> On this past September 14, Mr. Fiorentino posted this in response to Mr.
> Canal:
> **********
> From: "John Fiorentino" <jefiorent...@optimum.net>
> Newsgroups: alt.assassination.jfk
> Subject: Re: 2nd try, edited, Re: No more 2 cents? Re: The final
> photographs of John Fitzgerald Kennedy (1)
> Date: 14 Sep 2012 23:14:43 -0400
> Re: "stretching the skull"
> I simply don't agree, I tried an experiment after Larry's book came out
> and I found the scalp would tear before being "stretched" LESS than 1/2
> in.
> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.assassination.jfk/msg/c778d42c1ab7...
> ?dmode=source
> **********
> The following day I saw this and replied that I was not at all convinced
> by this, as far too little detail was given, and asked specifically what
> material Mr. Fiorentino had used in his stretching experiment to prove
> this, which I thought was a perfectly reasonable question:
> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.assassination.jfk/msg/2a60dc3ad9d5...
> ?dmode=source
> The next day Mr. Fiorentino responded only with this, which did not
> answer what material he was using, even though I cannot imagine the name
> of that material would be more than one, two, or three words at the
> most, and thus would have almost certain taken less than ten seconds to
> type:
> **********
> From: "John Fiorentino" <jefiorent...@optimum.net>
> Newsgroups: alt.assassination.jfk
> Subject: Re: 2nd try, edited, Re: No more 2 cents? Re: The final
> photographs of John Fitzgerald Kennedy (1)
> Date: 16 Sep 2012 17:38:58 -0400
> I did my experiments years ago, after the release of Sturdivan's book. I
> spoke with several morticians and frankly was generally laughed at, so you
> will excuse me if I don't go through the entire useless exercise again.
> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.assassination.jfk/msg/a53a5065a38b...
> ?dmode=source
> **********
> The next day I asked Mr. Fiorentino again what material he had used in
> his stretching experiment:
> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.assassination.jfk/msg/387c01902871...
> ?dmode=source
> On the same day he replied, still not naming the material, even though
> he could have typed it in less than ten seconds:
> **********
> From: "John Fiorentino" <jefiorent...@optimum.net>
> Newsgroups: alt.assassination.jfk
> Subject: Re: 2nd try, edited, Re: No more 2 cents? Re: The final
> photographs of John Fitzgerald Kennedy (1)
> Date: 17 Sep 2012 22:35:17 -0400
> Because mainly as I stated before King, this has ALL been done years ago.
> I did it when Sturdivan's book came out, etc. etc.
> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.assassination.jfk/msg/f8505d6c69a0...
> ?dmode=source
> **********
> Then the following day he said this to me:
> **********
> From: "John Fiorentino" <jefiorent...@optimum.net>
> Newsgroups: alt.assassination.jfk
> Subject: Re: 2nd try, edited, Re: No more 2 cents? Re: The final
> photographs of John Fitzgerald Kennedy (1)
> Date: 18 Sep 2012 14:51:15 -0400
> Mr. King
> Why don't you do some real research and go thru the archives of this
> newsgroup and you will see just how many times ALL of your questions and
> concerns have been answered by myself and others instead of repeatedly
> asking me to restate my positions ad infinitum?
> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.assassination.jfk/msg/15614f366bc3...
> ?dmode=source
> **********
> So I did exactly what he said, and only found two articles that he had
> ever posted prior to 9-14-12 in which he had ever before mentioned this
> experiment specifically, but did not mention what material he was
> stretching:
> **********
> From: "John Fiorentino" <johnfiorent...@optonline.net>
> Newsgroups: alt.assassination.jfk
> Subject: Re: Mitch Todd, and/or Dr. McAdams, question for you.
> Date: 22 Feb 2010 08:48:15 -0500
> 1. I also tried my own rather amateurish experiments such as you did. My
> conclusion from those, is that scalp skin can be "stretched" approx. 1/2
> in.
> 2. I consulted 2 morticians and presented the notion that scalp could be
> stretched 2-3 inches. Essentially they were very amused and stated it
> can't be done. They also questioned the necessity of taking ANY photos
> POST "reconstruction."
> 3. I consulted 2 forensic pathologists and presented the same idea. They
> were not only amused, but 1 actually laughed in my face.
> All four of these professionals indicated that MY guesstimate of approx.
> 1/2 in. was (pardon the pun) stretching it a bit.
> ALL indicated the scalp would "tear" and NOT stretch, LONG before you ever
> get to 2-3 inches.
> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.assassination.jfk/msg/a84fcea72e69...
> ?dmode=source
> **********
> The second article was from the day after, 2-23-10, and simply repeated
> the same text again:
> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.assassination.jfk/msg/0f35814de49d...
> ?dmode=source
> On the same day he said that I would find the answers to all my questions
> in the archives, and I looked and didn't find them, I posted several more
> articles asking him again what material he was stretching in his
> experiment, cited the two articles from February, 2010 in which he did not
> name that material, and replied to another poster who expressed the
> opinion that Mr. Fiorentino was bluffing because he was never answering
> this perfectly reasonable question, even though he could type the answer
> in less than ten seconds:
> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.assassination.jfk/msg/9a50f8e81e7b...
> ?dmode=source
> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.assassination.jfk/msg/ab66dab01e34...
> ?dmode=source
> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.assassination.jfk/msg/58ae8c0cc114...
> ?dmode=source
> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.assassination.jfk/msg/64e03f5d5ca1...
> ?dmode=source
> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.assassination.jfk/msg/94c3cdc32a0f...
> ?dmode=source
> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.assassination.jfk/msg/e483969bbf2a...
> ?dmode=source
> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.assassination.jfk/msg/7facc0b7edc3...
> ?dmode=source
> On September 24 I reminded Mr. Fiorentino again that he had still never
> answered me regarding what material he had stretched in his experiment,
> and that I still had not found any previous article that he had ever
> posted in which he had ever named that material:
> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.assassination.jfk/msg/8c4cd4e8394d...
> ?dmode=source
> Then, two days ago, on September 29, I saw that Mr. Fiorentino had said to
> me that he searched the archives and found much more than I did, but then
> he proceeded to quote from a past article of his that not only did not
> name the material he had stretched in his experiment, but made no mention
> of the experiment at all, which I duly noted in my reply. I also said
> that still nothing had been produced from the archives, by me or by him,
> showing any article he had ever posted in which he had named this
> material. And in a second reply on the same day I asked him to please
> produce a Message-ID and/or archive URL for any article he had ever posted
> in which he had named this material, so that I could admit my error and
> apologize for it:
> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.assassination.jfk/msg/e28bf3f24d13...
> ?dmode=source
> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.assassination.jfk/msg/1bcccbfa9450...
> ?dmode=source
> Then yesterday Mr. Fiorentino said this to me, but still didn't name the
> material he had stretched in his experiment, even though he could have
> typed the name of it in less than ten seconds:
> **********
> From: "John Fiorentino" <jefiorent...@optimum.net>
> Newsgroups: alt.assassination.jfk
> Subject: Re: Lurkers, wanna make a friendly bet? Re: BINGO. Re: The
> final photographs of John Fitzgerald Kennedy (1)
> Date: 30 Sep 2012 16:51:06 -0400
> One last thing with you. Say, what you want, do what you want, but don't
> call me a liar.
> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.assassination.jfk/msg/d654139baefe...
> ?dmode=source
> **********
