Re: yitzhak in eretz isreal (sic) Is A Make-Believe Jew
DVH
"Jon�" <ray...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:651308ba-acb0-4427...@m25g2000yqc.googlegroups.com...
> There was a DVH who loved high places
Hendecasyllable. Common in Sapphic poetry. You trying to tell us something?
> He would climb mountains without his braces
Hexameter, but not very heroic.
> �Cos when he reached the peaks-- he had hopes
9.
Whatever
> That Yitzhak would give him several-- pokes
9 again. This must be modern poetry.
> Whist he was bending down tying his laces!
11. More Sapphic preoccupations.
Well, all in all, I'd say your grasp exceeded your reach. It's not a bad
effort though. The kitsch vulgarity works well, and you give a convincing
impression of a halfwit.
Jon°
"and you give a convincing
impression of a halfwit".
________________________________________------------
Better then your impression of a "fuckwit"!
You wouldn’t have replied if it hadn’t gone home.
Happy climbing, don’t fall for Yitzhak and keep your rear well
protected from the cold "hiv" you comprehend me?
DVH
On Jan 2, 5:24 pm, "DVH" <d...@vhvhvhvh.com> wrote:
"and you give a convincing
impression of a halfwit".
________________________________________------------
> Better then your impression of a "fuckwit"!
Yes, considerably better.
>
> You wouldn�t have replied if it hadn�t gone home.
I reply to you only in the hope you'll say something more idiotic than the
last time. So far I haven't been disappointed.
>
> Happy climbing, don�t fall for Yitzhak and keep your rear well
> protected from the cold "hiv" you comprehend me?
Yes, I understand your preoccupations well. Nobody's judging you for your
perceived weaknesses though.
DVH
On Jan 2, 5:49 pm, "DVH" <d...@vhvhvhvh.com> wrote:
> "Jon " <rays...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
> the fake Jew Yitzhak uses.
> I really don't enjoy warring with you,
We're not warring - I'm leading you round by the nose. *That's* what you're
not enjoying.
> you are too dumb and stupid to
> really make a good adversary.
Poor old Jon. Practically everyone's given you a kicking these past couple
of days. Let's hope it doesn't continue all the way through 2010.
yitzhak in eretz isreal (sic)
> "Some Nazi Wanker <ray...@yahoo.co.uk> Snivelled:
>> you are too dumb and stupid to really make a good adversary.
> Poor old Jon. Practically everyone's given you a kicking these past
> couple of days.
It's not like he makes it difficult for us, though...
> Let's hope it doesn't continue all the way through 2010.
Was that 'doesn't' intentional....? :-P
Y.
--
Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein
AADP's 'left-wing Israeli intellectual'
'I love California. I practically grew up in Phoenix'
(Dan Quayle)
<http://elderofziyon.blogspot.com/>
DVH
"yitzhak in eretz isreal (sic)" <yit...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:034f8400$0$1289$c3e...@news.astraweb.com...
> On 2010-01-02, DVH <d...@vhvhvhvh.com> wrote:
>> "Some Nazi Wanker <ray...@yahoo.co.uk> Snivelled:
>
>>> you are too dumb and stupid to really make a good adversary.
>
>> Poor old Jon. Practically everyone's given you a kicking these past
>> couple of days.
>
> It's not like he makes it difficult for us, though...
He's nice like that.
>
>> Let's hope it doesn't continue all the way through 2010.
>
> Was that 'doesn't' intentional....? :-P
I fully believe that the cosmos has written his destiny already. Anything I
say will have no effect on what is foretold for Jon.
Andy
Both of their enemies are women.
This can be achieved by the British and Israeli elites destroying
families and perverting linages to ensure women are kept down and the
value of money kept up.
Including royalty and family business.
I have no problem with genetic and spiritual love match - i.e.
sexuality and personality , even arranged marriage for business
reasons as long as it is fully consensual- i.e. not forced. That
would produce an heir to the throne. Same goes for adoption, if the
monarch wishes to adopt a successor, as long as it is their adoption
by choice and made legal by their government, and supported by their
subjects.
All produce linages that are legitimate heirs. Male interference in
the throne lineage creates bastard linages. What you might call not-
love children i.e. forced marriage, violent marriage , rape etc etc.
Racial supremacy is just another word for male supremacy. Women have
had enough. Some jobs are done better by one sex, some by the other.
Why not let people be themselves and follow God or Destiny , whatever
they choose to call it.
If we can't extend this right to our royals, we don't have a nation in
the true sense because the monarch will not sit on the throne. The
issue concerns more QE1 than QE2, who I feel personally a lot of
sympathy with, as with her son Charles.
hello goodbye nevermind
just wondering.
is it some aapc'r crossposting?
do i need to go in and dig to find out what gives?
how about i just say this:
POETRY COMMENTS
did that help?
dipshits
DVH
"hello goodbye nevermind" <inoneearand...@home.com> wrote in
message news:Ry40n.15850$0U1....@newsfe16.iad...
> how did upm get mixed up with aapc?
>
> just wondering.
>
> is it some aapc'r crossposting?
>
> do i need to go in and dig to find out what gives?
>
> how about i just say this:
>
> POETRY COMMENTS
You get so many poetry comments in aapc. No wonder this thread stood out.
Lou Ravi
He's got a point though. You added the group as far as I can see and added
it again in a reply to someone who removed it. Is it that you are so proud
of your occasional doggerel that you wish to elicit comments on it?
DVH
"Lou Ravi" <j.mu...@libertysurf.fr> wrote in message
news:4b40f05a$0$894$ba4a...@news.orange.fr...
Yup.
Lou Ravi
> 'hello goodbye nevermind' wrote thus:
Wasn't it meant to be poetry?
Lou Ravi
OK, that's fine by me. As long as there is a good reason for crossposting.
I've never visited aapc so I couldn't pass an opinion on their critical
capacities, I suspect though that it would bore the pants off me. I always
find poetry people far too earnest, though have nothing against poetry per
se.
DVH
They might be pleased about that.
> I always
> find poetry people far too earnest,
Do you know a lot of poetry people?
> though have nothing against poetry per
> se.
I'm sure it's relieved to hear that.
Lou Ravi
Not patricularly but I occasional come across 'Poetry now' (?) on Radio 4.
It tends to make me laugh, as well as boring me, because the master of
ceremonies (for want of a better term) always puts on a sort of sepulchral
voice as if he is in a church or something and talking about the word of
god. Completely ridiculous.
>> though have nothing against poetry per
>> se.
>
> I'm sure it's relieved to hear that.
I hope so and they won't have to fear me starting an Anti-Poetry Liberation
Front (linked, of course, to al-Qaeda).