Sydney Film Festival
"Art wedded to truth must, in the end, have its rewards"
The Apu Trilogy written and directed by Satyajit Ray
By Richard Phillips
2 August 2001
One of the more memorable screenings at this year’s Sydney Film
Festival was Satyajit Ray’s Apu Trilogy— Pather Panchali
(1955), Aparajito (1956) and Apu Sansar (1959)—which traces the
life of a Bengali family and their son Apu, as he moves from childhood
in a rural village, through his youth in Benares where the family
later moves, to manhood and marriage in Calcutta. The three films,
which have been restored by the Merchant-Ivory Foundation, include new
subtitles and a digitally remixed and remastered version of Ravi
Shankar’s original soundtrack.
The Apu Trilogy, which made Satyajit Ray India’s first
internationally recognised director, helped to redefine cinema for the
most serious Indian filmmakers at this time and influenced and
encouraged many others internationally. Such was the power of
Ray’s work that Japanese master director Akira Kurosawa
remarked: “Not to have seen the cinema of Ray means existing in
the world without seeing the sun or the moon.”
Ray was born in Calcutta 1921 to a family of distinguished
intellectuals and grew up surrounded by art, literature and music. His
father and grandfather, who were closely associated with India’s
social reformist Brahmo Samaj movement and its leading poet and
dramatist Rabindranath Tagore, were printers and publishers who also
wrote and illustrated children’s stories and poetry. Ray’s
mother was an accomplished singer and other relatives were scientists,
photographers, artists and physicians. Ray developed an early interest
in western classical music and the cinema. He watched hundreds of
films, mainly American, in his youth and wrote to Hollywood stars and
directors, including Billy Wilder.
After graduating from the University of Calcutta where he majored in
physics and economics, Ray attended Santiniketan University in Kala
Bhavan, studying fine art and graphic design under renowned Bengali
artists Binode Bihari and Nandala Bose. Bihari taught him Chinese and
Japanese drawing and calligraphy techniques. In 1942 Ray returned to
Calcutta and took a job the following year with a British advertising
agency as a graphic designer and illustrator.
Increasingly passionate about movies, Ray helped establish the
Calcutta Film Society in 1947, organising special showings of
Hollywood, European and Russian films. He began writing film reviews
and in 1948 published a short but perceptive comment entitled
“What is Wrong with Indian Films”. It criticised the
predominance of saccharine sweet musicals and religious mysticism in
Indian cinema and declared: “The raw material of the cinema is
life itself. It is incredible that a country which has inspired so
much painting and music and poetry should fail to move the moviemaker.
He has only to keep his eyes open, and his ears. Let him do so.”
Soon after writing this essay, Ray met French film director Jean
Renoir who encouraged him to begin making his own films. In 1950 the
talented 29-year-old illustrator was sent to London for six months to
work in the advertising agency’s head office. Ray spent most of
his spare time there watching movies—more than 90 odd
films—including Vittorio de Sica’s The Bicycle Thief
(1948) and several other Italian neo-realist cinema classics.
Italian neo-realism, which had a profound impact on Ray and other
filmmakers, was characterised by its naturalistic documentary style,
on-location shooting, conversational speech rather than literary
dialogue, and the use of mainly non-professional actors. De
Sica’s film follows the heartrending efforts of a poor Italian
man and his son to recover a stolen bicycle the father needs in order
to get to work.
The Bicycle Thief, Ray wrote in a 1951 essay, was “a triumphant
rediscovery of the fundamentals of the cinema” and the
“simple universality of its theme, the effectiveness of its
treatment, and the low cost of its production make it the ideal film
for the Indian filmmaker to study.”
“The present blind worship of technique emphasises the poverty
of genuine inspiration among our directors,” Ray continued.
“For a popular medium, the best kind of inspiration should
derive from life and have its roots in it. No amount of technical
polish can make up for artificiality of theme and dishonesty of
treatment. The filmmaker must turn to life, to reality. De Sica, and
not [Cecil B.] DeMille, should be his ideal.”
Song of the Little Road
Ray had been commissioned in 1945 to illustrate a children’s
edition of Pather Panchali (Song of the Little Road), the popular
semi-autobiographical novel by Bibhutibhushan Bandhipadhyaya. Inspired
by de Sica’s film, Ray decided to make the novel the subject of
his first film and spent the two-week boat trip from London back to
India preparing shooting sketches and a basic plan for its production.
While work began on Pather Panchali in 1950, the first footage was not
shot until October 1952 and continued over the next two years on
weekends and holidays. The production had a miniscule budget with a
mainly amateur crew and cast. In fact, Sabrata Mitra, Ray’s
cinematographer, had never made a film before and the only experienced
members of the production were the editor, art director and an
80-year-old retired theatre actress, Chunibala Devi. The film was
finally completed, after a one-year interruption when Ray ran out of
funds, with a grant from the West Bengal government. It was released
in India in August 1955 and screened the following year at the Cannes
Film Festival where it won the festival’s Best Human Document
Award. This international recognition allowed Ray to quit the
advertising agency and devote the rest of his life to filmmaking,
literature and art.
