> In article <3c6238fc-1ed9-4b18-8103-78454a947
...@n9g2000yqn.googlegroups.com>,
> Jean Davison says...
> >On Sep 30, 10:04=A0pm, Ben Holmes <ad...@burningknife.com> wrote:
> >> In article <aee4219c-36e4-4040-919e-9f6ead113...@a7g2000yqo.googlegroups.=
> >com>,
> >> Jean Davison says...
> >> >On Sep 30, 3:54=3DA0pm, Ben Holmes <ad...@burningknife.com> wrote:
> >> >> In article <13b9d231-e065-4522-9cea-8136e4c3a...@h4g2000yqo.googlegrou=
> >ps.=3D
> >> >com>,
> >> >> Bud says...
> >> >> >On Sep 29, 12:52=3D3DA0pm, Ben Holmes <ad...@burningknife.com> wrote:
> >> >> >> In article <1ca5f09f-88b5-427a-a6dd-292e3c2cc...@a11g2000yqb.google=
> >gro=3D
> >> >ups=3D3D
> >> >> >.com>,
> >> >> >> Bud says...
> >> >> >> >On Sep 28, 1:48=3D3D3DA0pm, Ben Holmes <ad...@burningknife.com> wr=
> >ote:
> >> >> >> >> In article <4508bb8f-845b-434e-843e-7917331f9...@o8g2000yqm.goog=
> >leg=3D
> >> >rou=3D3D
> >> >> >ps.=3D3D3D
> >> >> >> >com>,
> >> >> >> >> Bud says...
> >> >> >> >> >On Sep 27, 12:22=3D3D3D3DA0pm, Ben Holmes <ad...@burningknife.c=
> >om> w=3D
> >> >rote:
> >> >> >> >> >> In article <ef7b1123-9136-40a0-8cc1-f541681b7...@m9g2000yqi.g=
> >oog=3D
> >> >leg=3D3D
> >> >> >rou=3D3D3D
> >> >> >> >ps.=3D3D3D3D
> >> >> >> >> >com>,
> >> >> >> >> >> Bud says...
> >> >> >> >> >> >On Sep 25, 9:53=3D3D3D3D3DA0pm, Ben Holmes <ad...@burningkni=
> >fe.co=3D
> >> >m> wr=3D3D
> >> >> >ote:
> >> >> >> >> >> >> In article <8d064db9-2f6a-4de0-9ae9-2f8270d58...@a7g2000yq=
> >o.g=3D
> >> >oog=3D3D
> >> >> >leg=3D3D3D
> >> >> >> >rou=3D3D3D3D
> >> >> >> >> >ps.=3D3D3D3D3D
> >> >> >> >> >> >com>,
> >> >> >> >> >> >> Bud says...
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >On Sep 24, 11:45=3D3D3D3D3D3DA0pm, Ben Holmes <ad...@burn=
> >ingkn=3D
> >> >ife.c=3D3D
> >> >> >om> w=3D3D3D
> >> >> >> >rote:
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> In article <02f1d0b9-ea23-4952-a348-2a217bc8a...@o8g200=
> >0yq=3D
> >> >m.g=3D3D
> >> >> >oog=3D3D3D
> >> >> >> >leg=3D3D3D3D
> >> >> >> >> >rou=3D3D3D3D3D
> >> >> >> >> >> >ps.=3D3D3D3D3D3D
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >com>,
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Bud says...
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >On Sep 24, 3:47=3D3D3D3D3D3D3DA0pm, Bud <sirsl...@fast=
> >.net>=3D
> >> > wrot=3D3D
> >> >> >e:
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> =3D3D3D3D3D3D3DA0 Not that I expect an answer but mo=
> >re be=3D
> >> >cause=3D3D
> >> >> > I en=3D3D3D
> >> >> >> >joy s=3D3D3D3D
> >> >> >> >> >eeing=3D3D3D3D3D
> >> >> >> >> >> > Ben =3D3D3D3D3D3D
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >run,
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> I shall pose this question To Mark Lane`s biggest fa=
> >n..=3D
> >> >.
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> =3D3D3D3D3D3D3DA0 =3D3D3D3D3D3D3DA0Mark Lane clearly=
> > lied w=3D
> >> >hen he =3D3D
> >> >> >stated =3D3D3D
> >> >> >> >that CE=3D3D3D3D
> >> >> >> >> >399 was=3D3D3D3D3D
> >> >> >> >> >> > "undef=3D3D3D3D3D3D
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >ormed".
