Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

THE Goo

58 views
Skip to first unread message

George Plimpton

unread,
Jan 6, 2013, 6:55:02 PM1/6/13
to
Fuckwit David Harrison - not in dispute.

Rupert

unread,
Jan 7, 2013, 1:52:22 AM1/7/13
to
On Monday, January 7, 2013 12:55:02 AM UTC+1, George Plimpton wrote:
> Fuckwit David Harrison - not in dispute.

Earlier you told me that by "not in dispute" you mean "not in rational dispute". Do you suppose that the question of whether you or David Harrison is "the Goo" is something that rationality can give an insight into? Or something that a rational person would spend a single second thinking about?

dh

unread,
Jan 7, 2013, 5:48:41 PM1/7/13
to
On Sun, 6 Jan 2013 22:52:22 -0800 (PST), Rupert asked Goo:

>Do you suppose that the question of whether you or David Harrison is "the Goo"
>is something that rationality can give an insight into?

http://is.gd/NiaFcr
http://is.gd/m5XZT6
http://is.gd/WRC52D
http://is.gd/zdYDPr

George Plimpton

unread,
Jan 7, 2013, 6:54:09 PM1/7/13
to
On 1/6/2013 10:52 PM, Rupert wrote:
> On Monday, January 7, 2013 12:55:02 AM UTC+1, George Plimpton wrote:
>> Fuckwit David Harrison - not in dispute.
>
> Earlier you told me that by "not in dispute" you mean "not in rational dispute". Do you suppose that the question of whether you or David Harrison is "the Goo" is something that rationality can give an insight into?

Yes, of course. I called Fuckwit David Harrison a "Goober" more than a
decade ago. Goober is an insulting pejorative applied to ignorant
hillbillies like Fuckwit especially in Georgia in the USA. The name was
made famous as a character on American TV in the 1960s: Goober Pyle, a
cousin of Gomer Pyle originally on the Andy Griffith Show. Goober Pyle
was an exceptionally dullwitted character, just like Fuckwit. See
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goober_Pyle.

Also: http://wgcl.images.worldnow.com/images/18159173_BG1.JPG

Rupert

unread,
Jan 8, 2013, 2:00:35 AM1/8/13
to
On the other hand, David Harrison now uses the word to refer to you much more frequently than you use the word to refer to him.

So what?

And I think you snipped my other question about whether you think any rational person should care.

George Plimpton

unread,
Jan 8, 2013, 1:21:32 PM1/8/13
to
Yes, it's a modification of Joseph Goebbels' "big lie" technique.

Rupert

unread,
Jan 8, 2013, 3:13:38 PM1/8/13
to
On Tuesday, January 8, 2013 7:21:32 PM UTC+1, George Plimpton wrote:
>
> Yes, it's a modification of Joseph Goebbels' "big lie" technique.

Have you ever stopped to think carefully what benefit you derive from your interactions with Harrison?

George Plimpton

unread,
Jan 8, 2013, 3:24:32 PM1/8/13
to
Yes, I have. I think of it as "mildly malicious satisfaction." It's
not as bad stubbing out my cigar butt on an orphan's head, but it's
closer to that than to helping teach starving Ethiopians how to grow food.

Rupert

unread,
Jan 9, 2013, 5:02:16 AM1/9/13
to
Do you believe that David Harrison would prefer it if you stopped replying to him?

George Plimpton

unread,
Jan 9, 2013, 12:29:35 PM1/9/13
to
> Do you believe that Fuckwit David Harrison would prefer it if you stopped replying to him?

No, I think Fuckwit actually lives for this. In his cracker delusions,
he thinks he wins the encounters. Of course, apart from using up some
of my time, he loses every one - 100%. You know this, too, and he knows
it as well.

dh

unread,
Jan 9, 2013, 3:05:06 PM1/9/13
to
On Mon, 7 Jan 2013 23:00:35 -0800 (PST), Rupert <rupertm...@yahoo.com>
wrote:

>On the other hand, David Harrison now uses the word to refer to you much more frequently than you use the word to refer to him.

Ron and I were both referring to Goo as Goo for years before it got to him
so bad he broke down and had to resort to calling me that too, in an effort to
relieve some of his discomfort. Goo can't think of anything better or equal
because he has no imagination, so he's forced to resort to a most pathetic type
of mimicry letting everyone know he was defeated AGAIN. From my pov the Goober's
revealing his deperation and inability to be origninal in as obvious a way as
possible. He's outstupididing himself again which is why he is Goobernicus
Gonad, the moron who thinks he's a genius. A Google search tells us much about
our goober Goobernicus. There are pages of Google telling us much about Goo.
It's an archive that can even tell us some of the "different people" Goo was
dishonestly pretending to be at different times, and making it clear why there
should be a name given to represent such a dishonest goober who dishonestly
pretends to be many different people. Yet you reward your brother by calling him
Ball...reward his dishonesties, and his dishonesties are ALL that Goo is. Who
knows how much of Goo's dishonesties he's honestly stupid enough to believe?
Even you who both admire and love Goo probably don't know the answer to that.

Rupert

unread,
Jan 9, 2013, 4:02:04 PM1/9/13
to
So what exactly is the source of the satisfaction? Is it the belief that you are doing a good job of pointing out the shortcomings in his arguments?

George Plimpton

unread,
Jan 9, 2013, 5:09:27 PM1/9/13
to
On 1/9/2013 12:05 PM, dh@. wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Jan 2013 23:00:35 -0800 (PST), Rupert <rupertm...@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On the other hand, David Harrison now uses the word to refer to you much more frequently than you use the word to refer to him.
>
> Douchebag Hamilton and I were both referring to Goo as Goo for years before

No. I called you Goober and Goo long before you ever got the idea to
use it on me. You got the idea from me. You *always* get your ideas
from someone smarter and more intelligent than you.

George Plimpton

unread,
Jan 9, 2013, 5:48:45 PM1/9/13
to
What do you care? You're not going to pretend to have some special
insight into psychology now, are you?


> Is it the belief that you are doing a good job of pointing out the shortcomings in his arguments?

That was a big part of it much earlier. Now, it's just because I like
to abuse him. He's a shitbag who deserves to be abused even more than I
have time to do.

Mr.Smartypants

unread,
Jan 10, 2013, 2:40:39 AM1/10/13
to
On Jan 9, 3:09 pm, George Plimpton <geo...@si.not> wrote:
> On 1/9/2013 12:05 PM, dh@. wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 7 Jan 2013 23:00:35 -0800 (PST), Rupert <rupertmccal...@yahoo.com>
> > wrote:
>
> >> On the other hand, David Harrison now uses the word to refer to you much more frequently than you use the word to refer to him.
>
> >      Douchebag Hamilton and I were both referring to Goo as Goo for years before
>
> No.  I called you Goober and Goo long before you ever got the idea to
> use it on me.  You got the idea from me.  You *always* get your ideas
> from someone smarter and more intelligent than you.


Goo, Dave was calling you Goobernicus Gonad (Goo for short) when
Google Groups were Deja News. At one point I posted with the subject
"PING Goo" and you answered, "what?" proving to all that YOU are the
one and only Goo.

