Did Gerald Ford sell copy of Oswald diary to Dallas Morning News?
Peter Fokes
8 July 1964
Captain W. P. Gannaway
Special Service Bureau
Dallas Police Department
Thru:
Lieutenant Jack Revill
Criminal Intelligence Section
Special Service Bureau
Dallas Police Department
Subject: Criminal Intelligence (1) Diary of Lee Harvey Oswald
Sir:
The following information was received from confidential informant
T-1 regarding SUBJECT, reportedly sold to the Dallas Morning News
without permission of Marina Oswald.
Source states that REPRESENTATIVE FORD (fnu), a member of the WARREN
COMMISSION, sold SUBJECT to the DALLAS MORNNG NEWS. MR. FORD had a
copy of the diary and took it to executives of LIFE MAGAZINE and also
NEWSWEEK magazine. Source states that these executives paid MARINA
OSWALD, widow of LEE HARVEY OSWALD, $16,000 for the world copyright of
the diary.
Source further states that proof of this is in the hands of the
DALLAS COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S office.
Respectfully submitted,
[signed with signature of]
H.M. Hart, Detective,
Criminal Intelligence Section
Evaluation: Informant considered reliable: Possibly true.
Int 2965-55
<quote off>
See:
http://jfk.ci.dallas.tx.us/37/3717-001.gif
Peter Fokes,
Toronto
Bud
> <quote on>
>
> 8 July 1964
>
> Captain W. P. Gannaway
> Special Service Bureau
> Dallas Police Department
>
> Thru:
> Lieutenant Jack Revill
> Criminal Intelligence Section
> Special Service Bureau
> Dallas Police Department
>
> Subject: Criminal Intelligence (1) Diary of Lee Harvey Oswald
>
> Sir:
> The following information was received from confidential informant
> T-1 regarding SUBJECT, reportedly sold to the Dallas Morning News
> without permission of Marina Oswald.
>
> Source states that REPRESENTATIVE FORD (fnu), a member of the WARREN
> COMMISSION, sold SUBJECT to the DALLAS MORNNG NEWS. MR. FORD had a
> copy of the diary and took it to executives of LIFE MAGAZINE and also
> NEWSWEEK magazine. Source states that these executives paid MARINA
> OSWALD, widow of LEE HARVEY OSWALD, $16,000 for the world copyright of
> the diary.
This Marina cleaned up from her husband`s murderous activities. And she
knew more incriminating things about her husband than she let on about, a
shrewd schemer playing the angles. She gave the investigators just enough
to satisfy them, she had more but it would have cast her in a bad light.
I`d have booted her narrow ass back to the Motherland.
tomnln
"Peter Fokes" <pfo...@rogers.com> wrote in message
news:484l1693tcckhchdt...@4ax.com...
Bud
> They should have arrested the Criminal Bastard ! !
What if there was no proof to be found at the Dallas County District
Attorney`s office?
Would you accept that Oswald was guilty if you were told that DA had
such proof?
Peter Fokes
wrote:
A week before the memo above was prepared, Ford was talking to the
press.
News article from Rome News-Tribune 30 June 1964
<quote on>
Rep. Gerald R. Ford, R-Mich., a member of the blue-ribbon panel headed
by Chief Justice Earl Warren, said the diary's contents were not
revealed by anyone associated with the commission.
He said he expected the matter to be brought up at the commission's
meeting today, and said he was "disturbed" over publication of parts
of the diary dealing with Oswald's life in the Soviet Union.
<quote off>
The WC decided to ask the FBI to investigate the leak at that meeting.
What was the result of the FBI investigation?
By the way, some folks have argued Ford was keeping the FBI informed
of Commission activities. Dale Myers tries to debunk those claims, but
he neglects one important fact ....
