More on 'Girl on the Stairs'

burgundy

unread,

Apr 24, 2013, 9:37:51 PM4/24/13

to

This book is making an impact. -- Burgundy

http://mysite.verizon.net/restu5kb/

curtjester1

unread,

Apr 25, 2013, 9:59:07 PM4/25/13

to

On Apr 24, 9:37 pm, burgundy <WBurgha...@aol.com> wrote:
> This book is making an impact. -- Burgundy
>
> http://mysite.verizon.net/restu5kb/

And the reason is because it's about a natural truth-seeker. People can
write books, but rarely does one not have the desire to write a book, and
just be a truth-seeker who just gets interested in the case, and goes
where his instincts go, to the people who he would interview that would
make a difference. He would ask questions, no others would ask. He would
start early, as in the 60's, and always keep an ongoing thirst, a journal
of sorts, and walk with the Weisberg's, the Joneses', and anyone that
could hone his direction with his instincts. He has many ways of being
unique, instead of being an 'arm- chair' writer, and his book makes a
difference with truth seekers, and would have made a huge difference had
he found some of his findings many decades earlier.

CJ

Bud

unread,

Apr 25, 2013, 10:06:56 PM4/25/13

to

On Apr 24, 9:37 pm, burgundy <WBurgha...@aol.com> wrote:

> This book is making an impact. -- Burgundy
>
> http://mysite.verizon.net/restu5kb/

What is the impact?

burgundy

unread,

Apr 26, 2013, 11:26:17 PM4/26/13

to

Oh Bud Bud Bud Bud .... Oswald not on 6.

Burgundy

Walt

unread,

Apr 27, 2013, 1:12:39 PM4/27/13

to

Barry Ernest would never have had the book published "decades
earlier"..... If he had persisted in telling the story, he would
probably died in a car accident.......

Bud

unread,

Apr 27, 2013, 6:23:54 PM4/27/13

to

You said the book was having an impact. What is the impact?

deke

unread,

Apr 27, 2013, 10:33:06 PM4/27/13

to

How many times does you question have to be answered? The impact is that
the book shows Oswald could not have been on the sixth floor and that
Adams' WC testimony was altered - clear evidence of a cover-up.

burgundy

unread,

Apr 27, 2013, 11:23:16 PM4/27/13

to

Yes

Bud

unread,

Apr 28, 2013, 10:17:42 AM4/28/13

to

That is the premise of the book. That isn`t the impact.

Bud

unread,

Apr 28, 2013, 10:18:42 AM4/28/13

to

I get it, you just didn`t understand the word you used.

The impact of this book is nothing. Nothing will be any different
than if the book was never published besides the author making a few
bucks. Claims that this is "proof* that Oswald was innocent (like I
haven`t seen it said a thousand times in these newsgroups that this or
that is such proof) are meaningless. It fills a need for those folks
who desperately want to believe that Oswald was patsy, but that is
hardly "impact".

deke

unread,

Apr 28, 2013, 7:33:41 PM4/28/13

to

We're probably just arguing semantics here, but to me, impact has to do
with influence, and from the comments I've seen here and elsewhere, it is
definitely influencing people.

curtjester1

unread,

Apr 28, 2013, 10:24:04 PM4/28/13

to

Impact potential is what the new evidence shows, and how it applies to the
overall JFK case. To people that already have their mind's made up, no
evidence counts as impact. It definitely shows that no shooter could have
hid a rifle and went down the stairs right after the shooting.

CJ

Bud

unread,

Apr 29, 2013, 6:15:41 PM4/29/13

to

No, it`s not even doing that. All the people making those comments
thought Oswald was a patsy before this book was written. No impact, no
influence, just a waste of perfectly good trees.

Bud

unread,

Apr 29, 2013, 6:16:10 PM4/29/13

to

Then when?