Rupert

unread,
Jan 10, 2013, 3:48:17 AM1/10/13
to
On Wednesday, January 9, 2013 11:48:45 PM UTC+1, George Plimpton wrote:
> On 1/9/2013 1:02 PM, Rupert wrote:
>
> > On Wednesday, January 9, 2013 6:29:35 PM UTC+1, George Plimpton wrote:
>
> >> On 1/9/2013 2:02 AM, Rupert wrote:
>
> >>
>
> >>> On Tuesday, January 8, 2013 9:24:32 PM UTC+1, George Plimpton wrote:
>
> >>
>
> >>>> On 1/8/2013 12:13 PM, Rupert wrote:
>
> >>
>
> >>>>
>
> >>
>
> >>>>> On Tuesday, January 8, 2013 7:21:32 PM UTC+1, George Plimpton wrote:
>
> >>
>
> >>>>
>
> >>
>
> >>>>>>
>
> >>
>
> >>>>
>
> >>
>
> >>>>>> Yes, it's a modification of Joseph Goebbels' "big lie" technique.
>
> >>
>
> >>>>
>
> >>
>
> >>>>>
>
> >>
>
> >>>>
>
> >>
>
> >>>>> Have you ever stopped to think carefully what benefit you derive from your interactions with Harrison?
>
> >>
>
> >>>>
>
> >>
>
> >>>>>
>
> >>
>
> >>>>
>
> >>
>
> >>>>
>
> >>
>
> >>>>
>
> >>
>
> >>>> Yes, I have. I think of it as "mildly malicious satisfaction." It's
>
> >>
>
> >>>>
>
> >>
>
> >>>> not as bad stubbing out my cigar butt on an orphan's head, but it's
>
> >>
>
> >>>>
>
> >>
>
> >>>> closer to that than to helping teach starving Ethiopians how to grow food.
>
> >>
>
> >>>
>
> >>
>
> >>> Do you believe that Fuckwit David Harrison would prefer it if you stopped replying to him?
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >> No, I think Fuckwit actually lives for this. In his cracker delusions,
>
> >>
>
> >> he thinks he wins the encounters. Of course, apart from using up some
>
> >>
>
> >> of my time, he loses every one - 100%. You know this, too, and he knows
>
> >>
>
> >> it as well.
>
> >
>
> > So what exactly is the source of the satisfaction?
>
>
>
> What do you care?

Just curious.

> You're not going to pretend to have some special
>
> insight into psychology now, are you?
>

No more than the next person, I would have thought.

>
>
>
>
> > Is it the belief that you are doing a good job of pointing out the shortcomings in his arguments?
>
>
>
> That was a big part of it much earlier. Now, it's just because I like
>
> to abuse him. He's a shitbag who deserves to be abused even more than I
>
> have time to do.

And you're comfortable with the idea that you spend a huge amount of time arguing with someone on usenet whose posts you regard as completely worthless, simply because you like to abuse him?

George Plimpton

unread,
Jan 10, 2013, 11:25:54 AM1/10/13
to
I don't. I don't spend all that much time on Usenet at all, and the
time I spend abusing Fuckwit probably isn't even 20% of the total time
spent in Usenet.

Rupert

unread,
Jan 10, 2013, 12:02:30 PM1/10/13
to
On Thursday, January 10, 2013 5:25:54 PM UTC+1, George Plimpton wrote:

>
> I don't. I don't spend all that much time on Usenet at all, and the
>
> time I spend abusing Fuckwit probably isn't even 20% of the total time
>
> spent in Usenet.

During December you made 180 posts to alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian. There is no doubt in my mind that a lot more than 20% of them were about David Harrison.

George Plimpton

unread,
Jan 10, 2013, 12:59:54 PM1/10/13
to
I made a lot of posts to other groups of which you are completely unaware.

Rupert

unread,
Jan 10, 2013, 1:25:02 PM1/10/13
to
Yes, I could have guessed as much. So what? Have I not established that you spend quite a lot of time posting about David Harrison?

George Plimpton

unread,
Jan 10, 2013, 1:48:49 PM1/10/13
to
No, you have not.

Rupert

unread,
Jan 10, 2013, 2:34:29 PM1/10/13
to
How many posts did you make in December that were about David Harrison?

dh

unread,
Jan 10, 2013, 3:16:12 PM1/10/13
to
On Wed, 9 Jan 2013 23:40:39 -0800 (PST), "Mr.Smartypants"
<bunghol...@lycos.com> wrote:

>On Wed, 09 Jan 2013 14:09:27 -0800, George Plimpton <geo...@si.not> wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 09 Jan 2013 15:05:06 -0500, dh@. wrote:
>>
>>>On Mon, 7 Jan 2013 23:00:35 -0800 (PST), Rupert <rupertm...@yahoo.com>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>On the other hand, David Harrison now uses the word to refer to you much more frequently than you use the word to refer to him.
>>>
>>> Ron and I were both referring to Goo as Goo for years before it got to him
>>>so bad he broke down and had to resort to calling me that too, in an effort to
>>>relieve some of his discomfort. Goo can't think of anything better or equal
>>>because he has no imagination, so he's forced to resort to a most pathetic type
>>>of mimicry letting everyone know he was defeated AGAIN. From my pov the Goober's
>>>revealing his deperation and inability to be origninal in as obvious a way as
>>>possible. He's outstupididing himself again which is why he is Goobernicus
>>>Gonad, the moron who thinks he's a genius. A Google search tells us much about
>>>our goober Goobernicus. There are pages of Google telling us much about Goo.
>>>It's an archive that can even tell us some of the "different people" Goo was
>>>dishonestly pretending to be at different times, and making it clear why there
>>>should be a name given to represent such a dishonest goober who dishonestly
>>>pretends to be many different people. Yet you reward your brother by calling him
>>>Ball...reward his dishonesties, and his dishonesties are ALL that Goo is. Who
>>>knows how much of Goo's dishonesties he's honestly stupid enough to believe?
>>>Even you who both admire and love Goo probably don't know the answer to that.
>>
>>No. I called you Goober and Goo long before you ever got the idea to
>>use it on me.
>
>Goo, Dave was calling you Goobernicus Gonad (Goo for short) when
>Google Groups were Deja News. At one point I posted with the subject
>"PING Goo" and you answered, "what?" proving to all that YOU are the
>one and only Goo.

It's a sign of desperation that Goo is even trying to get away with this
stupidity, since a Google search about Goo tells us so much. There are pages and
pages of Google results about Goo:

http://is.gd/730TF8

so what makes him think he can lie about this one? As obvious as a Google search
makes it, this may be his stupidest self-outstupidification yet.

dh

unread,
Jan 10, 2013, 3:20:50 PM1/10/13
to
On Wed, 09 Jan 2013 14:09:27 -0800, Goo lied amusingly blatantly:

>On Wed, 09 Jan 2013 15:05:06 -0500, dh@. wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 7 Jan 2013 23:00:35 -0800 (PST), Rupert <rupertm...@yahoo.com>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>On the other hand, David Harrison now uses the word to refer to you much more frequently than you use the word to refer to him.
>>
>> Ron and I were both referring to Goo as Goo for years before it got to him
>>so bad he broke down and had to resort to calling me that too, in an effort to
>>relieve some of his discomfort. Goo can't think of anything better or equal
>>because he has no imagination, so he's forced to resort to a most pathetic type
>>of mimicry letting everyone know he was defeated AGAIN. From my pov the Goober's
>>revealing his deperation and inability to be origninal in as obvious a way as
>>possible. He's outstupididing himself again which is why he is Goobernicus
>>Gonad, the moron who thinks he's a genius. A Google search tells us much about
>>our goober Goobernicus. There are pages of Google telling us much about Goo.
>>It's an archive that can even tell us some of the "different people" Goo was
>>dishonestly pretending to be at different times, and making it clear why there
>>should be a name given to represent such a dishonest goober who dishonestly
>>pretends to be many different people. Yet you reward your brother by calling him
>>Ball...reward his dishonesties, and his dishonesties are ALL that Goo is. Who
>>knows how much of Goo's dishonesties he's honestly stupid enough to believe?
>>Even you who both admire and love Goo probably don't know the answer to that.
>
>No.

As I predicted.

>I called you Goober and Goo long before you ever got the idea to
>use it on me.

