Jack Ruby, years before Ruby shot Oswald in

>
> the basement of Dallas police headquarters in 1963.
>
>
>
> <quote off>
>
>
>
> http://dailycaller.com/2013/05/10/roger-stone-lbj-had-kennedy-killed/
>
>
>
> PF

From that article, all I can say is what a worthless collection of
pseudo-facts and nonsensical speculation. I guess being an ex-Nixon fixer
doesn't leave one with a good pension. Cha-ching! (Except these folks
never understand that with a few exceptions, usually by dedicated (if
off-base) researchers, these JFK assassination books don't sell -- too
many flooding the market.)

[claviger]

"Stone also claimed that Johnson “micro-managed” Kennedy’s Dallas
motorcade, demanding that it pass through Dealy Plaza on November 22,
1963, when Oswald, from his perch in an overlooking book depository
building, shot Kennedy."
Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2013/05/10/roger-stone-lbj-had-kennedy-killed/#ixzz2TNiPSFPf

This not a new allegation. Unless Stone has specific details on how
the VP was able to manipulate both the Secret Service and Kennedy
staff in charge of the parade route, this allegation makes no sense.
Some have alleged Governor Connally changed the parade route. No
evidence for that either. It has been claimed the hard left turn from
Houston onto Elm was the danger point in this route. Unless Max
Holland is correct that is not where the shooting started. The first
shot closest to the corner missed the entire Limousine. The President
was struck by two bullets as the Limousine was cruising downhill
halfway to the Triple Underpass. Therefore, even if the entire parade
had taken place on Elm Street from start to finish with no turns at
all, the Limousine would still need to be in the same position to
access Stemmons Fwy.

[Lanny]

On Wednesday, May 15, 2013 3:10:51 PM UTC-4, claviger wrote:
> On May 13, 5:26 pm, PF <pfo...@rogers.com> wrote:
>

> "Stone also claimed that Johnson “micro-managed” Kennedy’s Dallas
>
> motorcade, demanding that it pass through Dealy Plaza on November 22,
>
> 1963, when Oswald, from his perch in an overlooking book depository
>
> building, shot Kennedy."
>
> Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2013/05/10/roger-stone-lbj-had-kennedy-killed/#ixzz2TNiPSFPf
>
>
>
> This not a new allegation. Unless Stone has specific details on how
>
> the VP was able to manipulate both the Secret Service and Kennedy
>
> staff in charge of the parade route, this allegation makes no sense.
>
> Some have alleged Governor Connally changed the parade route. No
>
> evidence for that either. It has been claimed the hard left turn from
>
> Houston onto Elm was the danger point in this route. Unless Max
>
> Holland is correct that is not where the shooting started. The first
>
> shot closest to the corner missed the entire Limousine. The President
>
> was struck by two bullets as the Limousine was cruising downhill
>
> halfway to the Triple Underpass. Therefore, even if the entire parade
>
> had taken place on Elm Street from start to finish with no turns at
>
> all, the Limousine would still need to be in the same position to
>
> access Stemmons Fwy.

Stone would have us believe that it was easier and more logical for LBJ
and Connally to "micro-manage" and "demand" that the Secret Service and
President Kennedy take the motorcade through the previously established
"kill zone" than it would be to place Oswald or some other assassin in a
reasonable firing position along whatever motorcade route was ultimately
selected.

Don't these lunatic conspiracy authors ever subject their wacky ideas to a
smell test?

What nonsense.

[Ralph Cinque]

What is nonsense is that LBJ would use Oswald as a shooter. Does it occur
to anyone that he might have actually wanted Kennedy dead and not anyone
else dead or injured? Therefore, he would have used professional
assassins, and I do mean more than one. Any idiot can figure that out.

I haven't read Stone's book, but the descriptions I have read sound like
he is maintaining that it went from LBJ to Ruby to Oswald, and that is
ridiculous. Once you say LBJ was involved (and you have to because he was)
you can't maintain Oswald was a shooter.

[Anthony Marsh]

Get with the program. Their theory is that the conspirators had to send
the limo to the exact building where their patsy was to frame him. You
can't frame Oswald for shooting the President in Fort Worth while he is
working in the TSBD. Sheesh! Use a little common sense. What you should
be doing is claiming no person was ever framed from a crime he didn't
commit. In all of history.

[curtjester1]

Of course, I should have seen it.

Nope, what??!

