My collection is offered to any museum with cintract protective stipulations
free
except for transportation costs.
Melvin Fullerton Accredited Artist WVU Creative Art Center WVU Univ.We must
begin a NEW AGE of cultural enlightenment to get out of this deadly social
morass of incivility madness violence of the GUN CULTURE.
This simply has got to be a troll.
I guess Monet and Cezanne were hacks, too. Go ahead, say it; you know you
want to.
*** I find it ironic that you mentioned illiterates.
But besides that, the argument you have stated is one that comes with
a lack of understanding and knowledge of the artists or even a lack of
pathos for art in general. Sure any child could equal the later work of Picasso,
that was exactly what picasso was trying to achieve, the naturalness and
freedom of expression a child has before they are told how to draw
in a linear and unimaginative way. But years of work and experience,
clean draughtsmanship, strength of line, vision for colour, is something
that no child can have until they have sweated long and hard over
a passion that drives them to experiment and stretch the medium
to its boundaries.
My paintings were shown on Norfolk Television
and people agreed that I could out paint Picasso
the best day he ever lived.
*** Norfolk Television? What people?
My collection is offered to any museum with
cintract protective stipulations free
except for transportation costs.
*** I am sure they are queuing up!
One day you will get it.
Seremba
Melvin Fullerton Creative Artist WVU
Melvin Fullerton Artist WVU
Don't we get this same guy every few months?
gg
There's an old story that when visiting an exhibition of children's drawings
Picasso said, " When I was their age, I could draw like Raphael, but it took
me a lifetime to learn to draw like them." I also heard an anecdote that
when one of Picasso's friends lost a painting (in a divorce, I think) by
another famous painting, Picasso told the friend not to worry because he
could faithfully reproduce the work from memory. Which, I think the story
goes, he did. Anyone who can verify that anecdote would earn my deepest
gratitude.
Having read your posts to this newsgroup, I disrespectfully disagree. Your
spelling errors, btw, are just too silly to be believable. I still say
you're a troll, albeit a somewhat amusing one.
>
> Melvin Fullerton Creative Artist WVU
I've got a couple friends over at WVU. I think I'll call them and check up
on this "Creative Artist" title they're handing out these days. Ought to be
good for a few laughs.
Melvin Fullerton Creative Artist WVU age
82 years old.
I notice that for such a talented "creative artist" all your fame comes via
vanity publishing and local access. Do you think when Picasso's Chamber of
Commerce wanted one of his paintings they made him pay for the reproduction?
"MelvinFullerton" <melvinf...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20011008193215...@mb-fd.aol.com...
sweet, isn't he?
--
Paul... (Off to Never Never Land)
-------------------------------------
http://www.geocities.com/dreamst8me/
Melvin, you are positively the most trollish twat I have heard of since
joining this group. 82 years old? Go dribble. maybe fifteen...mental age
I mean.
Melvin Fullerton Accredited Artist WVU Creative Art Center.age 82 years.
Melvin Fullerton Accredited Creative Artist
WVU Creative Art Center age 82 years.
all i could think of was: "alpha returns."
a hearty H67 G56 D78 to you, mr. gamble.
most sincerely,
j r sherman
We Americans buy up phony Egyptian Art
--Boston Museum of Art Spent $10 millions
of tax dollars for a smart Mexicans reproduction of an ancient piece of
Egyptian pottery--
Our so called public museums of American Art are filled with foreign junk--yet
they
call them American Musums of Modern Art
If you have been paying attention to Republican Senator Jesse Helms he has
been fighting this trashing of America's
visual arts for years-if you can understand
it-it aint art--if isnt childish in talent it aint
art--like that "New Sensations" from Britain
in the Public Brooklyn Art Museum
Pisspoor painting of the Catholic religious Icon of the Virgin Mary covered
with Elephant Shit-because a
rich American wanted it done--but not
allowed into Australia.
The Lonely Island
melvin Accredited Creative Artist WVU
age 82 years.
check what out? Apart from how small your brain is? Do you wish me to
visit you and see your works? If you have a website, provide the proof
of your artistic ability.
And of course your name is on the tip of everyone's tongue, where my
local library has half a dozen books on Chagall...and...er, none by you.
Speaking of illiterates, what brings you to a *poetry* newsgroup?
If it's that important to you.
Careful. Rick Frye may show up to comment on your namecalling. Or does he
only reserve such comments for the unpopular?
I love a circus.
Ganging up on eccentrics are what they do when not writing poetry. It's
something akin to a poetry slam. Next time bring the whole team.
Oh shit, don't go telling me I'm popular! Just because people have
stopped biting my head off doesn't mean I'm popular, just regular.
We've all been there and done that, one way or another. Love it or loath
it this is what happens. Are you becoming the next target? You have to
show how vitriolic you can be and promise to accuse someone of being a
faggot and threaten physical violence too.
