UFO's and the National Security State
Sir Arthur C. B. Wholeflaffers A.S.A.
Richard Dolan <key...@rochester.rr.com>
The following is the complete Introduction of "UFOs and the
National Security State: An Unclassified History. Volume One,
1941 to 1973."
The footnoted version of this is available at my website:
[http://keyholepublishing.com]
Read, enjoy, flame, whatever.
Richard Dolan
------------------
INTRODUCTION
In formal logic, a contradiction is the signal of defeat: but
in the evolution of real knowledge it marks the first step in
progress toward victory.
-Alfred North Whitehead
It is a mistake to believe that a science consists in nothing
but conclusively proved propositions, and it is unjust to
demand that it should. It is a demand only made by those who
feel a craving for authority in some form and a need to
replace the religious catechism by something else, even if it
be a scientific one.
- Sigmund Freud
There is a skeleton in every house.
-Anonymous
ABOUT THIS BOOK
The UFO problem is a real one. It has involved military
personnel around the world for more than fifty years, and is
wrapped in secrecy. Over the years, however, enough pieces of
the puzzle have emerged to give us a sense of what the
picture looks like. What I have tried to do is very simple:
to use as many of those pieces as possible in constructing a
clear, straightforward, historical narrative of the UFO
problem, focusing on the national security dimensions.
Considering the number of books about UFOs, it is curious
that one like this is so rare. And yet it is. Although there
are some excellent sources about this subject, much of the
field's writing is rather insular, so that few people are
acquainted with it. I believe that this book, on the
contrary, will be useful to experienced researchers as well
as those with little prior knowledge of the subject.
I have tried to weave together three strands of narrative
that have important relationships to one another: (1) UFO
reports themselves, with an emphasis on military encounters;
(2) the response to UFOs by national security organizations
in the U.S.; and (3) additional activities by American
national security groups that, while not directly
UFO-related, still provide important context to the problem,
and at times unique insights and connections. Fundamentally,
this is a book about the concern that military-intelligence
organizations have toward UFOs, and their concealment of that
fact from the public.
Despite the great amount of information I've presented in
this book (one of my readers called it "staggering"), I have
tried to make it easy. Each of the book's nine chapters is
broken down into a manageable number of sub-chapters, making
these 500-plus pages a bit more digestible. I also prepared
an appendix listing all of the military UFO encounters
described in this book - nearly 300. Mainly, however, I have
expended as much energy as possible to make this book concise
and informative. Your time as a reader is valuable. I have no
desire to waste it.
I have selected the period of 1941 to 1973 for this first
volume, and intend to complete a second volume that will take
the story through the remainder of the 20th century. The
early period is especially important to understand, if for no
other reason than to analyze the question of UFOs as
experimental technology. Today, everyone understands there
are secret experimental aircraft that might pass for UFOs.
Whether this was the case in the mid-20th century is explored
in the narrative of this book. The implications are
important, if one concedes UFOs to be objects, and not merely
natural phenomena. The early period is also important because
it was still possible in some instances to obtain first-rate
information from inside sources, much of which received
confirmation in later years. UFO information was always
subject to secrecy protocols, but such secrecy was not
necessarily as complete in the early period as it became
later.
I have researched this topic thoroughly, almost exhaustively.
Although all the source material for this book has already
been in the public domain, much of it has been ignored for
years, even decades. I suspect, therefore, that even some
experienced UFO researchers will be startled by this book's
contents, or at least provoked by the implications derived
from unique combinations of sources.
THE PROBLEM OF UFOS
Although stories of strange objects in the sky go far back in
time, the problem received little attention until the Second
World War. At that time, military personnel from Allied and
Axis countries reported unconventional objects in the sky,
eventually known as foo fighters. In retrospect, this
development is not so surprising. First, human aviation had
become widespread for the first time. Above the clouds,
thousands of pilots suddenly had the kind of visibility that
no one ever had before. A second reason was the invention of
radar, which extended the range of human vision by electronic
means. Moreover, it seemed reasonable to assume that the odd
sightings were related to the war itself, perhaps
experimental technology.
One might have expected such sightings to vanish after the
war's end in 1945. Instead, they increased. In Europe in
1946, then America in 1947, people saw and reported objects
that could not be explained in any conventional sense.
Wherever sightings occurred, military authorities dominated
the investigations, and for perfectly understandable reasons.
Unknown objects, frequently tracked on radar and observed
visually, were flying within one's national borders and, in
the case of the United States, over sensitive military
installations. The war was over. What was going on here?
Initially, some Americans feared that the Soviet Union might
be behind the "flying saucer" wave. This possibility was
studied, then rejected. At a time when the world's fastest
aircraft approached the speed of 600 mph, some of these
objects exceeded - or appeared to exceed - 1,000 mph. What's
more, they maneuvered like no aircraft could, including right
angle turns, stopping on a dime, and accelerating instantly.
Could the Soviets really have built something like that? If
so, why fly them over all over America and Western Europe? To
experts, the idea seemed farfetched at best, and fifty years
later, their conclusion stands.
If not Soviet, could the objects have been American? The
possibility was studied and rejected for the same reasons.
The speed of sound was not broken until October of 1947: was
it really credible that, prior to this, the Americans had
secretly discovered a hypersonic anti-gravity technology?
During the UFO wave of 1947, all indications are that there
were multiple, simultaneous investigations within the
American military and intelligence community of these flying
saucers. Although the Air Force was officially charged with
investigating them, it was never the only game in town. Every
service reported and investigated sightings. The FBI
investigated UFOs for a while, and by 1948 at the latest, the
CIA initiated an ongoing interest.
By the end of 1947, a contingent of analysts at the Air
Technical Intelligence Center (ATIC) at Wright-Patterson Air
Force Base believed that UFOs were extraterrestrial. ATIC was
the Air Force's chief center for evaluating new technology,
and as such was a key player in the early investigation of
UFOs. By the summer of 1948, this team prepared an "Estimate
of the Situation" that landed on the desk of Air Force
Commander Hoyt Vandenberg, stating the extraterrestrial
thesis. As the story goes, Vandenberg rejected it, either for
lack of proof, or because it did not state his desired
conclusion. Either way, he made it clear that the Air Force
would not accept speculation about extraterrestrials as a
solution to UFOs.
Of course, people continued to see these things and wonder
what they were. In the summer of 1952, for instance, UFO
sightings were so frequent and often of such high quality, it
actually appeared to some in the Air Force that an invasion
might be under way. Could it really be aliens?
With some help from the secret CIA-sponsored Robertson Panel
of January 1953, the Air Force greatly improved censorship
over the problem. Still, it never quite went away. Civilian
organizations emerged to collect and analyze interesting UFO
reports. Complicating matters was the fact that the Air Force
had backed itself into a corner. Despite its public contempt
for UFOs, it had committed itself to monitoring them as a
possible national security threat. Those who criticized the
Air Force's statements about UFOs - and there were many such
people - frequently asked, if saucers posed no threat to
national security, and existed only in the imagination, why
did the Air Force create Project Blue Book to study the
reports?
