Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Re: Impeachment! [Tard] Phoenix
2 views
Skip to first unread message
CastAlone
Aug 6, 2012, 9:08:34 PM8/6/12
to
[Tor]<---------------tin-hat (tin-god tosser) derbysh(i)re <FN...@AltUsenetKooks.com>
in <jvojla$26t$3 @news.mixmin.net> denied his claim provenance with:
>CastAlone, in <news:jvoaam$ntc$5...@speranza.aioe.org> did thusly write:
>
>> [Tor]<---------------tin-hat (tin-god tosser) derbysh(i)re <FN...@AltUsenetKooks.com>
>> in <jvngvk$5vr$10 @news.mixmin.net> - bone in lip sync - wagged tail with:
/..\
>>>What say you, Melty? Caught in yet another lie, the congenital liar
>>>Murphy will yet again try to screed his way out of his screed-dug
>>>hole, rather than own up to his misdeeds.
>>>
>>><wriggle out escape hatch>
>>
>> perhaps your "Murphy" will, who knows [shrug]
>>
>> let us just deal with your socks claim?
>> you quoted;
>> "CastAlone here, who posted photos of
>> someone's home that he stalked?"
>> _y o u_ **now write** "Murphy" is responsible for
>> something _you_ claim is a misdeed (a view that is
>> another argument all together).
>>
>> so which is it?
>>
>> feeding your allegations is pointless.
>
>Sez the Insane Loser Kook, who goes on to "feed the allegations".
>
being obtuse does become you...another derbysh(i)re attribute, ball
polisher <------------------ "bitrot" alert!
>Obsesso-kook just couldn't help but screed.
>
><sniggle><---------------raging delusion noted
>
>> i will say this...i am of the belief the poster you are looking at did
>> not post the original link either. also...reading this comment
>> from another user i am not so sure the poster you are pointing
>> at is not just another sock of yours, or someone mimicking your
>> "thoolen" pretend bot.
[link restored]
MID: <Hc6Tr.24110$Yf7.10887 @newsfe16.iad>
>
>Jesus Christ, did you just say that you and I are the same person?
>
you will need to explain that conclusion...to every reader, i wager.
>Holy fuck, you'll go to any length to weasel out of a bootfuck, eh?
>
sez the idiot with more dents in the tinhat than Cannonball Joe!
>Ugghh, I feel so... dirty. Being equated to you is like being equated
>to a festering pool of dog diarrhea.
>
is it all possible for you to participate in at least one thread without
dragging your hawt ("hot") "wife" in as a defense, Cap'n K00k?
http://www.freeimagehosting.net/u54dd
>> in short..in _thorough_ research of a target one discovers many
>> things, some of note, others just backfill.
>
>Yeah, in *thorough* *research*... yours, however, is a mad scrambling
>about through the Google archives, randomly cutting-and-pasting
>non-connected posts then manufacturing the 'evidence' needed to tie
>them together, or foregoing that altogether and just making the
>unsubstantiated claim that they're connected, with not a wit of
>evidence.
>
it is well past time you got off that merry-go-round.
nobody bought your spin into hyperbolic rhetoric.
not even the latest "newcomer" m'sieur Rancini.
MID: <jvlt05$bdt$1 @news.albasani.net>
for the record, again...the greater part of instances i have and will
refer to are still on mainstream servers today. HK and google search
simply provide a sometimes convenient method of referral for those
with no access to MID.
some of the most relevant items are now stored in
[alt.paul-derbyshire.fix.it.now] quite easily forwarded to any
news group, REF intact.
there is all that is needed to tie your derbysh(i)re lame ass to
the whipping post.
/...\
>
>How many times have I stated, "I'm just a big dumb boy who likes to
>butt heads online"?
>
nail/hammer/head
>You're an Insane Loser Kook.
>
>> all these are avenues i could have researched more, i did not.
>> that lapse of attention (what i call a sane decision) does not then
>> preclude me from mentioning fragments
>> (as off topic fragments) when ever and however i choose to.
>> the abstract utterance is not a lie, it is simply disinterest.
>
>It is simply that the information didn't fit in with your kooky
>world-view, so you discarded it after trying mightily to meld, bend
>and batter it into your frame of reference.
>
most accurate projection of the very method you use
in lame attempts to discredit the record.
>A poster some years ago told you something along these lines:
>You cannot fit the data to your own perceptions and assertions, you
>must find the data that supports reality, to bolster your assertions.
>
that's a cite?
null it is, without attribution.
myself recognizing of course the paraphrase is a
common enough trait in many a wild allegation.
>Obviously, you've not learned that lesson.
>
errr...likely around three street blocks in front of
you, whipping boi [eVhuLG]
>> now...i know i read who posted the original image you hang to
>> in your paranoia. if i found it you can find it.