At my age, regularity is more important than popularity any day.
I would love to be the next target. Do you think if I gave Gigi my phone
number he would call and threaten me? I already know that he's good at
calling names. But that's pretty weak. But then, so is he.
Well, it helps with the piles! :O)
I'm sure some of them can find out your phone number anyway. Pretty
scary really, specially when you look at some of our photos!
Hmmm. Your message gave JR Sherman some ideas. It's good to know that he's
smart enough to use a telephone book. I suppose my ignoring him these past
few weeks has got him feeling left out. The poor man.
Hey, JR. If you're reading this (and we know you are), don't put yourself
through so much trouble. Setting up phony email addresses, writing to people
who'll take you just as seriously as I do -- try working on your poetry
skills instead. Time is a valuable thing, don't you know.
Oops! :O)
Don't feel bad. Someone has to inspire him.
How does it feel to be a muse?
>Hmmm. Your message gave JR Sherman some ideas.
indeed it did. like how much more interesting you were when you were slamming
heroin, michael.
my god how boring you've become.
I always try to a-muse! :O) (Insert groan here)
--
Paul... (Off to Never Never Land)
-------------------------------------
http://www.geocities.com/dreamst8me/
This gibberish from a crack-head who has stated that Chuck is his pillar of
strength.
You're ignorance is showing Monkey-boy and your opinions are worthless, you
rendered them so when you took it up the ass from chuck (in a manner of
speaking) Now I remember why I kill-filed you.you're a fumbling fool. So
screw on the big red nose, slap on the floppy shoes and pull up the baggy
pants, do that which you do so well and dance for the nice people.
Dance monkey boy dance...show us you can speak, show us all.
Gosh, that really hurts my feelings, Michael C. Are you this pleasant in
person?
He takes it up the ass! :O)
Thanks for sharing that, but I'm not really here to discuss anyone's sexual
habits. There are other groups for that.
Note to Chuck: Do you see now the type of person you're letting piss you
off?
Oh god, you were supposed to laugh. How the hell do I know what he does
with his body?
The only time I got pissed at Chcuk was when he invited a bunch of
racists in here.
I know, I know. But to me Michael Cook is just as pathetic as JR Sherman and
a few others here who spend all day on their computers trying to get what
they feel is one step ahead of people like Chuck and Candice. It's nice to
find someone who doesn't go along with all that. Me, I find it hard to laugh
at pathetic people. Which is why it's getting harder to make fun of Gigi.
His pathetic attempts to interfere with my life simply because I'm posting
messages in "his" newsgroup. No job, a diminishing audience. I really do
believe this group is all he has in life.
As for Chuck, I never agreed with a lot of the things he's done here. But
rather than leave him alone to disappear (or to recreate himself into a
better person), the "regulars" just keep fueling him.
Reminds me a little of Sharon McElroy. I don't know if you were posting here
at the time, but she was just some woman who wrote bad poetry and posted it
in a few newsgroups. Then along came Gigi and Joy and JR to ridicule here
out of Usenet. The fact that Jim Sheard has a link on his AAPC site to Joy's
"Nude Whirl of Poultry" site and defends it as "literary parody" shows me
what he's really all about. Sharon McElroy never bothered anyone. She just
wrote bad poetry. If everyone would have ignored her, she would have
disappeared. But some people take too much delight in ridicule.
I wonder, would Sophie, Peter and all the other followers here be so vicious
in real life? I'm no saint, mind you. But I try not to say anything here
that I wouldn't say to someone in person. I doubt the same can be said for
Michael Cook and JR Sherman. In that respect, I think Chuck is better than
both of him. I suspect, right or wrong, he says whatever he wants in real
life.
One question, Paul (and anyone else wants to answer): Did you find it just a
little pathetic that Jim Sheard took the time to count up a week's worth a
posts and catagorize them to show that poetry is still the main topic here?
Politics eh? I find the whole thing pathetic, as in i don't hold truck
with the 'Let's kick the little guy while he's down' mentality. I don't
see what good any of it does. The very fact that the AUP is shoved down
people's throats as an answer when you query the viciousness of some
attacks...well, it's mass bullying. I went through all this not that
long ago, but I got fed up with Chuck's stupid racist tactics as much as
Sherman's egotism and as for Garry, well, his opinions aren't worth
spit.
It would be great if we could all just come on here and have a go,
without the gang attacks, but every playground has it's gang of bullies,
doesn't it.
I have never liked the excuse "The rules say i can do this so I will"
but my response is now, I post, fuck them.
Problem is if you spend all your time arguing with them you don't get
anything else done then you get as bad as them. I found myself spitting
nails with the pettiness of it all.