You not only didn't think of it Goo, but you obviously can't do any better
and are envious of me for coming up with it or you wouldn't have given in to the
temptation of your lame childlike mimicry.

dh

unread,
Jan 10, 2013, 3:20:56 PM1/10/13
to
On Thu, 10 Jan 2013 09:02:30 -0800 (PST), Rupert <rupertm...@yahoo.com>
wrote:
Telling lies about me that he thinks are "needed". How do you think any of
the lies Goo tells about me, any of them at all, could possibly support decent
AW over elimination?

George Plimpton

unread,
Jan 10, 2013, 5:15:22 PM1/10/13
to
On 1/10/2013 12:20 PM, dh@. wrote:
> On Wed, 09 Jan 2013 14:09:27 -0800, Goo lied amusingly blatantly:
>
>> On Wed, 09 Jan 2013 15:05:06 -0500, dh@. wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 7 Jan 2013 23:00:35 -0800 (PST), Rupert <rupertm...@yahoo.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On the other hand, David Harrison now uses the word to refer to you much more frequently than you use the word to refer to him.
>>>
>>> Douchebag Hamilton and I were both referring to Goo as Goo for years before
>>
>> No.I called you Goober and Goo long before you ever got the idea to
>> use it on me.
>
> You not only didn't think of

I called you Goober, and Goo, *long* before you lamely tried to turn it
around in your typical cracker sixth-grader schoolyard bullshit.

Mr.Smartypants

unread,
Jan 11, 2013, 3:30:09 AM1/11/13
to
On Jan 10, 3:15 pm, George Plimpton <geo...@si.not> wrote:
> On 1/10/2013 12:20 PM, dh@. wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 09 Jan 2013 14:09:27 -0800, Goo lied amusingly blatantly:
>
> >> On Wed, 09 Jan 2013 15:05:06 -0500, dh@. wrote:
>
> >>> On Mon, 7 Jan 2013 23:00:35 -0800 (PST), Rupert <rupertmccal...@yahoo.com>
> >>> wrote:
>
> >>>> On the other hand, David Harrison now uses the word to refer to you much more frequently than you use the word to refer to him.
>
> >>>     Douchebag Hamilton and I were both referring to Goo as Goo for years before
>
> >> No.I called you Goober and Goo long before you ever got the idea to
> >> use it on me.
>
> >      You not only didn't think of
>
> I called you Goober, and Goo, *long* before you lamely tried to turn it
> around in your typical cracker sixth-grader schoolyard bullshit.


No you didn't, Goo. Using your complete lack of imagination you began
calling Dave "Goo" only after he (and I) were calling you "Goo.

You're such a liar and you totally suck at it.

dh

unread,
Jan 12, 2013, 1:31:56 PM1/12/13
to
On Fri, 11 Jan 2013 00:30:09 -0800 (PST), "Mr.Smartypants"
<bunghol...@lycos.com> wrote:

>On Thu, 10 Jan 2013 14:15:22 -0800, Goo wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 10 Jan 2013 15:20:50 -0500, dh@. wrote:
>>
>>>On Wed, 09 Jan 2013 14:09:27 -0800, Goo lied amusingly blatantly:
>>>
>>>>On Wed, 09 Jan 2013 15:05:06 -0500, dh@. wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Mon, 7 Jan 2013 23:00:35 -0800 (PST), Rupert <rupertm...@yahoo.com>
>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On the other hand, David Harrison now uses the word to refer to you much more frequently than you use the word to refer to him.
>>>>>
>>>>> Ron and I were both referring to Goo as Goo for years before it got to him
>>>>>so bad he broke down and had to resort to calling me that too, in an effort to
>>>>>relieve some of his discomfort. Goo can't think of anything better or equal
>>>>>because he has no imagination, so he's forced to resort to a most pathetic type
>>>>>of mimicry letting everyone know he was defeated AGAIN. From my pov the Goober's
>>>>>revealing his deperation and inability to be origninal in as obvious a way as
>>>>>possible. He's outstupididing himself again which is why he is Goobernicus
>>>>>Gonad, the moron who thinks he's a genius. A Google search tells us much about
>>>>>our goober Goobernicus. There are pages of Google telling us much about Goo.
>>>>>It's an archive that can even tell us some of the "different people" Goo was
>>>>>dishonestly pretending to be at different times, and making it clear why there
>>>>>should be a name given to represent such a dishonest goober who dishonestly
>>>>>pretends to be many different people. Yet you reward your brother by calling him
>>>>>Ball...reward his dishonesties, and his dishonesties are ALL that Goo is. Who
>>>>>knows how much of Goo's dishonesties he's honestly stupid enough to believe?
>>>>>Even you who both admire and love Goo probably don't know the answer to that.
>>>>
>>>>No.
>>>
>>> As I predicted.
>>>
>>>>I called you Goober and Goo long before you ever got the idea to
>>>>use it on me.
>>>
>>> You not only didn't think of it Goo, but you obviously can't do any better
>>>and are envious of me for coming up with it or you wouldn't have given in to the
>>>temptation of your lame childlike mimicry.
>>
>>I called you Goober, and Goo, *long* before you lamely tried to turn it
>>around in your typical cracker sixth-grader schoolyard bullshit.
>
>No you didn't, Goo. Using your complete lack of imagination you began
>calling Dave "Goo" only after he (and I) were calling you "Goo.

Yes, only after we'd been doing it for years.

>You're such a liar and you totally suck at it.

The things he lies about are often such stupidly blatant things to lie about
it's sometimes surprising even Goo could be that stupid. Goo's now outstupiding
himself even more in a similar way to how he did with his pet food cow idea, by
agreeing that his lame childlike mimicry is "typical cracker sixth-grader
schoolyard bullshit." LOL...what a Goober!

dh

unread,
Jan 12, 2013, 1:32:10 PM1/12/13
to
On Thu, 10 Jan 2013 09:59:54 -0800, Goo wrote:

>On 1/10/2013 9:02 AM, Rupert wrote:
>> On Thursday, January 10, 2013 5:25:54 PM UTC+1, Goo wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> I don't. I don't spend all that much time on Usenet at all, and the
>>>
>>> time I spend abusing Fuckwit probably isn't even 20% of the total time
>>>
>>> spent in Usenet.
>>
>> During December you made 180 posts to alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian. There is no doubt in my mind that a lot more than 20% of them were about David Harrison.
>
>I made a lot of posts to other groups of which you are completely unaware.

What "different" people did you dishonestly pretend to be Goo? Do you think
I have even ten percent of the people you've dishonestly pretended to be on my
list Goob, or do you think it's less than that?

Mr.Smartypants

unread,
Jan 12, 2013, 3:54:45 PM1/12/13
to
Don't even ask. He couldn't tell you even if he tried. He can't even
tell us how many Ruperts he thinks he talks to.

George Plimpton

unread,
Jan 13, 2013, 6:47:31 PM1/13/13
to
On 1/12/2013 10:32 AM, Fuckwit David Harrison - *Goo* - convicted felon
for breeding fighting dogs, lied:

> On Thu, 10 Jan 2013 09:59:54 -0800, George A Plimpton wrote:
>
>> On 1/10/2013 9:02 AM, Rupert wrote:
>>> On Thursday, January 10, 2013 5:25:54 PM UTC+1, George B Plimpton wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> I don't. I don't spend all that much time on Usenet at all, and the
>>>> time I spend abusing Fuckwit probably isn't even 20% of the total time
>>>> spent in Usenet.
>>>
>>> During December you made 180 posts to alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian. There is no doubt in my mind that a lot more than 20% of them were about David Harrison.
>>
>> I made a lot of posts to other groups of which you are completely unaware.
>
> What "different" people did you dishonestly pretend to be

I never dishonestly pretend to be anyone.

As we have seen, *everyone* here - especially the legitimate and
intelligent anti-"ar" posters - says your "getting to experience life"
nonsense is bullshit. Everyone.

