Goo Is Getting Quite Agitated......

[Mr.Smartypants]

......he's starting one thread after another to squirm away from
something.

[dh]

The main thing I see Goo try to slink away from is his own stupid claims
that he can't support.

[Mr.Smartypants]

On May 8, 11:09 am, dh@. wrote:
> On Wed, 8 May 2013 00:07:04 -0700 (PDT), "Mr.Smartypants"
>

> <bunghole-jon...@lycos.com> wrote:
> >......he's starting one thread after another to squirm away from
> >something.
>
>     The main thing I see Goo try to slink away from is his own stupid claims
> that he can't support.

Isn't that always the case with him?

[George Plimpton]

On 5/8/2013 10:09 AM, Fuckwit David Harrison - *Goo* - stupid,
illiterate cracker and convicted felon, defeated entirely in 1999 and
doing nothing but wasting time ever since, lied:
> On Wed, 8 May 2013 00:07:04 -0700 (PDT), Juvenile Pointless Fuck-off Douchebag Hamilton lied:

>
>> ......he's starting one thread after
>

> The main thing I see Prof. Plimpton try to slink away from

Nothing. I confront your cracker nonsense head-on and bash your 65 IQ
cracker brain in almost every time you post.

[dh]

It sure is. The Goober's doing it again now.

[dh]

On Wed, 08 May 2013 12:14:04 -0700, Goo wrote:

>On Wed, 8 May 2013 11:06:57 -0700 (PDT), "Mr.Smartypants" <bunghol...@lycos.com> wrote:
>
>>On May 8, 11:09�am, dh@. wrote:

>>> On Wed, 8 May 2013 00:07:04 -0700 (PDT), "Mr.Smartypants"

>>>
>>> <bunghole-jon...@lycos.com> wrote:
>>> >......he's starting one thread after another to squirm away from
>>> >something.
>>>

>>> � � The main thing I see Goo try to slink away from is his own stupid claims

>>> that he can't support.
>>
>>

>>Isn't that always the case with him?
>

>Nothing.

Try to explain WHAT you want people to think prevents is from being to your
advantage that you're still alive and HOW you want them to think whatever it
supposedly is is supposedly doing so, Goo. Go:

>I confront your cracker nonsense head-on

Try to exaplain HOW you want people to think that anti-consideration is
superior to having consideration for the lives of domestic animals, Goo. Go:

>and bash your 65 IQ cracker brain in

Try to explain exactly WHICH potential future animals you want people to
think I believe experience any sort of loss by not being born, Goo. Go:

>almost every time you post.

Try to explain WHY you want people to think eliminationists lied about
wanting to eliminate pets if they don't really want to eliminate them Goo. Go:

[George Plimpton]

On 5/9/2013 3:31 PM, Fuckwit David Harrison - *Goo* - stupid, illiterate

cracker and convicted felon, defeated entirely in 1999 and doing nothing
but wasting time ever since, lied:

> On 5/8/2013 12:14 PM, George Plimpton wrote:
>> On 5/8/2013 10:09 AM, Fuckwit David Harrison - *Goo* - stupid,
>> illiterate cracker and convicted felon, defeated entirely in 1999 and
>> doing nothing but wasting time ever since, lied:
>>> On Wed, 8 May 2013 00:07:04 -0700 (PDT), Juvenile Pointless Fuck-off
>>> Douchebag Hamilton lied:
>>>

>>>> ......he's starting one thread after
>>>

>>> The main thing I see Prof. Plimpton try to slink away from
>>
>> Nothing. I confront your cracker nonsense head-on and bash your 65 IQ
>> cracker brain in almost every time you post.

>
> Try to exaplain HOW you want people to think that

Write in English, *Goo*.

[Mr.Smartypants]

Goo, can you explain to us how you now know what you claim couldn't be
known?

[dh]

On Fri, 10 May 2013 10:55:37 -0700 (PDT), "Mr.Smartypants"
<bunghol...@lycos.com> wrote:

>On May 9, 8:32�pm, Goo wrote:
>> On 5/9/2013 3:31 PM, Fuckwit David Harrison - *Goo* - stupid, illiterate
>> cracker and convicted felon, defeated entirely in 1999 and doing nothing
>> but wasting time ever since, lied:
>>

>> > On 5/8/2013 12:14 PM, Goo wrote:
>> >> On 5/8/2013 10:09 AM, Fuckwit David Harrison - *Goo* - stupid,
>> >> illiterate cracker and convicted felon, defeated entirely in 1999 and
>> >> doing nothing but wasting time ever since, lied:
>> >>> On Wed, 8 May 2013 00:07:04 -0700 (PDT), Juvenile Pointless Fuck-off
>> >>> Douchebag Hamilton lied:
>>
>> >>>> ......he's starting one thread after
>>
>> >>> � � �The main thing I see Prof. Plimpton try to slink away from
>>
>> >> Nothing. �I confront your cracker nonsense head-on and bash your 65 IQ
>> >> cracker brain in almost every time you post.
>>
>> > � � �Try to exaplain HOW you want people to think that
>>
>> Write in English, *Goo*.
>
>
>Goo, can you explain to us how you now know what you claim couldn't be
>known?

LOL! Goo probably did cry when he read that one. He's afraid of that
particular challenge as he proves repeatedly, and the lame Goober is afraid to
respond to you as he proves even more often, so he probably got very upset when
he saw you making that challenge. This could be Goo's greatest
self-outstupidification in a long line of self-outstupidifications. And once
again, Goo has gotten himself into a self-outstupiding position that even his
boys can't help him get out of.

[dh]

On Thu, 09 May 2013 19:32:33 -0700, Goo wrote:

>On Thu, 09 May 2013 18:31:48 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 08 May 2013 12:14:04 -0700, Goo wrote:
>>
>>>On Wed, 8 May 2013 11:06:57 -0700 (PDT), "Mr.Smartypants" <bunghol...@lycos.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On May 8, 11:09 am, dh@. wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, 8 May 2013 00:07:04 -0700 (PDT), "Mr.Smartypants"
>>>>>
>>>>> <bunghole-jon...@lycos.com> wrote:
>>>>> >......he's starting one thread after another to squirm away from
>>>>> >something.
>>>>>

>>>>>     The main thing I see Goo try to slink away from is his own stupid claims
>>>>> that he can't support.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Isn't that always the case with him?
>>>
>>>Nothing.
>>
>> Try to explain WHAT you want people to think prevents is from being to your
>>advantage that you're still alive and HOW you want them to think whatever it
>>supposedly is is supposedly doing so, Goo. Go:
>>

>>>I confront your cracker nonsense head-on
>>

>> Try to exaplain HOW you want people to think that anti-consideration is
>>superior to having consideration for the lives of domestic animals, Goo. Go:
>>

>>>and bash your 65 IQ cracker brain in
>>

>> Try to explain exactly WHICH potential future animals you want people to
>>think I believe experience any sort of loss by not being born, Goo. Go:
>>

>>>almost every time you post.
>>

>> Try to explain WHY you want people to think eliminationists lied about
>>wanting to eliminate pets if they don't really want to eliminate them Goo. Go:
>

>Wr

You've proven once again to have no idea what you want people to think you
think you're trying to talk about, Goo.

[George Plimpton]

On 5/13/2013 6:00 PM, Fuckwit David Harrison - *Goo* - stupid,

illiterate cracker and convicted felon, defeated entirely in 1999 and
doing nothing but wasting time ever since, lied:

> On 5/9/2013 7:32 PM, George Plimpton wrote:
>> On 5/9/2013 3:31 PM, Fuckwit David Harrison - *Goo* - stupid, illiterate
>> cracker and convicted felon, defeated entirely in 1999 and doing nothing
>> but wasting time ever since, lied:
>>
>>> On 5/8/2013 12:14 PM, George Plimpton wrote:
>>>> On 5/8/2013 10:09 AM, Fuckwit David Harrison - *Goo* - stupid,
>>>> illiterate cracker and convicted felon, defeated entirely in 1999 and
>>>> doing nothing but wasting time ever since, lied:
>>>>> On Wed, 8 May 2013 00:07:04 -0700 (PDT), Juvenile Pointless Fuck-off
>>>>> Douchebag Hamilton lied:
>>>>>

>>>>>> ......he's starting one thread after
>>>>>

>>>>> The main thing I see Prof. Plimpton try to slink away from
>>>>
>>>> Nothing. I confront your cracker nonsense head-on and bash your 65 IQ
>>>> cracker brain in almost every time you post.

>>>
>>> Try to exaplain HOW you want people to think that
>>

>> Write in English, *Goo*.

>
> You've proven once again

That you're an illiterate cracker. Yes.

[dh]

On Mon, 13 May 2013 22:19:09 -0700, Goo wussed horribly:

>On Mon, 13 May 2013 21:00:39 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 09 May 2013 19:32:33 -0700, Goo wrote:
>>
>>>On Thu, 09 May 2013 18:31:48 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Wed, 08 May 2013 12:14:04 -0700, Goo wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Wed, 8 May 2013 11:06:57 -0700 (PDT), "Mr.Smartypants" <bunghol...@lycos.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On May 8, 11:09 am, dh@. wrote:
>>>>>>> On Wed, 8 May 2013 00:07:04 -0700 (PDT), "Mr.Smartypants"
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> <bunghole-jon...@lycos.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> >......he's starting one thread after another to squirm away from
>>>>>>> >something.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     The main thing I see Goo try to slink away from is his own stupid claims
>>>>>>> that he can't support.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Isn't that always the case with him?
>>>>>
>>>>>Nothing.
>>>>
>>>> Try to explain WHAT you want people to think prevents is from being to your
>>>>advantage that you're still alive and HOW you want them to think whatever it
>>>>supposedly is is supposedly doing so, Goo. Go:
>>>>

>>>>>I confront your cracker nonsense head-on
>>>>

>>>> Try to exaplain HOW you want people to think that anti-consideration is
>>>>superior to having consideration for the lives of domestic animals, Goo. Go:
>>>>

>>>>>and bash your 65 IQ cracker brain in
>>>>

>>>> Try to explain exactly WHICH potential future animals you want people to
>>>>think I believe experience any sort of loss by not being born, Goo. Go:
>>>>

>>>>>almost every time you post.
>>>>

>>>> Try to explain WHY you want people to think eliminationists lied about
>>>>wanting to eliminate pets if they don't really want to eliminate them Goo. Go:
>>>
>>>Wr
>>
>> You've proven once again to have no idea what you want people to think you
>>think you're trying to talk about, Goo.
>

>That you're

You have no clue what you want people to think you think you're trying to
talk about and never did you stupid Googoots. That has been proven by you
consistently and you've proven that you can't present anything to suggest
otherwise, Goo.