Then came the great UFO wave of 1965 and 1966. The density
and quality of sightings made it clear that the Air Force
could no longer hide behind weather balloons, swamp gas, or
ball lightning. At the same time, it became equally
impossible to withstand public scrutiny of the problem. The
Air Force therefore funded a scientific study of UFOs by the
University of Colorado, known more generally as the Condon
Committee, to "settle" the matter once and for all. After two
years of suspense, the committee concluded that UFOs were not
worthy of scientific study, essentially nonsense. Critics
responded that the study itself was worthless, with
conclusions that did not match its own data. Moreover, the
committee had bad blood among its own members, which resulted
in the removal of the "pro-UFO" contingent mid-way through
the project. It strongly appeared that the project's
leadership was set on a negative conclusion from the
beginning. Rumors spread about control over the committee,
either by the Air Force or CIA.
As messy as the Condon Committee was, its report gave the Air
Force precisely what it needed: justification to close Blue
Book. In December, 1969, the Air Force announced it no longer
investigated UFOs. The major civilian investigative
organizations also declined rapidly, and people who saw UFOs
now had scarcely anywhere to turn.
Managing the public dimensions of the UFO problem was one
thing, but UFOs themselves were more intractable. Thus, even
though UFOs no longer had their own public relations desk at
the Pentagon, reports of unidentified flying objects
continued to fall within the Pentagon's classified system,
for obvious reasons. Indeed, the Air Force neglected to
mention in its 1969 announcement that Blue Book had never
been the main body investigating UFOs; after 1952, its
existence was purely a public relations endeavor.
Investigations of UFOs continued, and military facilities
dealing with super-sensitive information (such as the fabled
Area 51 in Groom Dry Lake, Nevada) continued to be the source
of UFO-related rumors. But a member of the military would be
foolish in the extreme to be caught discussing any of this
with the public. In the words of 133rd Airborne Wing officer
James Goodell:
"When you go to work on those locations, you sign away your
constitutional rights. You sign a piece of paper saying that
if you violate your security agreement, and you discuss
programs that you were working on, without a trial, without
the right of appeal, you're going to go to the Leavenworth
Federal Penitentiary for twenty years. That's a real big
incentive to keep your mouth shut."
This refers to the "Oath Upon Inadvertent Exposure to
Classified Security Data or Information." Taken by all
personnel exposed to classified information of any kind, it
is binding for life, under all circumstances.
The military has taken the UFO issue deep under cover. For
the last thirty years, requests to the Air Force or other
government bodies about UFOs have elicited the same response:
"From 1947 to 1969, the Air Force investigated Unidentified
Flying Objects under Project Blue Book. The project,
headquartered at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio, was
terminated Dec. 17, 1969. Of a total of 12,618 sightings
reported to Project Blue Book, 701 remained "unidentified."
"The decision to discontinue UFO investigations was based on
an evaluation of a report prepared by the University of
Colorado entitled, "Scientific Study of Unidentified Flying
Objects;" a review of the University of Colorado's report by
the National Academy of Sciences; previous UFO studies and
Air Force experience investigating UFO reports during the
1940s, '50s and '60s.
"As a result of these investigations, studies and experience
gained from investigating UFO reports since 1948, the
conclusions of Project Blue Book were: (1) no UFO reported,
investigated and evaluated by the Air Force was ever an
indication of threat to our national security; (2) there was
no evidence submitted to or discovered by the Air Force that
sightings categorized as "unidentified" represented
technological developments or principles beyond the range of
modern scientific knowledge; and (3) there was no evidence
indicating that sightings categorized as "unidentified" were
extraterrestrial vehicles.
"With the termination of Project Blue Book, the Air Force
regulation establishing and controlling the program for
investigating and analyzing UFOs was rescinded....
"Since the termination of Project Blue Book, nothing has
occurred that would support a resumption of UFO
investigations by the Air Force. Given the current
environment of steadily decreasing defense budgets, it is
unlikely the Air Force would become involved in such a costly
project in the foreseeable future.
Such is the unchanging, official truth about UFOs."
OFFICIAL CULTURE VS. UNOFFICIAL CULTURE
Some things are true, and some things are officially true.
In 1937, for example, Joseph Stalin authorized the first
Soviet census in a decade. Based on growth estimates of the
1920s, he expected a total near 170 million. Unfortunately,
the numbers came in at 156 million, and Stalin was none too
pleased. Rather than inquire as to what happened to the 14
million missing souls, Stalin devised a simpler solution: he
had most of the census takers shot, the rest sent to the
Gulag. Two years later, a more amenable 1939 census counted
170 million, which became the official number.
Anyone who has lived in a repressive society knows that
official manipulation of the truth occurs daily. But all
societies have their many and their few. In all times and all
places, it is the few who rule, and the few who exert
dominant influence over what we may call official culture.
While Stalin's solution to his census problem was extreme,
all elites take care to manipulate public information to
maintain existing structures of power. It's an old game.
Like everywhere else, America also has its topics that are
too sensitive to discuss openly without distressing some
powerful interest. UFOs have always been such a topic, as
seen by the combination of official denial, extreme secrecy,
public ridicule, and widespread popular belief connected to
it. Officially, UFOs do not exist, and are only discussed in
public as a kind of joke, or perhaps a piece of cultural
kitsch. Yet, about 80 percent of Americans believe in them.
Why does such a disparity exist? After all, most Americans
believe in God, and yet there is no official ridicule
associated with this belief. Could it be that a belief in
UFOs is - however odd this may at first seem - slightly
subversive?
THE REDMOND, OREGON INCIDENT
There are many examples in this book that illustrate the
disparity between official and unofficial truth about UFOs. I
will give one right here. It is one of the better-known UFO
reports: the Redmond, Oregon case.
Shortly before dawn on September 24, 1959, police officer
Robert Dickerson was driving through the streets of Redmond,
Oregon, when he saw a large, bright object descend over the
city, stop abruptly, and hover at 200 feet. The object was
low enough that nearby treetops glowed. Minutes later,
Dickerson drove to the Federal Aviation Administration office
at the Redmond Airport. Meanwhile, the object rapidly moved
to an area northeast of the airport, and once again hovered.
Its color had changed from bright white to reddish-orange.
Through binoculars, Dickerson and others perceived it as flat
and round; tongues of "flame" occasionally extended from its
edge.
At 5:10 a.m., FAA reported the object to the Seattle Air
Route Control Center, which relayed the message to Hamilton
Air Force Base in California. At 5:18 a.m., six F-102 jet
fighters were scrambled from Portland to intercept. Witnesses
were still watching the hovering object when the jets roared
over Redmond. As the aircraft approached, the object
squelched its "tongues of flame," emitted a fiery exhaust,
shot up into the air at an incredible speed, and disappeared
into the clouds at 14,000 feet. It was so close to the path
of the jets that one of the pilots swerved to avoid hitting
it. Another jet, caught in the turbulence of the tremendous
exhaust, nearly lost control. One pilot, using gunsight
radar, continued the chase, but the object abruptly changed
course - an event that was tracked by radar at Klamath Falls
Ground Control Intercept - and the pilot gave up. For two
hours afterward, the unknown object continued to register on
radar, performing high-speed maneuvers at an altitude between
6,000 and 54,000 feet.
The pilots immediately received an intelligence debriefing
and were ordered not to discuss the matter, even among
themselves. Unfortunately, hundreds of Redmond citizens had
heard the jets, some had seen the interceptors, and a few had
made reports about the unknown object. Forced into an
explanation, the Air Force said the flight was a routine
investigation caused by false radar returns. Excitable
witnesses probably imagined the glow.