Myers writes:
<quote on>
The fact that Ford even met with the FBI during the Commissions
earliest days has been known for 33 years, having been reported in
1975 by former assistant FBI director William Sullivan. Sullivan, who
had a bitter break with FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover, told
investigators that �Hoover did not want the Warren Commission to
conduct an exhaustive investigation for fear that it would discover
important and relevant facts that we in the FBI had not discovered in
our own investigation, [since] it would be greatly embarrassing to him
and damaging to his career and the FBI as a whole.� [11HSCA53]
Sullivan�s remarks were supported by the Church Committee, which found
that Hoover repeatedly told others that the Warren Commission was
seeking to criticize the FBI. [Church Committee Report, p.46]
In 1978, Ford himself testified to the House Select Committee on
Assassinations (HSCA) under penalty of perjury that he only met with
DeLoach on two occasions, December 12 and 17, 1963, both of which
times were �during the organizational period of the Commission and
before any investigations or hearings were undertaken by the
Commission.� [3HSCA576-577]
Despite the charge that Ford was a stoolie for the FBI, which conjures
up images of some ragged snitch meeting with government agents in back
alleys, it is highly significant to note that no one has been able to
show that Ford had any contact with the FBI other than the two dates
which Ford testified to. The 500 pages of recently declassified
documents turned over to the news media under the Freedom of
Information Act last week only strengthens this fact.
<quote off>
http://jfkfiles.blogspot.com/2008/08/gerald-ford-warren-commission-and-media.html
Myers does NOT MENTION that Ford and DeLoach agreed at one of those
meetings that further discussion would be on a CONFIDENTIAL basis.
Memo from DeLoach to Hoover:
<quote on>
"I had a long talk this morning [December 12, 1963] with Congressman
Gerald R. "Jerry" Ford . . . He asked that I come up and see him . . .
Ford indicated that he would keep me thoroughly advised as to the
activities of the Commission. He stated this would have to be on a
**confidential basis**, however, he thought it should be done. He also
asked if he could call me from time to time and straighten out
questions in his mind concerning our investigation. I told him by all
means he should do this. He reiterated that our relationship would, of
course,** remain confidential**."
<quote off>
If the two men met on a confidential basis, there would not be a
record of those meetings, and Ford could testify without fear under
penalty of perjury.
*PARDON me*, for changing the subject ...hehe
PF
John McAdams
wrote:
><quote on>
>
>8 July 1964
>
>Captain W. P. Gannaway
>Special Service Bureau
>Dallas Police Department
>
>Thru:
>Lieutenant Jack Revill
>Criminal Intelligence Section
>Special Service Bureau
>Dallas Police Department
>
>
>Subject: Criminal Intelligence (1) Diary of Lee Harvey Oswald
>
>Sir:
> The following information was received from confidential informant
>T-1 regarding SUBJECT, reportedly sold to the Dallas Morning News
>without permission of Marina Oswald.
>
>Source states that REPRESENTATIVE FORD (fnu), a member of the WARREN
>COMMISSION, sold SUBJECT to the DALLAS MORNNG NEWS. MR. FORD had a
>copy of the diary and took it to executives of LIFE MAGAZINE and also
>NEWSWEEK magazine. Source states that these executives paid MARINA
>OSWALD, widow of LEE HARVEY OSWALD, $16,000 for the world copyright of
>the diary.
>
Then why didn't TIME and NEWSWEEK publish them?
> Source further states that proof of this is in the hands of the
>DALLAS COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S office.
>
Seems that this hasn't turned up.
>Respectfully submitted,
>
>[signed with signature of]
>
>H.M. Hart, Detective,
>Criminal Intelligence Section
>
>
>Evaluation: Informant considered reliable: Possibly true.
>
>
Meaning: possibly false.
>Int 2965-55
>
>
><quote off>
>
>See:
>
>http://jfk.ci.dallas.tx.us/37/3717-001.gif
>
>
You do understand that a lot of memos record stuff that's untrue,
right?
Ever read FBI reports of UFO sightings?
