> Before I click on what may be a large file, could you elaborate what these > "interesting" (I presume) ideas might be?
I rather enjoyed the article, I have always appreciated Saarinen's work. His chapel at MIT is excellent, but the domed auditorium adjacent has had acoustical and roofing problems and since it opened. While you can hardly hear the person on the stage, a whisper on one side of the audience can be heard on the other side. EDS
Secretia Green wrote: >>Before I click on what may be a large file, could you elaborate what these >>"interesting" (I presume) ideas might be?
>Anal.
Thanks for the heads up. I'll give the site a miss. If people are too lazy to talk about it, then the site isn't worth the trouble or the site is trouble.
>>>Before I click on what may be a large file, could you elaborate what >>>these "interesting" (I presume) ideas might be?
>>Anal.
> Thanks for the heads up. I'll give the site a miss. If people are too > lazy to talk about it, then the site isn't worth the trouble or the site > is trouble.
The site was nice. ++'s comments were anal. Kris got it, but thought it was directed at him. Then again, maybe it's a conspiracy to get ++ to click the deadly link....
>>>>Before I click on what may be a large file, could you elaborate what >>>>these "interesting" (I presume) ideas might be?
>>>Anal.
>>Thanks for the heads up. I'll give the site a miss. If people are too >>lazy to talk about it, then the site isn't worth the trouble or the site >>is trouble.
Didn't click. No incentive. No discussion. No decription. No click
>The site was nice. ++'s comments were anal. Kris got it, but thought it >was directed at him. >Then again, maybe it's a conspiracy to get ++ to click the deadly link....
>> Before I click on what may be a large file, could you elaborate what >> these "interesting" (I presume) ideas might be?
> I rather enjoyed the article, I have always appreciated Saarinen's > work. His chapel at MIT is excellent, but the domed auditorium > adjacent has had acoustic