Donations Needed for Anonymous Prison Relief: Miss Anon Fatale

[mimus]

Anonymous hacker Higinio Ochoa AKA Anonw0rmer has had to pop into
prison for a bit, and his pregnant wife Miss Anon Fatale wants to
visit him once before she has their son Brody, and needs about $1500
to do so:

http://pastebin.com/szNG22zM

https://www.wepay.com/donations/w0rmersfreedom

Please help if you can.

--

They may be idiots, but they're our idiots.

[happy zombie jebus on the cross]

On Thu, 18 Apr 2013 13:05:42 -0700 (PDT), mimus <mim...@gmail.com>
wrote:

>Anonymous hacker Higinio Ochoa AKA Anonw0rmer has had to pop into
>prison for a bit, and his pregnant wife Miss Anon Fatale wants to
>visit him once before she has their son Brody, and needs about $1500
>to do so:
>
>http://pastebin.com/szNG22zM
>
>https://www.wepay.com/donations/w0rmersfreedom
>
>Please help if you can.

so many worthy causes to donate to, so little cash in hand.

we have a new portmanteau over here: chuggers. charity muggers, they
sneak up on you when you are in town trying to do whatever it is you
are doing there.


--

mhm x v i x i i i

[cipher]

On Sat, 20 Apr 2013 11:09:16 +0100, happy zombie jebus on the cross
Inscribed upon the Golden Tablets of Usenet thusly:

My problem is telling if they are genuine. Oh I suppose the facts of
this are real, the cause good. But where is the money going? Who
distributes it?





--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
)\ ( ) /( Cipher/Proud Member, Netscum Alumni Association
)-(0^^0)-( Bungmunch U./AHM Memorial Institute of F@x0r1n6/Dean
)/ \\// \( Colonel/1st Virginia Volunteers/CeSium Brigade
(oo) Registered Linux User #556617
/ ~~ \ Empire of APDD/#6-5p07/VLNOC Cohort #1407
o@o o@o Keeper of the alt.CeSium FAQ
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

[Marshall Philippe Pétain]

On Sat, 20 Apr 2013 16:50:32 +0000 (UTC), cipher
<cip...@nadegdaisakookboi.org> wrote:

>On Sat, 20 Apr 2013 11:09:16 +0100, happy zombie jebus on the cross
>Inscribed upon the Golden Tablets of Usenet thusly:
>
>> On Thu, 18 Apr 2013 13:05:42 -0700 (PDT), mimus <mim...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>Anonymous hacker Higinio Ochoa AKA Anonw0rmer has had to pop into prison
>>>for a bit, and his pregnant wife Miss Anon Fatale wants to visit him
>>>once before she has their son Brody, and needs about $1500 to do so:
>>>
>>>http://pastebin.com/szNG22zM
>>>
>>>https://www.wepay.com/donations/w0rmersfreedom
>>>
>>>Please help if you can.
>>
>> so many worthy causes to donate to, so little cash in hand.
>>
>> we have a new portmanteau over here: chuggers. charity muggers, they
>> sneak up on you when you are in town trying to do whatever it is you are
>> doing there.
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> mhm x v i x i i i
>
>My problem is telling if they are genuine. Oh I suppose the facts of
>this are real, the cause good. But where is the money going? Who
>distributes it?

very true. its well known that the charities employ chuggers along
with hiring companys to chug as well as volunteer chuggers to pull on
your heartstrings. in some cases not as much money actualy goes to the
deserving cause as one would think, there is one charity, i don't
recal the name, the person running it drives around in an astin
martin, concidering he's working for a charity, how'd he afford that?

here in england charities are registerd so you know they are
legitimate.

http://www.charitychoice.co.uk/charities

[mimus]

On Apr 20, 12:50 pm, cipher <cip...@nadegdaisakookboi.org> wrote:

> On Sat, 20 Apr 2013 11:09:16 +0100, happy zombie jebus on the cross
> Inscribed upon the Golden Tablets of Usenet thusly:
>