Pather Panchali, which is set in the early 1900s, has a relatively
simple plot. In fact, the film largely consists of a series of short,
loosely-connected vignettes tracing out the life and times of a poor
Brahmin family in rural Bengal and the birth and childhood of their
only son Apu. Head of the family, Harihar (Kanu Banerji), who dreams
of being a poet, has brought Sarbajaya (Karuna Banerji), his pregnant
wife, and Durga (Uma Das Gupta), his daughter, from Benares back to
the ancestral rural home. The young family also takes care of an aged
aunt, Indir Thakrun (Chunibala Devi).
The home is in serious disrepair with part of the land having been
sold to settle debts. Harihar, who obtains occasional bookkeeping work
for a local landlord, is forced to spend long periods away from the
family in search of full-time employment. The mischievous Durga steals
fruit from orchards, which she gives to Indir, thus creating conflicts
with the neighbours and between Sarbajaya and Indir. Blamed for
encouraging the young girl, Indir leaves the family but returns
following Apu’s birth.
Pather Panchali follows the trials and tribulations of this poor
family: the first conscious experiences of Apu (Subir Banerji), his
early school years and close bond with his sister Durga, and their
adventures in the nearby forest and fields. The underlying strength of
the film is Ray’s unsentimental but intensely artistic
exploration of many universal themes. He carefully examines the
interaction of life and death, the aged and the young, and makes
subtle references to the tensions between rural and city life and how
it is being changed by new technology—in this case electricity
and the railway.
In one memorable sequence, which also cuts to the last difficult
moments of Indir’s life, the children, who have been
quarrelling, are playing in fields far from home and come across some
high tension electricity pylons. Fascinated by the humming sound of
the wires they walk on through long grass, see the smoke of a distant
train and then run to the railway tracks. The train, which has
previously been an occasional background sound in their lives, is seen
in all its power, the hope of a better life beyond their immediate
environment. Their quarrels are forgotten in their fascination with
the train but on the way back home they stumble across Indir who has
collapsed and is dying in the woods.
Pather Panchali has some extraordinarily joyous moments combined with
periods of deep sadness, including the death of Indir, and then the
tragic loss of Durga, who catches a fever after a dancing in the
monsoon rains and dies just before her father’s long-awaited
return.
The success of Pather Panchali allowed Ray to begin work immediately
on Aparajito (The Unvanquished), also based on a Bandhipadhyaya novel,
which was completed in 1956 and won the Golden Lion award at the 1957
Venice Film Festival. This film is more complex in terms of plot and
characterisation compared to Pather Panchali and set new standards for
Indian cinema actors.
Set in the 1920s, Aparajito begins in the holy city of Benares on the
Ganges where the family, still in shock over Durga’s death, had
moved. Harihar is attempting to maintain Sarbajaya, his wife, and the
10-year-old Apu (Smaran Ghosal) by reciting Hindu scriptures and
selling religious trinkets to pilgrims visiting the holy river. While
the family is still poor and Harihar’s health is declining, he
is happy to be reunited with his wife and son, who is animated and
excited about city life. Tragedy strikes, however, when Harihar
catches a fever and collapses one day after climbing the steps from
the river and dies soon after.
Having lost her husband and only daughter, Sarbajaya decides to
relocate to her uncle’s village in Bengal where Apu resumes his
education at the local school. The central focus of Aparajito is the
changing relationship between Apu (now played by Santi Gupta) and his
mother. The years go by and Apu wins a scholarship to a Calcutta
college and leaves the village. Sarbajaya is proud of her son but
concerned about who will care for her in his absence.
The final part of the film alternates between Apu’s life with
his school friends in Calcutta and what he considers to be boring
vacations in the quiet village with his mother. Apu is unconscious of
his mother’s loneliness and disdainful of village life.
Sarbajaya, who scolds him for not writing to her enough, is torn by
her isolation and the recognition that the young man must make his own
way in the world. As in Pather Panchali, the train is a potent symbol
in the film: for Apu it is his lifeline to the outside world; for
Sarbajaya it is a vehicle of hope that carries Apu back to the village
for his brief vacations.
Ray produced two films— Paras Pathar (The Philosopher’s
Stone) and Jalsaghar (The Music Room) between 1957 and
1959—before deciding to make Apu Sansur (The World Apu) the last
of the trilogy in 1959. In this film Apu (Soumitra Chatterjee), now in
his mid-20s, has given up studying and, although unemployed, harbours
hopes of becoming a writer. Living in a small room near the Calcutta
railway tracks he is persuaded by an old school friend, Pulu (Swapan
Mukherjee), to attend a wedding in the country. The arranged marriage
of Aparna, the young bride, however, is cancelled at the last moment
after her family discovers that the suitor is mentally retarded. A new
groom must be found immediately or, according to tradition, Aparna
(Sharmila Tagore) will be cursed for the rest of her life. Apu is
asked to be the groom and agrees, despite some initial resistance. The
newly married young couple fall in love and move back to Calcutta.