CJ

[Jason Burke]

On 5/15/2013 8:48 PM, Ralph Cinque wrote:
> What is nonsense is that LBJ would use Oswald as a shooter. Does it occur
> to anyone that he might have actually wanted Kennedy dead and not anyone
> else dead or injured? Therefore, he would have used professional
> assassins, and I do mean more than one. Any idiot can figure that out.
>

Problem with this is when ya use a professional assassin, ya only need
one.

> I haven't read Stone's book, but the descriptions I have read sound like
> he is maintaining that it went from LBJ to Ruby to Oswald, and that is
> ridiculous. Once you say LBJ was involved (and you have to because he was)
> you can't maintain Oswald was a shooter.
>

Again, the ol' `if a and b then z`. Who needs those other silly letters?

[Lanny]

Since neither Johnson nor Connally were in any position to make "demands"
upon the President or Secret Service that they could reasonably hope to be
implemented by virtue of their superior knowledge of security matters or
their political rank and gravitas, it would seem that they might have
chosen a potential patsy with a little more flexibility than someone with
an 8 a.m. to 4 p.m. warehouse job. Like he couldn't call in sick and leave
a post-assassination trail of bread crumbs from some other building in
town?

Of course, if the conspirators themselves had a lick of common sense they
wouldn't have structured a conspiracy that had so many
before-and-after-the-fact elements that they could not hope to control.

But the real departure of any sense, common or otherwise, is why CTs like
yourself feel the need to invent these fantasies on their behalf?

[Ralph Cinque]

No matter how good an assassin is, you want and need backup. There are no
guarantees. Just because someone is a professional assassin is no
guarantee of success. As it was, they had several assassins, and it still
took them several shots to finish off Kennedy, and not without seriously
injuring and almost killing Connally. So, the assassination went very
badly, and you might say they botched it terribly. But, with just one
shooter, they would not have succeeded at all.

[Anthony Marsh]

On 5/16/2013 12:17 AM, Jason Burke wrote:
> On 5/15/2013 8:48 PM, Ralph Cinque wrote:
>> What is nonsense is that LBJ would use Oswald as a shooter. Does it occur
>> to anyone that he might have actually wanted Kennedy dead and not anyone
>> else dead or injured? Therefore, he would have used professional
>> assassins, and I do mean more than one. Any idiot can figure that out.
>>
>
> Problem with this is when ya use a professional assassin, ya only need one.
>

Not true. Professional snipers are often sent out in teams of 2, a
shooter and a spotter. You keep guessing at things and then stating them
as facts.

[Jason Burke]

On 5/16/2013 2:58 PM, Ralph Cinque wrote:
> No matter how good an assassin is, you want and need backup. There are no

How many verified do you get in 'Nam, Ralph? You seem to know a scarily
humongously big lot about this.

> guarantees. Just because someone is a professional assassin is no
> guarantee of success. As it was, they had several assassins,

None of who have ever been named. All of whom, and their handlers, and
their ops, and their backups, and the guys in the back office, and the
guys in those dozens of trucks in DP who altered Altgens in fifteen
minutes never said a word. Dang, these guys were *good*! Too bad they
forgot to erase Ozzie in the doorway.

> and it still
> took them several shots to finish off Kennedy, and not without seriously

'them'?

> injuring and almost killing Connally. So, the assassination went very
> badly, and you might say they botched it terribly. But, with just one
> shooter, they would not have succeeded at all.
>

I guess the idea of 'one shot, one kill' came much later.

Was *anyone* in Dealey not shooting at the prez?

(I do like the 'dozens of guys in trucks'. Reminds me of back home in
Brooklyn when a bread truck would be parked outside, well... for days at
a time.)

[Jason Burke]

On 5/16/2013 8:13 PM, Anthony Marsh wrote:
> On 5/16/2013 12:17 AM, Jason Burke wrote:
>> On 5/15/2013 8:48 PM, Ralph Cinque wrote:
>>> What is nonsense is that LBJ would use Oswald as a shooter. Does it
>>> occur
>>> to anyone that he might have actually wanted Kennedy dead and not anyone
>>> else dead or injured? Therefore, he would have used professional
>>> assassins, and I do mean more than one. Any idiot can figure that out.
>>>
>>
>> Problem with this is when ya use a professional assassin, ya only need
>> one.
>>
>
> Not true. Professional snipers are often sent out in teams of 2, a
> shooter and a spotter. You keep guessing at things and then stating them
> as facts.

