Who Takes UFOs & E.T.s Seriously?//Only Every Police Station and Fire Department in America!!
The Fire Officer's Guide To Disaster Control
The Fire Officer's Guide To Disaster Control by William M. Kramer, Ph.D. and Charles W. Bahme, J.D. is a totally serious book which is found in all fire and police department libraries across the United States. In June 1993, a new chapter (pp. 458-473) was added to this book. Bahme himself saw "UFOs" fly over Los Angeles on Aug. 26, 1942, and they were subsequently fired upon by ground defenses which killed nine people. During the Korean War, Bahme was Security Coordinator for the Chief of Naval Operations. The Guide is published by the Delaware State Fire School and made available through the Fire Engineering Book Service at 800-752-9768.
The Fire Officer's Guide To Disaster Control can also be found in your local library. The Dewey Decimal number is 363.378. The ISBN # is 0-912212-26-8. Ask the local librarian for help if you have trouble finding this. If it is checked out, you may put a reserve on it when it is returned. This is for the benefit of all the UFO debunkers out there who can't figure out how to use a library!
Chapter 13 is titled "Enemy Attack and UFO Potential" and it starts on page 439 and goes through to page 473, references are included. Page number 458 is where the UFO material begins, the main heading is "The UFO Threat - - A Fact." So now you know that every police and fire department has on hand instructions on how to handle a UFO "crisis." Under the main heading, as listed above, the authors explain"...interest in UFOs was greatly heightened when Congress in 1969 adopted a law which gave the NASA Administrator the arbitrary discretion to quarantine under armed guard any object, person, or other form of life which has been extraterrestrially exposed."
The next heading, is called, "UFO Discussion - - Why Now?" It goes on to explain how, during the early morning hours of August 26, 1942, sirens had signaled and "spectacular aerial fireworks filled the heavens all around." It has since become known as "The Los Angeles Air Raid of 1942," The was the army's' response to an UFO flyover, which was treated as an hostile "attack."
The following two chapters describe the UFO classification systems devised by Dr. J. Allen Hynek, and the various shapes, speeds and maneuverability "not attainable by aircraft of any kind commonly observed," of UFOs. The authors have a warning to the readers who have made up their minds that there is no such things as UFOs, "...notwithstanding the overwhelming evidence to the contrary, it should be pointed out that there is circumstantial evidence that disastrous effects have already been attributed to UFO activity in more than one nation, including the United States!"
The "History of UFOs" details the "hundreds of years of mysterious objects in the sky and strange moving lights" along with the World War II description of "Foo Fighters." Also explained is the Apollo 11 mission, where Armstrong, Aldrin and Collins "reported sightings of what seemed to be a UFO during the first half of their flight to the lunar surface." Moreover, "There were many more sightings by U.S. and Soviet Astronauts. On November, 11, 1966, Gemini XII astronauts Jim Lovell and Edwin Aldrin said that they saw four UFOs linked together." Dr. J. Allen Hynek emphatically stated, "Where they are coming from and why they are here is a matter of conjecture, but the fact that they were here on this planet is beyond a reasonable doubt."
Why The Secrecy?
The section titled, "Why the Secrecy?" starts off detailing Jim and Carol Lorenzos' book "UFOs Over America" in how "...the CIA has been closely involved in collection and suppression of UFO information. Witnesses to the phenomena have been bribed, coerced, and threatened by the CIA, who wanted valuable evidence given to them alone."
One reason given is that military intelligence may view the UFOs as a tool of either a known or unknown potential enemy. "If these vehicles prove evasive and surreptitious, all the more reason to suspect them...the probability looms large that the minds behind these vehicles may well be gathering intelligence of their own."
Another reason for secrecy may lie in the hope of obtaining knowledge relating to advanced propulsion methods and ANTI-GRAVITY systems before other potential enemies on earth may acquire it. Hence, though many nations are secretly investigating UFOs, they are reluctant to share their findings. Robert Lofton, in his book "Identified Flying Saucers," claims that the Air Force became the "goat" in the effort of the CIA to DEBUNK many sightings by pilots, radar technicians, and reliable civilian observers. He thinks that the suppression of information about how dangerous UFOs can be is wrong.
Major Donald Keyhoe describes in his book "Aliens From Space, The Real Story Of UFOs," the difficulties he had in 1957 in trying to get the truth from government agencies after he was director of NICAP, at the time the world's largest UFO research organization with over 30 subcommittees in the U.S. and abroad.
According to some UFOlogists the attempts at cover-up by the CIA extends to destruction of evidence that it could not confiscate. Apparently some of our nation's important leaders have been denied access to some UFO secrets in the possession of an agency of the United States, the very existence of which is classified ABOVE TOP SECRET! Ex-Presidential nominee and a retired Air Force Reserve Brigadier General, Barry Goldwater was quoted as saying, "I think some highly secret government UFO investigations are going on that we don't know about--and probably never will unless the Air Force discloses them." Goldwater said he was refused permission to check the Air Force files on UFOs!
Unleashed by the policy of Glasnost [greater openness] the Soviet media felt free to include accounts of UFO sightings. A Tass report of October 10, 1989, reported a large shiny ball or disk hovering over a Voronezh park, residents saw the UFO land and three creatures similar to human beings emerged, accompanied by a robot. ---One wonders when we in America are going to have an AMERICAN GLASNOST in regards to the alien presence-- In 1966, Representative Gerald Ford responded to a rash of sightings in his home state of Michigan by calling for, and getting, a House hearing on UFOs.
UFO Missions
Many reasons have been advanced for the purpose of the UFOs visits to our planet. Although some of the persons who apparently have been the subjects of genetic investigation, the majority of those who have studied possible UFO visitors, feel that they are friendly.