>> hop tuit!
>> ("murphy" alert)
>> <guffaw>
>
>Huh? There's a reason I call you Insane Loser Kook, Insane Loser Kook.
>
>But in the depths of your insanity, you'll not be able to discern that
>reason.
>
i am comfortable with it...all "par for the course" in bringing
the goat to the killing floor.
><sniggle>
oH yes, indeed...
in my experience a body so profoundly damaged in having their
quote lampooned would busy themselves in justification.
i cite...again;
>> you quoted;
>> "CastAlone here, who posted photos of
>> someone's home that he stalked?"
but no, not you, you choose to throw a tizzy fit, foaming the joint up!
MID: <jvpeqi$oj7$1 @news.mixmin.net>
MID: <jvpeqk$oj9$1 @news.mixmin.net>
MID: <jvpeql$oj7$2 @news.mixmin.net>
as this post is going to be archived for posterity the MID links have
been crippled, denying the google munge.
now, myself i would have just assumed a body as intelligent as
you would want a wider audience to believe you are, would have
noticed the glaring anomaly within the post you rely on, in comparison to
how i stow links, but no, once again it is necessary to drive your eyeballs
into the screen before you even come close to "getting it".
your hinge-pin post again...stowed: MID: <j57aqp$ne$1 @speranza.aioe.org>
btw...you missed the client line in that post?
"User-Agent: WinVN 0.99.12z (x86 32bit)"
there is a windows� mail client, no?
your very recent demonstration of your client's failure to recognise a
sig delimiter; MID: <jvoaeq$ntc$6 @speranza.aioe.org>
AND
the fact your posts are devoid of a line count in xOVER, would get some
kookoligists very excited, in full knowledge these are two prime
fingerprints in using windows� embedded news reading software.
oh yes, of course...silly silly insane me..it is a "coincidence"!
oH Dear, oH My MY...
there is that ever pervading escape hatch again....
[slaps the forehead]
--
[footnote]
for those coming in late and missing out on the funnin'
in; MID: <jvn4an$7s2$1 @speranza.aioe.org>
the vidieo mentioned is now here;
https://rapidshare.com/files/1635624984/TardHawtWifeFishin_CampusKapers.avi
having served it's purpose as a "honeypot" the
work is now redundant. there may be those
wondering?
overview: the video contains a parody of the tingod
"Cap'n Kook" (Tor Phoenix) engaging with his
hawt "wife", the message IT has been trolled, and
some floor action on campus....is all.
fair warning to those with a delicate stomach for
frank nudity and adult themes in copulation.
in <jvojla$26t$3 @news.mixmin.net> denied his claim provenance with:
>CastAlone, in <news:jvoaam$ntc$5...@speranza.aioe.org> did thusly write:
>
>> [Tor]<---------------tin-hat (tin-god tosser) derbysh(i)re <FN...@AltUsenetKooks.com>
>> in <jvngvk$5vr$10 @news.mixmin.net> - bone in lip sync - wagged tail with:
/..\
>>>What say you, Melty? Caught in yet another lie, the congenital liar
>>>Murphy will yet again try to screed his way out of his screed-dug
>>>hole, rather than own up to his misdeeds.
>>>
>>><wriggle out escape hatch>
>>
>> perhaps your "Murphy" will, who knows [shrug]
>>
>> let us just deal with your socks claim?
>> you quoted;
>> "CastAlone here, who posted photos of
>> someone's home that he stalked?"
>> _y o u_ **now write** "Murphy" is responsible for
>> something _you_ claim is a misdeed (a view that is
>> another argument all together).
>>
>> so which is it?
>>
>> feeding your allegations is pointless.
>
>Sez the Insane Loser Kook, who goes on to "feed the allegations".
>
being obtuse does become you...another derbysh(i)re attribute, ball
polisher <------------------ "bitrot" alert!
>Obsesso-kook just couldn't help but screed.
>
><sniggle><---------------raging delusion noted
>
>> i will say this...i am of the belief the poster you are looking at did
>> not post the original link either. also...reading this comment
>> from another user i am not so sure the poster you are pointing
>> at is not just another sock of yours, or someone mimicking your
>> "thoolen" pretend bot.
[link restored]
MID: <Hc6Tr.24110$Yf7.10887 @newsfe16.iad>
>
>Jesus Christ, did you just say that you and I are the same person?
>
you will need to explain that conclusion...to every reader, i wager.
>Holy fuck, you'll go to any length to weasel out of a bootfuck, eh?
>
sez the idiot with more dents in the tinhat than Cannonball Joe!
>Ugghh, I feel so... dirty. Being equated to you is like being equated
>to a festering pool of dog diarrhea.
