Google Groups Home
Help | Sign in
Murgado, RFK & LHO
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  17 messages - Collapse all
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
johncwatt...@aol.com  
View profile
 More options May 15, 8:19 pm
Newsgroups: alt.assassination.jfk
From: johncwatt...@aol.com
Date: 15 May 2008 20:19:44 -0400
Local: Thurs, May 15 2008 8:19 pm
Subject: Murgado, RFK & LHO

From David Talbot's "Brothers - The Hidden History of the Kennedy years"

"According to Bay of Pigs veteran Angelo Murgado, he and a team of fellow
Cuban exiles not only observed Oswald's suspicious activities in New
Orleans in August 1963, they reported on him to Bobby Kennedy."

"Murgado was aligned with the Cuban exile faction led by Manual Artime,
the Brigade's political leader."

"Artime enjoyed access to Bobby Kennedy meeting with him in his Washington
office, at Hickory Hill,and at the family's Palm Beach mansion."

"Some Brigade veterans enlisted in the US military but Murgado chose to
join the CIA's covert war on Havana.

Trained in intelligence gathering methods, he began to detect suspicious
activity among some of his fellow exiles in the Miami Cuban community, a
dangerous level of chatter aimed at President Kennedy. He took his
concerns to Artime, who was initially reluctant to do anything about them
for fear of betraying Cuban comrades. But, said Murgado, Artime finally
agreed to set up a meeting with Bobby Kennedy where they could alert him
to the threats against his brother."

"At the meeting, Murgado told the attorney general of his alarm about the
growing anti-Kennedy passions in Cuban exile circles. "I told him that we
have to keep a sharp eye on these Cubans. I was afraid that one of our
guys would go crazy. And I said, The same way that a lot of people are
trying to hit Castro, there are a lot of people trying to hit the
President of the United States...we have a lot of crazy sons of bitches
and they're willing to pull anything."

"Murgado said that Bobby asked him to keep an eye on alarming Cuban exile
activity and report back to him. "We asked, Why don't you tell the
President and use the CIA or FBI ? And he said, no no no - he didn't trust
any of the agencies. And he didn't want to load his brother down with this
situation. So we went outside the CIA and we did this on a personal basis
with Bobby."  The attorney general paid Murgado's expenses out of his own
pocket, according to the Bay of Pigs veteran. Setting up private
intelligence operations that he tightly controlled was a well- established
practice of Bobby Kennedy's throughout his political career."

"In the summer of 1963, Murgado's surveillance work led him to New
Orleans, where he came across a curious gringo named Lee Harvey Oswald.
Murgado and his compadres watched Oswald one day as he distributed his
pro-Castro propaganda on the street. They later saw stacks of Oswald's
pamphlets in the office of Carlos Bringuier, one of the local DRE
delegates who had confronted Oswald in a raucous shouting match that New
Orleans police would report appeared staged."

"Murgado's team came to the conclusion that Oswald was an FBI informant."

"After returning to Florida, Murgado met with Bobby again at his Palm
Beach house, where he reported on his surveillance targets, including the
mysterious Oswald.  He showed Kennedy newspaper photos taken of Oswald
handing out his pro-Castro pamphlets. He told the attorney general that as
far as he could determine Oswald was tied to the FBI. Bobby had never
heard of Oswald, according to Murgado, but he did not seem concerned about
him because of his apparent government role. "

"If Murgado's story is to be believed, it has historical significance.
Assassination researchers have long speculated about whether Bobby Kennedy
was already familiar with the name Oswald when it suddenly exploded on the
American stage on the afternoon of November 22. Was this the man to whom
Bobby was referring when he told anti-Castro leader Harry Ruiz Williams
that afternoon, "One of your guys did it" ? Did RFK immediately associate
Oswald with the covert war against Castro because of Murgado's
intelligence report ?"

"Or did he brush quickly past Oswald when Murgado brought him up because,
as some researchers have suggested, he already connected the name to the
administration's secret war ? The Murgado story may provide an important
key to Bobby's understanding of the crime. It could help explain why the
president's brother cast his suspicions immediately towards the
anti-Castro underworld on the afternoon of November 22."