From the thousands of reports he has studied, William Spaulding, aerospace engineer and head of the Arizona-based ground Saucer Watch, believes that a pattern indicates that UFOs are here on a surveillance mission; the fact that a majority of sightings occur around our military installations, research and development areas leads to the conclusion that a methodical study is being made of the earth and its defensive and offensive capabilities. "The phenomena is not unlike our own space explorations; scout ship surveys; soil samples; landings."
In his book "Incident at Exeter," John Fuller discusses the seeming affinity of UFOs for electrical power lines in the northeastern part of the United States. In a later section of this chapter dealing with the effects of UFOs on our terrestrial activities, we will see how this affinity may have been responsible for causing 36 million people to lose power over an area of 8,000 square miles.
Because of our recent adventures into space, there are some who speculate that UFOs are more concerned with what we will do there, than in settling here. In any event, the Air Force's official publication (issued by the Government Printing Office 1968) called "Flying Objects" says that "No UFO has been determined to represent a threat to our national security." That conclusion, however, should not rule out less disastrous consequences than the overthrow of our government.
Adverse Potential of UFOs
Despite the skepticism of scientists, the UFOs sent from other planets do exist and have visited earth. UFOs may have exhibited some destructive effects, whether or not intentionally in every instance, which we need to consider when drafting a plan for coping with an emergency situation where UFOs are involved. Some of these documented effects are as follows:
UFO Hazards
The two principal hazards noted with relation to UFOs have been attributed to powerful electrical fields which they can project in a general or localized area and the psychological effects they have produced on the general populace or individual contacts.
Force Field Impact
The disruption of air and ground travel has often been reported in the presence of UFOs. The ignition systems of auto and aircraft engines have apparently been affected by energized force fields to such an extent as to stop their operation; the headlights and radios also ceased to function. These effects have also been noted to influence the controls and instruments of aircraft, e.g., the pilot of a Piper PH-24 reported that his controls became inoperable when he was approached by three disk-shaped objects, 10 to 12 feet in diameter, over Mexico City on May 3, 1975. Similar cases have been reported by military pilots, illustrated by the classic case of the near mid-air collision of an army helicopter with a UFO on October 18, 1973, over Ohio, where not only did both the UHF and VHF radio wavelengths go dead temporarily, but the downward movement of the helicopter with its four occupants was levitated upward by a green beam from the UFO in time to prevent its crash into the ground.
Communications Disruption
In addition to the impedance or radio transmissions and reception, telephone interference has occurred, illustrated by the
...
Is this supposed to be one of those examples of HoleFlapper's published "research"? It looks more like ignorant religious propaganda and plagerism of someone else's web page rather than "research"...
>Who Takes UFOs & E.T.s Seriously?//Only Every Police Station and Fire Department >in America!!
I will call your hand for this lying bluff of yours. There is absolutely no evidence that this book is officially sanctioned by the Executive Department of the US Government as a guide or training manual by *any*, much less *every*, police station and fire department in America.
Even then, the book contradicts your childish fantasies...
>Chapter 13 is titled "Enemy Attack and UFO Potential"
Do you know what "potential" means? It means it isn't *actual*. You are twisting their words around to mean "ETs have visited us" and should be taken seriously when in reality the book is more a review of the anatomy of a mass delusion and how to deal with mob control. Whether or not a real ET ever visits us, people will lose their heads, as they often do, if they imagine ET is visiting us, just like they did during the broadcasting of Orsen Welles' THE WAR OF THE WORLDS. Of course, you were probably right there at the forefront of the panic when it happened, so you would certainly know what I am talking about.
In my opinion this is not a work to be taken seriously, just like your published "research" has never been anything to be taken seriously. Whatever happened to your story about the military men contacting ETs by Ouija Board? Haha!
"Be careful when casting out your demons, lest you cast out the best part of yourself" -- ?? =============================================================
Do you even know what the word 'Plagiarism' means? I doubt it, if you can't even be bothered to spell it correctly.
If you're going to troll about using the name "The_Sage" and label as ignorant others who are far more educated and literate than yourself, you might try using SPELLCHECK to at least hide your own ignorance.
> Is this supposed to be one of those examples of HoleFlapper's > published "research"? It looks more like ignorant religious propaganda > and plagerism of someone else's web page rather than "research"...
> >Who Takes UFOs & E.T.s Seriously?//Only Every Police Station and Fire Department > >in America!!
> I will call your hand for this lying bluff of yours. There is > absolutely no evidence that this book is officially sanctioned by the > Executive Department of the US Government as a guide or training > manual by *any*, much less *every*, police station and fire department > in America.
> Even then, the book contradicts your childish fantasies...
> >Chapter 13 is titled "Enemy Attack and UFO Potential"
> Do you know what "potential" means? It means it isn't *actual*. You > are twisting their words around to mean "ETs have visited us" and > should be taken seriously when in reality the book is more a review of > the anatomy of a mass delusion and how to deal with mob control. > Whether or not a real ET ever visits us, people will lose their heads, > as they often do, if they imagine ET is visiting us, just like they > did during the broadcasting of Orsen Welles' THE WAR OF THE WORLDS. Of > course, you were probably right there at the forefront of the panic > when it happened, so you would certainly know what I am talking about.
> In my opinion this is not a work to be taken seriously, just like your > published "research" has never been anything to be taken seriously. > Whatever happened to your story about the military men contacting ETs > by Ouija Board? Haha!
