Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Trials of Mary
0 views
Skip to first unread message
RENEW-INC
Oct 26, 1994, 12:40:14 AM10/26/94
to
Thomas Parker <par...@commodities.com> writes:
>In article <38gf9m$l...@newsbf01.news.aol.com> Adel23, ade...@aol.com writes:
>> Tommie, get a life and stop shooting at trolls and flame-bait; you kept
>> us in stitches for two days, man!
>
>Maybe I'M the newbie, but who posts flame-bait in a FLAME newsgroup? Then
>again, maybe you should set your sights a little higher...
>
>thomas
Who goes hunting for ducks where there are ducks?
Steven Sugar, MD
RENEW Inc.
>In article <38gf9m$l...@newsbf01.news.aol.com> Adel23, ade...@aol.com writes:
>> Tommie, get a life and stop shooting at trolls and flame-bait; you kept
>> us in stitches for two days, man!
>
>Maybe I'M the newbie, but who posts flame-bait in a FLAME newsgroup? Then
>again, maybe you should set your sights a little higher...
>
>thomas
Who goes hunting for ducks where there are ducks?
Steven Sugar, MD
RENEW Inc.
RENEW-INC
Oct 26, 1994, 12:54:41 AM10/26/94
to
Tom Finley <tfi...@en.com> writes:
> Flame bait? Those five thousand posts you write? Those were
>actually misguilded attempts to make a point. Of course every one
>was wrong... I can tell the difference between flame-bait and an
>attempt to make a point.
Tom-
Adel23 *had* to be a troll. Her (his?) posts seem to range
from IQ 75 to IQ 160. Or maybe Adel23 was a "they." But
no way did one person write the pabulum about "chicken
masturbation" and later post an extremly subtle (but
correct) analogy, all in an attempt to "make a point"
about the superiority of AOL.
To be quite candid, Adel23 seemed to be having
quite a few chuckles for two days. "Her" AOL profile
I think explains the motivation. All in all, it
was better than network TV (including some of the
sports!) this weekend.
Peace,
Steven Sugar, MD
> Flame bait? Those five thousand posts you write? Those were
>actually misguilded attempts to make a point. Of course every one
>was wrong... I can tell the difference between flame-bait and an
>attempt to make a point.
Tom-
Adel23 *had* to be a troll. Her (his?) posts seem to range
from IQ 75 to IQ 160. Or maybe Adel23 was a "they." But
no way did one person write the pabulum about "chicken
masturbation" and later post an extremly subtle (but
correct) analogy, all in an attempt to "make a point"
about the superiority of AOL.
To be quite candid, Adel23 seemed to be having
quite a few chuckles for two days. "Her" AOL profile
I think explains the motivation. All in all, it
was better than network TV (including some of the
sports!) this weekend.
Peace,
Steven Sugar, MD
DawnMcG MD
Oct 29, 1994, 6:36:07 PM10/29/94
to
In article <5kz1Svm.s...@delphi.com>, RENEW-INC
<steve...@delphi.com> writes:
<steve...@delphi.com> writes:
@Thomas Parker <par...@commodities.com> writes:
@ >In article <38gf9m$l...@newsbf01.news.aol.com> Adel23, ade...@aol.com
writes:
@ >> Tommie, get a life and stop shooting at trolls and flame-bait; you
kept
@ >> us in stitches for two days, man!
@ >
@ >Maybe I'M the newbie, but who posts flame-bait in a FLAME newsgroup? @
Then
@ >again, maybe you should set your sights a little higher...
@ >
@ >thomas
@Who goes hunting for ducks where there are ducks?
Migosh, you alt.suckers sure have a lot of time on your
hands.
--------------Witch Sara
--------------THE TIME IS NOW (-1 HOUR) EST
0 new messages