I hadn't heard of Murgado before. I see there were a couple of threads on
him back in 2005 but that concerned him being one of the Cubans involved
in the Odio incident. Strange that Talbot didn't mention that aspect.

John.


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
timst...@gmail.com  
View profile
 More options May 16, 10:16 am
Newsgroups: alt.assassination.jfk
From: timst...@gmail.com
Date: 16 May 2008 10:16:19 -0400
Local: Fri, May 16 2008 10:16 am
Subject: Re: Murgado, RFK & LHO
TOP POST

Hi John,

It appears that Murgado is lying here:

QUOTE ON:

He showed Kennedy newspaper photos taken of Oswald
handing out his pro-Castro pamphlets. He told the attorney general
that as
far as he could determine Oswald was tied to the FBI.

QUOTE OFF

There never WERE any published newspaper photos of Oswald handing out
his pro-Castro pamphlets until AFTER November 22, 1963.

Talbot has been taken in, just like Joan Mellen was taken in by Thomas
Edward Beckham.

We can only imagine that the rest of Murgado's claims are equally as
fanciful.

Regards,

Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia
*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*

On May 16, 10:19 am, johncwatt...@aol.com wrote:


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Anthony Marsh  
View profile
 More options May 16, 10:22 am
Newsgroups: alt.assassination.jfk
From: Anthony Marsh <anthony_ma...@comcast.net>
Date: 16 May 2008 10:22:32 -0400
Local: Fri, May 16 2008 10:22 am
Subject: Re: Murgado, RFK & LHO

I tend to doubt that story, but interesting right after the
assassination Bobby called the CIA director and questioned if the
assassin was one of their men.

    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
timst...@gmail.com  
View profile
 More options May 17, 1:49 pm
Newsgroups: alt.assassination.jfk
From: timst...@gmail.com
Date: 17 May 2008 13:49:18 -0400
Local: Sat, May 17 2008 1:49 pm
Subject: Re: Murgado, RFK & LHO
TOP POST

Hi Tony,

So, no matter how bogus the story, you still have to get in your dig
about the CIA, eh?

Oswald had NOTHING to do with the CIA, in an operative sense. Just
like this idiot, Angelo Murgado, had NOTHING to do with showing RFK
non existent *newspaper photos* of Oswald's FPCC activities in New
Orleans.

Who is this Talbot guy? How could he blindly publish such drivel in a
book and expect to keep his credibility intact? Murgado's nonsense is
an obvious melange of  previously debunked factoids. Talbot just
doesn't know enough to realise it.

Regards,

Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia
*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*

On May 17, 12:22 am, Anthony Marsh <anthony_ma...@comcast.net> wrote:


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
johncwatt...@aol.com  
View profile
 More options May 17, 1:50 pm
Newsgroups: alt.assassination.jfk
From: johncwatt...@aol.com
Date: 17 May 2008 13:50:52 -0400
Local: Sat, May 17 2008 1:50 pm
Subject: Re: Murgado, RFK & LHO
On 16 May, 15:22, Anthony Marsh <anthony_ma...@comcast.net> wrote:

Tony,

Thanks for your response. I've since discovered that Peter Dale Scott
does not believe Murgado  -  this is significant as Talbot
specifically thanks Jefferson Morley and PDS for agreeing to read and
comment on his manuscript. Either PDS did not tell Talbot he didn't
believe the Murgado story or Talbot chose to ignore him. To be fair to
Talbot he does not present the Murgado story as indisputable fact  -
he acknowledges that Murgado is a colourful character and that some
may not believe him.

Thanks again,

John.


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
James K. Olmstead  
View profile
 More options May 17, 1:52 pm
Newsgroups: alt.assassination.jfk
From: "James K. Olmstead" <jolmst...@neo.rr.com>
Date: 17 May 2008 13:52:07 -0400
Local: Sat, May 17 2008 1:52 pm
Subject: Re: Murgado, RFK & LHO

TOP POST

Hi John,

It appears that Murgado is lying here:

QUOTE ON:

He showed Kennedy newspaper photos taken of Oswald
handing out his pro-Castro pamphlets. He told the attorney general
that as
far as he could determine Oswald was tied to the FBI.