> "Be careful when casting out your demons, lest you cast out > the best part of yourself" -- ?? > =============================================================
L3g!0n <duk...@yahoo.com> wrote: > You're an idiot. > Do you even know what the word 'Plagiarism' means? I doubt it, if you can't > even be bothered to spell it correctly. > If you're going to troll about using the name "The_Sage" and label as > ignorant others who are far more educated and literate than yourself, you > might try using SPELLCHECK to at least hide your own ignorance. > why don't you go read a book or something.
^ ^
You forgot the capital at the beginning of the sentence and the question mark at the end. If you are going to post little tantrum lectures about spelling and literacy, your best bet would be to take the foot of your mouth and read what you are posting! Excuse me, but.... BWHAHAHAHAHAHA!
In article <3d44767f.14982...@news.rmci.net>, The_Sage says...
>In my opinion this is not a work to be taken seriously, just like your >published "research" has never been anything to be taken seriously. >Whatever happened to your story about the military men contacting ETs >by Ouija Board? Haha!
>The Sage
Weak.
Q: Some of our readers are not familiar with your case yet, so can you tell them why you were not reprimanded heavily for going AWOL (absent without leave)? Why were the six of you given honorable discharges?
Vance Davis: I'll give you a very realistic theory, and then I'll give you a theory that sounds logical, but is not necessarily realistic, so we can cover both sides.
People say we went AWOL. I'll be honest with you; we deserted. We knew what we were doing. We did not plan to come back. A lot of laws within the military were changed because of us. Instead of being called AWOL after 24 hours, it is now 15 minutes. Also, desertion carries an automatic jail sentence now. We went right through a lot of laws that they thought they had to catch everybody.
We did use an Ouiji board. We used all kinds of metaphysical material. So does your government. They use anything—HUMINT (human intelligence), SIGINT (signals intelligence), ELINT (electronics intelligence), PSYINT (psychic intelligence)—take those all together and you have a pretty good picture of what might be going on. When someone says they don't use psychics, he is lying. They do. They use every possible avenue to gather intelligence. Think about it; if you were in their position, you would do the same thing.
Now we used an Ouiji board. It was not the only avenue we used to gather information. When I was a kid, I learned in a Sylvan Mind Control class how to use "going to level and getting information," the way Edgar Cayce got information. They do use that.
We went AWOL with a lot of information—seven sessions, or about 1,500 pages of notes on UFOs, metaphysical stuff, spiritual stuff, Christian stuff—a lot of notes about the Bible (certain things have been told and certain people lied to etc.). We did not necessarily believe everything we had, but we had enough information and enough research (what little we could do) to say that something was definitely "rotten in Denmark." Something was wrong.
We went AWOL with all this. We deserted to Gulf Breeze to visit a couple of women—one of whom had been a psychic with the FBI—to ask them what they thought of the information and how accurate it could be. We got arrested.
Now let's put our feet in the government's shoes. Let's say we're in the military, or the government, or the White House. Six soldiers desert from the same unit. It has never occurred before in the 200-year recorded history of the military. How are we to deal with that? We want to make examples out of those six deserters. But to do that, we will have to court-martial them, which is like putting them in a trial of their peers. An officer is the equivalent of a judge.
Just like in civilian court, they have secret-level courts-martial and open courts-martial, but most of that does come out in the news. The media reported our story heavily—CNN, ABC, London, Germany, China, Japan—so they couldn't really hold a secret court-martial. Everybody was going to want to know what happened and why. If we were to be court-martialed, the first question we would be asked would be, "Why did you desert?" We had made a promise that if anybody asked, we would tell them. We had nothing to hide. We would tell them about the Ouiji board, about the information, about what went on.
Now at that point, as a prosecutor for the government, you have to prove that information is damaging to the United States government. Can you imagine what that would do to the public's view? They are saying, "Uh-oh. We have a problem here. If we court-martial them, we're going to spill our beans. We're going to have to release a bunch of stuff, classified or unclassified. It's going to slap us in the face. The deserters are going to embarrass us during a court-martial."
Second of all, if I were in a position of power in the government, I'd say, "Let's let the people guess what happened and not let them know, and let the deserters go." The problem with that is that we were given honorable discharges. See? Something is wrong there. They could have given us dishonorable discharges, but they didn’t. Nor did they declare us insane. So that logical thinking tends to go down the tubes.
Q: So what do you believe their reason is?
VD: That takes us to the second theory. I can make a logical stand for it, but it is almost impossible to prove or disprove.
The Ouiji board told us three things that are not in the book that I am going to share with you. 1) We were allowed to use this form of communication because we would not listen any other way. 2) For some reason, we would be a light unto the world. At the time we did not understand what that meant. Now, after the news coverage of it in 1990, we understand it. We kind of changed things—stirred the pot. A lot of things have happened quickly since 1990. We kind of opened up a beehive, which is okay, since it helped a lot of people out a little bit. 3) We cannot confirm whom we actually talked to. We were given names, but that does not mean that that is whom we were talking to. We were definitely involved with a very high intelligence that knew what was going on. It may have been lying to us, but it may have been an alien influence. That is highly possible. If that were true—and we were told that we would be protected and that certain people knew what was going on.
Now, I'm going to give you a few facts to back this line of thinking up. We knew we were probably going to go AWOL in the middle of June, 1990. It is interesting that the reports on us—the documents that they released—their reporting period started in the middle of June. In other words, the government started following us before we deserted.
Now this is how it normally works: if they knew that we were going AWOL, they would have caught us when we went on the flight, because that's a sign of guilt. They let us go on and let us fly. The only time I have been stopped is in July of 1990; otherwise, we've all been left alone by the government and all kinds of people
Now I'm going to get into some wild stuff, here, but it might logically make sense to some CONTACT FORUM readers. If we were involved with alien forces, if we were supposed to do a job, if we were supposed to desert and create the news fervor, if all this stuff was suppose to happen per a large plan of some kind, then does it make sense that, when we go captured, those aliens would step in and tell the government "hands-off"?
