Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

The death of Net Chauvinists

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Errol Flynn

unread,
Oct 28, 1994, 7:54:10 PM10/28/94
to
In article <38rkmo$o...@news.cerf.net> Tom Wark <mr...@cerf.net> choked out:

>All you net dwellers have
>realized that you time is limited.

If it's not the internet, it will be something else, don;t kid yourself.


>You had this world to yourselves for a long time. And like the deal
>making politicians who decided elections and candidate selection in smoky
>back rooms, you enjoyed the feeling of power, of having a club of your
>own. Now, witht he publicizing of the net, and the advance of common
>folk into your world, you realized the gig is up. The public has decided
>to take advantage of a public service: the net. It is no longer your
>club, and you net chauvinists are in the denial stage, which is often
>accompanied by the whining stage.

No, its the intellectual pursuants who are sighing and trying to do something
about the riff-raff who have accidentally found the doorway into our house.


>It will take a while, but eventually all you people who choose to flame
>the AOLers due to their poor use of the english language, their
>inappropriate posts, and all the other rediculous justifications will
>find your world invaded by those to whom the net should really belong:
>common folk.

The net is overused, overpublisized and already taxed to the hilt. If you
want to flood it, cough up some tax money to the gov't and get them to build a
new one for you Chuckleheads wasting bandwidth.

>You AOLers amuse me. I must say, I did get a chuckle or two out of
>reading all your posts. But generally, they reminded me of the polemics
>of a small group of people being overcome by circumstances and who are
>unable to adapt and fear to even try. The death of the net chauvinists
>is near.

Polemics, MY are we feeling literate tonight!? Chauvanists my ass, there just
seems to be an open policy for bullshit now.

Tom Wark

unread,
Oct 28, 1994, 3:50:47 PM10/28/94
to


Having finally gotten through a long, long list of articles by Net
chauvinists decrying the arrival of AOLers, and having suffered at
reading far too many articles by net dwellers who seem to have a
vocabulary limited to "fuck, shit, asshole, etc., I believe I have
finally figured out what is happening. All you net dwellers have


realized that you time is limited.

You had this world to yourselves for a long time. And like the deal


making politicians who decided elections and candidate selection in smoky
back rooms, you enjoyed the feeling of power, of having a club of your
own. Now, witht he publicizing of the net, and the advance of common
folk into your world, you realized the gig is up. The public has decided
to take advantage of a public service: the net. It is no longer your
club, and you net chauvinists are in the denial stage, which is often
accompanied by the whining stage.

It will take a while, but eventually all you people who choose to flame


the AOLers due to their poor use of the english language, their
inappropriate posts, and all the other rediculous justifications will
find your world invaded by those to whom the net should really belong:
common folk.

You AOLers amuse me. I must say, I did get a chuckle or two out of


reading all your posts. But generally, they reminded me of the polemics
of a small group of people being overcome by circumstances and who are
unable to adapt and fear to even try. The death of the net chauvinists
is near.

Cheers...

Tom...

Tom Finley

unread,
Oct 29, 1994, 7:20:58 AM10/29/94
to
Tom Wark (mr...@cerf.net) wrote:

: Having finally gotten through a long, long list of articles by Net


: chauvinists decrying the arrival of AOLers, and having suffered at
: reading far too many articles by net dwellers who seem to have a
: vocabulary limited to "fuck, shit, asshole, etc., I believe I have
: finally figured out what is happening. All you net dwellers have
: realized that you time is limited.

Please. Do you see that in my messages? No? I didn't think
so.

: You had this world to yourselves for a long time. And like the deal


: making politicians who decided elections and candidate selection in smoky
: back rooms, you enjoyed the feeling of power, of having a club of your
: own. Now, witht he publicizing of the net, and the advance of common
: folk into your world, you realized the gig is up. The public has decided
: to take advantage of a public service: the net. It is no longer your
: club, and you net chauvinists are in the denial stage, which is often
: accompanied by the whining stage.

I think I'm going to kill you (kill as in kill things he writes-
don't hurt me netcopper!).

: It will take a while, but eventually all you people who choose to flame


: the AOLers due to their poor use of the english language, their
: inappropriate posts, and all the other rediculous justifications will
: find your world invaded by those to whom the net should really belong:
: common folk.

The net doesn't belong to anyone. And if it did guess who it
would belong to? The people that created it.

: You AOLers amuse me. I must say, I did get a chuckle or two out of


: reading all your posts. But generally, they reminded me of the polemics
: of a small group of people being overcome by circumstances and who are
: unable to adapt and fear to even try. The death of the net chauvinists
: is near.

Prepare for the journey into my kill file.
--
Tom Finley
tfi...@en.com

Ian Blackburn

unread,
Oct 29, 1994, 3:27:33 PM10/29/94
to
In article <erolflyn.3...@mcs.com> Errol Flynn, erol...@mcs.com
writes:

>No, its the intellectual pursuants who are sighing and trying to do
something
>about the riff-raff who have accidentally found the doorway into our
house.

PHHHHHHH##!

Spatch

unread,
Oct 30, 1994, 1:10:52 AM10/30/94
to
In article <38rkmo$o...@news.cerf.net>, Tom Wark <mr...@cerf.net> wrote:

Mr. Cerf, your answer, please.

>
>
>
>Having finally gotten through a long, long list of articles by Net
>chauvinists decrying the arrival of AOLers, and having suffered at
>reading far too many articles by net dwellers who seem to have a
>vocabulary limited to "fuck, shit, asshole, etc., I believe I have
>finally figured out what is happening. All you net dwellers have
>realized that you time is limited.

GRAMMAR-METER SAT QUESTION:

Where should the second quotation mark (missing from the above paragraph)
be placed?

A. etc.,
B. what is happening.
C. time is limited.
D. none of the above (preferably the end of the post)

>
>You had this world to yourselves for a long time. And like the deal
>making politicians who decided elections and candidate selection in smoky
>back rooms, you enjoyed the feeling of power, of having a club of your
>own. Now, witht he publicizing of the net, and the advance of common
>folk into your world, you realized the gig is up. The public has decided
>to take advantage of a public service: the net. It is no longer your
>club, and you net chauvinists are in the denial stage, which is often
>accompanied by the whining stage.

You're the one calling them "Common Folk".

>
>It will take a while, but eventually all you people who choose to flame
>the AOLers due to their poor use of the english language, their
>inappropriate posts, and all the other rediculous justifications will
>find your world invaded by those to whom the net should really belong:
>common folk.

You're the one calling them "Common Folk".

>
>You AOLers amuse me. I must say, I did get a chuckle or two out of
>reading all your posts. But generally, they reminded me of the polemics
>of a small group of people being overcome by circumstances and who are
>unable to adapt and fear to even try.

Wait, whose side is he on, anyway?!

> The death of the net chauvinists
>is near.

All together now ... "Film at eleven."

>
>Cheers...

... was filmed in front of a live studio audience.

>
>Tom...

... hasn't done that much to warrant a KotM nomination but his antics here
certainly deserve a look-see.

0 new messages