Word soon leaked out, however, that the FAA was checking for
abnormal radioactivity where witnesses saw the object hover
and "blast off." This made it rather difficult for people to
swallow the Air Force explanation: why would FAA check for
abnormal radiation if the whole event was illusory? The Air
Force soon changed its solution: the object everyone had seen
was probably a weather balloon. But how could a weather
balloon outdistance jets flying at 600 mph? Nevertheless, the
explanation stood - for a little while.
The Air Force did not know that the nation's then-leading
civilian UFO group - the National Investigations Committee on
Aerial Phenomena - had obtained certified copies of FAA logs.
At various times before and after the Redmond incident, there
had been talk of pressure against the FAA into silence
regarding UFOs; apparently this time the pressure was
insufficient. The FAA logs described the unidentified object
and its maneuvers in great detail, including its evasion from
the interceptors. The logs also included Air Force
confirmations of radar tracking, scrambling of Portland jets,
and a report from Klamath Falls.
The Air Force promptly denounced the FAA for issuing false
information and maintained its balloon answer. After more
pressure from NICAP and several legislators, however, the Air
Force finally announced the "true" explanation: the witnesses
had seen the planet Venus.
POWER AND FEAR
Regarding the Redmond case, or dozens of similar incidents on
record, one might reasonably ask: why would the military
bother to hide UFO information in such a manner? If there are
aliens, why not just come out and say so?
For most hard-working people, for whom life is already
demanding and challenging enough, the UFO problem may seem
peripheral to their life. After all, millions of people slave
away throughout the world in sweatshops, prisons, or worse.
One can hardly think that such people would be much worse off
under alien overlords than they are already. But to the prime
beneficiaries of the social order, the UFO problem represents
a problem of grave significance, e.g., who or what is
muscling in on their turf? What could such entities want? At
bottom is the question of how the presence of others would
affect pre-existing social and power relationships.
This leads us to one our civilization's most interesting,
unpleasant, and unasked questions: "Who Owns What?" Stated
most simply, we can represent the U.S. population as a room
of 100 people, with a total private wealth of $100. Perhaps
in Utopia, the breakdown of wealth would approach a dollar
per person. In our little room, however, one person owns
forty of the dollars; nineteen more people own forty-five;
and eighty people share the remaining fifteen dollars. That
is America today, and with some variation this has been the
case throughout its history. If this is not a clear "class
society" then no such entity ever existed.
Fairness issues aside, recall that this not-so-imaginary
society has a political system, a set of laws, an economy, a
media, and so on. Need one ask who is in the best position to
ensure that those institutions are most responsive to his
needs? Or on whose behalf these systems are most likely to
work? And need one ask whether, in such a society, the
concepts of self-government, republicanism, or "rule of the
people" can have any real meaning?
Granted that the bottom 80 percent must be controlled,
pacified, and made compliant: how can the few control the
many in a way that preserves the veneer of a free society?
This is, after all, an old question with old solutions that
need ever-new tweaking. No elite can rule without obtaining
some minimal level of consent from the masses. Terror, force,
and crude propaganda can often do the job, but in wealthier
and ostensibly democratic societies, where the KGB or Stasi
cannot simply break into one's bedroom, elites need to
"manufacture consent" through really effective propaganda.
Accordingly, it becomes crucial to guide the public
discussion of issues in ways that avoid basic questions, such
as who owns what. Anything else will do: school prayer,
abortion, the Flag, or Monica Lewinsky.
Based upon the actions taken by the official structures of
power regarding UFO information, it would appear that the
truth of the matter constitutes a threat to those in charge.
THE NATIONAL SECURITY STATE
And what are the official structures of power? I have used
the term "national security state" as a convenient way to
express the military and intelligence communities, as well as
the worlds that feed upon them, such as defense contractors
and other underground, nebulous entities. Its fundamental
traits are secrecy, wealth, independence, power, and
duplicity.
1. Secrecy. Nearly everything of significance undertaken by
America's military and intelligence community in the past
half-century has occurred in secrecy. The undertaking to
build an atomic weapon, better known as the Manhattan
Project, remains the great model for all subsequent
activities. For four years not a single member of Congress
even knew about it, although its final cost exceeded the
then-incredible total of $2 billion. During and after the
Second World War, other important projects, such as the
development of biological weapons, the importation of Nazi
scientists, terminal mind control experiments, nationwide
interception of mail and cable transmissions of an unwitting
populace, infiltration of the media and universities, secret
coups, secret wars, and assassinations all took place far
removed not only from the American public, but most members
of Congress and a few Presidents. Indeed, several of the most
powerful intelligence agencies were themselves established in
secrecy, unknown by the public or Congress for many years.
2. Wealth. Since the 1940s, the U.S. Defense and Intelligence
establishment has had more money at its disposal than most
nations. In addition to official dollars, much of the money
is undocumented. From its beginning, the CIA was engaged in a
variety of off-the-record "business" activities that
generated large sums of cash. The connections of the CIA with
global organized crime (and thus de facto with the
international narcotics trade) has been well- established and
documented for many years. In addition, the CIA maintained
its own private airline fleet which generated a tidy sum of
unvouchered funds primarily out of Asia. Finally, much of the
original money to run the American intelligence community
came from very wealthy and established American families, who
have long maintained an interest in funding national security
operations important to their interests.
3. Independence. In theory, civilian oversight exists over
the U.S. national security establishment. The President is
the military Commander-in-Chief. Congress has official
oversight over the CIA. The FBI must answer to the Justice
Department. In practice, little of this fond theory applied
during the period under review. One reason has to do with the
secrecy: the compartmentalization of information within
military and intelligence circles. "Top Secret" clearance
does not clear one for all Top Secret information. Sensitive
information is available on a need to know basis. Two CIA
officers in adjoining rooms at the Langley Headquarters can
be involved in completely different top secret activities,
each completely ignorant of the other's doings. Such
compartmentalization not only increases secrecy, but
independence from the wrong (e.g. official) kinds of
oversight.
Great latitude of activity is not merely the prerogative of
the CIA. During the 1950s, President and five-star general
Dwight Eisenhower effectively lost control of the U.S.
nuclear arsenal. The situation deteriorated so much that
during his final two years in office, Eisenhower asked
repeatedly to get an audience with the head Strategic Air
Command to learn what America's nuclear retaliatory plan was.
What he finally learned in 1960, his final year in office,
horrified him. If a revered military hero such as Eisenhower
could not control America's nuclear arsenal, nor get a
straight answer from the Pentagon, how on earth could
Presidents Truman, Kennedy, Johnson, or Nixon regarding
comparable matters?
4. Power. Secrecy, wealth, and independence add up to power.
Through the years, the national security state has gained
access to the world's most sophisticated technology, sealed
off millions of acres of land from public access or scrutiny,
acquired unlimited snooping ability within U.S. borders and
beyond, conducted overt or clandestine actions against other
nations, and prosecuted wars without serious media scrutiny.
Domestically, it maintai ns influence over elected officials
and communities hoping for some of the billions of defense
dollars.
5. Duplicity. Deception is a key element of warfare, and when
winning is all that matters, the conventional morality held
by ordinary people becomes an impediment. The examples of
public deception by national security elements are too many
to summarize here, but are provided in the ensuing chapters.
The UFO cover-up (precisely the right phrase) is one secret
among many within the American national security state. Like
other areas within its domain, the UFO problem has been
handled secretly, with great deception, and significant
resources. The secrecy stems from a pervasive and fundamental
element of life in our world: that those who are at the top
of the heap will always take whatever steps necessary to
maintain the status quo.