Mr.Smartypants

unread,
Jan 14, 2013, 2:45:37 AM1/14/13
to
On Jan 13, 4:47 pm, George Plimpton <geo...@si.not> wrote:
> On 1/12/2013 10:32 AM, Fuckwit David Harrison - *Goo* - convicted felon
> for breeding fighting dogs, lied:
>
> > On Thu, 10 Jan 2013 09:59:54 -0800, George A Plimpton wrote:
>
> >> On 1/10/2013 9:02 AM, Rupert wrote:
> >>> On Thursday, January 10, 2013 5:25:54 PM UTC+1, George B Plimpton wrote:
>
> >>>> I don't.  I don't spend all that much time on Usenet at all, and the
> >>>> time I spend abusing Fuckwit probably isn't even 20% of the total time
> >>>> spent in Usenet.
>
> >>> During December you made 180 posts to alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian. There is no doubt in my mind that a lot more than 20% of them were about David Harrison.
>
> >> I made a lot of posts to other groups of which you are completely unaware.
>
> >      What "different" people did you dishonestly pretend to be
>
> I never dishonestly pretend to be anyone.

So you honestly pretend to be other people? Speaking of "other
people", how many Ruperts do you think you talk to?


dh

unread,
Jan 14, 2013, 2:40:49 PM1/14/13
to
On Sun, 13 Jan 2013 23:45:37 -0800 (PST), "Mr.Smartypants"
<bunghol...@lycos.com> wrote:

>On Sun, 13 Jan 2013 15:47:31 -0800, Goo wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 12 Jan 2013 13:32:10 -0500, dh@. wrote:
>>
>>>On Thu, 10 Jan 2013 09:59:54 -0800, Goo wrote:
>>>
>>>>On 1/10/2013 9:02 AM, Rupert wrote:
>>>>> On Thursday, January 10, 2013 5:25:54 PM UTC+1, Goo wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I don't. I don't spend all that much time on Usenet at all, and the
>>>>>>
>>>>>> time I spend abusing Fuckwit probably isn't even 20% of the total time
>>>>>>
>>>>>> spent in Usenet.
>>>>>
>>>>> During December you made 180 posts to alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian. There is no doubt in my mind that a lot more than 20% of them were about David Harrison.
>>>>
>>>>I made a lot of posts to other groups of which you are completely unaware.
>>>
>>> What "different" people did you dishonestly pretend to be Goo? Do you think
>>>I have even ten percent of the people you've dishonestly pretended to be on my
>>>list Goob, or do you think it's less than that?
>>
>> I never dishonestly pretend to be anyone.
>
>So you honestly pretend to be other people?

Could Goo really be stupid enough to think he "honestly" pretended to be
more than one person at a time, agreeing with and congratulating himselves as he
did so? Or could it be that Goo is now lying about thinking he honestly
pretended to be more than one person? Dozens of "different" people, in fact? My
guess is, even as stupid as the Goober is, he's not quite stupid enough to think
he was being honest which means he's lying blatantly AGAIN.

>Speaking of "other
>people", how many Ruperts do you think you talk to?

It's too bad that between all 3 goos they could never get anywhere with that
one. It seems to have the potential of being hilarious.

dh

unread,
Jan 14, 2013, 2:41:14 PM1/14/13
to
He may have a list of probably the hundreds of different people he has
dishonestly pretended to be. They never could get anywhere with the Rupert
thing, but we know Goo has dishonestly pretended to be at least a few dozen
different people, and we know he's pretended to be you, and me, and quite a few
people who do exist that I don't have on the list. I wonder how many more...

George Plimpton

unread,
Jan 14, 2013, 2:12:12 PM1/14/13
to
On 1/12/2013 10:32 AM, Fuckwit David Harrison - *Goo* - convicted felon
for breeding fighting dogs, lied:

> On Thu, 10 Jan 2013 09:59:54 -0800, George A Plimpton wrote:
>
>> On 1/10/2013 9:02 AM, Rupert wrote:
>>> On Thursday, January 10, 2013 5:25:54 PM UTC+1, George B Plimpton wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> I don't. I don't spend all that much time on Usenet at all, and the
>>>> time I spend abusing Fuckwit probably isn't even 20% of the total time
>>>> spent in Usenet.
>>>
>>> During December you made 180 posts to alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian. There is no doubt in my mind that a lot more than 20% of them were about David Harrison.
>>
>> I made a lot of posts to other groups of which you are completely unaware.
>
> What "different" people did you dishonestly pretend to be

I never dishonestly pretend to be anyone.

Mr.Smartypants

unread,
Jan 15, 2013, 3:06:27 PM1/15/13
to
On Jan 14, 12:12 pm, George Plimpton <geo...@si.not> wrote:
> On 1/12/2013 10:32 AM, Fuckwit David Harrison - *Goo* - convicted felon
> for breeding fighting dogs, lied:
>
> > On Thu, 10 Jan 2013 09:59:54 -0800, George A Plimpton wrote:
>
> >> On 1/10/2013 9:02 AM, Rupert wrote:
> >>> On Thursday, January 10, 2013 5:25:54 PM UTC+1, George B Plimpton wrote:
>
> >>>> I don't.  I don't spend all that much time on Usenet at all, and the
> >>>> time I spend abusing Fuckwit probably isn't even 20% of the total time
> >>>> spent in Usenet.
>
> >>> During December you made 180 posts to alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian. There is no doubt in my mind that a lot more than 20% of them were about David Harrison.
>
> >> I made a lot of posts to other groups of which you are completely unaware.
>
> >      What "different" people did you dishonestly pretend to be
>
> I never dishonestly pretend to be anyone.



So you think you've honestly pretended to be dozens of different
people?

dh

unread,
Jan 15, 2013, 3:30:47 PM1/15/13
to
On Sun, 13 Jan 2013 15:47:31 -0800, Goo lied blatantly:

>On Sat, 12 Jan 2013 13:32:10 -0500, dh@. wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 10 Jan 2013 09:59:54 -0800, Goo wrote:
>>
>>>On 1/10/2013 9:02 AM, Rupert wrote:
>>>> On Thursday, January 10, 2013 5:25:54 PM UTC+1, Goo wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't. I don't spend all that much time on Usenet at all, and the
>>>>>
>>>>> time I spend abusing Fuckwit probably isn't even 20% of the total time
>>>>>
>>>>> spent in Usenet.
>>>>
>>>> During December you made 180 posts to alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian. There is no doubt in my mind that a lot more than 20% of them were about David Harrison.
>>>
>>>I made a lot of posts to other groups of which you are completely unaware.
>>
>> What "different" people did you dishonestly pretend to be Goo? Do you think
>>I have even ten percent of the people you've dishonestly pretended to be on my
>>list Goob, or do you think it's less than that?
>
>I never dishonestly pretend to be anyone.

You have dishonestly pretended to be Mr. Smartypants, Goober, and you have
dishonestly pretended to be me and a number of other people who have actually
posted here. You're now dishonestly pretending to be George Plimpton, Goo.