>Reply to article by: Sir Arthur <nos...@newsranger.com> >Date written: Mon, 29 Jul 2002 12:42:42 GMT >MsgID:<6La19.31893$15.10...@www.newsranger.com> >>In my opinion this is not a work to be taken seriously, just like your >>published "research" has never been anything to be taken seriously. >>Whatever happened to your story about the military men contacting ETs >>by Ouija Board? Haha!
"Be careful when casting out your demons, lest you cast out the best part of yourself" -- ?? =============================================================
In article <2k419.227$LI.91...@news.uswest.net>, L3g!0n says...
>You're an idiot.
>Do you even know what the word 'Plagiarism' means? I doubt it, if you can't >even be bothered to spell it correctly.
Yes, Sludge A.K.A. Sage, IS an idiot, a useful idiot. Long ago Sludge admitted that he is part of the cover-up of UFO's, thus Sludge and NSA/NASA spOOk J. O-BORG are NOT interested talking about the facts, so they lie.
O-BORG is a paid liar, don't ask him about the thousands of crop-circles, animal mutilations, abductions, trace cases, radar sightings, military and ET bases, back-engineering of alien craft, ETs coming and going from military bases, alien implants, etc. etc. etc. O-BORG and Sludge would rather talk about swamp gas and crash test dummies.
You really exposed those useful idiots!!
>If you're going to troll about using the name "The_Sage" and label as >ignorant others who are far more educated and literate than yourself, you >might try using SPELLCHECK to at least hide your own ignorance.
>Reply to article by: Sir Arthur C. B. Wholeflaffers A.S.A. <nos...@newsranger.com> >Date written: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 04:35:10 GMT >MsgID:<2OJ19.32313$15.10...@www.newsranger.com> >Yes, Sludge A.K.A. Sage, IS an idiot, a useful idiot. >Long ago Sludge admitted that he is part of the >cover-up of UFO's, thus Sludge and >NSA/NASA spOOk J. O-BORG are NOT >interested talking about the facts, so they lie.
I always thought you wanted people to take you and your UFO issues seriously, but obviously you don't care. So go ahead and lie your arse off, but it only makes the spOOks look more honest and intelligent than you could ever hope to be.
"Be careful when casting out your demons, lest you cast out the best part of yourself" -- ?? =============================================================
In article <3d48afba.3371...@news.rmci.net>, The_Sage says...
>>Reply to article by: Sir Arthur C. B. Wholeflaffers A.S.A. <nos...@newsranger.com> >>Date written: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 04:35:10 GMT >>MsgID:<2OJ19.32313$15.10...@www.newsranger.com>
>>Yes, Sludge A.K.A. Sage, IS an idiot, a useful idiot. >>Long ago Sludge admitted that he is part of the >>cover-up of UFO's, thus Sludge and >>NSA/NASA spOOk J. O-BORG are NOT >>interested talking about the facts, so they lie.
>I always thought you wanted people to take you and your UFO issues >seriously, but obviously you don't care.
In a way you are right, I don't care what the spOOks, debunkers and outright liars like yourself have to say; since it is all swamp gas and hedge hogs. No wonder the debunkers credibility is down to 1%.
>but it only makes the spOOks look more honest and intelligent >than you could ever hope to be.
Doubtful. At the end Sagan wouldn't even dare debate Friedman, O-BORG somehow sneaks on the Rense show, I guess they must strong-arm him is my best guess.
Klass hasn't been on TeeVee for about 10 years Steve Greer had the biggest web broadcast in its history and UFO web sites are #2 on the entire net. So as usual, your assessment is totally wrong, but what else is new.
And you have been exposed so many times as a useful idiot, I kind of wonder why you are still here. The net has a ton of trolls these days, and low-level operatives who refuse to address the evidence, but what else is new??
On Thu, 01 Aug 2002 05:54:43 GMT, Sir Arthur C. B.Wholeflaffers A.S.A.
<nos...@newsranger.com> wrote: >And you have been exposed so many times >as a useful idiot, I kind of wonder why you >are still here. The net has a ton of >trolls these days, and low-level operatives >who refuse to address the evidence, >but what else is new??
Make sure you put yourself on your own concentration camp list, because you're the biggest liar on Usenet.
On Thu, 01 Aug 2002 03:51:21 GMT, thees...@azrmci.net (The_Sage) wrote: >>Reply to article by: Sir Arthur C. B. Wholeflaffers A.S.A. <nos...@newsranger.com> >>Date written: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 04:35:10 GMT >>MsgID:<2OJ19.32313$15.10...@www.newsranger.com>
>>Yes, Sludge A.K.A. Sage, IS an idiot, a useful idiot. >>Long ago Sludge admitted that he is part of the >>cover-up of UFO's, thus Sludge and >>NSA/NASA spOOk J. O-BORG are NOT >>interested talking about the facts, so they lie.
>I always thought you wanted people to take you and your UFO issues >seriously, but obviously you don't care. So go ahead and lie your arse >off, but it only makes the spOOks look more honest and intelligent >than you could ever hope to be.
Anyone posting to Usenet under false pretenses isn't honest or intelligent.
> I always thought you wanted people to take you and your UFO issues > seriously, but obviously you don't care. So go ahead and lie your > arse off, but it only makes the spOOks look more honest and > intelligent than you could ever hope to be.
> The Sage
I always thought you wanted people to take UFO issues not seriously, but obviously for reaching that goal you exclude data or use an 'explainaway'.
