Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Harsh words about futurists

5 views
Skip to first unread message

Lardy Girl

unread,
May 3, 2013, 5:44:20 PM5/3/13
to
Most people described as 'futurists' tend to have nothing of substance
to say, at best. Accordingly:

This fellow's a futurist =
...Sure is full-of-shit twat



--
A n n a S h e f l - For email, substitute 'usenet' for its anagram
- "Never eat more than you can lift." --Miss Piggy -
alt.anagrams FAQ: http://theanna.org/grams/
Weird news archive and more: http://theanna.org/

Jon Gearhart

unread,
May 4, 2013, 12:01:18 PM5/4/13
to
Lardy Girl wrote:
> Most people described as 'futurists' tend to have nothing of substance
> to say, at best. Accordingly:
>
> This fellow's a futurist =
> ...Sure is full-of-shit twat

That sums it up nicely!!

Earth Jargon

Phil Carmody

unread,
May 6, 2013, 10:11:08 AM5/6/13
to
Lardy Girl <ust...@asdf.fi> writes:

> Most people described as 'futurists' tend to have nothing of substance
> to say, at best. Accordingly:
>
> This fellow's a futurist =
> ...Sure is full-of-shit twat

Good, but I'd rotate that to 'Twat sure is full of shit'.

Phil
--
"In a world of magnets and miracles"
-- Insane Clown Posse, Miracles, 2009. Much derided.
"Magnets, how do they work"
-- Pink Floyd, High Hopes, 1994. Lauded as lyrical geniuses.

Jon Gearhart

unread,
May 6, 2013, 12:00:32 PM5/6/13
to
Phil Carmody wrote:
> Lardy Girl <ust...@asdf.fi> writes:
>
>> Most people described as 'futurists' tend to have nothing of substance
>> to say, at best. Accordingly:
>>
>> This fellow's a futurist =
>> ...Sure is full-of-shit twat
>
> Good, but I'd rotate that to 'Twat sure is full of shit'.
>
> Phil
>
Good call, Phil.

Lardy Girl

unread,
May 14, 2013, 5:56:35 PM5/14/13
to
> Good call, Phil.


D'oh. Yes, indeed.

And thanks for the kind words, folks.
0 new messages