> > On Thu, 18 Apr 2013 13:05:42 -0700 (PDT), mimus <mimu...@gmail.com>

> > wrote:
>
> >> Anonymous hacker Higinio Ochoa AKA Anonw0rmer has had to pop into prison
> >> for a bit, and his pregnant wife Miss Anon Fatale wants to visit him
> >> once before she has their son Brody, and needs about $1500 to do so:
>
> >> http://pastebin.com/szNG22zM
>
> >> https://www.wepay.com/donations/w0rmersfreedom
>
> >> Please help if you can.
>
> > so many worthy causes to donate to, so little cash in hand.
>
> > we have a new portmanteau over here: chuggers. charity muggers, they
> > sneak up on you when you are in town trying to do whatever it is you are
> > doing there.
>

> My problem is telling if they are genuine.  Oh I suppose the facts of
> this are real, the cause good.  But where is the money going?  Who
> distributes it?

Hig and Miz Fatale are genuine enough (as is their dragon Skiddles).
I've chatted with her a lot.

Hig got scragged for dumping a bunch-a law-enforcement email-addresses
etc. Something I disapprove of, myself (hence the "idiots" in my OP).
I just don't like to see hackers hazarded and possibly wasted (as in
this case) on trivia. Hack the big boys. Go for serious stuff. Hack
and doc-dump. Over and over. Operation Sunlight. That recent Virgin
Islands tax-haven doc-dump is the bee's knees. So was the Stratfor
hack (Jeremy Hammond's been scragged for that one, but it was worth
it--good work, d00dz). Barrett Brown's another h4c|<0r h3r0. And of
course Julian Assange should get a Nobel.

--

Dragon? that's what I thought too.

[Marshall Philippe P�tain]

On Mon, 22 Apr 2013 06:26:59 -0700 (PDT), mimus <mim...@gmail.com>
wrote:

this thing with assange hiding out in an embassy in london to be free
(basically house arrest from what i can see of it) is laughable. who
can seriously take the uk govts actions over this as those of a
credible govt? the puppet strings from thier us masters are showing.

[mimus]

On Apr 22, 2:01 pm, Marshall Philippe P tain
<meow.mix@FUCK_OFF_SPAMMER_meow.org> wrote:

> On Mon, 22 Apr 2013 06:26:59 -0700 (PDT), mimus <mimu...@gmail.com>

Sweden too, which is really depressing, and even more so when you
examine the political sitch there, a cross between (1) plutocracy
subservient to the Anglo-American plutocracy and (2) virulent feminism
in the sex-laws that eg mean that a man can be arrested for rape on a
woman's unsupported allegation (or even a prosecutor's in the absence
of a women's complaint, which is the case with regard to Assange) and
held incommunicado even from a lawyer for as long as it takes the
prosecutors to satisfy themselves one way or the other on the charge--
which is what Assange would be facing AT LEAST if he returned to
Sweden, but more likely he'd be "rendered" to the US for a quick trip
to Gitmo, or maybe Supermax.

Or the USS Limbo, circling forever out there in the North Atlantic.

--

Where am I, Dove?

< _ The Einstein Intersection _

[Marshall Philippe P�tain]

On Mon, 22 Apr 2013 11:09:38 -0700 (PDT), mimus <mim...@gmail.com>
wrote:

the swedish rabbit hole of us manipulated fuckery is far wider spread
than that. check out the blatant made up bullshite over the original
creaters of the pirate bay and blatant persecution of one of them. the
whole thing stinks worse than rotting herrings on a hot summers day.
then there is the copyright crap going on. its all down to the us,
every last part of it.

>Or the USS Limbo, circling forever out there in the North Atlantic.



--

[mimus]

On Apr 22, 2:19 pm, Marshall Philippe P tain
<meow.mix@FUCK_OFF_SPAMMER_meow.org> wrote:

> On Mon, 22 Apr 2013 11:09:38 -0700 (PDT), mimus <mimu...@gmail.com>

You saw this, right? if not, prepare for a stroke:

http://falkvinge.net/2011/09/05/cable-reveals-extent-of-lapdoggery-from-swedish-govt-on-copyright-monopoly/

Bark bark bark.