Aparna falls pregnant but tragedy strikes when she dies giving birth
to the child—a baby boy.
Angry and confused, Apu blames the baby for his wife’s death and
refuses to take any responsibility for the child and wanders the
countryside in a state of deep despair. Five years later he decides to
visit his son. Although his in-laws are bitter and the child rejects
him at first, father and son form a bond and Apu resolves to take full
care and responsibility of the young boy.
It is difficult to exaggerate the artistic beauty of the Apu Trilogy,
which has some astonishingly poetic and haunting imagery that
resonates long after specific details of the films’ plots have
faded from the one’s more immediate memory. Apu and
Durga’s discovery of the train outside their village or
Durga’s joyous dance in the first monsoon rains in Pather
Panchali; Sarbajaya’s emotional pain as she tries to come to
terms with her son’s longer absences from home in Aparajito; and
the extraordinary intimacy of the newly-married Apu and Aparna in Apu
Sansar.
Another one of the many indelible moments in Apu Sansar is Apu’s
interview with the manager of a small factory. The job? Handwriting
labels for food jars. The interview concludes and Apu is taken to the
workroom and looks into the dark and dirty hellhole. Nothing is said
and the camera barely moves. The blank gaze of a worker says more than
a thousand words of dialogue, not just about this soul-destroying job,
but the system that produces this misery.
The greatness of these films, however, lie not just in the lyrical
cinematography, honesty of the actors’ performances and the
intense music of Ravi Shankar, but in the universal themes Ray deals
with and his underlying optimism. Despite the extraordinarily tragic
moments in the trilogy, and there are many, Ray always provides a
sense of hope that no matter how great the difficulties confronting
his characters the struggle for genuinely caring human relations can
overcome all adversity. Commenting on the initial success of Pather
Panchali and Aparajito, Ray declared in 1958: “Personally I have
been lucky with my first two films, but what is really important and
exciting is not the immediate gain, but the ultimate vindication of
the belief that I hold dearest as an artist: art wedded to truth must,
in the end, have its rewards.”
Ray’s artistic legacy under attack
It is not possible here to provide a detailed overview of this
director’s cinematic work—the Apu Trilogy was, in fact,
the first of a number of truly great films by Ray on a diverse range
of subjects. Suffice to say, this thoroughly independent director, who
refused to be swayed by commercial considerations, was a
multi-talented artist. He wrote his own scripts, composed most of the
musical soundtracks and was the cinematographer in a number of his
films. He also wrote and illustrated scores of children’s books,
novels, detective stories and science fiction works and was writing up
until his death.
Before he died in 1992, soon after receiving a Lifetime Achievement
Oscar, he had made 29 features and several documentaries chronicling
different phases of Bengali social life and history—stories
about the rural poor, the urban middle classes and the wealthy. These
include: The Goddess (1960), Three Daughters (1961), The Lonely Wife
(1964), The Hero (1966), Days and Nights in the Forest (1969), Distant
Thunder (1973), The Chess Players (1977), The Home and the World
(1984), An Enemy of the People (1989), Branches of the Tree (1991) and
The Stranger (1991).
Rightly regarded as one of the century’s leading film directors
by international critics, Ray encountered many detractors in his own
country. In 1980, former film star and MP Nargis Dutt denounced him in
the Indian parliament for “exporting images of India’s
poverty for foreign audiences”. Ray earned the wrath of Hindu
chauvinists who claimed he was an “Orientalist,” or
Westernised Indian, who had renounced Indian culture.
These crude criticisms coincided with the rise of Hindu
fundamentalists who blame all of India’s social ills on foreign
influences and other religions, and insist that India must become an
exclusivist Hindu state. Today these extremists hold power through the
ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), which has repeatedly sought to
suppress the works of artists, film directors and historians that in
any way cut across or are critical of their right-wing, communalist
view of Indian society.
Such “critics” did not sway Satyajit Ray in the slightest.
Educated by a family who were leading figures in what has been
described as the Bengali renaissance and who campaigned for an end to
the caste system, child marriages, Sati (widow burning) and other
backward practices, Ray had no time for those calling for a Hindu or
nationalist approach to artistic creation.
Ray drew on the highest achievements in human science and culture for
artistic inspiration—from the European enlightenment, Asian
calligraphy, western classical music and the poetry of Rabindranath
Tagore. This progressive and thoroughly inclusive outlook infused all
his work and gave it an unmatched honesty and integrity. He once
commented that great cinema had the ability to “leave its
regional moorings and rise to a plane of universal gestures and
universal emotions”. This is the essential achievement of the
Apu Trilogy and indicates why it is anathema to the Hindu
fundamentalists today.