Oh, geez. Okay. A shooter and a spotter.
Tony, the point was that there weren't numerous *teams* of folks running
around on Dal-Tex, the overpass, the east side of the TSBD, the grassy
knoll, etc.

But I'm sure you knew that...

[Anthony Marsh]

On 5/17/2013 9:43 PM, Jason Burke wrote:
> On 5/16/2013 8:13 PM, Anthony Marsh wrote:
>> On 5/16/2013 12:17 AM, Jason Burke wrote:
>>> On 5/15/2013 8:48 PM, Ralph Cinque wrote:
>>>> What is nonsense is that LBJ would use Oswald as a shooter. Does it
>>>> occur
>>>> to anyone that he might have actually wanted Kennedy dead and not
>>>> anyone
>>>> else dead or injured? Therefore, he would have used professional
>>>> assassins, and I do mean more than one. Any idiot can figure that out.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Problem with this is when ya use a professional assassin, ya only need
>>> one.
>>>
>>
>> Not true. Professional snipers are often sent out in teams of 2, a
>> shooter and a spotter. You keep guessing at things and then stating them
>> as facts.
>
> Oh, geez. Okay. A shooter and a spotter.
> Tony, the point was that there weren't numerous *teams* of folks running
> around on Dal-Tex, the overpass, the east side of the TSBD, the grassy
> knoll, etc.
>
> But I'm sure you knew that...
>

I've only mentioned two shooters, the ones that the acoustical evidence
found. I've made a lot of enemies with the kooks for shooting down their
shooters in the storm drains, Dal-Tex etc.

[tray...@gmail.com]

In many ways the animation presented in the popular computer game JFK
Reloaded is more accurate in representing the historical elements in
Dealey Plaza 22 Nov '63 than anything offered to the public by the feds &
TV re-enactments. A multitude of videos from that program are posted
online and if one takes the time to look down on Elm Street from the TSBD
sniper's nest it's very obvious that as JFK's car was just becoming
visible from the Elm St.divider tree LBJ's Lincoln convertible is just
under and across from the sniper's window.

The shooter had an opportunity to shoot JFK, work the bolt , re-aim the
carbine at LBJ and blast him (if he was quick enough before LBJ's guards
reacted.

There was a pause between the 1st shot and the last 2. I believe the
shooter was taking aim at LBJ during this pause, abandoned the effort and
re-took aim at JFK.

To take aim at LBJ would mean the shooter was not an LBJ 'employee'. I
know there are those who are convinced the shooter was Mac Wallace but I'm
not convinced of it. Mac Wallace was small potatoes compared to the
Nixon/Howard Hughes/Johnny Roselli/Giancana/Trafficante/Miami CIA Station
Chief & others that created the notorious anti-Castro kill team that came
under target by JFK, RFK & their Federal Marshalls at the camps they were
using to train for their missions.

For those who believe that team in conjunction with top military brass
implementing a Northern Woods homegrown terrorist attack missed their
objective by allowing LBJ to live IMO. There was no assault on Cuba after
JFK's death and Hoover was assuring LBJ there was no conspiracy, just one
shooter (Oswald).

In todays real world, a dedicated anti-US terrorist would wet their pants
for an opportunity to strike at both the US President AND his Vice
President. That opportunity existed for whoever you think the shooter was
in the TSBD sniper's nest and it was either passed up or something went
wrong and only one target was executed..

An interesting side thought: if LBJ had his hitman up above him to kill
JFK why didn't he have him put a couple bullets into LBJ's car to make it
look good so folks wouldn't suspect him?

Another side thought: if there was a forward shooter (HSCA said there was)
had that person waited a few seconds to where JFK's car was close to the
pergola steps he would have had both JFK & LBK on Elm St. down below him
in the fishbowl.

I am beginning to feel the assassination was a botched attempt to clean
house of both the President & the Vice President. It's possible LBJ
accidentally slipped through the noose when it was desired for ladybird to
be wearing his brains.

Just sayin'

[Anthony Marsh]

On 5/20/2013 1:27 AM, tray...@gmail.com wrote:
> In many ways the animation presented in the popular computer game JFK
> Reloaded is more accurate in representing the historical elements in
> Dealey Plaza 22 Nov '63 than anything offered to the public by the feds &
> TV re-enactments. A multitude of videos from that program are posted

No.