.John
--------------
http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/home.htm
John McAdams
wrote:
>
>Myers writes:
>
><quote on>
>
>The fact that Ford even met with the FBI during the Commissions
>earliest days has been known for 33 years, having been reported in
>1975 by former assistant FBI director William Sullivan. Sullivan, who
>had a bitter break with FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover, told
>investigators that “Hoover did not want the Warren Commission to
>conduct an exhaustive investigation for fear that it would discover
>important and relevant facts that we in the FBI had not discovered in
>our own investigation, [since] it would be greatly embarrassing to him
>and damaging to his career and the FBI as a whole.” [11HSCA53]
>Sullivan’s remarks were supported by the Church Committee, which found
>that Hoover repeatedly told others that the Warren Commission was
>seeking to criticize the FBI. [Church Committee Report, p.46]
>
I thought he was trying to cover up a conspiracy?
Now you portray him as a bureaucrat worried about the reputation of
the bureau.
.John
--------------
http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/home.htm
Greg Jaynes
>
> Myers does NOT MENTION that Ford and DeLoach agreed at one of those
> meetings that further discussion would be on a CONFIDENTIAL basis.
>
> Memo from DeLoach to Hoover:
>
> <quote on>
>
> "I had a long talk this morning [December 12, 1963] with Congressman
> Gerald R. "Jerry" Ford . . . He asked that I come up and see him . . .
> Ford indicated that he would keep me thoroughly advised as to the
> activities of the Commission. He stated this would have to be on a
> **confidential basis**, however, he thought it should be done. He also
> asked if he could call me from time to time and straighten out
> questions in his mind concerning our investigation. I told him by all
> means he should do this. He reiterated that our relationship would, of
> course,** remain confidential**."
>
> <quote off>
>
> If the two men met on a confidential basis, there would not be a
> record of those meetings, and Ford could testify without fear under
> penalty of perjury.
>
> *PARDON me*, for changing the subject ...hehe
>
>
> - Show quoted text -
Peter,
After you asked me about it last year, I had this email exchange with
Hugh Aynesworth:
--------------------------------------------
Re: Oswalds Diary Hugh Aynesworth to you and Dave Perry - Jul 6
2009More Details
From: Hugh Aynesworth <XXXXXX@XXXXXXX>Hide .Add to: To Do, Calendar
To: Greg Jaynes <jay...@mail.com>.Cc: Dave Perry
<dperr...@hotmail.com>.Bcc:.
Date:Mon, Jul 6, 2009 1:32 pm.
Hi Greg:
Good to hear from you. yes, I remember you...and have noted several
JFK-related pieces you have filed over the years.
As far as the diary is concerned, I STILL have never revealed where it
came from. I have had several confront me with who they believed helped me
gather it -- from Henry Wade to Bob Denson, to Bill Alexander, Judge Joe
B. Brown, Marina Oswald, her lawyer Bill Mckenzie, to FBI agent Bob
Gemberling, etc.
For years I kept a silence about it because I thought it might endanger
someone's career...but that is not an issue any longer.
My book, "JFK: Breaking the News," was published at the time of the 40th
anniversary. I did NOT name the person. Am sure I will be updating in a
year or two and probably won't divulge it then either. It is of little
interest I feel sure.
If indeed you have located the gentleman who allowed me to copy it and he
will admit it, that's fine with me.
Good luck...
Hugh Aynesworth
P.S. The XXXXX XXXXX. I was there two years ago when I dropped four
Russian journalists there to interview Bill Alexander, who lived (or
officed) there at the time. Not on my regular route......
----- Original Message ----- From: "Greg Jaynes" <jay...@mail.com>
To: <Hugh Aynesworth >
Cc: <dperr...@hotmail.com>; <jay...@mail.com>
Sent: Saturday, July 04, 2009 3:01 AM
Subject: Oswalds Diary
Hello Mr. Aynesworth,
I'm sure you will remember me. I came over to your house once to help you
with your email. Then later, you and me and John McAdams had lunch at
Bell's Bar B Que on Jackson street back before it closed. This was
arranged by our friend Dave Perry.
