Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Cruelty of the biscuit revisited
2 views
Skip to first unread message
dh
May 8, 2013, 1:10:40 PM5/8/13
to
A guy was telling me about his dinner the other night,
which included deer meat that he had shot. He got
about 75 pounds of edible meat from it. That's over
100 servings. Less than 1/100 animal deaths for the
deer meat in his dinner. He also had broccoli, potatoes,
and biscuits. We thought it over and figured in that
meal the deer meat certainly contributed to the least
animal deaths, then the broccoli probably least after
that followed by the potatoe, and the biscuits contributed
to the most. He didn't have dessert or that would probably
have been above the biscuit.
Since he and his family eat a lot of meat that he hunts,
it's likely they contribute to far fewer animal deaths each
year than the average veg*n family. But it's easy to
imagine a veg*n kid being critical of another who is
chewing on some deer jerky at school, while the veg*n
kid is munching on a rice cake which caused far more
suffering to animals.
George Plimpton
May 8, 2013, 1:15:13 PM5/8/13
to
On 5/8/2013 10:10 AM, Fuckwit David Harrison - *Goo* - stupid,
illiterate cracker and convicted felon, defeated entirely in 1999 and
doing nothing but wasting time ever since, lied:
illiterate cracker and convicted felon, defeated entirely in 1999 and
doing nothing but wasting time ever since, lied:
>
> A guy was telling me about his dinner the other night,
No, he wasn't.
> A guy was telling me about his dinner the other night,
dh
May 9, 2013, 6:31:39 PM5/9/13
to
On Wed, 08 May 2013 10:15:13 -0700, Goo wrote:
>On 5/8/2013 10:10 AM, dh reposted:
>On 5/8/2013 10:10 AM, dh reposted:
>>
>> A guy was telling me about his dinner the other night,
>
>No, he wasn't.
He was at the time it was originally posted, Goo.
>> A guy was telling me about his dinner the other night,
>
>No, he wasn't.
George Plimpton
May 9, 2013, 10:32:33 PM5/9/13
to
On 5/9/2013 3:31 PM, Fuckwit David Harrison - *Goo* - stupid, illiterate
cracker and convicted felon, defeated entirely in 1999 and doing nothing
but wasting time ever since, lied:
but wasting time ever since, lied:
> On Wed, 08 May 2013 10:15:13 -0700, George Plimpton wrote:
>
>> On 5/8/2013 10:10 AM, Fuckwit David Harrison - *Goo* - stupid, illiterate cracker and convicted felon, defeated entirely in 1999 and doing nothing but wasting time ever since, lied:
>>>
>
>> On 5/8/2013 10:10 AM, Fuckwit David Harrison - *Goo* - stupid, illiterate cracker and convicted felon, defeated entirely in 1999 and doing nothing but wasting time ever since, lied:
>>>
>>> A guy was telling me about his dinner the other night,
>>
>> No, he wasn't.
>
> He was at the time it
No, he wasn't. The entire thing is bullshit; never happened.
>>
>> No, he wasn't.
>
> He was at the time it
George Plimpton
Aug 8, 2013, 1:35:57 AM8/8/13
to
On 3/11/2005 9:55 AM, dh...@nomail.com wrote:
> On Tue, 08 Mar 2005 George Plimpton wrote:
>
>>>> Until that entity
>>>> *already* exists, nothing can be a benefit to it.
>
> Everyone knows that
*YOU* don't, you stupid Fuckwit.
> What some of us understand but
> you are too stupid to grasp, is that life can be a benefit--to farm
> animals as well as other animals--while they are alive.
That's not what you're arguing, Fuckwit. You're arguing that *coming*
into existence - "getting to experience life", as you put it in your
wretchedly shitty cracker-speak way - is a benefit. Your irrational,
stupid, fuckwitted and utterly cracker belief is that the very instant
of coming into existence is a "benefit." It is *NOT*, Fuckwit. An
entity must already exist, with a welfare, in order for *anything* to be
a benefit to it.
>> SAY something next time
>
> We've been through it before.
You've lost 10,000 times before - *every* time.
> On Tue, 08 Mar 2005 George Plimpton wrote:
>
>>>> Until that entity
>>>> *already* exists, nothing can be a benefit to it.
>
> Everyone knows that
*YOU* don't, you stupid Fuckwit.
> What some of us understand but
> you are too stupid to grasp, is that life can be a benefit--to farm
> animals as well as other animals--while they are alive.
That's not what you're arguing, Fuckwit. You're arguing that *coming*
into existence - "getting to experience life", as you put it in your
wretchedly shitty cracker-speak way - is a benefit. Your irrational,
stupid, fuckwitted and utterly cracker belief is that the very instant
of coming into existence is a "benefit." It is *NOT*, Fuckwit. An
entity must already exist, with a welfare, in order for *anything* to be
a benefit to it.
>> SAY something next time
>
> We've been through it before.
You've lost 10,000 times before - *every* time.
0 new messages