I knew there was a reason I liked you. This is well said. And lately I've
been abiding by the same philosophy: "I post, fuck them." I know I've been
trying to talk newcomers into finding better forums, but I've been
rethinking that stand as well. Not everyone who posts here on a regular
basis has that old gang mentality (gang=Sophie, Jim, Joy, Gigi, JR Squirmie,
Andrew, Peter, Gnarl, et al). Maybe I'll eventually killfile the whole lot
of them so that, at least on my screen, poetry really will be the main topic
of AAPC. Of course that probably won't keep them from doing what they've
done in the past -- writing complaints to web hosts and ISPs in an attempt
to have me TOSed and my web sites taken down, sending me email with viruses
attached, sending email to my friends... But, children will be children.
Anyway, thanks for the positive influence. You're a pretty good poet too.
I'm looking forward to reading more of your work.
Ciao,
Jean Phillippe
>Anyway, thanks for the positive influence. You're a pretty good poet too.
>I'm looking forward to reading more of your work.
christ, michael, why not just blow him now and get it over with? god knows you
did enough of that in prison.
heh...
>
> I knew there was a reason I liked you. This is well said. And lately I've
> been abiding by the same philosophy: "I post, fuck them." I know I've been
> trying to talk newcomers into finding better forums, but I've been
> rethinking that stand as well. Not everyone who posts here on a regular
> basis has that old gang mentality (gang=Sophie, Jim, Joy, Gigi, JR Squirmie,
> Andrew, Peter, Gnarl, et al). Maybe I'll eventually killfile the whole lot
> of them so that, at least on my screen, poetry really will be the main topic
> of AAPC. Of course that probably won't keep them from doing what they've
> done in the past -- writing complaints to web hosts and ISPs in an attempt
> to have me TOSed and my web sites taken down, sending me email with viruses
> attached, sending email to my friends... But, children will be children.
>
> Anyway, thanks for the positive influence. You're a pretty good poet too.
> I'm looking forward to reading more of your work.
>
> Ciao,
>
> Jean Phillippe
Look mate, less of the flattery and just remember the old adage, "Don't
let the bastards grind you down." :O)
--
Paul... (Silently Bad Minded)
-------------------------------------
http://www.geocities.com/dreamst8me/
> I know, I know. But to me Michael Cook is just as pathetic as JR Sherman
I'll take that as a complement.
and
> a few others here who spend all day on their computers trying to get what
> they feel is one step ahead of people like Chuck and Candice.
Wrong, read my posts to your hero from two months ago, read my posts to
Candice.
It's nice to
> find someone who doesn't go along with all that. Me, I find it hard to
laugh
> at pathetic people. Which is why it's getting harder to make fun of Gigi.
> His pathetic attempts to interfere with my life simply because I'm posting
> messages in "his" newsgroup. No job, a diminishing audience. I really do
> believe this group is all he has in life.
Crybaby.
>
> As for Chuck, I never agreed with a lot of the things he's done here. But
> rather than leave him alone to disappear (or to recreate himself into a
> better person), the "regulars" just keep fueling him.
Wrong again, chuck lights all his own fires, he gathers his own wood.
>
> Reminds me a little of Sharon McElroy. I don't know if you were posting
here
> at the time, but she was just some woman who wrote bad poetry and posted
it
> in a few newsgroups. Then along came Gigi and Joy and JR to ridicule here
> out of Usenet. The fact that Jim Sheard has a link on his AAPC site to
Joy's
> "Nude Whirl of Poultry" site and defends it as "literary parody" shows me
> what he's really all about. Sharon McElroy never bothered anyone. She just
> wrote bad poetry. If everyone would have ignored her, she would have
> disappeared. But some people take too much delight in ridicule.
Get over it, move on. I hate a whiney person.
>
> I wonder, would Sophie, Peter and all the other followers here be so
vicious
> in real life? I'm no saint, mind you. But I try not to say anything here
> that I wouldn't say to someone in person. I doubt the same can be said for
> Michael Cook and JR Sherman. In that respect, I think Chuck is better than
> both of him. I suspect, right or wrong, he says whatever he wants in real
> life.
You know me, have we meet? Actually I probably wouldn't have much to say to
a person like you as I do not care for the company of well; people such as
yourself
>
> One question, Paul (and anyone else wants to answer): Did you find it just
a
> little pathetic that Jim Sheard took the time to count up a week's worth a
> posts and catagorize them to show that poetry is still the main topic
here?
What as asshole, you are as phony as chuck.
Well, it wasn't insincere. But people like you, Basil and a few others do
give me a reason to continue reading this group.
Gracias.
Jean-Phillippe
The difference is that I'm just a few miles away. So if you ever feel the
need to do more than post these brave little comebacks, let me know. It's
safer, I know, calling people names in a newsgroup. But it can't be very
satisfying.
I won't hold my breath.
Michael C <co...@mw.mediaone23.net> wrote in message
news:3dcB7.28254$Gd6.6...@typhoon.mw.mediaone.net...