> online and if one takes the time to look down on Elm Street from the TSBD
> sniper's nest it's very obvious that as JFK's car was just becoming
> visible from the Elm St.divider tree LBJ's Lincoln convertible is just
> under and across from the sniper's window.
>
> The shooter had an opportunity to shoot JFK, work the bolt , re-aim the
> carbine at LBJ and blast him (if he was quick enough before LBJ's guards
> reacted.
>

The SS could not prevent JFK from being shot. JFK himself said so that
morning.
Clint Hill would have to react BEFORE the first shot is fired.

> There was a pause between the 1st shot and the last 2. I believe the
> shooter was taking aim at LBJ during this pause, abandoned the effort and
> re-took aim at JFK.
>

Nonsense. It's an impossible shot from the sniper's nest.

> To take aim at LBJ would mean the shooter was not an LBJ 'employee'. I
> know there are those who are convinced the shooter was Mac Wallace but I'm
> not convinced of it. Mac Wallace was small potatoes compared to the
> Nixon/Howard Hughes/Johnny Roselli/Giancana/Trafficante/Miami CIA Station
> Chief & others that created the notorious anti-Castro kill team that came
> under target by JFK, RFK & their Federal Marshalls at the camps they were
> using to train for their missions.
>

Those guys were hired by the CIA, not by Nixon.

> For those who believe that team in conjunction with top military brass
> implementing a Northern Woods homegrown terrorist attack missed their

Operation Northwoods. Your problem is that you HEAR about something
sinister or read some kook Website and never learn the facts.

> objective by allowing LBJ to live IMO. There was no assault on Cuba after
> JFK's death and Hoover was assuring LBJ there was no conspiracy, just one
> shooter (Oswald).
>

There was no assault on Cuba because LBJ didn't have the stomach to
start WWIII.

> In todays real world, a dedicated anti-US terrorist would wet their pants
> for an opportunity to strike at both the US President AND his Vice
> President. That opportunity existed for whoever you think the shooter was
> in the TSBD sniper's nest and it was either passed up or something went
> wrong and only one target was executed..
>

Obama and Biden appear together often. Who's got the chops to make the hit?

> An interesting side thought: if LBJ had his hitman up above him to kill
> JFK why didn't he have him put a couple bullets into LBJ's car to make it
> look good so folks wouldn't suspect him?
>

Do you understand how good a sniper must be to INTENTIONALLY miss by a
couple of inches. You're talking Annie Oakley, but at a moving target.

> Another side thought: if there was a forward shooter (HSCA said there was)
> had that person waited a few seconds to where JFK's car was close to the
> pergola steps he would have had both JFK & LBK on Elm St. down below him
> in the fishbowl.
>

The grassy knoll shoot did wait until the end.

> I am beginning to feel the assassination was a botched attempt to clean
> house of both the President & the Vice President. It's possible LBJ
> accidentally slipped through the noose when it was desired for ladybird to
> be wearing his brains.
>
> Just sayin'
>
>

Silly.

[Walt]

On May 14, 6:41 am, curtjester1 <curtjest...@hotmail.com> wrote:

> And LBJ had an historic tie-in with Malcomb (Mac) Wallace who wore
> dark horned-rim glasses and whose finger print was found on a box at
> the Sniper's Nest..
>
> http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/JFKwallaceM.htm
>
> A man in a sports coat seen with glasses was seen in the sixth floor
> before the assassination, seen leaving in a hurry out the back of the
> TSBD at about 3 minutes, and seen getting in a Rambler station wagon
> with Oswald and others and taking off.

OMG!

[Walt]

On May 15, 5:36 pm, Lanny <lak...@insightbb.com> wrote:
> On Wednesday, May 15, 2013 3:10:51 PM UTC-4, claviger wrote:
> > On May 13, 5:26 pm, PF <pfo...@rogers.com> wrote:
>
> > > <quote>
>
> > > Legendary Republican operative Roger Stone claims in his new book that
>
> > > Lyndon Johnson arranged John F. Kennedy s assassination, and that
>
> > > Richard Nixon and Johnson had a documented relationship with Lee
>
> > > Harvey Oswald s killer, Jack Ruby, years before Ruby shot Oswald in
>
> > > the basement of Dallas police headquarters in 1963.
>
> > > <quote off>
>
> > >http://dailycaller.com/2013/05/10/roger-stone-lbj-had-kennedy-killed/
>
> > > PF
>
> > "Stone also claimed that Johnson “micro-managed” Kennedy’s Dallas
>
> > motorcade, demanding that it pass through Dealy Plaza on November 22,
>
> > 1963, when Oswald, from his perch in an overlooking book depository
>
> > building, shot Kennedy."
>

> > Read more:http://dailycaller.com/2013/05/10/roger-stone-lbj-had-kennedy-killed/...