An 'explainaway' is an unscientific attemped for reassurance, where you don't research the cause and just give a reasonable explanation for the effect.
"I offered my comments as a way to reach those people who have difficulty reasoning due to the conditioning of Hollywood. It is a way out for them; a way to show them that there is another more rational way of seeing things." The Sage on http://home.rmci.net/thesage/UFO.htm (page 1, Why debunk UFOs?)
"There is an unexplainable phenomenon and it has a reasonable explanation, therefore I am not interested in the cause, just the effect." The Sage in 'Denial is not skepticism', alt.alien.visitors Message 167 in thread, 2001-MAY-03 13:18:43 PST
"Remember that cause-and-effect are the cornerstone of the scientific method." See The Sage's most excellent writing on http://home.rmci.net/thesage/Pseudosci.htm (What is the scientific method?)
====== Humanoid sightings: mass hysteria (A), fantasy prone (B) or EM radiation (C)?
=A===== "Mass hysteria is any hysteria TRIGGERED by mob mentality or mass media. A delayed reaction to a mass media event still means it is a mass hysteria, even if the person is alone at the time of the experience."
"Not a single successful argument has ever been made against the claim that the UFO/ET fad is just another example of a mass delusion."
"1. You cannot hear things that don't exist, 2. You cannot see things that don't exist, 3. You cannot smell things that don't exist, 4. You cannot taste things that don't exist, and 5. You cannot feel things that don't exist."
"So the claim that all these multitudes of people coming forth to say they saw a little gray men wouldn't be doing it if there weren't some truth behind the phenomenon, is demonstratably false!"
The Sage in 'MASS HYSTERIAS' and 'HUMANIOD MONSTER DELUSION' on http://home.rmci.net/thesage/UFO.htm (Page 5, What is the alien abduction syndrome?)
=B===== INCLUDE the abductee's HISTORY and you come to the fantasy prone personality (Wilson and Barber in Imagery, Current Theory, Research an Application, 1983). A bibliographic research (Newman and Baumeister in Psychological Inquiry 7, 1996) showed that 87% of the abductees suffer from this personalitydisorder.
=C===== INCLUDE ALSO the abductee's ENVIRONMENT and you come to the electromagnetic pollution approach - EMPA (Budden, Electric UFO's, 1999), where the TRIGGER is electromagnetic radiation.
The Sage seem to ignore the obvious blatant fact that there is legitimate physical evidence presently in existence, that scientifically and rationally verifies the existence of an EM presence; A verifiable CAUSE for hearing, seeing, smelling, tasting and feeling things that don't exist, delusions triggered by electromagnetic (EM) radiation.
====== Geosound "is produced in the earth's strata. It is electrical activity underground - the equivalent of a thunderstorm in the atmosphere. Geosound can be an electronic-sounding squeal, or an intense buzzing like a swarm of bees. Geosound is often accompanied by sulphurous or 'electrical' smells [...]" [Chapter 6, Page 177]
The smells "can be created by, predictably, electrical discharges in the air. Such discharges change the energy states of various atoms, and numerous chemical compounds can be formed. [...] nitrogen, making up 70 per cent of the air, changes to a metastable state. This energized, or excited, nitrogen is called 'activated' because it readily combines with other atoms, whereas ordinary nitrogen does not: for example, it can combine with hydrogen to form ammonia, and with oxygen to form nitric oxide. It also reacts with other gases in the air to form nitrobenzen, which is an oily substance with a strong smell like bitter almonds. Ozone is also smelt around electrical machinery to some extent and it is commonly reported in association with CE [Close-Encounter] experiences. These processes could account for the smell alone, but it could also have been produced as a hallucination by field stimulation of the brain." [Chapter 3, Page 79]
Psychic Close Encounters Albert Budden Blandford, 1999 ISBN 0-7137-2799-3
====== All the examples outdate what Columbus saw in 1492 and the 1968 Condon Report: Is it an indication that there is progress been made in the research of the Alien Abduction Phenomenon?
====== This is a combination of my 2002-07-28 'For The Sage: Mass Hysteria?' and 2002-07-31 'Abduction: mass hysteria, fantasy prone or EM radiation?' posts.
>Reply to article by: s...@sss.sss (Laughing Last) >Date written: Thu, 01 Aug 2002 07:09:09 GMT >MsgID:<3d4cde52.14825...@news.erols.com> >Anyone posting to Usenet under false pretenses isn't honest or intelligent. >And that includes you.
Since I don't post under false pretenses, I don't see what relevancy this has to me. Maybe you're the one who isn't being honest or intelligent with us here? Do you know something that the rest of us don't know? Pray tell.
"Be careful when casting out your demons, lest you cast out the best part of yourself" -- ?? =============================================================
>Reply to article by: Sir Arthur C. B.Wholeflaffers A.S.A. <nos...@newsranger.com> >Date written: Thu, 01 Aug 2002 05:54:43 GMT >MsgID:<D2429.32519$15.10...@www.newsranger.com> >>I always thought you wanted people to take you and your UFO issues >>seriously, but obviously you don't care. >In a way you are right
"Be careful when casting out your demons, lest you cast out the best part of yourself" -- ?? =============================================================
> Who Takes UFOs & E.T.s Seriously?//Only Every Police Station and Fire > Department in America!!
Good God, Artie! I remember you posting this claptrap four years ago. Your claims were shot to hell then, but you've decided to trot it out one more time.
Frank Schnabel <frank...@sympatico.ca> wrote: > Good God, Artie! I remember you posting this claptrap four years ago. > Your claims were shot to hell then, but you've decided to trot it out one > more time.
