Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Need Alternatives to Anonymouse for Posting to ng?

8 views
Skip to first unread message

Dava...@marvelousmindanao.net

unread,
Jan 10, 2012, 1:22:08 PM1/10/12
to
Are there any good free alternatives to Anonymouse, for posting to ngs

It seems that anonymouse have dropped their free
connection for posting to newsgroups.

AnonyMe

unread,
Jan 12, 2012, 6:00:50 PM1/12/12
to
OmniMix would be a great companion for your marvelous Forté Agent 6.
This message was posted with exactly that combination. For different
newsgroups or tasks (normal or anonymous delivery with or without a
custom 'From:' header with or without MIME headers removed) I created
specific Personas, which makes mailing / posting very easy and secure.

http://www.danner-net.de/om.htm

AnonyMe


Kulin Remailer

unread,
Jan 13, 2012, 1:24:59 AM1/13/12
to
In article <EG914YW54092...@reece.net.au>
AnonyMe <anon...@somewhere.invalid> wrote:
Be advised, omnimix is NOT open-source software. As such, the author
has never allowed his peers to review his source code. Peer review is
a long-standing and respected practice in this very serious field of
security software. Because omnimix is closed-source, no one, but the
author, can assure you that omnimix is safe to use. You should
seriously consider looking at something open-source.

Here's how the security software we use breaks down:

open-source
--------------------------
openssl
gunpg
tor
private idaho
jack b nymble
quicksilver lite
quicksilver aam
news2remail
featherfoot
aamhsub interpreter
ghio nymserver
zax nymserv
bigapple mail2news
ghio mail2news
anonget
stealthmail

closed-source
--------------------------
omnimix



Kulin Remailer

unread,
Jan 13, 2012, 6:01:33 PM1/13/12
to
A small-time troll finally found his mission ...


Nomen Nescio

unread,
Jan 14, 2012, 2:58:30 PM1/14/12
to
In article <C9BWQO2X4092...@reece.net.au>
Is it true? Is Omnimix closed source?




















































Nomen Nescio

unread,
Jan 15, 2012, 4:54:09 PM1/15/12
to
Nomen Nescio wrote:

>Is it true? Is Omnimix closed source?

Let's say, just hypothetically, Omnimix is open source software,
which it isn't, are you capable of reviewing it and finding
mission critical bugs or do you know someone you trust who will do
that for you and assure you that it's safe to use that software?

Nomen Nescio

unread,
Jan 16, 2012, 3:44:47 PM1/16/12
to
In article <fda165062714e2ed...@dizum.com>
Any more red herrings, Danner? I wonder what the authors of those 16
open source programs think of you. I wonder what they think of a guy
who has distributed a closed source program for 6 years, in an open
source community, without divulging that it's closed source. I wonder
what those authors think of a snake in the grass like danner.

Either you've allowed _YOUR_PEERS_ to review your code or you
haven't. The fact is, you haven't. GET THE FUCK OUT.

Kulin Remailer

unread,
Jan 17, 2012, 3:53:34 AM1/17/12
to
>Any more red herrings, Danner? I wonder what the authors of those 16
>open source programs think of you. I wonder what they think of a guy
>who has distributed a closed source program for 6 years, in an open
>source community, without divulging that it's closed source.
As much as for 30 years now B.G. hasn't divulged that Windows is
closed source, for more than 20 years in an open source community with
Linux everywhere? I love such reproaches! Please keep up!


Kulin Remailer

unread,
Jan 17, 2012, 6:22:56 PM1/17/12
to
In article <5AVGWNHN4092...@reece.net.au>
Well, you certainly are full of red herrings! But that's fine. You
have, in fact, admitted to the accusations I've made. Everyone can
see that you posted your crap to this group without stating it's
closed source. Now you have admitted to NEVER stating it's closed
source at all. You've even brought laughably rediculous arguments to
the party. That's enough for me. I'm sure your replies have
illuminated the members of this group as to exactly what kind of man
you are. Now they know why omnimix users can be counted on 1 hand.
Thank you for making my case.


Kulin Remailer

unread,
Jan 18, 2012, 4:39:05 PM1/18/12
to
In article <JQHG261K4092...@reece.net.au>, Kulin Remailer
wrote:
> Here's how the security software we use breaks down:
>
> open-source
> --------------------------
> openssl
> gunpg
> tor
> private idaho
> jack b nymble
> quicksilver lite
> quicksilver aam
> news2remail
> featherfoot
> aamhsub interpreter
> ghio nymserver
> zax nymserv
> bigapple mail2news
> ghio mail2news
> anonget
> stealthmail
Which one is yours?


0 new messages