Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Re:
4 views
Skip to first unread message
user
Feb 26, 2012, 9:11:53 PM2/26/12
to
belly up
User Name
Feb 27, 2012, 12:40:37 AM2/27/12
to
belly up
Katrina Sanchez
Mar 2, 2012, 8:35:16 AM3/2/12
to
Peter Brierley
Apr 8, 2012, 7:06:50 AM4/8/12
to
User Name wrote:
>
> belly up
>
works.
>
> belly up
>
works.
user
Apr 14, 2012, 8:42:46 PM4/14/12
to
On 4/14/2012 7:11 PM, blacker wrote:
> What do you exit remailer operators think?
>
> Would you run a nym if it meant that you allowed full
> from headers that came through the nym?
>
> This is being sent through the paranoici nym.
I am really not understanding this question because I thought all nym
servers allow "From" headers. I mean, if I send a message from my nym to
an individual, the nym name appears with the delivered message. Does the
nym server at paranoici strip the From header before sending a message
on the the nym holder?
Secondly, was this message sent by the paranoici admin?
> What do you exit remailer operators think?
>
> Would you run a nym if it meant that you allowed full
> from headers that came through the nym?
>
> This is being sent through the paranoici nym.
I am really not understanding this question because I thought all nym
servers allow "From" headers. I mean, if I send a message from my nym to
an individual, the nym name appears with the delivered message. Does the
nym server at paranoici strip the From header before sending a message
on the the nym holder?
Secondly, was this message sent by the paranoici admin?
blacker
Apr 15, 2012, 8:30:43 AM4/15/12
to
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
user <us...@indifference.net> wrote:
>
>
>
> I am really not understanding this question because I thought all nym
> servers allow "From" headers. I mean, if I send a message from my nym to
> an individual, the nym name appears with the delivered message. Does the
> nym server at paranoici strip the From header before sending a message
> on the the nym holder?
No, it does not. I was thinking of using nyms as a substitute for
trying to find an exit remailer that allows full from headers. The
more nyms that are used for that purpose, the more nym traffic
there will be, which is a good thing.
The more exit remailers there are who also host a nym, the better
for them in terms of not being raided, since a full from header
message sent via a nym can not impersonate people, which is the
main reason for the problems faced by exit remailers that allow
full from headers.
>
> Secondly, was this message sent by the paranoici admin?
No.
~~~
This PGP signature only certifies the sender and date of the message.
It implies no approval from the administrators of nymph.paranoici.org.
Date: Sun Apr 15 12:30:43 2012 GMT
From: bla...@nymph.paranoici.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAk+Kv3MACgkQunvA3M2KptmV3QCeNlConudr0g7at9KaaNxRF8Mw
sR8Ani2g+0kiMoCeTI7L0NxKuz3a0/qy
=I391
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Hash: SHA1
user <us...@indifference.net> wrote:
>
>
>
> I am really not understanding this question because I thought all nym
> servers allow "From" headers. I mean, if I send a message from my nym to
> an individual, the nym name appears with the delivered message. Does the
> nym server at paranoici strip the From header before sending a message
> on the the nym holder?
trying to find an exit remailer that allows full from headers. The
more nyms that are used for that purpose, the more nym traffic
there will be, which is a good thing.
The more exit remailers there are who also host a nym, the better
for them in terms of not being raided, since a full from header
message sent via a nym can not impersonate people, which is the
main reason for the problems faced by exit remailers that allow
full from headers.
>
> Secondly, was this message sent by the paranoici admin?
~~~
This PGP signature only certifies the sender and date of the message.
It implies no approval from the administrators of nymph.paranoici.org.
Date: Sun Apr 15 12:30:43 2012 GMT
From: bla...@nymph.paranoici.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAk+Kv3MACgkQunvA3M2KptmV3QCeNlConudr0g7at9KaaNxRF8Mw
sR8Ani2g+0kiMoCeTI7L0NxKuz3a0/qy
=I391
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Nomen Nescio
Apr 15, 2012, 11:08:46 AM4/15/12
to
In article <20120415123...@remailer.paranoici.org>
be wrong. I think the problems are arising primarily from using exit
remailers to send out obnoxious and threatening messages, regardless of
whom the messages appear to be from, if anyone at all.
> >
> > Secondly, was this message sent by the paranoici admin?
>
> No.
>
>
So you have a nym at paranoice named nymserver, and the nym server at
paranoici signed your messages. I have to take a double take at that one.
Swell. :)
blacker <bla...@nymph.paranoici.org> wrote:
>
> user <us...@indifference.net> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > I am really not understanding this question because I thought all nym
> > servers allow "From" headers. I mean, if I send a message from my nym to
> > an individual, the nym name appears with the delivered message. Does the
> > nym server at paranoici strip the From header before sending a message
> > on the the nym holder?
>
> No, it does not. I was thinking of using nyms as a substitute for
> trying to find an exit remailer that allows full from headers. The
> more nyms that are used for that purpose, the more nym traffic
> there will be, which is a good thing.
What could be easier than getting a nym at mixnym.net?
>
> user <us...@indifference.net> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > I am really not understanding this question because I thought all nym
> > servers allow "From" headers. I mean, if I send a message from my nym to
> > an individual, the nym name appears with the delivered message. Does the
> > nym server at paranoici strip the From header before sending a message
> > on the the nym holder?
>
> No, it does not. I was thinking of using nyms as a substitute for
> trying to find an exit remailer that allows full from headers. The
> more nyms that are used for that purpose, the more nym traffic
> there will be, which is a good thing.
>
> The more exit remailers there are who also host a nym, the better
> for them in terms of not being raided, since a full from header
> message sent via a nym can not impersonate people, which is the
> main reason for the problems faced by exit remailers that allow
> full from headers.
I don't think it is the impersonation issue causing problems, but I could
> The more exit remailers there are who also host a nym, the better
> for them in terms of not being raided, since a full from header
> message sent via a nym can not impersonate people, which is the
> main reason for the problems faced by exit remailers that allow
> full from headers.
be wrong. I think the problems are arising primarily from using exit
remailers to send out obnoxious and threatening messages, regardless of
whom the messages appear to be from, if anyone at all.
> >
> > Secondly, was this message sent by the paranoici admin?
>
> No.
>
>
paranoici signed your messages. I have to take a double take at that one.
Swell. :)
0 new messages