George Plimpton

unread,
Jan 15, 2013, 4:38:51 PM1/15/13
to
On 1/15/2013 12:30 PM, On 1/15/2013 12:28 PM, Fuckwit David Harrison -
*Goo* - convicted felon for breeding fighting dogs, lied:

> On Sun, 13 Jan 2013 15:47:31 -0800, George Plimpton wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 12 Jan 2013 13:32:10 -0500, On 1/15/2013 12:28 PM, Fuckwit David Harrison - *Goo* - convicted felon for breeding fighting dogs, lied:
>>
>>> On Thu, 10 Jan 2013 09:59:54 -0800, George Plimpton helpfully explained:
>>>
>>>> On 1/10/2013 9:02 AM, Rupert wrote:
>>>>> On Thursday, January 10, 2013 5:25:54 PM UTC+1, George W. Plimpton wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I don't. I don't spend all that much time on Usenet at all, and the
>>>>>> time I spend abusing Fuckwit probably isn't even 20% of the total time
>>>>>> spent in Usenet.
>>>>>
>>>>> During December you made 180 posts to alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian.
>>>>
>>>> I made a lot of posts to other groups of which you are completely unaware.
>>>
>>> What "different" people did
>>
>> I never dishonestly pretend to be anyone.
>
> You have dishonestly pretended to be

I have never pretended to be anyone.

dh

unread,
Jan 16, 2013, 3:11:06 PM1/16/13
to
On Tue, 15 Jan 2013, "Mr.Smartypants" challenged Goo to explain:

>On Jan 14, 12:12�pm, Goo lied:
>> On 1/12/2013 10:32 AM, dh challenged Goo to explain:
>>
>> > On Thu, 10 Jan 2013 09:59:54 -0800, Goo wrote:
>>
>> >> On 1/10/2013 9:02 AM, Rupert wrote:
>> >>> On Thursday, January 10, 2013 5:25:54 PM UTC+1, Goo wrote:
>>
>> >>>> I don't. �I don't spend all that much time on Usenet at all, and the
>> >>>> time I spend abusing Fuckwit probably isn't even 20% of the total time
>> >>>> spent in Usenet.
>>
>> >>> During December you made 180 posts to alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian. There is no doubt in my mind that a lot more than 20% of them were about David Harrison.
>>
>> >> I made a lot of posts to other groups of which you are completely unaware.
>>
>> > � � �What "different" people did you dishonestly pretend to be
>>
>> I never dishonestly pretend to be anyone.
>
>
>
>So you think you've honestly pretended to be dozens of different
>people?

Could he really be stupid enough to think he "honestly" pretended to be
different people, often more than one at a time agreeing with and praising
himselves? Or is he really not too stupid to know it's dishonest but he's now
being dishonest about that TOO? My guess of course is the latter.

George Plimpton

unread,
Jan 16, 2013, 12:14:36 PM1/16/13
to
On 1/15/2013 12:30 PM, On 1/15/2013 12:28 PM, Fuckwit David Harrison -
*Goo* - convicted felon for breeding fighting dogs, lied:

> On Sun, 13 Jan 2013 15:47:31 -0800, George Plimpton wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 12 Jan 2013 13:32:10 -0500, On 1/15/2013 12:28 PM, Fuckwit David Harrison - *Goo* - convicted felon for breeding fighting dogs, lied:
>>
>>> On Thu, 10 Jan 2013 09:59:54 -0800, George Plimpton helpfully explained:
>>>
>>>> On 1/10/2013 9:02 AM, Rupert wrote:
>>>>> On Thursday, January 10, 2013 5:25:54 PM UTC+1, George W. Plimpton wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I don't. I don't spend all that much time on Usenet at all, and the
>>>>>> time I spend abusing Fuckwit probably isn't even 20% of the total time
>>>>>> spent in Usenet.
>>>>>
>>>>> During December you made 180 posts to alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian.
>>>>
>>>> I made a lot of posts to other groups of which you are completely unaware.
>>>
>>> What "different" people did
>>
>> I never dishonestly pretend to be anyone.
>
> You have dishonestly pretended to be

Mr.Smartypants

unread,
Jan 17, 2013, 2:26:37 PM1/17/13
to
I don't recall anybody saying you pretended to be "anyone" but you
certainly have pretended to be dozens of other personas.

You're such a goo.

George Plimpton

unread,
Jan 17, 2013, 4:17:05 PM1/17/13
to
On 1/15/2013 12:30 PM, On 1/15/2013 12:28 PM, Fuckwit David Harrison -
*Goo* - convicted felon for breeding fighting dogs, lied:

> On Sun, 13 Jan 2013 15:47:31 -0800, George Plimpton wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 12 Jan 2013 13:32:10 -0500, On 1/15/2013 12:28 PM, Fuckwit David Harrison - *Goo* - convicted felon for breeding fighting dogs, lied:
>>
>>> On Thu, 10 Jan 2013 09:59:54 -0800, George Plimpton helpfully explained:
>>>
>>>> On 1/10/2013 9:02 AM, Rupert wrote:
>>>>> On Thursday, January 10, 2013 5:25:54 PM UTC+1, George W. Plimpton wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I don't. I don't spend all that much time on Usenet at all, and the
>>>>>> time I spend abusing Fuckwit probably isn't even 20% of the total time
>>>>>> spent in Usenet.
>>>>>
>>>>> During December you made 180 posts to alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian.
>>>>
>>>> I made a lot of posts to other groups of which you are completely unaware.
>>>
>>> What "different" people did
>>
>> I never dishonestly pretend to be anyone.
>
> You have dishonestly pretended to be

George Plimpton

unread,
Jan 17, 2013, 4:17:46 PM1/17/13
to
On 1/15/2013 12:30 PM, On 1/15/2013 12:28 PM, Fuckwit David Harrison -
*Goo* - convicted felon for breeding fighting dogs, lied:

> On Sun, 13 Jan 2013 15:47:31 -0800, George Plimpton wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 12 Jan 2013 13:32:10 -0500, On 1/15/2013 12:28 PM, Fuckwit David Harrison - *Goo* - convicted felon for breeding fighting dogs, lied:
>>
>>> On Thu, 10 Jan 2013 09:59:54 -0800, George Plimpton helpfully explained:
>>>
>>>> On 1/10/2013 9:02 AM, Rupert wrote:
>>>>> On Thursday, January 10, 2013 5:25:54 PM UTC+1, George W. Plimpton wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I don't. I don't spend all that much time on Usenet at all, and the
>>>>>> time I spend abusing Fuckwit probably isn't even 20% of the total time
>>>>>> spent in Usenet.
>>>>>
>>>>> During December you made 180 posts to alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian.
>>>>
>>>> I made a lot of posts to other groups of which you are completely unaware.
>>>
>>> What "different" people did
>>
>> I never dishonestly pretend to be anyone.
>
> You have dishonestly pretended to be

George Plimpton

unread,
Jan 18, 2013, 1:17:32 AM1/18/13
to
On 1/15/2013 12:30 PM, On 1/15/2013 12:28 PM, Fuckwit David Harrison -
*Goo* - convicted felon for breeding fighting dogs, lied:

> On Sun, 13 Jan 2013 15:47:31 -0800, George Plimpton wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 12 Jan 2013 13:32:10 -0500, On 1/15/2013 12:28 PM, Fuckwit David Harrison - *Goo* - convicted felon for breeding fighting dogs, lied:
>>
>>> On Thu, 10 Jan 2013 09:59:54 -0800, George Plimpton helpfully explained:
>>>
>>>> On 1/10/2013 9:02 AM, Rupert wrote:
>>>>> On Thursday, January 10, 2013 5:25:54 PM UTC+1, George W. Plimpton wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I don't. I don't spend all that much time on Usenet at all, and the
>>>>>> time I spend abusing Fuckwit probably isn't even 20% of the total time
>>>>>> spent in Usenet.
>>>>>
>>>>> During December you made 180 posts to alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian.
>>>>
>>>> I made a lot of posts to other groups of which you are completely unaware.
>>>
>>> What "different" people did
>>
>> I never dishonestly pretend to be anyone.
>
> You have dishonestly pretended to be

dh

unread,
Jan 21, 2013, 6:07:51 PM1/21/13
to
On Thu, 17 Jan 2013 11:26:37 -0800 (PST), "Mr.Smartypants"
<bunghol...@lycos.com> wrote:

>On Jan 16, 10:14 am, Goo lied blatantly:
>> On 1/15/2013 12:30 PM, On 1/15/2013 12:28 PM, dh pointed out:
>>
>> >      You have dishonestly pretended to be
>>
>> I have never pretended to be anyone.
>
>
>I don't recall anybody saying you pretended to be "anyone" but you
>certainly have pretended to be dozens of other personas.