[George Plimpton]

On 5/16/2013 2:51 PM, Fuckwit David Harrison - *Goo* - stupid,

illiterate cracker and convicted felon, defeated entirely in 1999 and
doing nothing but wasting time ever since, lied:

> On 5/13/2013 10:19 PM, George Plimpton wrote:
>> On 5/13/2013 6:00 PM, Fuckwit David Harrison - *Goo* - stupid,
>> illiterate cracker and convicted felon, defeated entirely in 1999 and
>> doing nothing but wasting time ever since, lied:
>>
>>> On 5/9/2013 7:32 PM, George Plimpton wrote:
>>>> On 5/9/2013 3:31 PM, Fuckwit David Harrison - *Goo* - stupid, illiterate
>>>> cracker and convicted felon, defeated entirely in 1999 and doing nothing
>>>> but wasting time ever since, lied:
>>>>
>>>>> On 5/8/2013 12:14 PM, George Plimpton wrote:
>>>>>> On 5/8/2013 10:09 AM, Fuckwit David Harrison - *Goo* - stupid,
>>>>>> illiterate cracker and convicted felon, defeated entirely in 1999 and
>>>>>> doing nothing but wasting time ever since, lied:
>>>>>>> On Wed, 8 May 2013 00:07:04 -0700 (PDT), Juvenile Pointless Fuck-off
>>>>>>> Douchebag Hamilton lied:
>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> ......he's starting one thread after
>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> The main thing I see Prof. Plimpton try to slink away from
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Nothing. I confront your cracker nonsense head-on and bash your 65 IQ
>>>>>> cracker brain in almost every time you post.

>>>>>
>>>>> Try to exaplain HOW you want people to think that
>>>>

>>>> Write in English, *Goo*.

>>>
>>> You've proven once again
>>

>> That you're an illiterate cracker. Yes.
>

> You have no clue what you want people to think you think you're

Write in English, *Goo*.

[Mr.Smartypants]

I that all you've got, Goobs? LOL!

[Dutch]

What is it about his ankles that you find so enticing?

[Mr.Smartypants]

How about you man up and tell Goobs his pet food cow story was nothing
but bullshit?

Do you have the guts for it?

Didn't think so.

[Dutch]

Why would I do that? I don't know that and I don't care. You want
company in your pointless obsessions?

> Do you have the guts for it?
>
> Didn't think so.
>

Now you want to bite my ankles, ewwwwwww.

[Mr.Smartypants]

You don't know!!? You're the one who did the search for pet food cows.

>
> > Do you have the guts for it?
>
> > Didn't think so.
>
> Now you want to bite my ankles, ewwwwwww.

You'll never stand up to Goo no matter what he says and you know it.

[Dutch]

I said I don't know *that*, referring to your statement.

Did *you* do a search? If not, why not? If so, what did you discover?

>
>>
>>> Do you have the guts for it?
>>
>>> Didn't think so.
>>
>> Now you want to bite my ankles, ewwwwwww.
>
> You'll never stand up to Goo no matter what he says and you know it.

That's false, I constantly disagree with Fuckwit Goober Harrison. I also
disagree with Mr Plimpton when it is appropriate. But he and I agree on
most things, you and Goober Harrison could not be further apart, yet
you're butt-buddies, why is that?

[Mr.Smartypants]

The only Goo here is your buddy Plimpton as he calls himself now.

[dh]

On Thu, 16 May 2013 16:35:44 -0700, Goo wussed horribly:

>On Thu, 16 May 2013 17:51:40 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 13 May 2013 22:19:09 -0700, Goo wussed horribly:
>>
>>>On Mon, 13 May 2013 21:00:39 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Thu, 09 May 2013 19:32:33 -0700, Goo wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Thu, 09 May 2013 18:31:48 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Wed, 08 May 2013 12:14:04 -0700, Goo wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>On Wed, 8 May 2013 11:06:57 -0700 (PDT), "Mr.Smartypants" <bunghol...@lycos.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>On May 8, 11:09�am, dh@. wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 8 May 2013 00:07:04 -0700 (PDT), "Mr.Smartypants"
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> <bunghole-jon...@lycos.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> >......he's starting one thread after another to squirm away from
>>>>>>>>> >something.
>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> � � The main thing I see Goo try to slink away from is his own stupid claims

>>>>>>>>> that he can't support.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Isn't that always the case with him?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Nothing.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Try to explain WHAT you want people to think prevents is from being to your
>>>>>>advantage that you're still alive and HOW you want them to think whatever it
>>>>>>supposedly is is supposedly doing so, Goo. Go:
>>>>>>

>>>>>>>I confront your cracker nonsense head-on
>>>>>>

>>>>>> Try to exaplain HOW you want people to think that anti-consideration is
>>>>>>superior to having consideration for the lives of domestic animals, Goo. Go:
>>>>>>

>>>>>>>and bash your 65 IQ cracker brain in
>>>>>>

>>>>>> Try to explain exactly WHICH potential future animals you want people to
>>>>>>think I believe experience any sort of loss by not being born, Goo. Go:
>>>>>>

>>>>>>>almost every time you post.
>>>>>>

>>>>>> Try to explain WHY you want people to think eliminationists lied about
>>>>>>wanting to eliminate pets if they don't really want to eliminate them Goo. Go:
>>>>>
>>>>>Wr
>>>>
>>>> You've proven once again to have no idea what you want people to think you
>>>>think you're trying to talk about, Goo.
>>>
>>>That you're
>>
>> You have no clue what you want people to think you think you're trying to
>>talk about and never did you stupid Googoots. That has been proven by you
>>consistently and you've proven that you can't present anything to suggest
>>otherwise, Goo.
>

>Wr

Try to explain WHAT you want people to think prevents it from being to your

advantage that you're still alive and HOW you want them to think whatever it
supposedly is is supposedly doing so, Goo. Go:

Try to exaplain HOW you want people to think that anti-consideration is
superior to having consideration for the lives of domestic animals, Goo. Go:

Try to explain exactly WHICH potential future animals you want people to
think I believe experience any sort of loss by not being born, Goo. Go:

Try to explain WHY you want people to think eliminationists lied about

wanting to eliminate pets if they don't really want to eliminate them, Goo. Go:

[dh]

If not you truly are a stupid moron. Even stupider than the moron you are if
you really are aware of the fact but lie about it, in fact.

>and I don't care. You want
>company in your pointless obsessions?
>
>> Do you have the guts for it?
>>
>> Didn't think so.
>>
>
>Now you want to bite my ankles, ewwwwwww.

It's really gross that you're fantasising about that, from my pov. Goo
fantasises about guy's assholes and you fantasise about guy's ankles. You two
are just right for each other though, disgusting as that is.

[dh]

On Sun, 19 May 2013 12:14:36 -0700, Dutch <n...@email.com> wrote:

>Mr.Smartypants wrote:
>> On May 19, 3:29 am, Dutch <n...@email.com> wrote:
>>> Mr.Smartypants wrote:
>>>
>>>> How about you man up and tell Goobs his pet food cow story was nothing
>>>> but bullshit?
>>>
>>> Why would I do that? I don't know that and I don't care. You want
>>> company in your pointless obsessions?
>>
>>
>> You don't know!!? You're the one who did the search for pet food cows.
>
>I said I don't know *that*, referring to your statement.
>
>Did *you* do a search? If not, why not? If so, what did you discover?

No cattle raised for no other reason than to become pet food. If you think
you can find some though go ahead and present the evidence. It's only been about
four of five years that you've had to try doing it I suppose, but still even in
that short a time you should have been able to come up with something. The
nothing non-example you presented you boasted that you foud quickly...possibly
only over a period of a couple of months...so go ahead and try to present some
more. Maybe even something that IS an example, instead of the lame shit you did
present which is NOT an example of what Goo was trying to talk about. Try
presenting some example(s) of what the Goober thought he was trying to talk
about and you believe exist NOW! GO!!!:

[George Plimpton]

On 5/20/2013 4:41 PM, Fuckwit David Harrison - *Goo* - stupid,

illiterate cracker and convicted felon, defeated entirely in 1999 and
doing nothing but wasting time ever since, lied:

> On 5/16/2013 4:35 PM, George Plimpton wrote:
>> On 5/16/2013 2:51 PM, Fuckwit David Harrison - *Goo* - stupid,
>> illiterate cracker and convicted felon, defeated entirely in 1999 and
>> doing nothing but wasting time ever since, lied:
>>
>>> On 5/13/2013 10:19 PM, George Plimpton wrote:
>>>> On 5/13/2013 6:00 PM, Fuckwit David Harrison - *Goo* - stupid,
>>>> illiterate cracker and convicted felon, defeated entirely in 1999 and
>>>> doing nothing but wasting time ever since, lied:
>>>>
>>>>> On 5/9/2013 7:32 PM, George Plimpton wrote:
>>>>>> On 5/9/2013 3:31 PM, Fuckwit David Harrison - *Goo* - stupid,
>>>>>> illiterate
>>>>>> cracker and convicted felon, defeated entirely in 1999 and doing
>>>>>> nothing
>>>>>> but wasting time ever since, lied:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 5/8/2013 12:14 PM, George Plimpton wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 5/8/2013 10:09 AM, Fuckwit David Harrison - *Goo* - stupid,
>>>>>>>> illiterate cracker and convicted felon, defeated entirely in 1999
>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>> doing nothing but wasting time ever since, lied:
>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 8 May 2013 00:07:04 -0700 (PDT), Juvenile Pointless
>>>>>>>>> Fuck-off
>>>>>>>>> Douchebag Hamilton lied:
>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> ......he's starting one thread after
>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> The main thing I see Prof. Plimpton try to slink away from
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Nothing. I confront your cracker nonsense head-on and bash your
>>>>>>>> 65 IQ
>>>>>>>> cracker brain in almost every time you post.

