Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Help!!!! San Francisco Art Gallery

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Stephen Copley

unread,
Nov 17, 1999, 3:00:00 AM11/17/99
to
I'm looking for an art gallery by the name of Harcourt in the San Francisco
area. I know it existed in the seventies and I am wondering if it's still
around. If you know of it please send me an email at
ste...@theartistcolony.com

Thanks in advance
Stephen

Andrew Werby

unread,
Nov 24, 1999, 3:00:00 AM11/24/99
to

Stephen Copley wrote in message ...
[I wrote the following about two years ago, but I'm still wondering about
the issue raised- when a gallery is going under, how does its retention of
money from the sale of consignment art differ from ordinary theft?
Apparently there is a distinction in the law- there was never any criminal
prosecution in this or any similar case. If you ask a cop (I did, once, when
this happened to me) signing that consignment contract is the same as giving
your art away, as far as they are concerned.]

I read an interesting article in the current issue of the S.F. Weekly;
about the famous, prestigious Harcourt's gallery, formerly a major player in
the local art scene, going out of business recently. Apparently the gallery
had been selling consigned art right up to the end, but had for months
neglected to inform the artists or other owners of the sales, or (needless
to say) to send any checks. Such local luminaries as John Battenberg, Bruce
Beasly, and Nancy Genn were stuck for amounts ranging into the thousands of
dollars. Their prospects of recovering more than a token amount from the
bankruptcy proceedings look dim. Unusually for a case of this type, the
District Attorney's office is mulling criminal charges against the owner,
for fraudulently "selling out of trust". While generally cases like this are
considered civil matters, apparently it can, under certain circumstances, be
a criminal offense to misappropriate art entrusted to one as a consignee.
The conditions that must be met to prove criminal intent in a matter like
this seem vague and hard to prove, and the article did not go into detail on
this point. Are there any legal types out there who can explain the
difference between civil misappropriation and criminal theft in a case like
this? California law applies, which I understand is more protective of
artist's rights than that of most states.

Andrew Werby
http://unitedartworks.com

0 new messages