Has has posted this one and many others over and over again. Some probably dozens of times. This is all he has, redundant words, and no real proof.
> When will you learn?
The only thing he seems to have learned is that he now has stopped pretending he is a Doctor and giving bogus medical advice in support newsgroups.
>> Who Takes UFOs & E.T.s Seriously?//Only Every Police Station and Fire >> Department in America!!
>Good God, Artie! I remember you posting this claptrap four years ago. >Your claims were shot to hell then...
Wrong. None, I repeat, "None" of my material has ever been refuted by a reputable poster. The "reputable" part eliminates the trolls from this group and spOOksthe like O-BORG. Borsch and Echelon®. - - - - -- -- -- Who Takes UFOs & E.T.s Seriously?//Only Every Police Station and Fire Department in America!!
The Fire Officer's Guide To Disaster Control
The Fire Officer's Guide To Disaster Control by William M. Kramer, Ph.D. and Charles W. Bahme, J.D. is a totally serious book which is found in all fire and police department libraries across the United States. In June 1993, a new chapter (pp. 458-473) was added to this book. Bahme himself saw "UFOs" fly over Los Angeles on Aug. 26, 1942, and they were subsequently fired upon by ground defenses which killed nine people. During the Korean War, Bahme was Security Coordinator for the Chief of Naval Operations. The Guide is published by the Delaware State Fire School and made available through the Fire Engineering Book Service at 800-752-9768.
The Fire Officer's Guide To Disaster Control can also be found in your local library. The Dewey Decimal number is 363.378. The ISBN # is 0-912212-26-8. Ask the local librarian for help if you have trouble finding this. If it is checked out, you may put a reserve on it when it is returned. This is for the benefit of all the UFO debunkers out there who can't figure out how to use a library!
Chapter 13 is titled "Enemy Attack and UFO Potential" and it starts on page 439 and goes through to page 473, references are included. Page number 458 is where the UFO material begins, the main heading is "The UFO Threat - - A Fact." So now you know that every police and fire department has on hand instructions on how to handle a UFO "crisis." Under the main heading, as listed above, the authors explain"...interest in UFOs was greatly heightened when Congress in 1969 adopted a law which gave the NASA Administrator the arbitrary discretion to quarantine under armed guard any object, person, or other form of life which has been extraterrestrially exposed."
The next heading, is called, "UFO Discussion - - Why Now?" It goes on to explain how, during the early morning hours of August 26, 1942, sirens had signaled and "spectacular aerial fireworks filled the heavens all around." It has since become known as "The Los Angeles Air Raid of 1942," The was the army's' response to an UFO flyover, which was treated as an hostile "attack."
The following two chapters describe the UFO classification systems devised by Dr. J. Allen Hynek, and the various shapes, speeds and maneuverability "not attainable by aircraft of any kind commonly observed," of UFOs. The authors have a warning to the readers who have made up their minds that there is no such things as UFOs, "...notwithstanding the overwhelming evidence to the contrary, it should be pointed out that there is circumstantial evidence that disastrous effects have already been attributed to UFO activity in more than one nation, including the United States!"
The "History of UFOs" details the "hundreds of years of mysterious objects in the sky and strange moving lights" along with the World War II description of "Foo Fighters." Also explained is the Apollo 11 mission, where Armstrong, Aldrin and Collins "reported sightings of what seemed to be a UFO during the first half of their flight to the lunar surface." Moreover, "There were many more sightings by U.S. and Soviet Astronauts. On November, 11, 1966, Gemini XII astronauts Jim Lovell and Edwin Aldrin said that they saw four UFOs linked together." Dr. J. Allen Hynek emphatically stated, "Where they are coming from and why they are here is a matter of conjecture, but the fact that they were here on this planet is beyond a reasonable doubt."
Why The Secrecy?
The section titled, "Why the Secrecy?" starts off detailing Jim and Carol Lorenzos' book "UFOs Over America" in how "...the CIA has been closely involved in collection and suppression of UFO information. Witnesses to the phenomena have been bribed, coerced, and threatened by the CIA, who wanted valuable evidence given to them alone."
One reason given is that military intelligence may view the UFOs as a tool of either a known or unknown potential enemy. "If these vehicles prove evasive and surreptitious, all the more reason to suspect them...the probability looms large that the minds behind these vehicles may well be gathering intelligence of their own."
Another reason for secrecy may lie in the hope of obtaining knowledge relating to advanced propulsion methods and ANTI-GRAVITY systems before other potential enemies on earth may acquire it. Hence, though many nations are secretly investigating UFOs, they are reluctant to share their findings. Robert Lofton, in his book "Identified Flying Saucers," claims that the Air Force became the "goat" in the effort of the CIA to DEBUNK many sightings by pilots, radar technicians, and reliable civilian observers. He thinks that the suppression of information about how dangerous UFOs can be is wrong.
Major Donald Keyhoe describes in his book "Aliens From Space, The Real Story Of UFOs," the difficulties he had in 1957 in trying to get the truth from government agencies after he was director of NICAP, at the time the world's largest UFO research organization with over 30 subcommittees in the U.S. and abroad.
According to some UFOlogists the attempts at cover-up by the CIA extends to destruction of evidence that it could not confiscate. Apparently some of our nation's important leaders have been denied access to some UFO secrets in the possession of an agency of the United States, the very existence of which is classified ABOVE TOP SECRET! Ex-Presidential nominee and a retired Air Force Reserve Brigadier General, Barry Goldwater was quoted as saying, "I think some highly secret government UFO investigations are going on that we don't know about--and probably never will unless the Air Force discloses them." Goldwater said he was refused permission to check the Air Force files on UFOs!