Or "Bjork bjork bjork."

> > --

>
> > Or the USS Limbo, circling forever out there in the North Atlantic.

--

Hopefully the food would be good.

[happy zombie jebus on the cross]

On Mon, 22 Apr 2013 11:41:03 -0700 (PDT), mimus <mim...@gmail.com>

no i had not seen it. that is wihtout a close second, the vilest thing
i have ever read online. where do americas tendrils of corruption end?
will it all end when america presses to have the earths name changed
to something like the united planet america and finaly takes over
everything?

>Bark bark bark.
>
>Or "Bjork bjork bjork."
>
>> > --
>>
>> > Or the USS Limbo, circling forever out there in the North Atlantic.



--

[mimus]

On Apr 23, 10:48 am, happy zombie jebus on the cross
<meow.mix@FUCK_OFF_SPAMMER_meow.org> wrote:

> On Mon, 22 Apr 2013 11:41:03 -0700 (PDT), mimus <mimu...@gmail.com>

> > http://bit.ly/oKUHRB

>
> no i had not seen it. that is wihtout a close second, the vilest thing
> i have ever read online. where do americas tendrils of corruption end?
> will it all end when america presses to have the earths name changed
> to something like the united planet america and finaly takes over
> everything?

Well, in fairness, America is wealth's bitch, no matter what country
the wealth comes from-- see for example the "Citizens United" decision
by our great Supreme Court which openly threw American politics open
in 2010 to anonymous money from all around the world-- and wealthy
countries like Saudi Arabia long ago figured out it's stupid to
challenge America militarily when you can simply buy its leaders
("both" "parties", of course) and use its military for your own
purposes (see Gulf Wars I and II).

--

Of course, if you're a poor country,
you're out of the bidding, just like if you were
an ordinary American citizen.

[happy zombie jebus on the cross]

On Tue, 23 Apr 2013 08:38:27 -0700 (PDT), mimus <mim...@gmail.com>
wrote:

the year america was sold on the open market like a common whore. how
the fuck did they get away with that?

>and wealthy
>countries like Saudi Arabia long ago figured out it's stupid to
>challenge America militarily when you can simply buy its leaders
>("both" "parties", of course) and use its military for your own
>purposes (see Gulf Wars I and II).

this new land of oportunity really didn't work out to well for the new
settelrs and thier decendents. they're more fucked than they were back
in the old world.

[mimus]

On Apr 23, 2:56 pm, happy zombie jebus on the cross
<meow.mix@FUCK_OFF_SPAMMER_meow.org> wrote:

> On Tue, 23 Apr 2013 08:38:27 -0700 (PDT), mimus <mimu...@gmail.com>

There's quite a bit of work going on to stop it, AAMOF.

Citizens United was the match thrown on the economic devastation of
the Oil Bubble that exploded into OWS, which had to be crushed by a
nationwide sixteen-city Federal operation (by a "liberal" "Democratic"
Administration), but is still sputtering along, and hopefully will re-
erupt after the next plutocratic atrocity, whatever in God's name that
will be, possibly an attack on Social Security.

Most of the specifically anti-Citizens-United political effort is
focused on a Constitutional Amendment along the lines of (simplest
version and one I prefer) "Corporations are not persons."

No-one's talking about impeaching the Citizens United Five (the vote
was 5-4) for some reason-- probably because impeachment would have to
start in the Federal House of Representatives, which is controlled by
the more virulently plutocratic of the two parties, the Republicans:
they play the "black hats", staking out the extreme plutocratic and
anti-populist positions in DC Theater, while the Democrats play the
"white hats", vowing they'll "ne'er consent", until they finally all
"compromise" on what fuckery they intended all along, and then go off
to have some cold ones.

