The sun energy source is not nuclear fusion, but magnetic fields from the center of the Galaxy. The sun converts energy to mass and not mass to energy.

[d...@pixelphase.com]

The document could be downloaded at:
<http://www.pixelphase.com/sun/sun.pdf>
<http://www.tikunim.co.il/sun/sun.pdf>

Its title is:
The sun energy source is not nuclear fusion, but magnetic fields from the
center of the Galaxy. The sun converts energy to mass and not mass to
energy.

Abstract:
The sun energy source thought to be a nuclear fusion reactor inside the sun
core. The sun is not heated by fusion reaction but by magnetic fields coming
from the galactic center. The nuclear fusion is a by product of the magnetic
fields heating. The changing magnetic fields from the galactic center induce
electric currents inside the sun that heat the sun. The heat and the high
kinetic energy of particles in the sun core, trigger high energy collisions
that create the main constituents of matter, electron, proton and neutron.
The collisions also fuse or nucleosynthesis heavier elements like deuterium,
tritium, helium and lithium. This leads to the fact that the stars and
galaxies constantly produce mass and energy. The article will explain the
clockworks behinds the galaxies energy production. The galaxy energy and
mass production cancel out the Big Bang theory and leads to a steady state
cosmological model with large amount of new mass created that expand and
accelerate the universe.

[MadD...@yahoo.com]

d...@pixelphase.com wrote:
>> Snip (Deservedly)>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Why is there no option to negative rate a post???

[Faux_Pseudo]

_.-In alt.ascii-art, MadD...@yahoo.com wrote the following -._

> d...@pixelphase.com wrote:
>>> Snip (Deservedly)>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>
> Why is there no option to negative rate a post???

Because this isn't slashdot. If one could apply a negative rating to
a post then every post would have one. This is USENET after all.
Just assume that anyone who posts things like that are either spammers
or trolls.
__
______.-------------| |
__ (______( | |\\\\\
..--'' ``--.._ ___/ `------------| |___
__ ``--..______.---'|| \ __ | ||
..--'' ``--.._ / || || | | | | | | ||
``--.._____\ || || | | | |__| | ||
The plug is pulled `---.||_/ | ||
Plonked is the troll \ .------------| |---'
Feed him I will not .------( :F_P: | |\\\\\
`------`-------------| |
http://fauxascii.com/ascii `--'

--
=()==()==()==()==()- http://fauxascii.com
\ \ \ \ \ \ ASCII artist
:F_P:-O- -O- -O- -O- -O- -O- -O-
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \

[Alex Terieur]

Nice signature anyway

Faux_Pseudo <Faux....@gmail.com> wrote in news:wO0gh.1054$RR4.1032
@newsfe22.lga:

[felixf...@gmail.com]

On Mar 21, 5:39 pm, Alex Terieur <a...@tech-int.net> wrote:
> Nice signature anyway
>
> Faux_Pseudo <Faux.Pse...@gmail.com> wrote in news:wO0gh.1054$RR4.1032
> @newsfe22.lga:
>
> > _.-In alt.ascii-art, MadDog...@yahoo.com wrote the following -._

> >> d...@pixelphase.com wrote:
> >>>> Snip (Deservedly)>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>
> >> Why is there no option to negative rate a post???
>
> > Because this isn't slashdot. If one could apply a negative rating to
> > a post then every post would have one. This is USENET after all.
> > Just assume that anyone who posts things like that are either spammers
> > or trolls.
> > __
> > ______.-------------| |
> > __ (______( | |\\\\\
> > ..--'' ``--.._ ___/ `------------| |___
> > __ ``--..______.---'|| \ __ | ||
> > ..--'' ``--.._ / || || | | | | | | ||
> > ``--.._____\ || || | | | |__| | ||
> > The plug is pulled `---.||_/ | ||
> > Plonked is the troll \ .------------| |---'
> > Feed him I will not .------( :F_P: | |\\\\\
> > `------`-------------| |
> > http://fauxascii.com/ascii`--'

Faux - your stuff rocks man...

felix
www.keystroketshirts.com