CAN THEY REALLY COVER THIS UP?
UFO skeptics often ask, "do you really think the government
could hide something like this for so long?" The question
itself reflects a basic misunderstanding about the nature of
the national security state: that secrecy is a way of life.
Actually, though, the answer is yes, and no.
Yes, in that cover-ups are standard operating procedure,
frequently unknown to the public for decades, becoming public
knowledge by a mere roll of the dice. But also no, in that
UFO information has leaked out from the very beginning. It is
impossible to shut the lid completely. The key lies in
neutralizing and discrediting unwelcome information,
sometimes through official denial, other times through [Image]
proxies in the media.
As mentioned earlier, military secrecy orders are severe, and
a major incentive to secrecy. In addition, the history of the
U.S. media shows unsettling developments, not least of which
is penetration by the intelligence community. By the early
1950s, the CIA had cozy relationships with most major media
executives in America. The most significant of these were
with the New York Times, The Washington Post, The Christian
Science Monitor, The New York Herald- Tribune, The Saturday
Evening Post, The Miami Herald, Time-Life, CBS News, Scripps-
Howard Newspapers, Hearst Newspapers, the Associated Press,
United Press International, the Mutual Broadcasting System,
and Reuters. In addition, the CIA had major ownership over
many proprietary publications throughout the Europe, Asia,
and the Americas. By the early 1970s, the agency admitted to
having working relationships with over 400 American
journalists. Consider the possibilities with 400
strategically placed people throughout the mainstream media.
There is evidence that this relationship continues.
These connections gave several benefits to the CIA. They
provided cover for agency operatives and enabled its staffers
to gain valuable information from journalists. More
insidiously, however, were instances in which reporters
planted disinformation on behalf of the agency. In other
words, information from such august publications as The New
York Times in all likelihood contained articles that were
intentionally false, planted on behalf of the CIA. We know
that such things occurred; what we do not know is how
frequently, or when.
The result is effective news management. Long before CIA
operative Gary Powers was shot down over Soviet air space in
1960, American reporters knew about U-2 flyovers. Prior to
the Bay of Pigs invasion, they knew about the training of
Cubans in Guatemala by the CIA. Regarding the Vietnam War,
the media almost uniformly followed the line of the Johnson
Administration until it became clear that the war could not
be "won." The 1980s saw great progress in keeping the press
out of American military actions such as Grenada, Libya, and
Panama, culminating in the most censored major American war
of the century, the Gulf War of 1991.
Not surprisingly, the mainstream media supported government
propaganda about UFOs, as well. From 1947 onward, while the
Air Force worked to remove the UFO problem from the public
domain, the media helped it to ridicule the subject. The
release of every major Air Force and CIA statement about UFOs
has, without exception, been met by uncritical media
acquiescence. It is true that the decade of the 1990s has
brought a different kind of media openness about UFOs than
existed in past decades, due to the recognition that money
can be made. The net result, however, is a very mixed bag. At
the same time that such television networks as A&E and
Discovery have provided fairly serious documentaries on the
subject, UFOs have essentially become an adjunct of pop
culture. Moreover, serious treatment by the major networks
has remained non-existent.
SCIENTIFIC QUESTIONS
In the conclusion of the University of Colorado Report on
UFOs, physicist Edward U. Condon asked with evident annoyance
that, if aliens are really here, why haven't they presented
themselves? The whole question, he wrote,
would be settled in a few minutes if a flying saucer were to
land on the lawn of a hotel where a convention of the
American Physical Society was in progress, and its occupants
were to emerge and present a special paper to the assembled
physicists....
Evidently, if there are aliens here, they are not especially
interested in announcing themselves to us. Is it yet possible
to prove the issue? Are there hypotheses that can be tested?
Can "believers" somehow produce the proof that skeptics
continually demand?
What would constitute proof? Many people have videotaped
UFOs. Some are hoaxes, while others appear to be genuine. Is
it possible to prove one is genuine? What about consistent
witness testimony? Perhaps persuasive in a court of law, but
provable in the court of science? What about radar/visual
cases, such as the Redmond, Oregon case described earlier, in
which a UFO is observed visually and tracked on radar?
Certainly compelling to someone who was there, but . . .
proof?
Not only must we ask what constitutes proof, but who is
authorized to deem it so. This is not so easy to determine.
Certainly, an acknowledgment of aliens would have to come
from a major spokesperson of official culture - a message
from the President, perhaps. The matter is more political
than scientific. UFO evidence derived from a grassroots level
can never survive its inevitable conflict with official
culture (fifty years of failure have borne this out). An
acknowledgment about the reality of the UFO phenomenon will
only occur when the official culture deems it worthwhile or
necessary to make it. Don't hold your breath.
As a result, the easiest thing to do with UFO evidence is to
ignore it, which is what most people do. Much harder is to
confront it honestly, whether this means accepting or
debunking it. That is, accepting into one's worldview
something as "far out" as extraterrestrials is not easy for
many people, especially when one's official culture finds
little more than ridicule in the subject. But honest
debunking is very, very difficult, considering the compelling
nature of so many UFO cases. Personally, I am close to the
position that it is impossible to do this honestly, but will
leave the benefit of the doubt to some exceptional, as yet
unfound, individual.
The problem with nearly all skeptical arguments against alien
visitation is that, quite simply, they fail to look at the
UFO evidence. They all sound great in theory, but fall apart
when presented with a few good reports. In the end, skeptics
are forced to fall back upon their most often-used weapon:
claiming a UFO event was a hoax.
The most common of the theoretical complaints are:
Granted that there may be intelligent life elsewhere in the
universe, interstellar travel is still impossible. The
distances between stars are too vast to travel. J. Allen
Hynek, long-time consultant to the Air Force's Project Blue
Book, had an expression for this kind of attitude about UFOs:
"it can't be, therefore it isn't." It is true that the
distances of interstellar space are so vast as to make travel
appear to be impossible. No person could survive a 10,000
year interstellar journey, considering our current
technologies.
The most common rejoinder is that perhaps a breakthrough in
propulsion technology is possible, and that perhaps we can
somehow surpass or bypass the speed of light obstacle, like
the Enterprise at warp eight. Physicists scoff at the idea,
except those who are now working on it. Is it at least
possible that someone else might already have gotten further
on this problem? The claims of thousands of eyewitnesses
point to revolutionary propulsion methods of UFO craft.
But the question really betrays a lack of imagination. Even
assuming no breakthroughs in propulsion technology, recent
developments in just two areas - artificial intelligence and
biotechnology - will bring revolutionary developments within
the next century. Many in those two fields believe it will
actually be possible to create an artificially intelligent
organism. Perhaps, having found a twin to Earth somewhere out
there, an artificially intelligent organism could make the
long journey. Or why even use an organism when one could
equip the ship itself with artificial intelligence?
If we can plausibly imagine ourselves finding another planet
with features similar to our own, and send an intelligent
probe there, how likely is it that someone else has already
done the same to us? There are many unknown variables, to be
sure, but the prospect cannot be denied.
Why would presumably superior aliens be interested in us?