>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Try to exaplain HOW you want people to think that
>>>>>>

>>>>>> Write in English, *Goo*.

>>>>>
>>>>> You've proven once again
>>>>

>>>> That you're an illiterate cracker. Yes.
>>>

>>> You have no clue what you want people to think you think you're
>>

>> Write in English, *Goo*.

>
> Try to explain WHAT you want people to think

Write in English, *Goo*.

[Mr.Smartypants]

Goobs, you should kick your gooling's ass and get him searching for
your pet food cows. So far all he's done is outstupid himself in the
same way you did.

[Mr.Smartypants]

It's quite amazing they still think they have a leg to stand on with
the pet food cow thing. The legend of Goo's Mother of all self-
outstupidications regarding pet food cows will live on long after
Goo's been confined to an asylum I'm sure. Even when he was having his
orgasm of achieving the mother of all self-outstupidifications, Goo
managed to blurt out that the whole idea was "fuckwitted and wrong".
It was like watching the Titanic hit the iceberg then back up and plow
into it again.

[Dutch]

Mr.Smartypants wrote:
> It's quite amazing they still think they have a leg to stand on

You two really should confine your stupidity to email.

[Dutch]

Classic ankle-biting.

[George Plimpton]

On 5/21/2013 3:14 PM, Dutch wrote:
> Douchebag Hamilton blabbered:

>> [ankle-biter bullshit]
>>
>
> Classic ankle-biting.

Yep - nothing of any value at all.

[Mr.Smartypants]

Have either of you two morons found any pet food cows raised under
contract for 12 years only to become pet food?

[George Plimpton]

On 5/21/2013 3:13 PM, Dutch wrote:
> Douchebag Hamilton, juvenile ass-suck, gurgled:

>> It's quite amazing they still think they have a leg to stand on
>
> You two really should confine your stupidity to email.

Douchebag goes down to lick Fuckwit's crack out on the houseboat with
regularity.

[Mr.Smartypants]

Any progress in your search for the choice cuts from the EXTRA
livestock you think you believe are being raised?

[Dutch]

<plop!> Another turd hits the water.

[Dutch]

That would be a good topic for you and Fuckwit the next time you meet in
the Goober Motel. It might strain your intellect though..

[Mr.Smartypants]

Why isn't Goo blubbering about pet food cows and the EXTRA livestock
he claims are being raised?

Would it be because your find of only ONE cow completely blew his
story out of the water?

[Dutch]

What a sad little clown you have become.

[Mr.Smartypants]

I guess you can't deny you piddled on Goo's little parade.

[Dutch]

I can't deny that you're a sad little clown.

[Derek]

After "docking". http://tinyurl.com/cjusb

[Rupert]

I find it rather bizarre to think that that would be pleasurable.

[Derek]

On Thu, 23 May 2013 06:40:42 -0700 (PDT), Rupert <rupertm...@yahoo.com>
wrote:

I would rather not know what it means. Too late now, and for you. Sorry.

[George Plimpton]

Ugh. There's a brand of men's trousers over here called Dockers,
started by the Levi-Strauss company back in the 1980s. I have never
bought them, because they have the company logo label on the outside of
the hip pocket and I have never worn clothing that had the brand name
displayed externally, but now I have even more reason not to wear them.

I expect it's all Fuckwit and Douchebag wear.

[Derek]

I've had two week-long breaks renting a boat to chug around the Norfolk
Broads, and I knew I was being made the butt of some kind of a joke when
asking some of the people on other boats about the best places for docking,
but it wasn't until quite recently that I realised in what way.

>I expect it's all Fuckwit and Douchebag wear.

You can bet he wears them half way down his legs, saggy style. Fuckwit was
born and raised in dungarees though.

[George Plimpton]

LOL!!! That's really funny, and in the end (pun intended), no real
harm done.

[Derek]

"So let me get this right - you're looking for somewhere quiet and private
to try docking?"
- Yes

"Done it before?"
- Yes

"Did you like it?"
- Yes. We had a great time

"And your good lady there - does she just watch or does she lend a hand?
- Both

It went on like that for quite a while.

[George Plimpton]

That was truly LOL funny. The dog even looked up at me.

[Mr.Smartypants]

On May 23, 9:16 am, George Plimpton <geo...@si.not> wrote:
> On 5/23/2013 8:08 AM, Derek wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Thu, 23 May 2013 07:45:03 -0700, George Plimpton <geo...@si.not> wrote:
>
> >> On 5/23/2013 7:23 AM, Derek wrote:
> >>> On Thu, 23 May 2013 07:04:03 -0700, George Plimpton <geo...@si.not> wrote:
>
> >>>> On 5/23/2013 6:54 AM, Derek wrote:

> >>>>> On Thu, 23 May 2013 06:40:42 -0700 (PDT), Rupert <rupertmccal...@yahoo.com>

> >>>>> wrote:
>
> >>>>>> On Thursday, May 23, 2013 11:45:01 AM UTC+2, Derek wrote:
> >>>>>>> On Tue, 21 May 2013 23:39:11 -0700, George Plimpton <geo...@si.not> wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>> On 5/21/2013 3:13 PM, Dutch wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>>> Douchebag Hamilton, juvenile ass-suck, gurgled:
>
> >>>>>>>>>> It's quite amazing they still think they have a leg to stand on
>
> >>>>>>>>> You two really should confine your stupidity to email.
>
> >>>>>>>> Douchebag goes down to lick Fuckwit's crack out on the houseboat with
>
> >>>>>>>> regularity.
>

> >>>>>>> After "docking".http://tinyurl.com/cjusb

>
> >>>>>> I find it rather bizarre to think that that would be pleasurable.
>
> >>>>> I would rather not know what it means. Too late now, and for you. Sorry.
>
> >>>> Ugh.  There's a brand of men's trousers over here called Dockers,
> >>>> started by the Levi-Strauss company back in the 1980s.  I have never
> >>>> bought them, because they have the company logo label on the outside of
> >>>> the hip pocket and I have never worn clothing that had the brand name
> >>>> displayed externally, but now I have even more reason not to wear them.
>
> >>> I've had two week-long breaks renting a boat to chug around the Norfolk
> >>> Broads, and I knew I was being made the butt of some kind of a joke when
> >>> asking some of the people on other boats about the best places for docking,
> >>> but it wasn't until quite recently that I realised in what way.
>
> >> LOL!!!   That's really funny, and in the end (pun intended), no real
> >> harm done.
>
> > "So let me get this right - you're looking for somewhere quiet and private
> > to try docking?"
> > - Yes
>
> > "Done it before?"
> > - Yes
>
> > "Did you like it?"
> > - Yes. We had a great time
>
> > "And your good lady there - does she just watch or does she lend a hand?
> > - Both
>
> > It went on like that for quite a while.
>
> That was truly LOL funny.  The dog even looked up at me.

Probably because you were giggling like a little girl.

[dh]

On Tue, 21 May 2013 23:59:39 -0700 (PDT), "Mr.Smartypants"
<bunghol...@lycos.com> wrote:

>On May 22, 12:39�am, Goo fantasised:

>
>> Douchebag goes down to lick Fuckwit's crack out on the houseboat with
>> regularity.
>
>
>Any progress in your search for the choice cuts from the EXTRA
>livestock you think you believe are being raised?

Apparently Goo is obsessing about guys' assholes again. With his boy
obsessing over Goo's ankles I guess it's not a big surprise that that pushed the
Goober over the edge into his all too frequent asshole obsession "state". So far
afawk Goo could not obsess about assholes in his pre-existent state, yet in his
current state of existence he obsesses over them and apparently enjoys doing so
greatly. Goo's ability now to obsess over assholes as he apparently loves to do,
stronly suggests that he IS better off now than in his pre-existence state for
that reason as well as his ability to enjoy anything else he likes to do, like
lie, and invent idiotic seeming concepts he can't even attempt to support, and
insult other people's ideas without being able to provide anything as good much
less better.

[dh]

On Thu, 23 May 2013 14:54:42 +0100, Derek <dere...@groupmail.com> wrote:

>On Thu, 23 May 2013 06:40:42 -0700 (PDT), Rupert <rupertm...@yahoo.com>
>wrote:
>
>>On Thursday, May 23, 2013 11:45:01 AM UTC+2, Derek wrote:

>>> On Tue, 21 May 2013 23:39:11 -0700, Goo wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> >On 5/21/2013 3:13 PM, Dutch wrote:
>>>
>>> >> Douchebag Hamilton, juvenile ass-suck, gurgled:
>>>
>>> >>> It's quite amazing they still think they have a leg to stand on
>>>
>>> >>
>>>
>>> >> You two really should confine your stupidity to email.
>>>
>>> >
>>>
>>> >Douchebag goes down to lick Fuckwit's crack out on the houseboat with
>>>
>>> >regularity.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> After "docking". http://tinyurl.com/cjusb
>>
>>I find it rather bizarre to think that that would be pleasurable.
>
>I would rather not know what it means. Too late now, and for you. Sorry.

Isn't it you who brought it up to begin with? I don't know what it means in
contrast to your blatant dishonesty, but must expect that it has something to do
with other guys' assholes since you Goos publically obsess over them all too
frequently so I must expect that's what you're doing again now.

[dh]

It sure did. I wonder how many hours he has spent trying to find something
"else". Obviously he wasn't able to find anything, and this has been going on
for several years now. Remember Goo believed it for a couple of years, and even
after it was shown to be a stupid idea by the Gooling the child himself still
acts like he thinks he could support the stupid idea if he wanted to. Even now
that he's proven he can not and we've let him know that he's proven he can not,
he still wants to act like he thinks it can be done. How incredibly stupid, even
for a Goo. But then, "Dutch" always has been about the worst of people for
disagreeing with himself. And then there was his great unlearning which he can't
even attempt to try to explain.

