Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Ball stupidly lies about something which is a matter of public record and still fresh in everyone's memory

18 views
Skip to first unread message

Rupert

unread,
May 6, 2008, 3:32:20 AM5/6/08
to
"You stupidly told Rupert a math term he used wasn't a real word" -
Ronny

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian/msg/e6446e0474d0e32f?dmode=source

"No" - Jonathan Ball

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian/msg/c71e96c3858cbdf3?dmode=source

Refutation:

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.christnet/msg/3126ba558ae1e0f1?dmode=source

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian/msg/91b8632a7340bc86?dmode=source

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian/msg/22d0b79832d1be8c?dmode=source

'Nuff said.

Message has been deleted

Rupert

unread,
May 6, 2008, 5:11:15 AM5/6/08
to
On May 6, 3:39 pm, Rudy Canoza <pi...@thedismalscience.noot> wrote:
> Rupert wrote:
> > [bullshit]
>
> No.

No, come on, Ball. You can do better than that. Tell us why those
three posts of yours aren't a refutation.

Let's hear it.

Rupert

unread,
May 6, 2008, 5:14:39 AM5/6/08
to
On May 6, 3:39 pm, Rudy Canoza <pi...@thedismalscience.noot> wrote:
> Rupert wrote:
> > [bullshit]
>
> No.

It's clear-cut, Ball. There's no room to wiggle out of it. Ronny
pointed out that you recently and repeatedly claimed that
"axiomatizable" is not a real word. That's his exact wording - "not a
real word". Same as your wording. There's no room for bullshit about
"sloppy reading habits". Ronny is simply reporting what you said, as I
demonstrated.

You lied.

End of story.

Is "axiomatizable" a real word or isn't it, Ball? You tell us one way
or the other.

You won't, because you're a coward.

Rupert

unread,
May 6, 2008, 5:26:08 AM5/6/08
to
On May 6, 3:39 pm, Rudy Canoza <pi...@thedismalscience.noot> wrote:
> Rupert wrote:
> > [bullshit]
>
> No.

All I can say is the fact that you are trying to pretend there is room
for reasonable doubt about *this* one is a sign of *serious*
desperation.

Mr.Smartypants

unread,
May 6, 2008, 7:05:58 AM5/6/08
to
On May 6, 5:39 pm, Rudy Canoza <pi...@thedismalscience.noot> wrote:
> Rupert wrote:
> > [bullshit]
>
> No.


C'mon Boobs, tell us what made you tell Rupert he was using
"axiomatizable" inappropriately after he PROVED to you it was a real
word?

You didn't even know the word existed but you suddenly became an
authority on it's usage.

How does that work anyway?

Mr.Smartypants

unread,
May 6, 2008, 7:08:24 AM5/6/08
to


Rupert you may have noticed that in every debate Boobs is always
desperate. "Seriously" so. I guess that's why he claims to be a
"serious" person.

Message has been deleted

Rupert

unread,
May 6, 2008, 6:19:39 PM5/6/08
to
On May 6, 5:14 pm, Rupert <rupertmccal...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> Is "axiomatizable" a real word or isn't it, Ball? You tell us one way
> or the other.
>
> You won't, because you're a coward.

What do you know, my prediction was correct!

What a surprise.

0 new messages