Some obvious answers: water, minerals, and life. The
possibilities inherent in DNA could be of special interest to
others who might arrive. While humans prize the extraction of
minerals in the ground more highly than human life itself,
DNA may be the greatest prize on Earth - it certainly is the
most complex. Our understanding of DNA has come a long way
since its discovery by Watson and Crick fifty years ago, but
our ability to manipulate this complex matrix of life remains
in its infancy. Meanwhile, blessed with an astonishing supply
of biological diversity on this planet, mankind seems capable
only of exterminating it. Some environmental scientists
believe that, at the present rate, human beings will wipe out
as many as two-thirds of all living species on the Earth
within the next century. But others may actually know what to
do with DNA.
Why haven't they made themselves known to us? This was
Condon's question. After all, a simple landing of an alien
vessel on the White House lawn would surely settle matters.
The question of course cannot be answered, but it does make
some questionable assumptions, mainly that the human race is
on some kind of parity with others who may arrive. If I were
studying a band of highland gorillas, I doubt that I would
introduce myself to the dominant male with a view toward
establishing diplomatic relations. Perhaps something on the
order of open relations with official culture is not
something that aliens would even think about. Or, perhaps an
open acknowledgment and relationship promises too many
headaches.
Besides, if one takes seriously the thousands of reports and
claims of alien abduction, the rejoinder is that aliens have
made their presence known. They have done so, however,
covertly, in a manner that bypasses all official channels of
our civilization - an act of extreme subversion.
Infrastructure questions. Where is the infrastructure of this
alien civilization that can produce such incredible
technology and enormous vessels? If UFO reports are to be
taken seriously, there must be thousands, or even millions,
of aliens already here - how can that be? In the end,
however, questions like these are all guilty of the same
mistake, which is that they try to place us inside the
enlarged head of these aliens. They presume that we can
somehow think for them and imagine what their civilization
can be like. They are too theoretical. It is one thing to
discuss the likelihood or impossibility of space travel,
quite another to examine and explain a few good UFO reports.
Despite the mass of data supporting the reality of both UFOs
and an ongoing cover-up, there will be many who still ask
whether this stuff is all true. C an we know with certainty
that these sources are accurate? How can we know? That
protean genius, Voltaire, who was himself a historian of the
first rank, had this to say about the matter:
"Historical truths are merely probabilities. If you fought at
the battle of Philippi, that is for you a truth which you
know by intuition, by perception. But for us who dwell near
the Syrian desert, it is merely a very probable thing, which
we know by hearsay. How much hearsay is necessary to form a
conviction equal to that of a man who, having seen the
thing, can flatter himself that he has a sort of certainty?
"He who has heard the thing told by twelve thousand
eye-witnesses, has only twelve thousand probabilities, equal
to one strong probability, which is not equal to certainty.
If you have the thing from only one of these witnesses, you
know nothing; you should be skeptical. If the witness is
dead, you should be still more skeptical, for you cannot
enlighten yourself. If from several witnesses who are dead,
you are in the same plight. If from those to whom the
witnesses have spoken, your skepticism should increase still
more.
"From generation to generation skepticism increases, and
probability diminishes; and soon probability is reduced to
zero."
Wise words. Historical knowledge is slippery, and can never
attain a mathematical certainty. We may achieve a working
hypothesis, or perhaps reasonable certainty, but surely
nothing more. And yet, who disputes that Octavian and Antony
defeated Brutus and Cassius at Philippi in the year 42 B.C.?
POSSIBLE DIMENSIONS OF THE UFO PROBLEM
So, just how serious is the UFO problem? Are aliens really
among us? If so, what do they want?
Keeping this discussion completely factual, we can
acknowledge that the UFO phenomenon has always been global.
It is not, as some Americans continue to believe, a uniquely
American phenomenon, or restricted to the southwestern
states. By no means. Sober, reliable, people of all
sociological strata have reported unconventional objects
throughout North and South America, Europe, Africa, Asia,
Australia, Antarctica, all the world's major bodies of water,
and even outer space.
UFOs are also actual objects, not simply atmospheric
phenomena. This is not to say that some atmospheric phenomena
have not been mistakenly believed to be flying saucers, but
that the core of difficult UFO cases are of actual objects of
apparently unconventional design (e.g. disc-shaped), and
capable of incredible speeds and maneuverability. When an
object is seen visually, is tracked clearly on radar, and
when pilot after pilot is adamant that what he saw was a real
object, it is reasonable to conclude that we are dealing with
something real.
It is also true that from the 1950s and beyond, people around
the world have been claiming to see alien entities. Now, it
is certainly possible that they were mistaken. It is
interesting to note, however, that such people have
frequently been interviewed by civil and military
authorities, and typically been considered honest. In late
1954, for example, hundreds of witnesses in France and the
rest of Mediterranean region, as well as South America,
claimed to see short alien beings. The witnesses were men,
women, youths, and the elderly, doctors, professors,
mechanics, homemakers, and peasant farmers. Several cases
left significant landing traces. Were these people hoaxing?
Not according to the authorities who investigated them. Were
they delusional? If so, what caused such widespread and
similar delusions? Was it a case of mass hysteria? If so, it
was an event that cut across national and language barriers
among people who knew little about UFOs to begin with.
In addition, a number of prominent military and scientific
personnel have believed in the extraterrestrial hypothesis
(ETH) as an explanation for UFOs. In other words, they
believed that aliens are here. There is a good reason why
military personnel take the subject seriously, considering
the seemingly non-stop nature of their encounters with
unidentified flying objects.
There is also no doubt that the actual number of UFO
sightings vastly exceeds any official total. Hynek believed
the difference to be a factor of ten. That, of course, was
when people had somewhere to report their sightings. I can
add that, in the final twelve months of writing this book, I
encountered about thirty people who volunteered UFO sightings
to me, without any solicitation on my part. In every case,
the witnesses never reported what they saw to any authority,
and in most cases told either no one, or perhaps a close
friend. One woman told me of her sighting, even though she
had not told her husband. How many people are there who have
seen a UFO, but never made their sighting a matter of public
knowledge? I believe the answer to that is, lots.
What we have here is a widespread phenomenon affecting many
people, generating high levels of interest, concerning a
project that is taking place in near-complete secrecy, for
purposes unknown, by entities unknown, with access to
apparently substantial resources and technology. That, at
least, is how matters appear to be.
SOURCES AND DOCUMENTATION
Bodies need bones; history needs facts. In the course of this
study some seemingly outlandish claims are made: how do I
back them up?
In preparing this book, I have drawn from three basic groups
of sources.
1. Previously classified documents released through the
Freedom of Information Act. The Freedom of Information Act
was a completely unforseen development to those involved in
UFO secrecy during the 1940s, 1950s, and 1960s. The Act was
passed in 1966, but gained some teeth only in the aftermath
of Watergate and Vietnam. By the mid-1970s, many citizens
filed FOIA requests regarding government involvement with
UFOs, and obtained information that confirmed extreme
interest in UFOs.
UFO researcher Bruce Maccabee compiled a short list of
government information available to the public which was not
available in 1969. It includes: the files of Project Blue
Book, the UFO files of the Air Force Office of Special
Investigation (AFOSI), The UFO files of the FBI, CIA files,
State Department files, Army files, Navy files, Coast Guard
files, the Canadian National Research Council files, and
more. Maccabee estimated that perhaps 5,000 pages of
government documents have been released in recent years that
were not contained within the Project Blue Book/AFOSI file as
of 1969.