[dh]

On Wed, 22 May 2013 01:58:18 -0700, Dutch <n...@email.com> wrote:

>On Tue, 21 May 2013 23:06:28 -0700 (PDT), "Mr.Smartypants" challenged a Gooling:

>
>>Have either of you two morons found any pet food cows raised under
>>contract for 12 years only to become pet food?
>

><p

You Goos suck so badly at this that you can't even attempt to pretend that
you ever had any clue at all what you thought you were trying to talk about.
Proved by you and Goo, and not in dispute.

[dh]

On Thu, 23 May 2013 09:33:12 -0700 (PDT), "Mr.Smartypants"
<bunghol...@lycos.com> wrote:

>On May 23, 9:16�am, Goo wrote:
>> On 5/23/2013 8:08 AM, Derek wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > On Thu, 23 May 2013 07:45:03 -0700, Goo wrote:
>>
>> >> On 5/23/2013 7:23 AM, Derek wrote:

>> >>> On Thu, 23 May 2013 07:04:03 -0700, Goo wrote:
>>
>> >>>> On 5/23/2013 6:54 AM, Derek wrote:
>> >>>>> On Thu, 23 May 2013 06:40:42 -0700 (PDT), Rupert <rupertmccal...@yahoo.com>
>> >>>>> wrote:
>>
>> >>>>>> On Thursday, May 23, 2013 11:45:01 AM UTC+2, Derek wrote:

Nothing gets the Goos obsessing like fantasising about assholes, and no
doubt all three of them giggle hysterically.

[Dutch]

dh@. wrote:
> you can't even attempt to pretend that
> you ever had any clue at all what you thought you were trying to talk about.

Nobody with an ounce of pride in his command of English usage writes
shit like that. You are illiterate.

[Mr.Smartypants]

Dutch is trying to emulate Goobs by finding ways to disagree with
himself. I wonder if he's proud of proving Goo's pet food cow story to
be total bullshit?......of course he could never let on to Goo that he
was proud of what he'd done.

[George Plimpton]

On 5/23/2013 2:22 PM, Fuckwit David Harrison - *Goo* - stupid,

illiterate cracker and convicted felon, defeated entirely in 1999 and
doing nothing but wasting time ever since, lied:

> On Thu, 23 May 2013 14:54:42 +0100, Derek <dere...@groupmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 23 May 2013 06:40:42 -0700 (PDT), Rupert <rupertm...@yahoo.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Thursday, May 23, 2013 11:45:01 AM UTC+2, Derek wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 21 May 2013 23:39:11 -0700, Goo wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On 5/21/2013 3:13 PM, Dutch wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> Douchebag Hamilton, juvenile ass-suck, gurgled:
>>>>
>>>>>>> It's quite amazing they still think they have a leg to stand on
>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>> You two really should confine your stupidity to email.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Douchebag goes down to lick Fuckwit's crack out on the houseboat with
>>>>
>>>>> regularity.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> After "docking". http://tinyurl.com/cjusb
>>>
>>> I find it rather bizarre to think that that would be pleasurable.
>>
>> I would rather not know what it means. Too late now, and for you. Sorry.
>
> Isn't it you who brought it up to begin with?

You and Douchebag "dock" together. That's sick. You should be beaten
for it.

[George Plimpton]

On 5/23/2013 2:21 PM, Fuckwit David Harrison - *Goo* - stupid,

illiterate cracker and convicted felon, defeated entirely in 1999 and
doing nothing but wasting time ever since, lied:

> On Wed, 22 May 2013 01:58:18 -0700, Dutch <n...@email.com> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 21 May 2013 23:06:28 -0700 (PDT), "Mr.Smartypants" challenged a Gooling:
>>
>>> Have either of you two morons found any pet food cows raised under
>>> contract for 12 years only to become pet food?
>>
>> <p
>

> You suck so badly at this

*Goo*, you are the one who sucks at this worse than anyone. You suck,
and you blow. You have lost *EVERY* time, since 1999. 14 years of
abject, total, unmitigated failure. You lost, but you're so fucking
stupid, and you suck and blow so much, that you are unable to see that
you lost.

[dh]

On Thu, 23 May 2013 01:51:55 -0700, Dutch <n...@email.com> wrote:

>Mr.Smartypants wrote:
>> On May 22, 5:03 pm, Dutch <n...@email.com> wrote:
>>> Mr.Smartypants wrote:
>>>> On May 22, 3:03 am, Dutch <n...@email.com> wrote:
>>>>> Mr.Smartypants wrote:

>>>>>> On May 22, 12:39 am, Goo wrote:
>>>>>>> On 5/21/2013 3:13 PM, Dutch wrote:
>>>
>>>>>>>> Douchebag Hamilton, juvenile ass-suck, gurgled:
>>>>>>>>> It's quite amazing they still think they have a leg to stand on
>>>
>>>>>>>> You two really should confine your stupidity to email.
>>>
>>>>>>> Douchebag goes down to lick Fuckwit's crack out on the houseboat with
>>>>>>> regularity.
>>>
>>>>>> Any progress in your search for the choice cuts from the EXTRA
>>>>>> livestock you think you believe are being raised?
>>>
>>>>> That would be a good topic for you and Fuckwit the next time you meet in
>>>>> the Goober Motel. It might strain your intellect though..
>>>
>>>> Why isn't Goo blubbering about pet food cows and the EXTRA livestock
>>>> he claims are being raised?
>>>
>>>> Would it be because your find of only ONE cow completely blew his
>>>> story out of the water?
>>>
>>> What a sad little clown you have become.
>>
>>
>> I guess you can't deny you piddled on Goo's little parade.
>>
>
>I can't deny

That's as close to honesty as you can get, so we'll accept it and move on.
Okay, you were a complete and absolute failure and we all are aware of it, but
you still want to think such animals exist. So go and find them!!!! Fly and soar
with this.....finding and retrieving delightful examples of cattle being raised
for no other purpose than to become pet food, even if not for a dozen years but
only a few. Go.......soar......quit wussing around..................

[dh]

"Dutch" seems to disagree with himself and flip flop around more than the
Goober. For a while he acted like he could appreciate decent lives for livestock
and then somehow he suddenly unlearned and changed his pov entirely so he says,
though he can't say HOW he unlearned:

"We give them life. They give us their lives, and our
lifestyles. It's a mutually beneficial contract" - "Dutch"

"It's ethically impermissible to consider the lives
of other creatures" - "Dutch"

"Good "lives" (sequences of physical and mental
experiences) are beneficial to animals." - "Dutch"

"Taking moral credit for a livestock animal's very
existence is analagous to taking moral credit for the
life of a daughter you sell onto the streets." - "Dutch"

"I appreciate lives of positive value for livestock that
exist or will exist"- "Dutch"

""Getting to experience life" is not a benefit to an animal"
- "Dutch"

"We should feel good if animals are given good treatment." - "Dutch"

"I decline to "consider" the lives of animals" - "Dutch"

"I have said repeatedly that I believe that many livestock
animals have lives of positive value"- "Dutch"

"It is illogical and inadmissible to "consider" the lives
(existence) of livestock, or of any other creature" - "Dutch"

"WIldlife, like livestock, happen to be living creatures,
their lives per se are not relevant to this issue." - "Dutch"

"Wild animals on average suffer more than farm animals,
I think that's obvious." - "Dutch"

>I wonder if he's proud of proving Goo's pet food cow story to
>be total bullshit?......of course he could never let on to Goo that he
>was proud of what he'd done.

He sure hasn't been able to do anything to back up the Goober's stupid idea.
He hasn't even been able to make another attempt.

[dh]

On Thu, 23 May 2013 16:53:43 -0700, Dutch <n...@email.com> wrote:

>On Thu, 23 May 2013 17:21:10 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 22 May 2013 01:58:18 -0700, Dutch <n...@email.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On Tue, 21 May 2013 23:06:28 -0700 (PDT), "Mr.Smartypants" challenged a Gooling:
>>>
>>>>Have either of you two morons found any pet food cows raised under
>>>>contract for 12 years only to become pet food?
>>>
>>><p
>>

>> You Goos suck so badly at this that you can't even attempt to pretend that

>>you ever had any clue at all what you thought you were trying to talk about.

>>Proved by you and Goo, and not in dispute.
>

>Nobody with an ounce of pride in his command of English usage writes
>shit like that.

What I pointed out is true, proved by you and Goo, and not in dispute.

[dh]

On Tue, 28 May 2013 13:17:53 -0700, Goo wrote:

>On Thu, 23 May 2013 17:21:10 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>

>>On Wed, 22 May 2013 01:58:18 -0700, Dutch <n...@email.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On Tue, 21 May 2013 23:06:28 -0700 (PDT), "Mr.Smartypants" challenged a Gooling:
>>>
>>>>Have either of you two morons found any pet food cows raised under
>>>>contract for 12 years only to become pet food?
>>>
>>><p
>>

>> You Goos suck so badly at this that you can't even attempt to pretend that
>>you ever had any clue at all what you thought you were trying to talk about.
>>Proved by you and Goo, and not in dispute.

. . .
>you

YOU GOOS proved it, Goo.

[George Plimpton]

On 5/30/2013 3:48 PM, Fuckwit David Harrison - *Goo* - stupid,

illiterate cracker and convicted felon, defeated entirely in 1999 and
doing nothing but wasting time ever since, lied:

> On 5/28/2013 1:17 PM, George Plimpton wrote:
>> On 5/23/2013 2:21 PM, Fuckwit David Harrison - *Goo* - stupid,
>> illiterate cracker and convicted felon, defeated entirely in 1999 and
>> doing nothing but wasting time ever since, lied:
>>

>>> On Wed, 22 May 2013 01:58:18 -0700, Dutch <n...@email.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Tue, 21 May 2013 23:06:28 -0700 (PDT), "Mr.Smartypants" challenged
>>>> a Gooling:
>>>>
>>>>> Have either of you two morons found any pet food cows raised under
>>>>> contract for 12 years only to become pet food?
>>>>
>>>> <p
>>>

>>> You suck so badly at this
>>
>> *Goo*, you are the one who sucks at this worse than anyone. You suck,
>> and you blow. You have lost *EVERY* time, since 1999. 14 years of
>> abject, total, unmitigated failure. You lost, but you're so fucking
>> stupid, and you suck and blow so much, that you are unable to see that
>> you lost.
>

> YOU proved it

No, *YOU* proved it, *Goo* - *YOU* proved that you suck and blow at this.