>
> > This not a new allegation.  Unless Stone has specific details on how
>
> > the VP was able to manipulate both the Secret Service and Kennedy
>
> > staff in charge of the parade route, this allegation makes no sense.
>
> > Some have alleged Governor Connally changed the parade route.  No
>
> > evidence for that either.  It has been claimed the hard left turn from
>
> > Houston onto Elm was the danger point in this route.  Unless Max
>
> > Holland is correct that is not where the shooting started.  The first
>
> > shot closest to the corner missed the entire Limousine.  The President
>
> > was struck by two bullets as the Limousine was cruising downhill
>
> > halfway to the Triple Underpass.  Therefore, even if the entire parade
>
> > had taken place on Elm Street from start to finish with no turns at
>
> > all, the Limousine would still need to be in the same position to
>
> > access Stemmons Fwy.
>
> Stone would have us believe that it was easier and more logical for LBJ
> and Connally to "micro-manage" and "demand" that the Secret Service and
> President Kennedy take the motorcade through the previously established
> "kill zone" than it would be to place Oswald or some other assassin in a
> reasonable firing position along whatever motorcade route was ultimately
> selected.

The Secret Service merely accepted the route that DPD Chief Jesse
Curry recommended....

Curry led the way and JFK's driver Bill Greer followed....... There
was no need to "micro manage" or demand....

[Anthony Marsh]

On 5/20/2013 12:14 PM, Walt wrote:
> On May 15, 5:36 pm, Lanny <lak...@insightbb.com> wrote:
>> On Wednesday, May 15, 2013 3:10:51 PM UTC-4, claviger wrote:
>>> On May 13, 5:26 pm, PF <pfo...@rogers.com> wrote:
>>
>>>> <quote>
>>
>>>> Legendary Republican operative Roger Stone claims in his new book that
>>
>>>> Lyndon Johnson arranged John F. Kennedy s assassination, and that
>>
>>>> Richard Nixon and Johnson had a documented relationship with Lee
>>
>>>> Harvey Oswald s killer, Jack Ruby, years before Ruby shot Oswald in
>>
>>>> the basement of Dallas police headquarters in 1963.
>>
>>>> <quote off>
>>
>>>> http://dailycaller.com/2013/05/10/roger-stone-lbj-had-kennedy-killed/
>>
>>>> PF
>>

>>> "Stone also claimed that Johnson �micro-managed� Kennedy�s Dallas

Wrong/ Sorrels worked on it with Curry.
They test drove the route.

> Curry led the way and JFK's driver Bill Greer followed....... There
> was no need to "micro manage" or demand....
>

The route was published in the paper a few days before and the SS had it
before that.

[Walt]

You're right..... Lee was the designated patsy

[Walt]

On May 20, 6:03 pm, Anthony Marsh <anthony.ma...@comcast.net> wrote:
> On 5/20/2013 12:14 PM, Walt wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On May 15, 5:36 pm, Lanny <lak...@insightbb.com> wrote:
> >> On Wednesday, May 15, 2013 3:10:51 PM UTC-4, claviger wrote:
> >>> On May 13, 5:26 pm, PF <pfo...@rogers.com> wrote:
>
> >>>> <quote>
>
> >>>> Legendary Republican operative Roger Stone claims in his new book that
>
> >>>> Lyndon Johnson arranged John F. Kennedy s assassination, and that
>
> >>>> Richard Nixon and Johnson had a documented relationship with Lee
>
> >>>> Harvey Oswald s killer, Jack Ruby, years before Ruby shot Oswald in
>
> >>>> the basement of Dallas police headquarters in 1963.
>
> >>>> <quote off>
>
> >>>>http://dailycaller.com/2013/05/10/roger-stone-lbj-had-kennedy-killed/
>
> >>>> PF
>

> >>> "Stone also claimed that Johnson micro-managed Kennedy s Dallas

Sorrels was drunk, grossly incompetant, or part of the
conspiracy.......Because he never rejected Jesse Curry's
recommendation, as he should have......

[Anthony Marsh]

How do you assume it was Curry's recommendation?
Why do you think Sorrels should have rejected the route?
You preferred going straight down Main to Industial Blvd? And running
over winos?