> >and wealthy
> >countries like Saudi Arabia long ago figured out it's stupid to
> >challenge America militarily when you can simply buy its leaders
> >("both" "parties", of course) and use its military for your own
> >purposes (see Gulf Wars I and II).
>
> this new land of oportunity really didn't work out to well for the new
> settelrs and thier decendents. they're more fucked than they were back
> in the old world.

Looks about the same in the Auld Sod, AFAICT.

--

Except you've got _three_ plutocratic parties instead of two now.

[Marshall Philippe P�tain]

On Tue, 23 Apr 2013 12:56:28 -0700 (PDT), mimus <mim...@gmail.com>
wrote:

it'd be nice to see something to show for the work done so far.

>Citizens United was the match thrown on the economic devastation of
>the Oil Bubble that exploded into OWS, which had to be crushed by a
>nationwide sixteen-city Federal operation (by a "liberal" "Democratic"
>Administration), but is still sputtering along, and hopefully will re-
>erupt after the next plutocratic atrocity, whatever in God's name that
>will be, possibly an attack on Social Security.

i'm sure they're working on something to rile the population up into
mass rebellion so marshal law can be introduced.

>Most of the specifically anti-Citizens-United political effort is
>focused on a Constitutional Amendment along the lines of (simplest
>version and one I prefer) "Corporations are not persons."

whoever thought of having corporations classed as people is an evil
and corrupt beyond imagination, cunt.

>No-one's talking about impeaching the Citizens United Five (the vote
>was 5-4) for some reason-- probably because impeachment would have to
>start in the Federal House of Representatives, which is controlled by
>the more virulently plutocratic of the two parties, the Republicans:
>they play the "black hats", staking out the extreme plutocratic and
>anti-populist positions in DC Theater, while the Democrats play the
>"white hats", vowing they'll "ne'er consent", until they finally all
>"compromise" on what fuckery they intended all along, and then go off
>to have some cold ones.

and once again the us political soap goes to credits.

>> >and wealthy
>> >countries like Saudi Arabia long ago figured out it's stupid to
>> >challenge America militarily when you can simply buy its leaders
>> >("both" "parties", of course) and use its military for your own
>> >purposes (see Gulf Wars I and II).
>>
>> this new land of oportunity really didn't work out to well for the new
>> settelrs and thier decendents. they're more fucked than they were back
>> in the old world.
>
>Looks about the same in the Auld Sod, AFAICT.

we don't have religious wingnuts trying to control education and govt
polocy over here (the govts got problems with its own guys arguing
about what to do about the current education system with regard to
gcse's). here the state and the church have been seperate for a long
time.

[mimus]

On Apr 24, 3:42 pm, Marshall Philippe Pétain
<meow.mix@FUCK_OFF_SPAMMER_meow.org> wrote:

> On Tue, 23 Apr 2013 12:56:28 -0700 (PDT), mimus <mimu...@gmail.com>

Senator Lindsey Graham just coined a splendid new phrase and meme,
"potential enemy combatants", which apparently applies to all of us,
especially if we're, like, poor, or dark-skinned, or have some other
flaw.

> >Most of the specifically anti-Citizens-United political effort is
> >focused on a Constitutional Amendment along the lines of (simplest
> >version and one I prefer) "Corporations are not persons."
>
> whoever thought of having corporations classed as people is an evil
> and corrupt beyond imagination, cunt.

It was a cute little example of early DC Theater, during the Gilded
Age IIRC, with a court reporter "accidentally" including the doctrine
as part of a ruling, and the Court then "reprimanding" that reporter
while not correcting that "error", which was then and thus introduced
into American jurisprudence, and has been the occasion for most
invocations of the Fourteenth Amendment (which extends all Federal
citizen rights to the State level) since, the Court having been
generally unwilling to broadly apply the Fourteenth to rights and
citizens in general, but always being willing to allow corporate
"citizens" all the "rights" they want, Federal and State.