[dh]

On Thu, 30 May 2013 16:34:57 -0700, Goo wrote:

>On Thu, 30 May 2013 18:48:05 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>
>>On Tue, 28 May 2013 13:17:53 -0700, Goo wrote:
>>
>>>On Thu, 23 May 2013 17:21:10 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>>>

>>>>On Wed, 22 May 2013 01:58:18 -0700, Dutch <n...@email.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Tue, 21 May 2013 23:06:28 -0700 (PDT), "Mr.Smartypants" challenged a Gooling:
>>>>>
>>>>>>Have either of you two morons found any pet food cows raised under
>>>>>>contract for 12 years only to become pet food?
>>>>>
>>>>><p
>>>>

>>>> You Goos suck so badly at this that you can't even attempt to pretend that
>>>>you ever had any clue at all what you thought you were trying to talk about.
>>>>Proved by you and Goo, and not in dispute.
>>. . .
>>>you
>>
>> YOU GOOS proved it, Goo.
>

>No, *YOU* proved it

Ron and I made YOU GOOS prove it, Goo.

[Dutch]

"Ron" says no animal benefits by being raised for livestock. He's afraid
to say it to you directly.

[Mr.Smartypants]

I've told him that DIRECTLY before. While we've both decided to agree
to disagree about that we both also acknowledge that you goos are the
most hilarious act on the internet.
How about YOU confronting Goo directly to explain how he thinks he now
knows what he claims can't be known.......and maybe ask him to explain
how he thinks he found that out.

[Rupert]

Seems a bit unfair to suggest that two consenting adults should be beaten for choosing to engage in a sexual activity together.

[Dutch]

Mr.Smartypants wrote:
>> >"Ron" says no animal benefits by being raised for livestock. He's afraid
>> >to say it to you directly.
> I've told him that DIRECTLY before. While we've both decided to agree
> to disagree about that

That is his fundamental theme; everything he rants on about in every
post is about nothing but that. If you don't agree on that you have no
business being allies. All the two of you do is work together on lame
ankle-biting about irrelevant nonsense.

[Mr.Smartypants]

Really? I think it's rather interesting that we can be so far apart on
one subject but still agree that you goos are the stupidest, most
hilarious trio of clowns ever encountered on usenet.

[Dutch]

Mr.Smartypants wrote:
> On Jun 5, 2:56 am, Dutch <n...@email.com> wrote:
>> Mr.Smartypants wrote:
>>>>> "Ron" says no animal benefits by being raised for livestock. He's afraid
>>>>> to say it to you directly.
>>> I've told him that DIRECTLY before. While we've both decided to agree
>>> to disagree about that
>>
>> That is his fundamental theme; everything he rants on about in every
>> post is about nothing but that. If you don't agree on that you have no
>> business being allies. All the two of you do is work together on lame
>> ankle-biting about irrelevant nonsense.
>
>
> Really?

Yes, really. Cows raised for pet food? Really? Pre-existence, really?
Knowing what can't be known, really? This is all rubbish, made up
bullshit, and YOU KNOW IT.

> I think it's rather interesting that we can be so far apart on
> one subject

ONE SUBJECT? It is THE subject that is the fundamental reason for this
newsgroup, the raising, use and consumption of animals. You two have
polar opposite opinions on it.

> but still agree that you goos are the stupidest, most
> hilarious trio of clowns ever encountered on usenet.

You don't believe that either. Fuckwit is the clown and you're his
water-boy. I just don't know why.

[Mr.Smartypants]

On Jun 5, 2:52 pm, Dutch <n...@email.com> wrote:
> Mr.Smartypants wrote:
> > On Jun 5, 2:56 am, Dutch <n...@email.com> wrote:
> >> Mr.Smartypants wrote:
> >>>>> "Ron" says no animal benefits by being raised for livestock. He's afraid
> >>>>> to say it to you directly.
> >>> I've told him that DIRECTLY before. While we've both decided to agree
> >>> to disagree about that
>
> >> That is his fundamental theme; everything he rants on about in every
> >> post is about nothing but that. If you don't agree on that you have no
> >> business being allies. All the two of you do is work together on lame
> >> ankle-biting about irrelevant nonsense.
>
> > Really?
>
> Yes, really. Cows raised for pet food? Really? Pre-existence, really?
> Knowing what can't be known, really? This is all rubbish, made up
> bullshit, and YOU KNOW IT.

It's all stuff your boss Goo made up. Don't do his wussing for him.
Makes you look silly.

>
> > I think it's rather interesting that we can be so far apart on
> > one subject
>
> ONE SUBJECT? It is THE subject that is the fundamental reason for this
> newsgroup, the raising, use and consumption of animals. You two have
> polar opposite opinions on it.
>
> > but still agree that you goos are the stupidest, most
> > hilarious trio of clowns ever encountered on usenet
>

> You don't believe that either. Fuckwit is the clown and you're his
> water-boy. I just don't know why.

What an absolute genius you are!! No wonder Goo picked YOU from so
many to be his own personal little gooling. Who else but someone as
intelligent as a gooling could possibly presume to tell me what I
believe?

[Dutch]

Mr.Smartypants wrote:
> On Jun 5, 2:52 pm, Dutch <n...@email.com> wrote:
>> Mr.Smartypants wrote:
>>> On Jun 5, 2:56 am, Dutch <n...@email.com> wrote:
>>>> Mr.Smartypants wrote:
>>>>>>> "Ron" says no animal benefits by being raised for livestock. He's afraid
>>>>>>> to say it to you directly.
>>>>> I've told him that DIRECTLY before. While we've both decided to agree
>>>>> to disagree about that
>>
>>>> That is his fundamental theme; everything he rants on about in every
>>>> post is about nothing but that. If you don't agree on that you have no
>>>> business being allies. All the two of you do is work together on lame
>>>> ankle-biting about irrelevant nonsense.
>>
>>> Really?
>>
>> Yes, really. Cows raised for pet food? Really? Pre-existence, really?
>> Knowing what can't be known, really? This is all rubbish, made up
>> bullshit, and YOU KNOW IT.
>
>
> It's all stuff your boss Goo made up. Don't do his wussing for him.
> Makes you look silly.

ROTFL! I look silly? You two two need to listen to yourselves.

>>
>>> I think it's rather interesting that we can be so far apart on
>>> one subject
>>
>> ONE SUBJECT? It is THE subject that is the fundamental reason for this
>> newsgroup, the raising, use and consumption of animals. You two have
>> polar opposite opinions on it.
>>
>>> but still agree that you goos are the stupidest, most
>>> hilarious trio of clowns ever encountered on usenet
>>
>> You don't believe that either. Fuckwit is the clown and you're his
>> water-boy. I just don't know why.
>
> What an absolute genius you are!! No wonder Goo picked YOU from so
> many to be his own personal little gooling. Who else but someone as
> intelligent as a gooling could possibly presume to tell me what I
> believe?

I don't have to presume, you told me, as if I didn't already know.

You're wearing some horrible wound in your ego from something Ball said
to you once now you're obsessed with finding a way to get him back, and
doing a piss-poor job of it.

[Mr.Smartypants]

So I don't believe that you, Goo, and Derek are the stupidest, most
hilarious trio on usenet?

[Dutch]

I refuse to believe you're that big of an idiot. Some would disagree.

[Mr.Smartypants]

Dutch, you three are hilarious. Read over some of your posts
especially the ones where to try to come to Goo's rescue. They're the
really funny ones.

[Dutch]

Of course there's always a chance I'm wrong and you ARE this much of an
idiot.

[Mr.Smartypants]

There you go. Running from the truth again.

[Dutch]

You're never going to tire of posting meaningless bullshit are you?

[dh]

It is, but their stupidity and especially the dishonesty and contemptibility
factors are so high in the Goos it's amazing that anyone could respect them.

How stupid would a person have to be to honestly be in favor of decent AW
over elimination as two of the three Goos claim to be, yet spend over a decade
encouraging people NOT TO have appreciation for when decent AW regulations, or
anything else, successfully result in lives of positive value for millions of
domestic animals? A person would have to be so remarkably stupid that they work
AGAINST what they claim to be in favor of. IF!!! either of the Goos who claim to
favor AW honestly do, then opposing appreciation for when it's successful is no
doubt their biggest selfoutstupidification yet. Not just livestock, but the Goos
are opposed to appreciating lives of positive value for anything and everything,
afaik.

These stupid Goobers agree with your side that no domestic animals have
lives of positive value, so why do the morons fight with you anyway? I've quoted
Goo countless times and he has probably lied that every one of his quotes is not
a quote at some point along the way, and we KNOW he's lied that a number of them
are not if he hasn't lied about all of them. In contrast and adding to his
selfoutstupidifications the Goober has also claimed that a number of them are
true statements. The consistency, ALWAYS, is that Goo can never even attempt to
say how he wants people to think he thinks he disagrees with himself about any
of them, and they are all arguments in favor of elimination over decent AW in
contrast to how they claim to feel. We know Goo agrees with himself about all of
his following quotes, so see if you feel any of them do NOT agree with your side
of this issue which two of the Goos (dishonestly imo) claim to be opposed to:

"NO livestock benefit from being farmed." - Goo

"No farm animals benefit from farming." - Goo

"There is nothing to "appreciate" about the livestock "getting
to experience life" - Goo

"logically one MUST conclude that not raising them in the first place is the
ethically superior choice." - Goo

"you MUST believe that it makes moral sense not to raise the animals as the only
way to prevent the harm that results from killing them." - Goo

""Getting to experience life" has no significance." - Goo

"the "getting to experience life" deserves NO moral
consideration, and is given none; the deliberate killing
of animals for use by humans DOES deserve moral
consideration, and gets it." - Goo

""giving them life" does NOT mitigate the wrongness of
their deaths" - Goo

"Causing animals to be born and "get to experience life"
(in Fuckwit's wretched prose) is no mitigation at all for
killing them." - Goo

"When considering your food choices ethically, assign
ZERO weight to the morally empty fact that choosing to
eat meat causes animals to be bred into existence." - Goo

"The meaningless fact-lette that farm animals "get to
experience life" deserves no consideration when asking
whether or not it is moral to kill them. Zero." - Goo

"the nutritionally unnecessary choice deliberately to kill an animal
ALWAYS causes a moral harm greater in magnitude than . . . the
moral "benefit" realized by the animal in existing at all" - Goo

"the moral harm caused by killing them is greater in magnitude
than ANY benefit they might derive from "decent lives" - Goo

"no matter how "decent" the conditions are, the deliberate killing
of the animals erases all of it." - Goo

"it is not "better" that the animal exist, no matter
its quality of live" - Goo

"It is not "better" in any moral way, and not in *any* way
at all to the animal itself, that the animal exists." - Goo

"The meaningless fact-lette that farm animals "get
to experience life" deserves no consideration when
asking whether or not it is moral to kill them. Zero." - Goo

"It is completely UNIMPORTANT, morally, that "billions
of animals" at any point "get to experience life."
ZERO importance to it." - Goo

"There is no consideration whatever to be given to any animals' "getting to
experience life."" - Goo

"A life - *any* life of *any* quality - is not a "benefit" to an animal versus
never existing" - Goo

"Coming into existence is not a benefit compared with never existing - proved."
- Goo

etc...........