The public is especially indebted to Citizens Against UFO
Secrecy (CAUS), and the determination of people who
petitioned government agencies for UFO documents. Fortunately
for researchers, most of the relevant FOIA documents are
readily available on the Internet. In book form, much of the
pertinent documentation has been published in Clear Intent
(1984), by CAUS members Lawrence Fawcett and Barry Greenwood.
In addition, Timothy Good's Above Top Secret (1987) used many
FOIA documents to support the thesis of an international UFO
coverup. FOIA documentation also exists in dozens of other
published books.
2. Primary sources (e.g. books) from people involved in UFO
research at the time. Many of the primary sources from the
mid-1940s to the mid-1960s are hard to come by. Still, with
some effort, it is possible to track down the key sources.
In the first place, there were three main organizations of
the 1950s and 1960s that collected significant UFO data. They
are: (1) Project Blue Book (formerly Projects Sign and
Grudge), which was conducted by the United States Air Force;
(2) the Aerial Phenomena Research Organization (APRO), a
global organization founded by Jim and Coral Lorenzen; and
(3) the National Investigative Committee for Aerial Phenomena
(NICAP), led by retired Marine Corps Major Donald Keyhoe. The
records of these organizations are not especially accessible.
Project Blue Book's records are available for a fee at the
National Archives in Washington, D.C. APRO's records have
never been published in a systematic form and have been
unavailable for years. NICAP's files ended up at the Center
for UFO Studies in Chicago, but have never been published.
More readily available are publications that made use of the
above sources. Many Blue Book cases were distilled by two
individuals who based their books on them: Captain Edward
Ruppelt, who headed Blue Book in the early 1950s, and Air
Force consultant Alan Hynek. Ruppelt's 1956 Report on
Unidentified Flying Objects is essential reading. It derives
heavily from Blue Book files, and is amplified by Ruppelt's
account of military and government attitudes toward the UFO
problem during that period. Hynek also wrote two books based
on his twenty years of affiliation with Blue Book. In
addition, the complete list of Blue Book unknowns are
available at several Internet sites, and UFO researcher Brad
Steiger published a collection of Blue Book reports in the
1970s.
Although APRO files are unavailable, much of the
organization's work was published in the many books of its
founders, Jim and Coral Lorenzen. All are valuable and most
are difficult to find. Coral Lorenzen also wrote and edited
the APRO Bulletin, one of the finest UFO journals ever, and
today one of the rarest.
NICAP records are to some extent available through the
organization's seminal UFO Evidence, published in 1964. The
book is long out of print and unavailable even in most
libraries. Beside this, the writings of Donald Keyhoe are
essential reading. Keyhoe was NICAP's director from 1956 to
1969, and without question the most important UFO
researcher/writer ever. His five books on the subject contain
a wealth of information. It surely helped that Keyhoe was
friend and associate to prominent figures in the American
military and intelligence community, including Roscoe
Hillenkoetter, Delmar Farhney, Arthur Radford, and others.
Throughout, he elaborated on his contention that UFOs
represented the technology of an extraterrestrial
civilization.
Keyhoe worked hard to obtain accurate reports, and succeeded
far more than he failed. He also could look ahead, always a
rare gift. In 1940 he wrote a prescient book on how the
coming world war would be fought. In 1953 he daringly (and
with remarkable accuracy) wrote about the future of space
travel. But most importantly, Keyhoe scored coup after coup
for many years while digging for UFO facts. His 1953 book
alone contained several gems: (1) The first detailed account
of the 1952 Washington sightings and the ensuing Air Force
press conference, the latter description of which remains the
best available anywhere. (2) The publication (obtained
through official channels no less) of about 50 previously
classified UFO reports, many of which flatly contradicted
official positions that there was nothing to the phenomenon,
and several of which suggested intelligent control beyond
anything conventionally possible. (3) The outlines of the
Robertson Panel, which Keyhoe quickly learned about. This
last was truly a remarkable score, and was something only
Keyhoe could have done.
It is the unavoidable fact that UFO researchers have not used
Keyhoe's books effectively. Today, he is nearly forgotten.
His books are absent from footnotes, and rarely appear in
bibliographies. Prominent UFO researchers blandly acknowledge
his key role in breaking the dam on information, and then
ignore him.
Writers such as Keyhoe, the Lorenzens, Hynek, Ruppelt, and a
few others of the early period remain unique and
indispensable sources of information. Nothing written today
about that period, including this book, can replace them. But
they were not infallible. Keyhoe and the Lorenzens made their
share of mistakes, and Hynek's writings are often
self-serving and coy (until his "conversion" to the UFO cause
during the mid-1960s, Hynek was held in relatively low regard
by many UFO researchers for his frequent servility to the Air
Force line). Still, these people offered the best information
we will ever have on this period, and they must therefore be
placed in a special category of consideration. Above all, one
must read their books with great care.
Even though my focus is on the American dimension of the
problem, it is not exclusively so, as both the UFO phenomenon
and American national security interests are global. There
are a few European sources, but unfortunately for the early
period, there were no European civilian organizations
equivalent to APRO or NICAP that maintained an extensive
database. One of the important early European researchers was
Frenchman Aimé Michel, who researched and recorded in
admirable detail the great 1954 European Flap. In addition,
several of Jacques Vallee's books also provide good source
material for the European aspect of the UFO phenomenon.
3. Contemporary scholarship. The quality of work on UFOs
varies to an alarming extent. Some of the most sophisticated
discussion and analysis does not exist in book form at all,
but only on the Internet. While much of the Internet writing
on UFOs demonstrates excellent historical understanding, most
of it is not historical writing, per se. The fact is that
there is a serious lack of systematic historical writing on
the subject of UFOs. In my own judgment, until this book,
there had been a single, genuine history: The UFO Controversy
in America (1975), by Temple University historian David
Jacobs. Jacobs' book was a well-researched, successfully
written history. Its primary drawback derived from its time
of publication, which preceded the great release of UFO data
through FOIA. It also offered little on the relationship
between the U.S. intelligence community and UFOs. Jerome
Clark's three-volume UFO Encyclopedia is another important
resource for the serious reader. Although I disagree with
some interpretations offered by Clark, his work is valuable,
and is available as an abridged, single-volume, The UFO Book.
Other useful books are indicated in the bibliography.
It was not easy deciding when to stop hunting for more
information, even though I had a mass of data from hundreds
of sources. Every time I thought I had obtained the
fundamentals of a particular element of UFO history, I
inevitably found something new and exciting to look into,
frequently on an Internet web site. As anyone who has ever
written history knows, however, at some point you have to
stop hunting and start writing. Although I am sure this book
would have continued to benefit from several more years of
research, I believe it would have been a benefit of
diminishing returns. Still, I leave the door open to future
revisions if I decide that more thorough research is truly
warranted.
The waters of UFO research are deep, and I have tried not to
lose my footing. Throughout, I have been careful never to
veer far from established facts. I am reminded of the saying:
we are never as radical as reality itself. Thus, while some
of my conclusions are more conservative than what others
might think justified, they are just as often more radical.
FINAL REMARKS AND CONCERNS
Because I have tried to provide perspective on the political
and military dimension to the UFO problem, there is the
danger that I have written two books instead of one. After
reviewing my material, I don't think this has happened, but
there certainly are passages dealing with the national
security state that are not directly UFO-related. I have
added them for the value of their indirect light. It is
important to show that the cover-up of UFO information is not
all that unusual. In all cases, I have tried to keep the
non-UFO-specific passages as succinct as possible.
