Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Can anyone tell why the Morton case is relevant

2 views
Skip to first unread message

Ray

unread,
Mar 24, 2012, 6:54:35 PM3/24/12
to


I have posted information about the case of Michael Morton
on the Education Forum
and got back the equivalent
of DUMB LOOKS.

Lets see if members of the Mc. Adams Forum are any smarter
http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=18935

claviger

unread,
Mar 24, 2012, 8:35:54 PM3/24/12
to
You think the DA for Dallas County and the DPD had DNA evidence that would
exonerate LHO, but refuse to release it. Was DNA analysis even available
in 1963?


Bud

unread,
Mar 25, 2012, 9:57:45 AM3/25/12
to
On Mar 24, 6:54 pm, Ray <j.raymondcarr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I have posted information about the case of Michael Morton
> on the Education Forum
> and got back the equivalent
> of DUMB LOOKS.

You did a poor job of showing any relevance to the Kennedy
assassination. There are thousands of cases that would be relevant,
like Hinckley, the self deluded loner living in a fantasy world that
shot Reagan.

Ray

unread,
Mar 25, 2012, 6:07:44 PM3/25/12
to
So far it seems members here are no smarter
than members of the Education Forum.

Bud

unread,
Mar 26, 2012, 12:27:21 AM3/26/12
to
On Mar 25, 6:07 pm, Ray <j.raymondcarr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> So far it seems members here are no smarter
> than members of the Education Forum.

<snicker> Well, they set the bar pretty high there.

The truth is you haven`t offered anything to support your premise.
You`ll get blank stares when you don`t say anything.

bigdog

unread,
Mar 26, 2012, 4:18:42 PM3/26/12
to
No it wasn't, at least according to Wikipedia

"The DNA profiling technique was first reported in 1984[3] by Sir Alec
Jeffreys at the University of Leicester in England,[4] and is now the
basis of several national DNA databases. Dr. Jeffreys's genetic
fingerprinting was made commercially available in 1987, when a chemical
company, Imperial Chemical Industries (ICI), started a blood-testing
centre in England.[5]"

Bud

unread,
Mar 27, 2012, 3:23:18 PM3/27/12
to
Ray`s claim wasn`t based on science or anything you can find in a book.
It was based on "things are as Ray says because Rays says they are, and
anyone who has an opinion that differs with Ray is a chowderhead". To my
mind you don`t amass evidence against such pronouncements, you ridicule
them.


0 new messages