Oh but Goo has pretended to be specific people. The Goober has pretended to
be you for example, and he has pretended to be me. I don't know for a fact but
fee quite certain he has pretended to be Rupert. Goo has also pretended to be a
number of other people who actually posted here. Also when Goo agreed with and
complimented himselves as different people, he necessarily was pretending to be
different people. Goo lied blatantly again, and was caught at it again.

>You're such a goo.

A true Goober through and through, and afaik so is anyone who respects and
admires him.

dh

unread,
Jan 21, 2013, 6:08:10 PM1/21/13
to
On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 09:14:36 -0800, Goo lied:

>I have never pretended to be anyone.

You've pretended to be me Goo, and you've pretended to be Ron. You did so
very piss poorly of course Goob, but you did so none the less.

George Plimpton

unread,
Jan 20, 2013, 12:21:35 AM1/20/13
to
On 1/15/2013 12:30 PM, On 1/15/2013 12:28 PM, Fuckwit David Harrison -
*Goo* - convicted felon for breeding fighting dogs, lied:

> On Sun, 13 Jan 2013 15:47:31 -0800, George Plimpton wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 12 Jan 2013 13:32:10 -0500, On 1/15/2013 12:28 PM, Fuckwit David Harrison - *Goo* - convicted felon for breeding fighting dogs, lied:
>>
>>> On Thu, 10 Jan 2013 09:59:54 -0800, George Plimpton helpfully explained:
>>>
>>>> On 1/10/2013 9:02 AM, Rupert wrote:
>>>>> On Thursday, January 10, 2013 5:25:54 PM UTC+1, George W. Plimpton wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I don't. I don't spend all that much time on Usenet at all, and the
>>>>>> time I spend abusing Fuckwit probably isn't even 20% of the total time
>>>>>> spent in Usenet.
>>>>>
>>>>> During December you made 180 posts to alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian.
>>>>
>>>> I made a lot of posts to other groups of which you are completely unaware.
>>>
>>> What "different" people did
>>
>> I never dishonestly pretend to be anyone.
>
> You have dishonestly pretended to be

George Plimpton

unread,
Jan 21, 2013, 10:25:25 PM1/21/13
to
On 1/21/2013 3:08 PM, Fuckwit David Harrison - *Goo* - convicted felon
for breeding fighting dogs, lied:

> On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 09:14:36 -0800, George Plimpton wrote:
>
>> I have never pretended to be anyone.
>
> You've pretended to be me

LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Of all the people in the world I might ever pretend to be, *Goo*, a
stupid, inbred, hillbilly, cousin-fucking lying amusement park lighting
tech and breeder of fighting dogs is not one of them.

George Plimpton

unread,
Jan 22, 2013, 2:39:10 PM1/22/13
to
On 1/21/2013 3:08 PM, Fuckwit David Harrison - *Goo* - convicted felon
for breeding fighting dogs, lied:

> On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 09:14:36 -0800, George Plimpton wrote:
>
>> I have never pretended to be anyone.
>
> You've pretended to be me

dh

unread,
Jan 22, 2013, 6:32:29 PM1/22/13
to
On Mon, 21 Jan 2013 19:25:25 -0800, Goo wussed:

>On Mon, 21 Jan 2013 18:08:10 -0500, dh@. wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 09:14:36 -0800, Goo lied:
>>
>>>I have never pretended to be anyone.
>>
>> You've pretended to be me Goo, and you've pretended to be Ron. You did so
>>very piss poorly of course Goob, but you did so none the less.
>
>Of all the people in the world I might ever pretend to be

You've pretended to be a number of people who have posted in this forum
Goober, and we know it. We also know that Ron and I are among that number, Goo.

George Plimpton

unread,
Jan 22, 2013, 2:40:57 PM1/22/13
to
On 1/21/2013 3:08 PM, Fuckwit David Harrison - *Goo* - convicted felon
for breeding fighting dogs, lied:

> On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 09:14:36 -0800, George Plimpton wrote:
>
>> I have never pretended to be anyone.
>
> You've pretended to be me

George Plimpton

unread,
Jan 22, 2013, 10:15:26 PM1/22/13
to
On 1/22/2013 3:32 PM, Fuckwit David Harrison - *Goo* - convicted felon
for breeding fighting dogs, lied:

> On Mon, 21 Jan 2013 19:25:25 -0800, George Plimpton wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 21 Jan 2013 18:08:10 -0500, Fuckwit David Harrison - *Goo* - convicted felon for breeding fighting dogs, lied:
>>
>>> On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 09:14:36 -0800, George Plimpton wrote:
>>>
>>>> I have never pretended to be anyone.
>>>
>>> You've pretended to be me
>>
>> Of all the people in the world I might ever pretend to be, *Goo*, a stupid,
>> inbred, hillbilly, cousin-fucking lying amusement park lighting tech and
>> breeder of fighting dogs is not one of them.
>
> You've pretended to be a number of people

I couldn't even pretend to stoop so low to be you, Fuckwit. I would
pretend to be Adolph Hitler, Lee Harvey Oswald or a bucket of horseshit
before I would pretend to be you, Fuckwit.

Mr.Smartypants

unread,
Jan 26, 2013, 12:58:40 AM1/26/13
to
You've very stupidly pretended to be a lot of different people
including Dave and myself.

You're such a goober!

dh

unread,
Jan 28, 2013, 6:54:29 PM1/28/13
to
On Tue, 22 Jan 2013 19:15:26 -0800, Goo wrote:

>On Tue, 22 Jan 2013 18:32:29 -0500, dh@. wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 21 Jan 2013 19:25:25 -0800, Goo wussed:
>>
>>>On Mon, 21 Jan 2013 18:08:10 -0500, dh@. wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 09:14:36 -0800, Goo lied:
>>>>
>>>>>I have never pretended to be anyone.
>>>>
>>>> You've pretended to be me Goo, and you've pretended to be Ron. You did so
>>>>very piss poorly of course Goob, but you did so none the less.
>>>
>>>Of all the people in the world I might ever pretend to be
>>
>> You've pretended to be a number of people who have posted in this forum
>>Goober, and we know it. We also know that Ron and I are among that number, Goo.
>
>I couldn't even pretend to stoop so low to be you, Fuckwit. I would
>pretend to be Adolph Hitler, Lee Harvey Oswald or a bucket of horseshit
>before I would pretend to be you, Fuckwit.

Yet you have Goober, and you've pretended to be Ron too, and we know it. You
sucked at it of course Goob and wrote the stupidist shit you could intentionally
come up with, which isn't as stupid as what you do when trying to be
intelligent, but still it was more stupid and dishonest than he or I would
actually write. I believe usually it had something to do with your infatuation
with the male asshole, Goo.

dh

unread,
Jan 28, 2013, 6:55:45 PM1/28/13
to
On Fri, 25 Jan 2013 21:58:40 -0800 (PST), "Mr.Smartypants"
<bunghol...@lycos.com> wrote:

>On Jan 22, 8:15�pm, Goo wrote:
>> On 1/22/2013 3:32 PM, dh pointed out:
>>
>> > On Mon, 21 Jan 2013 19:25:25 -0800, Goo wrote:
>>
>> >> On Mon, 21 Jan 2013 18:08:10 -0500, dh pointed out:
>>
>> >>> On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 09:14:36 -0800, Goo wrote:
>>
>> >>>> I have never pretended to be anyone.
>>
>> >>> � � You've pretended to be me
>>
>> >> Of all the people in the world I might ever pretend to be, *Goo*, a stupid,
>> >> inbred, hillbilly, cousin-fucking lying amusement park lighting tech and
>> >> breeder of fighting dogs is not one of them.
>>
>> > � � �You've pretended to be a number of people
>>
>> I couldn't even pretend to stoop so low to be you, Fuckwit. �I would
>> pretend to be Adolph Hitler, Lee Harvey Oswald or a bucket of horseshit
>> before I would pretend to be you, Fuckwit.
>
>
>You've very stupidly pretended to be a lot of different people
>including Dave and myself.