I am confident that I have followed through on my intention
to adhere closely to the facts. It is true that there are
some places in this book where I speculate on some
possibilities or theories; when I do, I have tried to make
this clear. Throughout, I have tried to the best of my
ability to serve as a useful guide through the maze of UFO
reports and policy. If nothing else, this topic deserves a
respectable history. The UFO field has long since reached the
point where the available information is more than sufficient
for a unified history of the early years. So I have presented
this book, despite its imperfections, as a partial
restitution for such egregious neglect.
Even if UFOs were to turn out to be a unique form of mass
hallucination (which they will not), this study will still
have value for its review of how the U.S. national security
apparatus handled the problem. If there are other answers,
then this book should clarify some of the key patterns
involved.
Unfortunately, those patterns leave little cause for optimism
regarding either the problem or its response. Americans are
in a bad enough state trying to struggle through the ordinary
smoke of their official culture. How can they be expected to
assess the implications of the UFO problem? They can begin
only by recognizing that secrecy over UFOs exists, and that
this secrecy is part of a broader policy of control and
deception. It is a bad omen that our civilization,
beleaguered as it is by its own doing, has not faced this
problem squarely.
David Patrick
Another repost by Flaffer.
It's rather pointless to try and rebut an introduction to a book. Only a
discussion about the actual cases in depth would be worthwhile.
I ask you again to discuss the two cases I have researched : The
Rendlesham incident and the Berkshire Triangle case. Do you have nothing
yourself to say about them?
David Patrick
hughe
David Patrick wrote:
He wont reply, Only posts others work. Then claims its his own.
Koyaanisqatsi Fahrvergnugen
> UFOs and the National State
> Richard Dolan <key...@rochester.rr.com>
> The following is the complete Introduction of "UFOs and the
> National Security State: An Unclassified History. Volume One,
> 1941 to 1973."
> The footnoted version of this is available at my website:
> [<http://keyholepublishing.com>]
What Are They?
By Richard M. Dolan
©2002 all rights reserved
http://keyholepublishing.com/What%20Are%20They.htm
[Excerpt]:
"The more one considers probable developments in
our own technology and AI, the less outlandish
alien technology appears. It may be within our
grasp sooner than many people think. Quite possibly
fifty years, possibly less.
"The hypothesis of advanced machine intelligence
severely weakens one of the main skeptical arguments
against UFOs. This is that an advanced technological
civilization is not thought to have much durability.
Skeptics see our own technological civilization so
rapidly spinning out of control and extrapolate this
feature to intelligent life elsewhere. Now, advanced
technology wielded by biological entities may indeed
be inherently unstable. But it is not so clear that
such a condition applies equally to advanced machine
intelligence. If not, the extraterrestrial hypothesis
becomes much more tenable as a way to explain UFOs."
http://keyholepublishing.com/What%20Are%20They.htm
* * * ~ ^ ~ ^ ~ ^ ~ * * *
Brookhaven National Laboratory
http://www.bnl.gov/RHIC/
Astrium - Space is our business
http://www.matra-marconi-space.com/
John Lilly's "Cosmic Coincidence Control"
http://www.johnclilly.com/
"In the province of the mind, there are no limits."
National Reconnaissance Office - N. R. O.
http://164.109.174.16/index.html
"...possible visitation."
--Bernard Haisch
http://ufoskeptic.org/dimensions.html
See also Jacques Vallee:
http://www.google.com/search?q=Jacques+Vallee&btnG=Google+Search
THE RESPONSIBLE PARENT'S GUIDE
TO HEALTHY MOOD-BOOSTERS
FOR THE WHOLE DAMN FAMILY
http://www.biopsychiatry.com/index.html
***
To obtain a universe
like ours seems to require fine
tuning of the initial density to
agree with the critical density to
an accuracy around one part in 10^60!
[That's a "ten" with sixty zeros]
http://www.damtp.cam.ac.uk/user/gr/public/inf_lowden.html
Many-Worlds Quantum Theory
http://www.innerx.net/personal/tsmith/ManyWorlds.html
NEC Research Institute - Physical Science Research Activities
http://www.neci.nj.nec.com/neci-website/research-ps.html#Optics
***
Quantum Physics, abstract quant-ph/9805040
Optical Tachyons in Parametric Amplifiers:
How Fast Can Quantum Information Travel?
http://arXiv.org/abs/quant-ph/9805040
Transhuman/Posthuman Web Report:
http://www.google.com/search?q=transhuman
"...[Don't] let these guys
get behind you. They are tricky. And their
elfin humor may not be your idea of a good
time. http://deoxy.org/timemind.htm
"Nuclear Transfer for human therapeutics and animal cloning."
[<http://www.advancedcell.com/press_curr.html>]
Snake FourSixNineNine
> I ask you again to discuss the two cases I have researched : The
> Rendlesham incident and the Berkshire Triangle case.
What's your view?
Info:
*******
Rendlesham incident ...
http://www.magonia.demon.co.uk/ethbull/mms14.html
"Rendlesham is ufology in microcosm. Almost the entire
subject is there in one case. I wish I could honestly say
that it was all just a bunch of spaced-out airmen chasing
a lighthouse and then fooling themselves for 20 years.
Whilst - as I have never shirked from admitting - some
of it clearly is, I believe there is rather too much going
on in the background to claim game, set and match.
Nigel, I fear, made his mind up 15 years ago and I hope
he can at least ask himself the question - might I not be
wrong? Anyone who has read my articles on this case
even since Friend or Foe? was published in January 1998
(see Northern UFO News and International UFO Reporter)
will know that I am constantly reviewing my position as
new evidence seems to constantly develop. As a UFO
investigator, the day you stop letting the evidence
dictate what you believe and being willing to change
from belief to scepticism (or indeed vice versa) is the
day you ought to quit. It always puzzles me why
keeping an open mind is regarded in some quarters
as a crime worse than making it up prematurely in a
way that proves to be dead wrong."
-- Jenny Randles, Buxton, Derbyshire
"... From such a scenario we must conclude that
Jenny is acting as a subversive agent who is actively
willing to reveal the secrets of our Government, just to
satisfy her curiosity for the 'truth'. Where is her social
responsibility? Will she accept that she is an urban
guerilla who is undermining our political, social, military
and economic structure? Isn't that a crime worse than
being merely closed-minded?"
-- Nigel Watson
http://www.magonia.demon.co.uk/ethbull/mms14.html
*******
The Halt Tape UFOs Reconsidered
by Brian P James
The 20th anniversary of the Rendlesham Incident
passed in December 2000, but interest in "Britain's
Roswell" continues to grow. This is no doubt
helped by Georgina Bruni's recent book
You Can't Tell The People
(Sidgwick & Jackson/ISBN 0 283 06358 0).
One of the pieces of 粗vidence' in the public
domain since 1984 has been the 創th'
generation copy of "The Halt Tape".
http://www.apra.org.uk/halt_tape.htm
Rendlesham incident:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&ie=ISO-8859-1&q=Rendlesham+incident
*******
UFO HOVERS OVER TOWN ON THE
BERKSHIRE-SURREY LINE
http://ufoinfo.com/roundup/v02/rnd02_35.shtml
On Saturday, August 30, 1997, at 7:50 p.m., residents
of Sunningdale, Berkshire, UK gathered on Cobham
Common to watch a bright light hover over the
nearby town of Camberley, Surrey.
"Its altitude was at cloud level (10,000 feet or
3,030 meters--J.T.)," one witness reported.
