Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
National Portrait Gallery
0 views
Skip to first unread message
Hans-Peter Reich
Jan 7, 2003, 9:41:10 AM1/7/03
to
National Portrait Gallery = Genial art (or partially not).
--
Cheers
Hans-Peter
--------------------
(www.nachtreiter.de)
Anna Graham
Jan 7, 2003, 11:43:06 AM1/7/03
to
National Portrait Gallery =
I portray all. No genital art!
I portray all. No genital art!
"Hans-Peter Reich" <ha...@x-mail.net> wrote in message news:aveorb$ue6$00$1...@news.t-online.com...
Mick Tully
Jan 7, 2003, 2:52:17 PM1/7/03
to
"Anna Graham" <an...@graham.not> wrote in message
news:usDS9.85687$B31.20...@twister.socal.rr.com...
National Portrait Gallery =
I portray all. No genital art!
;-)
Or, I portray little Anna gal!
Original talent portrayal.
All to glory in paint art era?
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.434 / Virus Database: 243 - Release Date: 25/12/2002
Rick Rothstein
Jan 7, 2003, 11:16:12 PM1/7/03
to
> National Portrait Gallery = Genial art (or partially not).
National Portrait Gallery
=
Original art... not really apt.
Original lay/pro art talent.
Art, in large part, an oily lot.
Oil paint rag... not really art.
Porn? Literally an agitator.
Largely totalitarian porn.
Rick
Mick Tully
Jan 8, 2003, 4:12:29 PM1/8/03
to
"Rick Rothstein" <rickNOS...@NOSPAMcomcast.net> wrote in message
news:H46cnY2GRu-...@comcast.com...
> "Hans-Peter Reich" <ha...@x-mail.net> wrote in message
> news:aveorb$ue6$00$1...@news.t-online.com...
> > National Portrait Gallery = Genial art (or partially not).
>
> National Portrait Gallery
> =
> Original art... not really apt.
Yes it is! ;-)
0 new messages