> >No-one's talking about impeaching the Citizens United Five (the vote
> >was 5-4) for some reason-- probably because impeachment would have to
> >start in the Federal House of Representatives, which is controlled by
> >the more virulently plutocratic of the two parties, the Republicans:
> >they play the "black hats", staking out the extreme plutocratic and
> >anti-populist positions in DC Theater, while the Democrats play the
> >"white hats", vowing they'll "ne'er consent", until they finally all
> >"compromise" on what fuckery they intended all along, and then go off
> >to have some cold ones.
>
> and once again the us political soap goes to credits.

And then the commercials for the expensive stuff.

> >> >and wealthy
> >> >countries like Saudi Arabia long ago figured out it's stupid to
> >> >challenge America militarily when you can simply buy its leaders
> >> >("both" "parties", of course) and use its military for your own
> >> >purposes (see Gulf Wars I and II).
>
> >> this new land of oportunity really didn't work out to well for the new
> >> settelrs and thier decendents. they're more fucked than they were back
> >> in the old world.
>
> > Looks about the same in the Auld Sod, AFAICT.
>
> we don't have religious wingnuts trying to control education and govt
> polocy over here (the govts got problems with its own guys arguing
> about what to do about the current education system with regard to
> gcse's). here the state and the church have been seperate for a long
> time.

https://twitter.com/johnkt09/status/327090128164102145

--

The stronger the walls between
Church, State and Business,
the better for all of us.

[happy zombie jebus on the cross]

On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 13:09:05 -0700 (PDT), mimus <mim...@gmail.com>
wrote:

a very nice way to discribe a populace that isn't happy with thier
elected officials work. what a fuckhead.

>> >Most of the specifically anti-Citizens-United political effort is
>> >focused on a Constitutional Amendment along the lines of (simplest
>> >version and one I prefer) "Corporations are not persons."
>>
>> whoever thought of having corporations classed as people is an evil
>> and corrupt beyond imagination, cunt.
>
>It was a cute little example of early DC Theater, during the Gilded
>Age IIRC, with a court reporter "accidentally" including the doctrine
>as part of a ruling, and the Court then "reprimanding" that reporter
>while not correcting that "error", which was then and thus introduced
>into American jurisprudence, and has been the occasion for most
>invocations of the Fourteenth Amendment (which extends all Federal
>citizen rights to the State level) since, the Court having been
>generally unwilling to broadly apply the Fourteenth to rights and
>citizens in general, but always being willing to allow corporate
>"citizens" all the "rights" they want, Federal and State.

i wonder how many other accidents have happend that have done nothing
but help corporations?

>> >No-one's talking about impeaching the Citizens United Five (the vote
>> >was 5-4) for some reason-- probably because impeachment would have to
>> >start in the Federal House of Representatives, which is controlled by
>> >the more virulently plutocratic of the two parties, the Republicans:
>> >they play the "black hats", staking out the extreme plutocratic and
>> >anti-populist positions in DC Theater, while the Democrats play the
>> >"white hats", vowing they'll "ne'er consent", until they finally all
>> >"compromise" on what fuckery they intended all along, and then go off
>> >to have some cold ones.
>>
>> and once again the us political soap goes to credits.
>
>And then the commercials for the expensive stuff.

i boggle when i see the adds on tv, i have no idea why anyone would
want this crap that's being sold. from what i can see its nearly all
complete shit that serves no real purpose.

>> >> >and wealthy
>> >> >countries like Saudi Arabia long ago figured out it's stupid to
>> >> >challenge America militarily when you can simply buy its leaders
>> >> >("both" "parties", of course) and use its military for your own
>> >> >purposes (see Gulf Wars I and II).
>>
>> >> this new land of oportunity really didn't work out to well for the new
>> >> settelrs and thier decendents. they're more fucked than they were back
>> >> in the old world.
>>
>> > Looks about the same in the Auld Sod, AFAICT.
>>
>> we don't have religious wingnuts trying to control education and govt
>> polocy over here (the govts got problems with its own guys arguing
>> about what to do about the current education system with regard to
>> gcse's). here the state and the church have been seperate for a long
>> time.
>
>https://twitter.com/johnkt09/status/327090128164102145

sounds like america summed up.