[dh]

On Wed, 5 Jun 2013 01:53:53 -0700 (PDT), Rupert <rupertm...@yahoo.com>
wrote:

>On Tuesday, May 28, 2013, the Goober lied about his own fantasy:

How about when a stupid disgusting Goober masturbates about it openly in a
public ng, and then to further his masturbation the Googoots lies that it has
actually taken place? LOL...I know "how about" in your case...LOL...you ADMIRE
it because Goo is your bro and your hero.

[dh]

On Wed, 05 Jun 2013 13:52:13 -0700, Dutch <n...@email.com> wrote:

>
>Mr.Smartypants wrote:
>> On Jun 5, 2:56 am, Dutch <n...@email.com> wrote:
>>> Mr.Smartypants wrote:
>>>>>> "Ron" says no animal benefits by being raised for livestock. He's afraid
>>>>>> to say it to you directly.
>>>> I've told him that DIRECTLY before. While we've both decided to agree
>>>> to disagree about that
>>>
>>> That is his fundamental theme; everything he rants on about in every
>>> post is about nothing but that. If you don't agree on that you have no
>>> business being allies. All the two of you do is work together on lame
>>> ankle-biting about irrelevant nonsense.
>>
>>
>> Really?
>
>Yes, really. Cows raised for pet food?

_________________________________________________________
Ron laughed at Goo:

>> LOL!!!! You STILL believe cattle are raised for 12 years for no other reason
>> than to become pet food

Goo replied:

For some, that turns out to be true. <shrug>
���������������������������������������������������������
>Really?
_________________________________________________________
"shrubkiller" wrote:

>>And so here is stupid little Goober desperately trying to get us to
>>believe that someone deliberately fed a cow for TWELVE years in order
>>to turn her into pet food.

Goo replied:

Exactly. That's exactly what the AP story said.

"shrubkiller" wrote:

>>She was likely a range cow that was beyond her calf bearing years and
>>far too tough for sale at the supermarket meat section.

Goo replied:

No. It was an animal bred under contract for pet food.
���������������������������������������������������������
>Pre-existence,

"The only way that the concept "benefit from existence"
can begin to make sense semantically is if one assumes
a pre-existent state" - Goo

>really?

"Not existing is not equivalent to "being nothing."" - Goo

>Knowing what can't be known,

"EVEN WITH the very best animal welfare conditions one
might provide: they STILL might not be as good as the
"pre-existence" state was for the animals; one simply
cannot know." - Goo

>really?

"When the entity moves from "pre-existence" into the
existence we know, we don't know if that move improves
its welfare, degrades it, or leaves it unchanged." - Goo

>This is all rubbish,

"...existence, or "getting to experience life", is not a benefit compared
with never existing." - Goo

"the comparison is nonsense and cannot be made." - Goo

>made up

"It is not a "benefit" to come into existence and "get to experience life"
instead of never existing" - Goo

"I *never* make such a comparison" - Goo

>bullshit,

"A life - *any* life of *any* quality - is not a "benefit" to an animal versus
never existing" - Goo

"the comparison between existence and non-existence, from the
perspective of the entity, cannot be made" - Goo

>and YOU KNOW IT.

"The animal was bred and raised to be pet food. That's
exactly what the AP story says." - Goo

"It's established: cattle and other animals are expressly raised
to be pet food." - Goo

"Cattle are specifically bred into existence to be pet
food. There have been several citations to support this." - Goo

""pre-existence" . . . "getting to experience life" . . . is based on it." - Goo
"one has no knowledge of that state of pre-existence" - Goo

"Coming into existence is not a benefit compared with never existing - proved."
- Goo

"I show, conclusively, that the comparison cannot be made." - Goo

[Dutch]

Your posts are the usenet equivalent of shitting on the floor.

[Rupert]

Jonathan Ball is not, by any stretch of the imagination, my brother and my hero, and you would have to be extraordinarily stupid to think so. I have no particularly strong feelings about all this nonsense about "docking" one way or the other. It's just another big pile of nonsense.

[Mr.Smartypants]

You're talking about Goo's posts? I think he'll give you an ass-
whooping for that.

[George Plimpton]

On 6/4/2013 10:57 AM, Fuckwit David Harrison - *Goo* - stupid,

illiterate cracker and convicted felon, defeated entirely in 1999 and
doing nothing but wasting time ever since, lied:

> On 5/30/2013 4:34 PM, George Plimpton wrote:
>> On 5/30/2013 3:48 PM, Fuckwit David Harrison - *Goo* - stupid,
>> illiterate cracker and convicted felon, defeated entirely in 1999 and
>> doing nothing but wasting time ever since, lied:
>>
>>> On 5/28/2013 1:17 PM, George Plimpton wrote:
>>>> On 5/23/2013 2:21 PM, Fuckwit David Harrison - *Goo* - stupid,
>>>> illiterate cracker and convicted felon, defeated entirely in 1999 and
>>>> doing nothing but wasting time ever since, lied:
>>>>

>>>>> On Wed, 22 May 2013 01:58:18 -0700, Dutch <n...@email.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, 21 May 2013 23:06:28 -0700 (PDT), "Mr.Smartypants" challenged
>>>>>> a Gooling:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Have either of you two morons found any pet food cows raised under
>>>>>>> contract for 12 years only to become pet food?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <p
>>>>>

>>>>> You suck so badly at this
>>>>
>>>> *Goo*, you are the one who sucks at this worse than anyone. You suck,
>>>> and you blow. You have lost *EVERY* time, since 1999. 14 years of
>>>> abject, total, unmitigated failure. You lost, but you're so fucking
>>>> stupid, and you suck and blow so much, that you are unable to see that
>>>> you lost.
>>>
>>> YOU proved it
>>
>> No, *YOU* proved it, *Goo* - *YOU* proved that you suck and blow at this.
>

> Ron and I made

squishy noises on your houseboat for hours. Shut up about it.

[Mr.Smartypants]

Goo, what is it you think you found out about the things you claim
can't be known? Dutch gave a little hint that if someone were to age
regress back beyond the point of existence he could learn everything
he wanted to know about pre-existence.

Is that what you think you did, Goobs? How did you get back?......or
do you think you're still stuck there?

[dh]

On Thu, 6 Jun 2013 22:03:10 -0700 (PDT), Rupert <rupertm...@yahoo.com>

wrote:

>On Friday, June 7, 2013 12:01:47 AM UTC+2, d...@. wrote:
>> On Wed, 5 Jun 2013 01:53:53 -0700 (PDT), Rupert <rupertm...@yahoo.com>
>>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> >On Tuesday, May 28, 2013, the Goober lied about his own fantasy:
>>
>> >> On 5/23/2013 2:22 PM, Fuckwit David Harrison - *Goo* - stupid,
>>
>> >>
>>
>> >> illiterate cracker and convicted felon, defeated entirely in 1999 and
>>
>> >>
>>
>> >> doing nothing but wasting time ever since, lied:
>>
>> >>
>>
>> >>
>>
>> >>
>>
>> >> > On Thu, 23 May 2013 14:54:42 +0100, Derek <dere...@groupmail.com> wrote:
>>

>> >> >> I would rather not know what it means. Too late now, and for you. Sorry.
>>
>> >>
>>
>> >> >
>>
>> >>
>>
>> >> > Isn't it you who brought it up to begin with?
>>
>> >>
>>
>> >>
>>
>> >>
>>
>> >> You and Douchebag "dock" together. That's sick. You should be beaten
>>
>> >>
>>
>> >> for it.
>>
>> >
>>
>> >Seems a bit unfair to suggest that two consenting adults should be beaten for choosing to engage in a sexual activity together.
>>
>>
>>
>> How about when a stupid disgusting Goober masturbates about it openly in a
>>
>> public ng, and then to further his masturbation the Googoots lies that it has
>>
>> actually taken place? LOL...I know "how about" in your case...LOL...you ADMIRE
>>
>> it because Goo is your bro and your hero.
>

>...[Goo] is not, by any stretch of the imagination, my brother and my hero, and you would have to be extraordinarily stupid to think so.