>
is it all possible for you to participate in at least one thread without
dragging your hawt ("hot") "wife" in as a defense, Cap'n K00k?
http://www.freeimagehosting.net/u54dd
>> in short..in _thorough_ research of a target one discovers many
>> things, some of note, others just backfill.
>
>Yeah, in *thorough* *research*... yours, however, is a mad scrambling
>about through the Google archives, randomly cutting-and-pasting
>non-connected posts then manufacturing the 'evidence' needed to tie
>them together, or foregoing that altogether and just making the
>unsubstantiated claim that they're connected, with not a wit of
>evidence.
>
it is well past time you got off that merry-go-round.
nobody bought your spin into hyperbolic rhetoric.
not even the latest "newcomer" m'sieur Rancini.
MID: <jvlt05$bdt$1 @news.albasani.net>
for the record, again...the greater part of instances i have and will
refer to are still on mainstream servers today. HK and google search
simply provide a sometimes convenient method of referral for those
with no access to MID.
some of the most relevant items are now stored in
[alt.paul-derbyshire.fix.it.now] quite easily forwarded to any
news group, REF intact.
there is all that is needed to tie your derbysh(i)re lame ass to
the whipping post.
/...\
>
>How many times have I stated, "I'm just a big dumb boy who likes to
>butt heads online"?
>
nail/hammer/head
>You're an Insane Loser Kook.
>
>> all these are avenues i could have researched more, i did not.
>> that lapse of attention (what i call a sane decision) does not then
>> preclude me from mentioning fragments
>> (as off topic fragments) when ever and however i choose to.
>> the abstract utterance is not a lie, it is simply disinterest.
>
>It is simply that the information didn't fit in with your kooky
>world-view, so you discarded it after trying mightily to meld, bend
>and batter it into your frame of reference.
>
most accurate projection of the very method you use
in lame attempts to discredit the record.
>A poster some years ago told you something along these lines:
>You cannot fit the data to your own perceptions and assertions, you
>must find the data that supports reality, to bolster your assertions.
>
that's a cite?
null it is, without attribution.
myself recognizing of course the paraphrase is a
common enough trait in many a wild allegation.
>Obviously, you've not learned that lesson.
>
errr...likely around three street blocks in front of
you, whipping boi [eVhuLG]
>> now...i know i read who posted the original image you hang to
>> in your paranoia. if i found it you can find it.
>> hop tuit!
>> ("murphy" alert)
>> <guffaw>
>
>Huh? There's a reason I call you Insane Loser Kook, Insane Loser Kook.
>
>But in the depths of your insanity, you'll not be able to discern that
>reason.
>
i am comfortable with it...all "par for the course" in bringing
the goat to the killing floor.
><sniggle>
oH yes, indeed...
in my experience a body so profoundly damaged in having their
quote lampooned would busy themselves in justification.
i cite...again;
>> you quoted;
>> "CastAlone here, who posted photos of
>> someone's home that he stalked?"
but no, not you, you choose to throw a tizzy fit, foaming the joint up!
MID: <jvpeqi$oj7$1 @news.mixmin.net>
MID: <jvpeqk$oj9$1 @news.mixmin.net>
MID: <jvpeql$oj7$2 @news.mixmin.net>
as this post is going to be archived for posterity the MID links have
been crippled, denying the google munge.
now, myself i would have just assumed a body as intelligent as
you would want a wider audience to believe you are, would have
noticed the glaring anomaly within the post you rely on, in comparison to
how i stow links, but no, once again it is necessary to drive your eyeballs
into the screen before you even come close to "getting it".
your hinge-pin post again...stowed: MID: <j57aqp$ne$1 @speranza.aioe.org>
btw...you missed the client line in that post?
"User-Agent: WinVN 0.99.12z (x86 32bit)"
there is a windows� mail client, no?
your very recent demonstration of your client's failure to recognise a
sig delimiter; MID: <jvoaeq$ntc$6 @speranza.aioe.org>
AND
the fact your posts are devoid of a line count in xOVER, would get some
kookoligists very excited, in full knowledge these are two prime
fingerprints in using windows� embedded news reading software.
oh yes, of course...silly silly insane me..it is a "coincidence"!
oH Dear, oH My MY...
there is that ever pervading escape hatch again....
[slaps the forehead]
--
[footnote]
for those coming in late and missing out on the funnin'
in; MID: <jvn4an$7s2$1 @speranza.aioe.org>
the vidieo mentioned is now here;
https://rapidshare.com/files/1635624984/TardHawtWifeFishin_CampusKapers.avi
having served it's purpose as a "honeypot" the
work is now redundant. there may be those
wondering?
overview: the video contains a parody of the tingod
"Cap'n Kook" (Tor Phoenix) engaging with his
hawt "wife", the message IT has been trolled, and
some floor action on campus....is all.
fair warning to those with a delicate stomach for
frank nudity and adult themes in copulation.
0 new messages