At that lunch meeting I asked you about Oswald's diary. I was amused how
you wryly said you never told anyone how you got it.
I have not read your new book yet but I read the teaser on your website
about how the FBI was trying to find out about the diary. Anyway, I was
wondering if you reveal this in your book.
I found out several years ago how you got it. But out of deference to you,
I never have revealed it. Though I have let folks know that I know. I just
thought it was too neat of a little tale for me to upstage you on it. My
discussion of it was at the Dallas Historical Society. Then one of the
moderators on the assassination usenet group found out about that and
asked me about it publicly. I didn't tell him. I just said it wasn't hard
to figure out. I think I suggested he contact you and ask you.
Now, if you have revealed it in your new book, please let me know. Then I
will discuss with my friends and enemies how I came to find out.
Otherwise, I won't.
Have you been over to the XXXXX XXXXX lately?
Thanks,
Greg
-----------------------------------
And so..... if he doesn't care, then here it is:
I was riding my bicycle in downtown Dallas on a Sunday night about 10:00
p.m. I love the city at night. Now days, there are a lot of people milling
around til late. But this night was at a time before the city had
revitalized the central business district. It was always desolate and
mostly empty except for the ever present vehicle traffic.
As I was easily making my way up Commerce street, I passed a man and a
woman waiting to cross the street. As I passed them I noticed a familiar
looking face in the dim light. I wasn't sure but I stopped about fifty
feet past them. I called out to them. I said "Excuse me, can I ask you a
question?" . I asked, "Are you Bill Alexander?" Alexander, confirmed who
he was and I rode my bike back to where they were standing.
He was very friendly and seemed to appreciate being recognized. The woman
didn't though. I guess she was his wife, I didn't ask. She continued
walking while Alexander and I stood there and spoke.
We had a grand conversation about all things Dallas. We talked about Roe v
Wade, Bill Decker, Joe Brown, the Ruby trial, Randall Dale Adams and much
more. I guess we talked for about 45 minutes. Finally, he had enough. I
guess he was getting tired of standing. He said he needed to go. As he was
walking away, it occurred to me to ask him about Oswald's diary. So, I
called to him, "Wait, one more thing." . I asked him "Can you shed any
light on how Hugh Aynesworth got a hold of Oswald's diary?". He stopped in
the street. Then laughed and walked back over to the sidewalk where I was
still standing straddling my bicycle.
He told me that Aynesworth was in his office one day. He didn't go into
any great detail about what they were discussing but they were talking. He
said Aynesworth asked him whatever became of Jack Ruby's hat. I think
Alexander must have told this part of story before to someone because he
was obviously enjoying telling it. He said when Aynesworth asked about the
hat, he just smiled and pointed to his coat rack. The hat was hanging on
it.
I could see that this portrayed Alexander's personality. This was the kind
of thing he liked. And here I was getting to share that in the dim light
of Commerce street late on a sunday night.
Alexander told me that he pulled a copy of the diary out of a drawer and
showed it to Aynesworth. He said he then left it on his desk and asked
Aynesworth to excuse him while he left the office.
Then he really did have to go. He laughed and said he enjoyed the talk and
continued walking away in the direction the woman had gone.
Did Aynesworth copy the diary there? Did he take off with the copy
Alexander left on the desk? I don't know. I didn't get to press it. But I
do know how Aynesworth got the diary. And now, so do you.
I couldn't find it in my email, I guess I didn't save it in my sent mail
folder, but I emailed Aynesworth again telling him this story. I urged him
to personally clear it up for the sake of Dallas history. He didn't write
back.