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Why would the truth need lies to support it?
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > =3D3D3D3D3D3DA0As expected Ben ran, and I got my enjo=
> >yment=3D
> >> >.
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> I see you snipped my response... here it is again:
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > =3D3D3D3D3DA0I didn`t snip anything. My response appeare=
> >d bef=3D
> >> >ore y=3D3D
> >> >> >ours =3D3D3D
> >> >> >> >did, =3D3D3D3D
> >> >> >> >> >is
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >all.
> >> >> >> >> >> >> Actually, you replied to your own post. (as anyone can see=
> > fo=3D
> >> >r t=3D3D
> >> >> >hem=3D3D3D
> >> >> >> >sel=3D3D3D3D
> >> >> >> >> >ves
> >> >> >> >> >> >> in a threaded newsreader)
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> *******************************************************=
> >*
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Forgetful, aren't you?
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> I told you to go read Chapter Five, then get back to me=
> > wh=3D
> >> >en =3D3D
> >> >> >you=3D3D3D
> >> >> >> > co=3D3D3D3D
> >> >> >> >> >uld
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> tell me what the topic was.
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > =3D3D3D3D3DA0Has what to do with whether Lane lied? Sinc=
> >e whe=3D
> >> >n doe=3D3D
> >> >> >s the=3D3D3D
> >> >> >> > trut=3D3D3D3D
> >> >> >> >> >h nee=3D3D3D3D3D
> >> >> >> >> >> >d
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >lies to support it?
> >> >> >> >> >> >> If you don't even know what the topic is, how can you accu=
> >se =3D
> >> >som=3D3D
> >> >> >eon=3D3D3D
> >> >> >> >e o=3D3D3D3D
> >> >> >> >> >f
> >> >> >> >> >> >> lying?
> >> >> >> >> >> > =3D3D3D3DA0Because Lane called CE399 "undeformed" and it is=
> >n`t. =3D
> >> >He kn=3D3D
> >> >> >ew it=3D3D3D
> >> >> >> > wasn=3D3D3D3D
> >> >> >> >> >`t
> >> >> >> >> >> >and lied about the evidence. Why does the truth need lies to=
> > su=3D
> >> >ppo=3D3D
> >> >> >rt =3D3D3D
> >> >> >> >it.
> >> >> >> >> >> >And why can`t you admit that Lane lied?
> >> >> >> >> >> Still don't know the topic, do you?
> >> >> >> >> >> >> "Queen's Bishop pawn to QB4."
> >> >> >> >> >> >> Truth or a lie?
> >> >> >> >> >> Dead silence. Point made.
> >> >> >> >> >> <snipped>
> >> >> >> >> > =3D3D3DA0You are running from the fact that Mark Lane lied abo=
> >ut CE=3D
> >> >399 b=3D3D
> >> >> >eing
> >> >> >> >> >"undeformed". Why did Lane lie about the evidence, and why woul=
> >d t=3D
> >> >he =3D3D
> >> >> >tru=3D3D3D
> >> >> >> >th
> >> >> >> >> >need such lies to support it?
> >> >> >> >> Sorry "Bud", I have no need to run at all... the facts are in my=
> > fa=3D
> >> >vor=3D3D
> >> >> >.
> >> >> >> > =3D3DA0Is it a fact that CE399 is "undeformed". Lane says it is. =
> >What =3D
> >> >say
> >> >> >> >you?
> >> >> >> Still afraid of the answer, I see.
> >> >> > =3DA0I have no problem with the answer at all. CE399 is deformed.
> >> >> Do you think you're fooling anyone?
> >> > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Do you think *you're* fooling anyone, Ben?
> >> >> What's the topic?
> >> > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0The topic of this thread is "Question For Ben Holmes=
> >," as
> >> >explained in post #1. =A0Refusing to answer the question only makes you =
> >look
> >> >bad. =A0So please keep it up!
> >> >Jean
> >> This is perhaps the reason you refuse to post in an open forum.
> >> Unfortunately, in this censored forum, I can't be more specific.
> > More dodge ball from Mr. Holmes. Keep it up!
> > Jean
> I'm still right there in the open forum where you now refuse to go. The
> "dodge ball" is not a game of me dodging facts, it's a game of McAdams
> putting up a wall to the facts.
> If you truly have the facts on your side, why are you afraid to debate in
> an open forum?