Yes, always extremely stupidly. The Goober bitches about me posting his own
quotes because I leave out his attempts at dishonest tricks, while Goo is guilty
of the most contemptible "forgeries" and "misquotes" and the most of them, that
I've seen in these forums. He's also the most dishonest person I've ever
encountered, which I like to point out from time to time.

>You're such a goober!

Goo might be the biggest Goober to ever post in ngs. He's the Gooberest
person I've ever encountered anyway...

George Plimpton

unread,
Jan 23, 2013, 11:16:52 AM1/23/13
to
On 1/22/2013 3:32 PM, Fuckwit David Harrison - *Goo* - convicted felon
for breeding fighting dogs, lied:

> On Mon, 21 Jan 2013 19:25:25 -0800, George Plimpton wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 21 Jan 2013 18:08:10 -0500, Fuckwit David Harrison - *Goo* - convicted felon for breeding fighting dogs, lied:
>>
>>> On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 09:14:36 -0800, George Plimpton wrote:
>>>
>>>> I have never pretended to be anyone.
>>>
>>> You've pretended to be me
>>
>> Of all the people in the world I might ever pretend to be, *Goo*, a stupid,
>> inbred, hillbilly, cousin-fucking lying amusement park lighting tech and
>> breeder of fighting dogs is not one of them.
>
> You've pretended to be a number of people

George Plimpton

unread,
Jan 28, 2013, 7:21:16 PM1/28/13
to
On 1/28/2013 3:54 PM, Fuckwit David Harrison - *Goo* - convicted felon
for breeding fighting dogs, lied:

> Yet you have, and you've pretended to be Ron too

No. I would never stoop so low as to impersonate fuckstains like you
two. If I were going to impersonate anyone, it would be someone smart.

Rupert

unread,
Jan 29, 2013, 1:27:16 AM1/29/13
to
I definitely remember one time when you impersonated "pearl" and made a post about David Harrison soliciting homosexual sex on a houseboat.

George Plimpton

unread,
Jan 29, 2013, 2:11:31 AM1/29/13
to
I've made several posts about Fuckwit trolling for queer sex on his
houseboat, because that's exactly what he did.

Fuckwit's prospective "john":
I fish Lanier, where on the lake are you?


Fuckwit David Harrison:
At Holiday Marina. I don't fish, but if you'd want to hook up and
go for a boat ride--houseboat, runabout, and/or paddle around in
a kayak--let me know.

http://tinyurl.com/3ac8a


"Hook up" is slang for shagging - doing the rumpy-pumpy urban renewal.
The guy Fuckwit was trying to lure onto his houseboat is male, of
course, and Fuckwit was trying to get him to come down for a visit on
his houseboat, and then the guy would dream he was hatching a zucchini
and wake up to find Fuckwit hanging onto his sideburns.

However, I didn't make any such disparaging comment about Fuckwit
trolling for queer sex under the guise of "pearl". That's just bullshit
- a lie.

>

George Plimpton

unread,
Jan 29, 2013, 2:15:05 AM1/29/13
to
On 1/28/2013 10:27 PM, Rupert wrote:
> I definitely remember [load of wimpy bullshit]

You seem to have made it through the night this last night. You haven't
started wasting time until nearly 7:30 in the morning your time. Did
you take a somnif�re?

Mr.Smartypants

unread,
Jan 29, 2013, 3:05:24 AM1/29/13
to
Which one of the Ruperts do you think you are talking to, Goo?

Rupert

unread,
Jan 29, 2013, 7:43:19 AM1/29/13
to
This is the post where you impersonated "pearl" and talked about David Harrison soliciting gay sex on his houseboat.

https://groups.google.com/group/alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian/msg/dd10a691df533610?dmode=source&output=gplain&noredirect&pli=1

You shouldn't accuse other people of lying when you have no good grounds for doing so. It's unethical.

I have no idea whether or not David Harrison was in fact seeking out a sexual encounter with another man, and I also have no idea why any rational person should care. I mean, gay sex is not an entirely uncommon pastime, is it? Would you be getting all excited if you thought he was seeking out a sexual encounter with a woman? If not, then why do you get so excited about this? What's the big deal?

Rupert

unread,
Jan 29, 2013, 7:44:27 AM1/29/13
to
> you take a somnif�re?

Got up at around 6 am. Didn't have any coffee or alcohol last night.

dh

unread,
Jan 30, 2013, 3:15:04 PM1/30/13
to
On Mon, 28 Jan 2013 22:27:16 -0800 (PST), Rupert <rupertm...@yahoo.com>
wrote:

>>On Mon, 28 Jan 2013 18:54:29 -0500, dh@. wrote:
>>
>>>On Tue, 22 Jan 2013 19:15:26 -0800, Goo wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Tue, 22 Jan 2013 18:32:29 -0500, dh@. wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Mon, 21 Jan 2013 19:25:25 -0800, Goo wussed:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Mon, 21 Jan 2013 18:08:10 -0500, dh@. wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 09:14:36 -0800, Goo lied:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>I have never pretended to be anyone.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You've pretended to be me Goo, and you've pretended to be Ron. You did so
>>>>>>>very piss poorly of course Goob, but you did so none the less.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Of all the people in the world I might ever pretend to be
>>>>>
>>>>> You've pretended to be a number of people who have posted in this forum
>>>>>Goober, and we know it. We also know that Ron and I are among that number, Goo.
>>>>
>>>>I couldn't even pretend to stoop so low to be you, Fuckwit. I would
>>>>pretend to be Adolph Hitler, Lee Harvey Oswald or a bucket of horseshit
>>>>before I would pretend to be you, Fuckwit.
>>>
>>> Yet you have Goober, and you've pretended to be Ron too, and we know it. You
>>>sucked at it of course Goob and wrote the stupidist shit you could intentionally
>>>come up with, which isn't as stupid as what you do when trying to be
>>>intelligent, but still it was more stupid and dishonest than he or I would
>>>actually write. I believe usually it had something to do with your infatuation
>>>with the male asshole, Goo.
>>
>> No. I would never stoop so low as to impersonate fuckstains like you
>>
>> two. If I were going to impersonate anyone, it would be someone smart.
>
>I definitely remember one time when you impersonated "pearl" and made a post about David Harrison soliciting homosexual sex on a houseboat.

Goo has pretended to be me doing the same thing, and has indulged his
asshole infatuation pretending to be Ron directing interest toward me, etc.

dh

unread,
Jan 30, 2013, 3:15:11 PM1/30/13
to
On Mon, 28 Jan 2013 16:21:16 -0800, Goo wrote:

>If I were going to impersonate anyone, it would be someone smart.