Respectfully,
Greg Jaynes
Anthony Marsh
> On Fri, 18 Jun 2010 01:05:41 -0400, Peter Fokes<pfo...@rogers.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>> Myers writes:
>>
>> <quote on>
>>
>> The fact that Ford even met with the FBI during the Commissions
>> earliest days has been known for 33 years, having been reported in
>> 1975 by former assistant FBI director William Sullivan. Sullivan, who
>> had a bitter break with FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover, told
>> conduct an exhaustive investigation for fear that it would discover
>> important and relevant facts that we in the FBI had not discovered in
>> our own investigation, [since] it would be greatly embarrassing to him
>> Sullivan?s remarks were supported by the Church Committee, which found
>> that Hoover repeatedly told others that the Warren Commission was
>> seeking to criticize the FBI. [Church Committee Report, p.46]
>>
>
> I thought he was trying to cover up a conspiracy?
>
Just because he wanted to cover up the conspiracy does not mean that he
was part of the conspiracy. He was only doing what he thought was best for
the country, trying to prevent WWIII.
John McAdams
<anthon...@comcast.net> wrote:
>On 6/18/2010 1:45 PM, John McAdams wrote:
>> On Fri, 18 Jun 2010 01:05:41 -0400, Peter Fokes<pfo...@rogers.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Myers writes:
>>>
>>> <quote on>
>>>
>>> The fact that Ford even met with the FBI during the Commissions
>>> earliest days has been known for 33 years, having been reported in
>>> 1975 by former assistant FBI director William Sullivan. Sullivan, who
>>> had a bitter break with FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover, told
>>> investigators that ?Hoover did not want the Warren Commission to
>>> conduct an exhaustive investigation for fear that it would discover
>>> important and relevant facts that we in the FBI had not discovered in
>>> our own investigation, [since] it would be greatly embarrassing to him
>>> and damaging to his career and the FBI as a whole.? [11HSCA53]
>>> Sullivan?s remarks were supported by the Church Committee, which found
>>> that Hoover repeatedly told others that the Warren Commission was
>>> seeking to criticize the FBI. [Church Committee Report, p.46]
>>>
>>
>> I thought he was trying to cover up a conspiracy?
>>
>
>Just because he wanted to cover up the conspiracy does not mean that he
>was part of the conspiracy. He was only doing what he thought was best for
>the country, trying to prevent WWIII.
>
But that's not what Sullivan said.
.John
--------------
http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/home.htm
Peter Fokes
Time owned LIFE magazine. Management probably decided LIFE was a more
appropriate format for the diary.
Perhaps Newsweek turned Ford down, or was outbid by Time.
>
>
>> Source further states that proof of this is in the hands of the
>>DALLAS COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S office.
>>
>
>Seems that this hasn't turned up.
>
>
>>Respectfully submitted,
>>
>>[signed with signature of]
>>
>>H.M. Hart, Detective,
>>Criminal Intelligence Section
>>
>>
>>Evaluation: Informant considered reliable: Possibly true.
>>
>>
>
>Meaning: possibly false.
>
>>Int 2965-55
>>
>>
>><quote off>
>>
>>See:
>>
>>http://jfk.ci.dallas.tx.us/37/3717-001.gif
>>
>>
>
>You do understand that a lot of memos record stuff that's untrue,
>right?
I had no idea! What a silly question, posed more for for effect than
meaning.
Subject header: Did Gerald Ford sell copy of Oswald diary to Dallas
Morning News?
>Ever read FBI reports of UFO sightings?
Nope. Life is too short for UFOs.