If you didn't agree with the Goober about all of the following and more it
MIGHT be in some way stupid, but since you do agree with Goo it seems more
likely that he is your bro and hero than not:

"NO livestock benefit from being farmed." - Goo

"No farm animals benefit from farming." - Goo

"There is nothing to "appreciate" about the livestock "getting
to experience life" - Goo

"Shut the fuck up about "consideration" for "their lives"" - Goo

"the moral harm caused by killing them is greater in magnitude
than ANY benefit they might derive from "decent lives" - Goo

"no matter how "decent" the conditions are, the deliberate killing
of the animals erases all of it." - Goo

""giving them life" does NOT mitigate the wrongness of
their deaths" - Goo

"the "getting to experience life" deserves NO moral
consideration, and is given none; the deliberate killing
of animals for use by humans DOES deserve moral
consideration, and gets it." - Goo

"It is not "better" for the animals to experience a good life than
never to live at all." - Goo

""Getting to experience life" has no significance." - Goo

"There is no "consideration" to be given." - Goo

"*NO* right-thinking person attempts to "balance" the death with some
bullshit about the animal's "getting to experience life."" - Goo

"...existence, or "getting to experience life", is not a benefit compared
with never existing." - Goo

"it is not "better" that the animal exist, no matter
its quality of live" - Goo

"Existence - "getting to experience life" - is not a benefit to livestock
animals (or any other living entity) and deserves no moral consideration
at all, and gets none from rational people." - Goo

"It is not a "benefit" to come into existence and "get to experience life"
instead of never existing" - Goo

"A life - *any* life of *any* quality - is not a "benefit" to an animal versus
never existing" - Goo

""aras" confront him with a truth that . . . consumption
of "meat...gravy" harms animals interests." - Goo

[dh]

On Mon, 10 Jun 2013 09:39:09 -0700 (PDT), "Mr.Smartypants"
<bunghol...@lycos.com> wrote:

>Goo, what is it you think you found out about the things you claim
>can't be known? Dutch gave a little hint that if someone were to age
>regress back beyond the point of existence he could learn everything
>he wanted to know about pre-existence.

His boy claims to have unlearned how to appreciate life for any creatures and
Goo claims to have learned that which he said can't be known. Could there be a
connection?

>Is that what you think you did, Goobs? How did you get back?......or
>do you think you're still stuck there?

It's certainly a shame the Goober doesn't have any clue at all what he
thinks he thinks about this one, since it would likely be hilarious. Goo can't
say how his boy unlearned either. What a pair of clueless idiots. The gooling
did share something about why he wants people to think he suddenly completely
changed his pov and lifestlye away from veg*nism though:

"I changed my attitude about eating meat
after having intense debates with the participants here, including
Jonathan Ball, Rick Etter, John Mercer, and others." - "Dutch"

Yet he can't say how he unlearned having appreciation.

[dh]

There're all Goobal posts, and the gooling apparently is ashamed of them. He
can't attempt to defend any of Goo's idiocies either. Just whine a little about
them being exposed and that's about it. His wussile pules don't help the Goobal
position in the least, while they do reveal the desperation and ineptitude that
consumes them both. Puling wusses...that does have sort of a Goobal ring to it.

[dh]

That response is a lot lamer than my reply to your wussing, so even if mine
is what you claim yours is still a lot lamer. Yours would probably be along the
lines of someone eating the shit and then vomiting it back on the floor. That
does sound like a good comparison with the position you and Goo are in.

[Mr.Smartypants]

Dutch is every bit as good at wussing as Goo is. Dutch isn't posting
as he's out celebrating the gold star Goo gave him for passing his
wussing finals.

[Rupert]

On Tuesday, June 11, 2013 5:50:50 PM UTC+2, d...@. wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Jun 2013 22:03:10 -0700 (PDT), Rupert <rupertm...@yahoo.com>
>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> >On Friday, June 7, 2013 12:01:47 AM UTC+2, d...@. wrote:
>
> >> On Wed, 5 Jun 2013 01:53:53 -0700 (PDT), Rupert <rupertm...@yahoo.com>
>
> >>
>
> >> wrote:
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >> >On Tuesday, May 28, 2013, the Goober lied about his own fantasy:
>
> >>
>
> >> >> On 5/23/2013 2:22 PM, Fuckwit David Harrison - *Goo* - stupid,
>
> >>
>
> >> >>
>
> >>
>
> >> >> illiterate cracker and convicted felon, defeated entirely in 1999 and
>
> >>
>
> >> >>
>
> >>
>
> >> >> doing nothing but wasting time ever since, lied:
>
> >>
>
> >> >>
>
> >>
>
> >> >>
>
> >>
>
> >> >>
>
> >>
>
> >> >> > On Thu, 23 May 2013 14:54:42 +0100, Derek <dere...@groupmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>
>
>
>
> >> >> >> I would rather not know what it means. Too late now, and for you. Sorry.
>
> >>
>
> >> >>
>
> >>
>
> >> >> >
>
> >>
>
> >> >>
>
> >>
>
> >> >> > Isn't it you who brought it up to begin with?
>
> >>
>
> >> >>
>
> >>
>
> >> >>
>
> >>
>
> >> >>
>
> >>
>
> >> >> You and Douchebag "dock" together. That's sick. You should be beaten
>
> >>
>
> >> >>
>
> >>
>
> >> >> for it.
>
> >>
>
> >> >
>
> >>
>
> >> >Seems a bit unfair to suggest that two consenting adults should be beaten for choosing to engage in a sexual activity together.
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >> How about when a stupid disgusting Goober masturbates about it openly in a
>
> >>
>
> >> public ng, and then to further his masturbation the Googoots lies that it has
>
> >>
>
> >> actually taken place? LOL...I know "how about" in your case...LOL...you ADMIRE
>
> >>
>
> >> it because Goo is your bro and your hero.
>
> >
>
> >...[Goo] is not, by any stretch of the imagination, my brother and my hero, and you would have to be extraordinarily stupid to think so.
>
>
>
> If you didn't agree with the Goober about all of the following and more it
>
> MIGHT be in some way stupid, but since you do agree with Goo it seems more
>
> likely that he is your bro and hero than not:
>

That is a stupid inference. I can have points of agreement with him without him being my brother and my hero.

>
>
> "NO livestock benefit from being farmed." - Goo
>

Maybe you can give us a specific example of a farm animal benefitting from being farmed.

[dh]

Well he certainly did wuss in fine Goobal style. We see that neither of
those Goobers have any idea at all what they want people to think they think
they're trying to talk about.

[dh]

On Tue, 11 Jun 2013 15:13:40 -0700 (PDT), Rupert <rupertm...@yahoo.com>

Maybe, but you don't. He's your bro and hero.

>> "NO livestock benefit from being farmed." - Goo
>>
>
>Maybe you can give us a specific example of a farm animal benefitting from being farmed.

I've given you plenty and even remarked about the fact that you couldn't
appreciate any.

[George Plimpton]

On 6/13/2013 12:31 PM, Fuckwit David Harrison - *Goo* - stupid,

illiterate cracker and convicted felon, defeated entirely in 1999 and
doing nothing but wasting time ever since, lied:

> On Tue, 11 Jun 2013 15:13:40 -0700 (PDT), Rupert <rupertm...@yahoo.com>
> wrote:

>>
>> Maybe you can give us a specific example of a farm animal benefitting from being farmed.
>
> I've given you plenty and

No. You haven't given any. You could not have done - *NO* animal
"benefits" from "being farmed."

[Rupert]

On Thursday, June 13, 2013 9:31:49 PM UTC+2, d...@. wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Jun 2013 15:13:40 -0700 (PDT), Rupert <rupertm...@yahoo.com>
>
> wrote:
>

> >That is a stupid inference. I can have points of agreement with him without him being my brother and my hero.
>
>
>
> Maybe, but you don't. He's your bro and hero.
>

I wonder what makes you so convinced of that.

> >> "NO livestock benefit from being farmed." - Goo
>
> >Maybe you can give us a specific example of a farm animal benefitting from being farmed.
>
> I've given you plenty and even remarked about the fact that you couldn't
>
> appreciate any.
>

You think that broiler chickens benefit from being farmed, do you?

[dh]

On Sun, 16 Jun 2013 10:00:26 -0700 (PDT), Rupert <rupertm...@yahoo.com>

wrote:

>On Thursday, June 13, 2013 9:31:49 PM UTC+2, d...@. wrote:
>> On Tue, 11 Jun 2013 15:13:40 -0700 (PDT), Rupert <rupertm...@yahoo.com>
>>
>> wrote:
>>
>
>> >That is a stupid inference. I can have points of agreement with him without him being my brother and my hero.
>>
>>
>>
>> Maybe, but you don't. He's your bro and hero.
>>
>
>I wonder what makes you so convinced of that.

Goo is in favor of the misnomer but tries to pretend and does so very VERY
poorly that he's in favor of decent AW. He does that in an attempt to not lose
the respect of people who disrespect eliminationists, though it doesn't work
with me of course. He's your bro because of that and more, and he's your hero
because from your position he seems like a "special agent" or some such thing.
You feel like he's sort of working "under cover" and you respect and admire it.
So did "Dutch" which is why he started lying in a similar way.

>> >> "NO livestock benefit from being farmed." - Goo
>>
>> >Maybe you can give us a specific example of a farm animal benefitting from being farmed.
>>
>> I've given you plenty and even remarked about the fact that you couldn't
>>
>> appreciate any.
>>
>
>You think that broiler chickens benefit from being farmed, do you?

The vast majority of them yes. You've certainly provided no reason to
believe otherwise, though I've encouraged you to try and believe that you have
tried even though you haven't come anywhere near succeeding.