QUOTE OFF

There never WERE any published newspaper photos of Oswald handing out
his pro-Castro pamphlets until AFTER November 22, 1963.

Talbot has been taken in, just like Joan Mellen was taken in by Thomas
Edward Beckham.

We can only imagine that the rest of Murgado's claims are equally as
fanciful.

Regards,

Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia
*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*

Tim:  The major problem is with claiming no photos were taken, the ONI offices were
two blocks and on second floor from the street demo conducted by Oswald and we
know that a man associated with events ran over and filmed things.  I'm not sure of
the man's name at this time, but I believe he had his family with him and was a couple
of streets over at the time.  No photos were published....but I do believe photos were
taken.  Off the top of my head I believe he was associated with Gen Walker.  There
are some newsgroup posts on this from years ago.....I think Clark Wilkins was in on
those.

Several Cubans who I've been in contact with over the years claim photos were taken.
Santigo De Juan, claimed to have slapped Oswald.  Santigo worked at VOA and several
members of the radio staff went down to hassle Oswald. Santigo was interviewed for
WC....but there's not much in the offical reports concerning this.  Santigo was part of
the Cuban Revolution fighting with Castro and later fled due to his role in a assassination
attempt on Castro.  He was associated with Ohio mob members in Cuba that were also
working for the CIA (Robert John Gentile).  Gentile was convicted of plot to kill Castro
and RFK bailed him out of jail with BOP prisoners.

The WC makes a big deal of the DRE encounter but the record and investigation concerning
the VOA staff action is very limited....it's almost a "side note" to the event.

I was told years ago....but never had the chance to confirm it that the BBC did a documentary
called "The Bearded Warriors" and Santigo's encounter with Oswald is part of that documentary
but I consider that "rumor".    Santigo is still alive as of 2007....but is difficult to contact.  His
wife  had alot of the photos he had from the late 50's and 60's and I've never been
able to contact her or his daughter who might have some of the New Orleans photos at VOA.

jko

On May 16, 10:19 am, johncwatt...@aol.com wrote:


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
curtjester1  
View profile
 More options May 18, 12:06 pm
Newsgroups: alt.assassination.jfk
From: curtjester1 <curtjest...@hotmail.com>
Date: 18 May 2008 12:06:13 -0400
Local: Sun, May 18 2008 12:06 pm
Subject: Re: Murgado, RFK & LHO
On May 15, 5:19 pm, johncwatt...@aol.com wrote:

This would hardly even seem compellingly eventful to me since Robert
Kennedy and Artime were very close, close enough to take Artime on ski
vacation to discuss options with them, like putting some of the BoP
veterans into the military (Mar. 1963), and Artime met with JFK an
right before the Orange Bowl before he made his famous declaration
about the flag flying over Cuba.  And Artime was part of the JFK-RFK
plan to invade Cuba from the Dominican Republic and Artime's spot in
Central America in a CIA/Exile meeting on the day the President was
shot.

CJ


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
timst...@gmail.com  
View profile
 More options May 19, 9:19 am
Newsgroups: alt.assassination.jfk
From: timst...@gmail.com
Date: 19 May 2008 09:19:59 -0400
Local: Mon, May 19 2008 9:19 am
Subject: Re: Murgado, RFK & LHO
TOP POST

Hi James,

I think the crucial element that shows Murgado's claim to be fanciful
is this claim about newspaper photographs. There never were any
published at the time. The only story published about Oswald at the
time didn't feature a photograph and anyone reading it could only have
come away with the impression that Oswald was working for the FPCC,
not the FBI.

As we both know, there were films made of both the Canal St
leafletting incident and the ITM leafletting incident, one week later.
However, stills were NEVER made from any of these films until AFTER
the assassination, when the significance of the films was realised.
Until then, Oswald's FPCC activities in New Orleans were a minor
story.

Murgado's claim about seeing piles of Oswald's FPCC literature in
Bringuier's office is simply absurd, in my view, if not downright
insulting. Seems like an obvious embellishment of t