Unleashed by the policy of Glasnost [greater openness] the Soviet media felt free to include accounts of UFO sightings. A Tass report of October 10, 1989, reported a large shiny ball or disk hovering over a Voronezh park, residents saw the UFO land and three creatures similar to human beings emerged, accompanied by a robot. ---One wonders when we in America are going to have an AMERICAN GLASNOST in regards to the alien presence-- In 1966, Representative Gerald Ford responded to a rash of sightings in his home state of Michigan by calling for, and getting, a House hearing on UFOs.
UFO Missions
Many reasons have been advanced for the purpose of the UFOs visits to our planet. Although some of the persons who apparently have been the subjects of genetic investigation, the majority of those who have studied possible UFO visitors, feel that they are friendly.
From the thousands of reports he has studied, William Spaulding, aerospace engineer and head of the Arizona-based ground Saucer Watch, believes that a pattern indicates that UFOs are here on a surveillance mission; the fact that a majority of sightings occur around our military installations, research and development areas leads to the conclusion that a methodical study is being made of the earth and its defensive and offensive capabilities. "The phenomena is not unlike our own space explorations; scout ship surveys; soil samples; landings."
In his book "Incident at Exeter," John Fuller discusses the seeming affinity of UFOs for electrical power lines in the northeastern part of the United States. In a later section of this chapter dealing with the effects of UFOs on our terrestrial activities, we will see how this affinity may have been responsible for causing 36 million people to lose power over an area of 8,000 square miles.
Because of our recent adventures into space, there are some who speculate that UFOs are more concerned with what we will do there, than in settling here. In any event, the Air Force's official publication (issued by the Government Printing Office 1968) called "Flying Objects" says that "No UFO has been determined to represent a threat to our national security." That conclusion, however, should not rule out less disastrous consequences than the overthrow of our government.
Adverse Potential of UFOs
Despite the skepticism of scientists, the UFOs sent from other planets do exist and have visited earth. UFOs may have exhibited some destructive effects, whether or not intentionally in every instance, which we need to consider when drafting a plan for coping with an emergency situation where UFOs are involved. Some of these documented effects are as follows:
UFO Hazards
The two principal hazards noted with relation to UFOs have been attributed to powerful electrical fields which they can project in a general or localized area and the psychological effects they have produced on the general populace or individual contacts.
Force Field Impact
The disruption of air and ground travel has often been reported in the presence of UFOs. The ignition systems of auto and aircraft engines have apparently been affected by energized force fields to such an extent as to stop their operation; the headlights and radios also ceased to function. These effects have also been noted to influence the controls and instruments of aircraft, e.g., the pilot of a Piper PH-24 reported that his controls became inoperable when he
...
> Wrong. None, I repeat, "None" of my material > has ever been refuted by a reputable poster. > The "reputable" part eliminates the trolls from this > group and spOOksthe like O-BORG. Borsch and Echelon(r).
Ah, yes, the standard UFO kook ploy: attack the person not the argument. Simply dismiss the person as not credible, that way you don't have to respond to actual arguments.
But back to your claims...
I didn't have time to read your entire post; it just seemed to go on and on (you really must learn to only post the main points). Fire departments and, more importantly, police departments do need some training to deal with the mass confusion and/or hysteria that can come from UFO sightings. To deny this is only naivety. I would be very surprise if the reference that you cited is an actual explanation of what to do if aliens invade.
>>> Who Takes UFOs & E.T.s Seriously?//Only Every Police Station and >>> Fire Department in America!!
>>Good God, Artie! I remember you posting this claptrap four years ago. >>Your claims were shot to hell then...
>Wrong. None, I repeat, "None" of my material >has ever been refuted by a reputable poster. >The "reputable" part eliminates the trolls from this >group and spOOksthe like O-BORG. Borsch and Echelon®. >- - - - -- -- -- >Who Takes UFOs & E.T.s Seriously?//Only Every Police Station and Fire Department >in America!!
>The Fire Officer's Guide To Disaster Control
>The Fire Officer's Guide To Disaster Control by William M. Kramer, >Ph.D. and >Charles W. Bahme, J.D. is a totally serious book which is found in all >fire and >police department libraries across the United States. In June 1993, a >new chapter (pp. 458-473) was added to this book. Bahme himself saw >"UFOs" fly >over Los Angeles on Aug. 26, 1942, and they were subsequently fired >upon by ground defenses which killed nine people. During the Korean >War, Bahme was Security Coordinator for the Chief of Naval Operations. >The Guide is published >by the Delaware State Fire School and made available through the Fire >Engineering Book Service at 800-752-9768.
>The Fire Officer's Guide To Disaster Control can also be found in your local >library. The Dewey Decimal number is 363.378. The ISBN # is 0-912212-26-8. >Ask the local librarian for help if you have trouble finding this. If >it is >checked out, you may put a reserve on it when it is returned. This is >for the >benefit of all the UFO debunkers out there who can't figure out how to >use a >library!
>Chapter 13 is titled "Enemy Attack and UFO Potential" and it starts on >page 439 >and goes through to page 473, references are included. Page number 458 is >where the UFO material begins, the main heading is "The UFO Threat - - >A Fact." >So now you know that every police and fire department has on hand instructions >on how to handle a UFO "crisis." Under the main heading, as listed >above, the >authors explain"...interest in UFOs was greatly heightened when >Congress in 1969 >adopted a law which gave the NASA Administrator the arbitrary >discretion to quarantine under armed guard any object, person, or other >form of life which has >been extraterrestrially exposed."