[dh]

On Thu, 13 Jun 2013 14:04:40 -0700, Goo lied:

>On Thu, 13 Jun 2013 15:31:49 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>
>>On Tue, 11 Jun 2013 15:13:40 -0700 (PDT), Rupert <rupertm...@yahoo.com>
>>wrote:
>>

>>>On Tuesday, June 11, 2013 5:50:50 PM UTC+2, d...@. wrote:

>>>> On Thu, 6 Jun 2013 22:03:10 -0700 (PDT), Rupert <rupertm...@yahoo.com>

>>>>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> >On Friday, June 7, 2013 12:01:47 AM UTC+2, d...@. wrote:
>>>>

>>>> >> On Wed, 5 Jun 2013 01:53:53 -0700 (PDT), Rupert <rupertm...@yahoo.com>

>>>>
>>>> >>
>>>>
>>>> >> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> >>
>>>>
>>>> >>
>>>>
>>>> >>
>>>>
>>>> >> >On Tuesday, May 28, 2013, the Goober lied about his own fantasy:
>>>>
>>>> >>
>>>>

>>>> >> >> On 5/23/2013 2:22 PM, Fuckwit David Harrison - *Goo* - stupid,

>>>>
>>>> >>
>>>>
>>>> >> >>
>>>>
>>>> >>
>>>>
>>>> >> >> illiterate cracker and convicted felon, defeated entirely in 1999 and
>>>>
>>>> >>
>>>>
>>>> >> >>
>>>>
>>>> >>
>>>>
>>>> >> >> doing nothing but wasting time ever since, lied:
>>>>
>>>> >>
>>>>
>>>> >> >>
>>>>
>>>> >>
>>>>
>>>> >> >>
>>>>
>>>> >>
>>>>
>>>> >> >>
>>>>
>>>> >>
>>>>

>>>> >> >> > On Thu, 23 May 2013 14:54:42 +0100, Derek <dere...@groupmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> >>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> >> >> >> I would rather not know what it means. Too late now, and for you. Sorry.
>>>>
>>>> >>
>>>>
>>>> >> >>
>>>>
>>>> >>
>>>>
>>>> >> >> >
>>>>
>>>> >>
>>>>
>>>> >> >>
>>>>
>>>> >>
>>>>
>>>> >> >> > Isn't it you who brought it up to begin with?
>>>>
>>>> >>
>>>>
>>>> >> >>
>>>>
>>>> >>
>>>>
>>>> >> >>
>>>>
>>>> >>
>>>>
>>>> >> >>
>>>>
>>>> >>
>>>>
>>>> >> >> You and Douchebag "dock" together. That's sick. You should be beaten
>>>>
>>>> >>
>>>>
>>>> >> >>
>>>>
>>>> >>
>>>>
>>>> >> >> for it.
>>>>
>>>> >>
>>>>
>>>> >> >
>>>>
>>>> >>
>>>>
>>>> >> >Seems a bit unfair to suggest that two consenting adults should be beaten for choosing to engage in a sexual activity together.
>>>>
>>>> >>
>>>>
>>>> >>
>>>>
>>>> >>
>>>>
>>>> >> How about when a stupid disgusting Goober masturbates about it openly in a
>>>>
>>>> >>
>>>>
>>>> >> public ng, and then to further his masturbation the Googoots lies that it has
>>>>
>>>> >>
>>>>
>>>> >> actually taken place? LOL...I know "how about" in your case...LOL...you ADMIRE
>>>>
>>>> >>
>>>>
>>>> >> it because Goo is your bro and your hero.
>>>>
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>> >...[Goo] is not, by any stretch of the imagination, my brother and my hero, and you would have to be extraordinarily stupid to think so.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> If you didn't agree with the Goober about all of the following and more it
>>>>
>>>> MIGHT be in some way stupid, but since you do agree with Goo it seems more
>>>>
>>>> likely that he is your bro and hero than not:
>>>>
>>>
>>>That is a stupid inference. I can have points of agreement with him without him being my brother and my hero.
>>
>> Maybe, but you don't. He's your bro and hero.
>>
>>>> "NO livestock benefit from being farmed." - Goo
>>>>
>>>

>>>Maybe you can give us a specific example of a farm animal benefitting from being farmed.
>>

>> I've given you plenty and even remarked about the fact that you couldn't
>>appreciate any.
>

>No. You haven't given any. You could not have done

Here are some examples, Goo:

http://www.agrabilityproject.org/images/clip_image002_0015.jpg
http://www.karlschatz.com/yearofthegoat/images/skyland.jpg
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2305/2361808892_b1a8025730.jpg
http://www.quailhunt.net/images/Quail%20Farm2.jpg
http://images.usatoday.com/news/_photos/2006/04/10/egg.jpg
http://www.mir.com.my/rb/photography/leofoo/windows/images/duckpond.jpg
http://www.csulb.edu/~odinthor/Sheep.jpg
http://www.seldomseenfarm.co.uk/images/goose%20540-2.jpg
http://www.jamesranch.net/images/home_cow_red_cliff.jpg
http://www.omafra.gov.on.ca/english/landuse/mds_p7f11.JPG
http://www.drgobbler.com/images/turkeys.JPG
http://cache.daylife.com/imageserve/02Jz3CK90Q2LI/610x.jpg
http://www.cohabnet.org/images/img_issue3.2_lrg.jpg
http://www.indymedia.org.uk/images/2008/01/389523.gif
http://www.colleenpatrick.com/blog/uploaded_images/June-2007-13-782938.jpg
http://www.sprucedale.com/images/feedlot.jpg
http://www.saucierquail.com/farm4.jpg
http://www.fwi.co.uk/Assets/GetAsset.aspx?ItemID=3802569
http://www.banhdc.org/images/ch-hor-20060319.jpg
http://www.sheep101.info/Images/VAfeedlot.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v660/sarahpayton/Grass-fedCows.jpg
http://bentleycellars.com/db2/00200/bentleycellars.com/_uimages/GoldSheepRanch.JPG
http://www.ens-newswire.com/ens/apr2005/20050415_feedlot.jpg
http://www.agralarm.com/images/400_Texas_Broilers.jpg
http://www.circlekquailfarm.com/200%20x%20134.JPG
http://www.moonridgefarm.co.uk/USERIMAGES/more%20quail.jpg
http://www.therunningduckfarm.com/images/fieldtripw.jpg
http://www.agriproducts.com.au/verve/_resources/sheep2_page.jpg
http://www.harveyquarterhorseranch.com/graphics/allhorses.jpg
http://www.jphpk.gov.my/English/Asmawi%20M.%20Tahir.jpg
http://www.realclimate.org/images/Sheep.jpg
http://www.cps.gov.on.ca/french/ev10000/ev10703.jpg
http://www.tribuneindia.com/2004/20040212/wd6.jpg
http://www.mtexpress.com/2000/06-21-00/u21cov1.jpg
http://www.farm-energy.ca/IReF/uploads/images/Case_Studies/EE/Lighting2.jpg
http://www.piercefarmwatch.org/images/blog/bellsurvivors.jpg
http://www.mountvernonfarm.net/images/cows1.jpg
http://www.biblicalresearchreports.com/sheep_on_bare_dirt.jpg
http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/media/images/44105000/jpg/_44105757_bank416ap.jpg
http://www.apartmenttherapy.com/uimages/kitchen/2008_08_15-MorrisBeef.jpg
http://www.alcockhorseranch.com/images/horse.gif
http://www.boerdurhamgoatfarm.com/images/upload/fullsize/2008-3-25-goats-2-061.jpg
http://www.mountain-beef.com/images/sales.jpg
http://www.vivavegie.org/vvi/vva/vvi36/images/chickens.jpeg
http://www.kingbirdfarm.com/images/KBF%20broilers%20hoop%20house.jpg
http://www.prairiespringsranch.com/images/13.jpg
http://www.countryliving.com/cm/countryliving/images/Geese-GARDEN0805-de.jpg
http://www.specialtytravel.com/operators/logos/18059.jpg

[George Plimpton]

[George Plimpton]

On 6/18/2013 3:35 PM, Fuckwit David Harrison - *Goo* - stupid,

illiterate cracker and convicted felon, defeated entirely in 1999 and
doing nothing but wasting time ever since, lied:

> On 6/13/2013 2:04 PM, George Plimpton wrote:

>> On 6/13/2013 12:31 PM, Fuckwit David Harrison - *Goo* - stupid,

>> illiterate cracker and convicted felon, defeated entirely in 1999 and
>> doing nothing but wasting time ever since, lied:
>>

>>> On Tue, 11 Jun 2013 15:13:40 -0700 (PDT), Rupert
>>> <rupertm...@yahoo.com>
>>> wrote:
>>
>>>>
>>>> Maybe you can give us a specific example of a farm animal benefitting
>>>> from being farmed.
>>>
>>> I've given you plenty and
>>

>> No. You haven't given any. You could not have done - *NO* animal
>> "benefits" from "being farmed."
>

> Here are some examples

No.

[Rupert]

Okay, so looking at this second image, can you elaborate on what benefit the goats get from being farmed?

[Rupert]

On Wednesday, June 19, 2013 12:35:10 AM UTC+2, d...@. wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Jun 2013 10:00:26 -0700 (PDT), Rupert <rupertm...@yahoo.com>
>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> >On Thursday, June 13, 2013 9:31:49 PM UTC+2, d...@. wrote:
>
> >> On Tue, 11 Jun 2013 15:13:40 -0700 (PDT), Rupert <rupertm...@yahoo.com>
>
> >>
>
> >> wrote:
>
> >>
>
> >
>
> >> >That is a stupid inference. I can have points of agreement with him without him being my brother and my hero.
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >> Maybe, but you don't. He's your bro and hero.
>
> >>
>
> >
>
> >I wonder what makes you so convinced of that.
>
>
>
> Goo is in favor of the misnomer

Jonathan Ball is not in favour of animal rights. It's absolutely unfathomable how you could come to such a ridiculous conclusion.

> but tries to pretend and does so very VERY
>
> poorly that he's in favor of decent AW. He does that in an attempt to not lose
>
> the respect of people who disrespect eliminationists, though it doesn't work
>
> with me of course. He's your bro because of that and more, and he's your hero
>
> because from your position he seems like a "special agent" or some such thing.
>

This is nonsense.

> You feel like he's sort of working "under cover" and you respect and admire it.
>

Seems to me that you are experiencing delusional thinking.

> So did "Dutch" which is why he started lying in a similar way.
>
>
>
> >> >> "NO livestock benefit from being farmed." - Goo
>
> >>
>
> >> >Maybe you can give us a specific example of a farm animal benefitting from being farmed.
>
> >>
>
> >> I've given you plenty and even remarked about the fact that you couldn't
>
> >>
>
> >> appreciate any.
>
> >>
>
> >
>
> >You think that broiler chickens benefit from being farmed, do you?
>
>
>
> The vast majority of them yes. You've certainly provided no reason to
>
> believe otherwise, though I've encouraged you to try and believe that you have
>
> tried even though you haven't come anywhere near succeeding.

So you've read the stuff that I copied and pasted from the CIWF document? Would you care to elaborate on why that does not give us reason to doubt that broiler chickens benefit from being farmed?