>
>.John
>--------------
>http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/home.htm
Peter Fokes,
Toronto
Peter Fokes
<john.m...@marquette.edu> wrote:
>On Fri, 18 Jun 2010 01:05:41 -0400, Peter Fokes <pfo...@rogers.com>
>wrote:
>
>>
>>Myers writes:
>>
>><quote on>
>>
>>The fact that Ford even met with the FBI during the Commissions
>>earliest days has been known for 33 years, having been reported in
>>1975 by former assistant FBI director William Sullivan. Sullivan, who
>>had a bitter break with FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover, told
>>investigators that �Hoover did not want the Warren Commission to
>>conduct an exhaustive investigation for fear that it would discover
>>important and relevant facts that we in the FBI had not discovered in
>>our own investigation, [since] it would be greatly embarrassing to him
>>and damaging to his career and the FBI as a whole.� [11HSCA53]
>>Sullivan�s remarks were supported by the Church Committee, which found
>>that Hoover repeatedly told others that the Warren Commission was
>>seeking to criticize the FBI. [Church Committee Report, p.46]
<quote off>
>>
>
>I thought he was trying to cover up a conspiracy?
You did?
>
>Now you portray him as a bureaucrat worried about the reputation of
>the bureau.
John, the passage above was written by Dale Myers, not me.
Peter Fokes
Interesting story Greg. Thanks for sharing. Curry said he kept the
diary in a locked drawer, but who knows?
PF
tomnln
"Anthony Marsh" <anthon...@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:4c1c01bb$1...@mcadams.posc.mu.edu...
tomnln
commissioners SEE>>> http://whokilledjfk.net/FORD.htm
See Deloach's 2 page report on those meetings with Ford.
"Peter Fokes" <pfo...@rogers.com> wrote in message
news:h78o16lisd0crgf8d...@4ax.com...
Greg Jaynes
> On 18 Jun 2010 17:32:55 -0400, Greg Jaynes <jay...@mail.com> wrote:
>
> Interesting story Greg. Thanks for sharing. Curry said he kept the
> diary in a locked drawer, but who knows?
>
> PF
Great! You solved it. Either Curry is the culprit or it didn't really
happen.
Respctfully,
Greg Jaynes
John McAdams
wrote:
> I had no idea! What a silly question, posed more foutr for effect than
>meaning.
>
>
>Subject header: Did Gerald Ford sell copy of Oswald diary to Dallas
>Morning News?
>
The answer is "no."
Look . . . I know you dislike Ford for a lot of reasons, starting with
the fact that he was a Republican.
But he wasn't a sleazy character.
>>Ever read FBI reports of UFO sightings?
>
>Nope. Life is too short for UFOs.
>
>
Just wanted to see whether you are aware that a lot of nonsense gets
recorded in FBI reports. Somebody has a story to tell, and they
record it.
.John
The Kennedy Assassination Home Page
http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/home.htm
Peter Fokes
Lol. Ya right.
I'm afraid all we have are various stories, and no way of
corroborating any of them.
>Respctfully,
>Greg Jaynes
Peter Fokes,
Toronto
Peter Fokes
How do you know?
>Look . . . I know you dislike Ford for a lot of reasons, starting with
>the fact that he was a Republican.
Oh for heavens sake. Do you really believe I dislike anyone who is a
Republican simply because they are a Republican?
Please tell me the reasons you think I dislike Ford. I have never
discussed Gerald Ford with you.
>But he wasn't a sleazy character.
So you believe the person who leaked the diary to the Dallas Morning
News was sleazy?
>
>>>Ever read FBI reports of UFO sightings?
>>
>>Nope. Life is too short for UFOs.
>>
>>
>
>Just wanted to see whether you are aware that a lot of nonsense gets
>recorded in FBI reports. Somebody has a story to tell, and they
>record it.
>
>.John
>
>
>The Kennedy Assassination Home Page
>http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/home.htm
Peter Fokes,
Toronto
Peter Fokes
>On Jun 17, 9:42 pm, "tomnln" <tom...@cox.net> wrote:
>> They should have arrested the Criminal Bastard ! !
>
> What if there was no proof to be found at the Dallas County District
>Attorney`s office?
It is interesting that the evaluation rates the informant as
"reliable".
Why would the informant be given a "reliable" rating if he had
provided inaccurate information in the past? Obviously the
information of this informant had proven to be reliable.