>The next heading, is called, "UFO Discussion - - Why Now?" It goes on >to explain how, during the early morning hours of August 26, 1942, >sirens had signaled and "spectacular aerial fireworks filled the >heavens all around." It >has since become known as "The Los Angeles Air Raid of 1942," The was >the army's' response to an UFO flyover, which was treated as an hostile "attack."
>The following two chapters describe the UFO classification systems >devised by >Dr. J. Allen Hynek, and the various shapes, speeds and maneuverability >"not attainable by aircraft of any kind commonly observed," of UFOs. >The authors >have a warning to the readers who have made up their minds that there >is no such >things as UFOs, "...notwithstanding the overwhelming evidence to the contrary, >it should be pointed out that there is circumstantial evidence that disastrous >effects have already been attributed to UFO activity in more than one nation, >including the United States!"
>The "History of UFOs" details the "hundreds of years of mysterious >objects in >the sky and strange moving lights" along with the World War II >description of >"Foo Fighters." Also explained is the Apollo 11 mission, where >Armstrong, Aldrin and Collins "reported sightings of what seemed to be >a UFO during the >first half of their flight to the lunar surface." Moreover, "There >were many >more sightings by U.S. and Soviet Astronauts. On November, 11, 1966, Gemini XII >astronauts Jim Lovell and Edwin Aldrin said that they saw four UFOs linked >together." Dr. J. Allen Hynek emphatically stated, "Where they are coming from >and why they are here is a matter of conjecture, but the fact that they were >here on this planet is beyond a reasonable doubt."
>Why The Secrecy?
>The section titled, "Why the Secrecy?" starts off detailing Jim and >Carol Lorenzos' book "UFOs Over America" in how "...the CIA has been >closely involved >in collection and suppression of UFO information. Witnesses to the phenomena >have been bribed, coerced, and threatened by the CIA, who wanted >valuable evidence given to them alone."
>One reason given is that military intelligence may view the UFOs as a >tool of >either a known or unknown potential enemy. "If these vehicles prove evasive >and surreptitious, all the more reason to suspect them...the >probability looms >large that the minds behind these vehicles may well be gathering intelligence of >their own."
>Another reason for secrecy may lie in the hope of obtaining knowledge relating >to advanced propulsion methods and ANTI-GRAVITY systems before other potential >enemies on earth may acquire it. Hence, though many nations are >secretly investigating UFOs, they are reluctant to share their >findings. Robert Lofton, >in his book "Identified Flying Saucers," claims that the Air Force >became the >"goat" in the effort of the CIA to DEBUNK many sightings by pilots, >radar technicians, and reliable civilian observers. He thinks that the suppression of >information about how dangerous UFOs can be is wrong.
>Major Donald Keyhoe describes in his book "Aliens From Space, The Real Story Of >UFOs," the difficulties he had in 1957 in trying to get the truth from >government agencies after he was director of NICAP, at the time the >world's largest UFO research organization with over 30 subcommittees >in the U.S. and >abroad.
>According to some UFOlogists the attempts at cover-up by the CIA >extends to destruction of evidence that it could not confiscate. >Apparently some of our >nation's important leaders have been denied access to some UFO secrets >in the >possession of an agency of the United States, the very existence of >which is >classified ABOVE TOP SECRET! Ex-Presidential nominee and a retired Air Force >Reserve Brigadier General, Barry Goldwater was quoted as saying, "I >think some >highly secret government UFO investigations are going on that we don't >know about--and probably never will unless the Air Force discloses >them." Goldwater >said he was refused permission to check the Air Force files on UFOs!
>Unleashed by the policy of Glasnost [greater openness] the Soviet media felt >free to include accounts of UFO sightings. A Tass report of October >10, 1989, >reported a large shiny ball or disk hovering over a Voronezh park, residents saw >the UFO land and three creatures similar to human beings emerged, accompanied by >a robot. ---One wonders when we in America are going to have an >AMERICAN GLASNOST in regards to the alien presence-- In 1966, >Representative Gerald Ford >responded to a rash of sightings in his home state of Michigan by >calling for, >and getting, a House hearing on UFOs.
>UFO Missions
>Many reasons have been advanced for the purpose of the UFOs visits to >our planet. Although some of the persons who apparently have been the >subjects of >genetic investigation, the majority of those who have studied possible >UFO visitors, feel that they are friendly.
>From the thousands of reports he has studied, William Spaulding, >aerospace engineer and head of the Arizona-based ground Saucer Watch, >believes that a pattern indicates that UFOs are here on a surveillance >mission; the fact that a >majority of sightings occur around our military installations, research >and development areas leads to the conclusion that a methodical study >is being made >of the earth and its defensive and offensive capabilities. "The >phenomena is >not unlike our own space explorations; scout ship surveys; soil >samples; landings."
>In his book "Incident at Exeter," John Fuller discusses the seeming affinity of >UFOs for electrical power lines in the northeastern part of the United States. >In a later section of this chapter dealing with the effects of UFOs on >our terrestrial activities, we will see how this affinity may have been responsible >for causing 36 million people to lose power over an area of 8,000 >square miles.
>Because of our recent adventures into space, there are some who >speculate that >UFOs are more concerned with what we will do there, than in settling >here. In >any event, the Air Force's official publication (issued by the >Government Printing Office 1968) called "Flying Objects" says that "No >UFO has been determined to represent a threat to our national >security." That conclusion, >however, should not rule out less disastrous consequences than the overthrow of >our government.
>Adverse Potential of UFOs
>Despite the skepticism of scientists, the UFOs sent from other planets >do exist >and have visited earth. UFOs may have exhibited some destructive >effects, whether or not intentionally in every instance, which we need >to consider when >drafting a plan for coping with an emergency situation where UFOs are involved. >Some of these documented effects are as