LOL! You outstupid yourself way too much to ever pull that off Goob. In
contrast to that we see dozens of examples of you having impersonated "different
people" who frequently outstupided themselves Goo, like:

Jonathan Ball
Citizen
Benfez
Wilson Woods
Radical Moderate
Bingo
Edward
George
Bill
Fred
Mystery Poster
Merlin the dog
Bob the dog
sil...@onairos.com
elvira
Dieter
"Dieter d.Schmidt@deutsche_telekom.de"
<pricker...@yahoo.com>
Abner Hale
Roger Whitaker
Fucktard
Apoo
Ted Bell
notg...@yahoo.com
Jay Santos
mortons.s...@chicago.not
Rudy Canoza
Trappist
sb2...@yahoo.com
Leif Erikson
S. Maizlich
SlipperySlope
Eden
Sylvia Stevens
chico chupacabra
S. Maizlich
T. Howard Pines, Jr.
George Plimpton
Chrissy Degeer
Mauricio Rodriguez, Nihada Tutic and Tim Goss
Pete Crayne, Dare Adelekan, Cathy Demkiw, and about 16 others
Räy Fîscher
Barack Obama
Delma T. Ivey
Bob Casanova

dh

unread,
Jan 30, 2013, 3:15:27 PM1/30/13
to
On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 04:43:19 -0800 (PST), Rupert <rupertm...@yahoo.com>
wrote:

>This is the post where you impersonated "pearl" and talked about David Harrison soliciting gay sex on his houseboat.
>
>https://groups.google.com/group/alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian/msg/dd10a691df533610?dmode=source&output=gplain&noredirect&pli=1
>
>You shouldn't accuse other people of lying when you have no good grounds for doing so. It's unethical.

Goo does that very very frequently, lying blatantly himself as he does of
course.

>I have no idea whether or not David Harrison was in fact seeking out a sexual encounter with another man,

Nope. People who aren't gay don't think the way Goo does.

>and I also have no idea why any rational person should care. I mean, gay sex is not an entirely uncommon pastime, is it? Would you be getting all excited if you thought he was seeking out a sexual encounter with a woman? If not, then why do you get so excited about this? What's the big deal?

If Goo realy believed that's what I was doing he probably wouldn't have said
anything about it because then it wouldn't be insulting toward me. But since Goo
doesn't think gay, which I'm not, he knows it would be insulting so that's why
he said it. Were you somehow unaware of that? Are you unaware that's why he lies
that I approve of dog fighting too? And why he lies about me being a convicted
felon? And why he lies that I don't consider quality of life for livestock?
Etc.... How could you go all these years reading Goo's lies and not be aware of
why he's lying?

George Plimpton

unread,
Jan 30, 2013, 4:29:36 PM1/30/13
to
On 1/30/2013 12:15 PM, Fuckwit David Harrison - THE *Goo* - lied:
>> two. If I were going to impersonate anyone, it would be someone smart.
>
> You outstupid yourself way too much to

LOL!!! *Goo*: *YOU* are the one who has "outstupided" {LOL!!!!!!!)
yourself for *FOURTEEN* fucking years!!!!!!!!

LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

dh

unread,
Feb 4, 2013, 7:13:43 PM2/4/13
to
On Wed, 30 Jan 2013 13:29:36 -0800, Goo agreed:

>On Wed, 30 Jan 2013 15:15:11 -0500, dh@. wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 28 Jan 2013 16:21:16 -0800, Goo wrote:
>>
>>>If I were going to impersonate anyone, it would be someone smart.
>>
>>R�y F�scher
>>Barack Obama
>>Delma T. Ivey
>>Bob Casanova
>
>LOL!!! Goo: *YOU* are the one who has "outstupided" {LOL!!!!!!!)
>yourself for *FOURTEEN* fucking years!!!!!!!!

We agree you have outstupided yourself for fourteen fucking years Goo, just
as you're doing again right now. LOL...What a Goober!

George Plimpton

unread,
Feb 4, 2013, 9:28:23 PM2/4/13
to
On 2/4/2013 4:13 PM, dh@. wrote:
>>>> two. If I were going to impersonate anyone, it would be someone smart.
>>>
>>> You outstupid yourself way too much to
>>
>> LOL!!! *Goo*: *YOU* are the one who has "outstupided" {LOL!!!!!!!)
>> yourself for *FOURTEEN* fucking years!!!!!!!!
>>
>> LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>
> We agree

Yes, *Goo* - we *ALLLLLL* agree that *YOU* are the one who has
"outstupided" <giggle> yourself for FOURTEEN fucking years.

Rupert

unread,
Feb 5, 2013, 3:19:00 AM2/5/13
to
You once told me that giggling was girlish.

dh

unread,
Feb 6, 2013, 2:31:23 PM2/6/13
to
On Mon, 04 Feb 2013 18:28:23 -0800, Goo wrote:

>On Mon, 04 Feb 2013 19:13:43 -0500, dh@. wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 30 Jan 2013 13:29:36 -0800, Goo agreed:
>>
>>>On Wed, 30 Jan 2013 15:15:11 -0500, dh@. wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Mon, 28 Jan 2013 16:21:16 -0800, Goo wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>If I were going to impersonate anyone, it would be someone smart.
>>>>
>>>LOL!!! Goo: *YOU* are the one who has "outstupided" {LOL!!!!!!!)
>>>yourself for *FOURTEEN* fucking years!!!!!!!!
>>
>> We agree you have outstupided yourself for fourteen fucking years Goo, just
>>as you're doing again right now. LOL...What a Goober!
>
>Yes, Goo

The main way you outstupid yourself is with your dishonesties Goo from my
pov, but sometimes even when you're not lying you still outstupid yourself.

George Plimpton

unread,
Feb 6, 2013, 3:00:04 PM2/6/13
to
On 2/6/2013 11:31 AM, Fuckwit David Harrison - *Goo* - convicted felon
for breeding fighting dogs, lied:

> On 2/4/2013 6:28 PM, George Plimpton wrote:
>> On 2/4/2013 4:13 PM, Fuckwit David Harrison - THE *Goo* - lied:
>>>>>> two. If I were going to impersonate anyone, it would be someone
>>>>>> smart.
>>>>>
>>>>> You outstupid yourself way too much to
>>>>
>>>> LOL!!! *Goo*: *YOU* are the one who has "outstupided" {LOL!!!!!!!)
>>>> yourself for *FOURTEEN* fucking years!!!!!!!!
>>>>
>>>> LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>>>
>>> We agree
>>
>> Yes, *Goo* - we *ALLLLLL* agree that *YOU* are the one who has
>> "outstupided" <giggle> yourself for FOURTEEN fucking years.
>
> The main way

The *main* way you "outstupid" <chortle> yourself, *Goo*, is by
continuing to claim to believe that existence - "getting to experience
life" - is a benefit, when I have conclusively shown that it isn't.

Mr.Smartypants

unread,
Feb 7, 2013, 2:54:30 AM2/7/13
to
Did you giggle when you posted that, Goo?

dh

unread,
Feb 10, 2013, 6:50:03 PM2/10/13
to
On Wed, 6 Feb 2013 23:54:30 -0800 (PST), "Mr.Smartypants"
<bunghol...@lycos.com> wrote:

>On Feb 6, 1:00 pm, Goo wrote:
>
>> The *main* way you "outstupid" <chortle> yourself, *Goo*, is by
>> continuing to claim to believe that existence - "getting to experience
>> life" - is a benefit, when I have conclusively shown that it isn't.
>
>Did you giggle when you posted that, Goo?

Goo can't say what he wants people to think is preventing life from being a
benefit to him. The Goober is so inept that he can't even pretend to try.

George Plimpton

unread,
Feb 10, 2013, 8:51:30 PM2/10/13
to
On 1/30/2013 12:15 PM, Fuckwit David Harrison - THE *Goo* - lied:

>> two. If I were going to impersonate anyone, it would be someone smart.
>
> You outstupid yourself way too much to

George Plimpton

unread,
May 21, 2013, 1:15:40 PM5/21/13
to
On 1/21/2013 3:08 PM, Fuckwit David Harrison - *Goo* - convicted felon
for breeding fighting dogs, lied:

> On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 09:14:36 -0800, George Plimpton wrote:
>
>> I have never pretended to be anyone.
>
> You've pretended to be me

LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
0 new messages