Message from discussion
Today's laughing stock
Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!newsfeed.direct.ca!look.ca!logbridge.uoregon.edu!nntp-relay.ihug.net!lust.ihug.co.nz!ihug.co.nz!not-for-mail
From: debiddo <debi...@ihug.co.nz>
Newsgroups: alt.animals.whales
Subject: Re: Today's laughing stock
Date: Sun, 09 Dec 2001 01:59:58 +1300
Organization: ihug ( New Zealand )
Lines: 45
Message-ID: <3C120ECE.9E32F69A@ihug.co.nz>
References: <3C108762.2544C162@ihug.co.nz> <3C119C18.2AFC1BDD@telus.net> <christopher.lund-0812010829150001@c224s131h2.upc.chello.no> <3C11CA24.27AF1196@telus.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: p52-max7.wlg.ihug.co.nz
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: lust.ihug.co.nz 1007816522 8239 203.173.231.180 (8 Dec 2001 13:02:02 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@ihug.co.nz
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2001 13:02:02 +0000 (UTC)
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (Win95; U)
X-Accept-Language: ja,en
Douglasred wrote:
> C Lund wrote:
>
> > In article <3C119C18.2AFC1...@telus.net>, Douglasred
> > <doug_frederick...@telus.net> wrote:
> >
> > > ...this tripe of yours is useless, debiddo. Putting your so predictable
> > > responses to some person's words, post it where they'll never see it...
> >
> > Doesn't matter. Subscribers to this forum will see it. if you thnk the
> > people he's making fun of should be defended, then defend them yourself.
> > Poke holes in his ridicule.
>
> No thanks, I'll do my poking when and where I choose...it's just somewhat
> tacky to me. Did I say now, that their comments should be defended?
Exactly my point. I don't think many people here would try to defend this sort of
nonsense. "I don't want to lose the whales - therefore I am anti Japan and
Norway's whaling". This is the sort of uninformed opinion which the anti whaling
camp is happy to claim as their own, as a part of their "world opinion". It's a
total joke that the anti whaling reps prance around spouting that crap when the
people who they claim to represent have no idea about anything to do with whales.
> They are
> what they are. It's just a cheap anonymous ridicule which is unwarranted.
I believe it is healthy for NG readers to see that the people who support the
anti whalers are by and large uninformed.
> Particularly from someone (debiddo) who keeps telling people how supremely
> intelligent he is
When have I ever told anyone how supremely intelligent I am? What I have done is
claimed that Dick is of a very closed, limited mind. I don't think I have ever
come across someone with such a dangerously closed mind.
> (and he got dem papers to proov it). It's tacky, cheap, and
> low class...that's all. No big deal...interesting that you support it though.
Interesting that you don't give these anti whaling supporters a good rark up.
They aren't helping your side whatsoever.
debiddo
|