And in this case the informant provided an easy way to check his
reliability. The informant said without prevarication that proof of
his knowledge was available in the hands of the DALLAS COUNTY DISTRICT
ATTORNEY'S office.
Did the detectives follow up the informant's comment and check with
the Dallas County District Attorney's office?
I don't know. Perhaps someone does. Perhaps there is another memo
stating the informant was wrong, and that there is no such proof. Or
perhaps the informant's claim was never checked, or if it was, a
conclusion with regards to the informant's claim was never made public
or recorded.
All we have is the informant's remarks and the evaluation that he has
been found to be a reliable in the past.
Certainly if this the proof he claimed existed did not exist in the
DA's office, then his rating as an informant would surely be changed
from "reliable" to "unreliable."
Did this informant provide additional information to the police after
this report? Was that information reliable. Did his rating as an
informant continue to be classified as "reliable?"
>
> Would you accept that Oswald was guilty if you were told that DA had
>such proof?
Wouldn't that depend on the nature of the proof?
In this case, we don't know the nature of the "proof" that the
reliable informant was referring to .... it would have been up to the
detectives to seek out that proof from the DA's office if they were
assigned to pursue the issue. Of course, we don't know if they did
continue to pursue the issue, or the response of the DA to any request
for proof if such a request was made.
PF
Jean Davison
Peter,
The Mary Ferrell site has numerous documents on the FBI
investigation of this leak.
Life got the diary from Dallas reporter Hugh Aynesworth -- 4
pages starting here:
http://www.maryferrell.org/mffweb/archive/viewer/showDoc.do?docId=59633&relPageId=54
The FBI Lab compared Life's copy of the diary with the copy held
by the Dallas DA's office and found that they matched. The DA's copy also
had Assistant D.A. Bill Alexander's thumb print on it. See the bottom
half of this page:
http://www.maryferrell.org/mffweb/archive/viewer/showDoc.do?docId=62229&relPageId=262
The D.A.'s office evidently obtained copies of Oswald's papers
from the DPD:
http://www.maryferrell.org/mffweb/archive/viewer/showDoc.do?docId=59638&relPageId=19
Alexander denied being the source and claimed Ford did it:
http://www.maryferrell.org/mffweb/archive/viewer/showDoc.do?docId=59623&relPageId=16
Anonymous call to the FBI, 2 pp.:
http://www.maryferrell.org/mffweb/archive/viewer/showDoc.do?docId=59622&relPageId=15
http://www.maryferrell.org/mffweb/archive/viewer/showDoc.do?docId=59622&relPageId=16
Seems to me that Greg Jaynes was right, and the answer to your
question is "No."
Jean
Peter Fokes
<jjdavison...@yahoo.com> wrote:
You are a jewel, Jean.
Alexander sounds like Blackbeard, the pirate! Not many folks in his
position would be brave enough to tell J. Edgar Hoover" to kiss my
**s"!
lol
Hugh should reveal the answer in his will!
(Long live Hugh.)
:-)
PF
Jean Davison
> On 19 Jun 2010 23:34:23 -0400, "Jean Davison"
>
>
> You are a jewel, Jean.
>
> Alexander sounds like Blackbeard, the pirate! Not many folks in his
> position would be brave enough to tell J. Edgar Hoover" to kiss my
> **s"!
>
> lol
>
> Hugh should reveal the answer in his will!
>
> (Long live Hugh.)
>
> :-)
>
> PF
>
Thanks, Peter, but the only "jewel" here is the Ferrell site, an
excellent source for JFK documents:
http://www.maryferrell.org/wiki/index.php/JFK_Assassination
Jean
Anthony Marsh
Nice of you to acknowledge that fact. Also the sister sites History
Matters and AARC. So, do you think they are run by a WC defender like you?
Do you think WC defenders are really interested in making documents
available to researchers?