"The sky was broken cloud and dry at the time."
The UFO "appeared as a very bright,
magnesium-white cylindrical object of about the
same size and speed of an aircraft. It was far
too bright to be a conventional aircraft. It was
pointing at 45 degrees going down and
travelling north. It then changed shape and
elongated to over twice its original size."
The UFO continued its northward descent
and then "began stretching until it formed
a crescent moon shape--like a C." After that,
it disappeared. (USENET report.)
Gr
Fahrvergnugen) wrote:
>John Lilly's "Cosmic Coincidence Control"
> http://www.johnclilly.com/
>"In the province of the mind, there are no limits."
John Lilly, the darling of MKULTRA
jeff g.
Oh look, it came out from under its rock. Whatsmatter, sweetie, Marty
Cannon got you on the run? You're so quiet these days.
Gr
wrote:
Government Corruption Serves The Alien Agenda
There's no doubt what so ever that aliens are abusive. There is no doubt
that a faction of the US government is working in behalf of these aliens and
that they too are also abusers. There is no doubt that the government is
deliberately covering up their complicity in order to protect themselves and
deceive the citizens of the USA. There is no doubt what so ever that this
government agency holds itself beyond the law and has committed crimes
against the citizens of the USA, including invasion of privacy, mind
control, and mind influencing. There is no doubt that this agency employs
remote viewers to gather data on unsuspecting citizens in order to
psychologically manipulate and remotely influence them via the Internet and
in their private lives. There is no doubt that this agency uses mind
control victims as remote viewers, who are easily manipulated into believing
they are serving an altruistic purpose. There is no doubt what so ever that
this agency has, with malice, covertly and deliberately ruined the lives,
families and financial status of citizens who they perceive as a threat in
exposing their operations.
Anytime one faction has technological superiority, there is abuse of those
who do not have that technological superiority -- namely the innocent
public. Give humans any sort of position of power, and they abuse it for
personal gain by abusing those who don't have access to that power. Abusing
innocent people in the name of scientific discovery is still abuse, and
still wrong. Taking that to it's lowest common denominator, they're nothing
more than common thieves, cheats and con artists -- albeit it highly
educated, knowledgeable and privileged people, but not worthy of honest
people's respect. And they're morally wrong. Period.
Any person within secret government who is working with or in contact with
aliens is subject to alien manipulation and mind control and have been
manipulated into believing they are doing something nobel for mankind. Any
person within secret government is an abductee, then they've been
conditioned to do their job within secret government via alien mind control
and manipulation and likely suffer Stockholm Syndrome. It is likely the
aliens have selected certain abductees who can not resist alien mind control
to hold key positions within secret government.
The aliens lie. They promise all sorts of things to people, and of course,
those things never come to pass. The aliens are capable of reading peoples'
minds and can feed back to that person just what that person wants to hear.
making that person believe the aliens are on their side, when in fact, the
aliens are only interested in *their* agenda. The aliens need humans for
their purpose, which is to genetically engineer an acceptable species of
'humans' who are telepathic and self-reproducing, as their race is dying.
The aliens believe since the human race is *also* dying, that it is
acceptable to parasitize the human race so they can survive through the use
of the human race as a base species. The truth is the aliens have little
more than contempt for the human species, they think humankind is stupid and
they will at all costs, keep their presence obscured until they are finished
using the human race for their purposes. The aliens think of themselves as
an altruistic species, saving what is good of the human race. The only
problem, is that has been done completely without consent *of* the human
race. And through this whole process, the aliens have had no compassion,
sympathy, regard or respect for the people they've used as test subjects in
order to save themselves. The aliens use what they glean from peoples'
minds in order to control them, keep the status quo and preserve the
cover-up. The aliens play on peoples' dreams, deep desires, egos, sex or
any other ploy to maintain the status quo -- and that status quo is the
alien agenda. Are these aliens the benevolent saviors of mankind? I think
not. They never gave anyone a chance, and in stead tell everyone they have
the right to do what they're doing, and they've been 'sanctioned' by a
higher authority, implying they are godly. The fact is if god exists, it
can not be proven. But *if* the human race are gods children, then surely
the aliens are tampering where they have *NO* authority.
The truth is, the human race is nothing more than a resource to the aliens
and the abductees are little more than experimental animals and expendable.
And the government is powerless to do anything about it, because they have
been manipulated into believing they are assisting 'saving' the human race.
No one alive today will *ever* see the end of this story, because by the
time the aliens have finished their project, we will be dead and gone.
Kiss the human race goodbye.
Truth Detracting Elements of the Abduction Phenomena:
Psychological Implications
By Eve Frances Lorgen, M. A.
This is an article taken directly from my book, The Love Bite.
One the hallmarks of an abductee is the pattern of emotional
isolation. This behavior can be explained as a result of conditioning,
learned adaptations from the abductee's family members, or reinforced by the
alien handlers. The abductee usually learns early in life not to talk about
"the little people" who come into their bedrooms at night. The child
may talk about their abduction experiences only to be told that they are
just "nightmares". Children often describe the alien intruders as monsters,
who come out of the closet or through the walls. The children are
immediately invalidated when their parents or siblings tell them there is
no such thing as monsters, or aliens for that matter.
Emotional Isolation and the Maintenance of Secrecy
Some abductees have discovered that the aliens instructed them
not talk about their encounters. It is apparent that aliens go to great
lengths to maintain secrecy, instill false or screen memories into their
victims to cover their true motives.
Our social structure--especially in the Western
world--reinforces the precept that "aliens do not exist" or is only science
fiction. The result of these negating and isolating conditions forces the
abductee to turn inward or act out in rebellion against parents,
school, religion or social structure. The abductee who has been denied
validation of their experience will have a tendency to not trust their own
feelings, stay in denial and even act out in anger. Those who have turned
anger inward will become depressed or even suicidal depending on the extent
of trauma endured.
Post Traumatic Stress
Post traumatic stress disorder is common in those who have had
alien encounters throughout their lives. If a particular event was
extremely traumatic, the characteristic symptoms will be: intense fear,
terror, helplessness and partial or complete amnesia. This may include
re-experiencing the abduction, recurrent nightmares, flashbacks, and
avoidance of stimuli associated with the event and an emotional numbing. The
person may develop insomnia, increased arousal to stimuli (i.e., noises in
the night), fear of the dark and sleep disorders such as insomnia and night
terrors. In young children, they may re-experience the trauma through
repetitive play. They may exhibit a marked change in orientation toward the
future, for example, a foreshortened future whereby they do not expect to
have a long life, career or marriage. The psychic numbing or diminished
responsiveness to stimuli usually begins soon after the traumatic event.
This emotional anesthesia causes the abductee to feel detached and estranged
from other people.
Other symptoms for traumatized abductee children are angry
outbursts, rebellious acting out behaviors and promiscuity. Extreme phobias
of going to the doctor or dentist, or even preoccupation with horror scenes
(blood and guts) have been reported.
Dissociation and Addictions as Coping Skills
At very young ages the abductee is likely to develop
dissociative coping skills if the trauma or abuse was severe. Oftentimes
abuse already occurs in the abductees' family, compounding the issues of
alien abduction. If the parents are in denial of their own alien abductions
and their children's, the abductee has a higher probability of developing
unhealthy coping skills such as, emotional isolation, rebelliousness,
tendency toward violence, drug or alcohol addictions, co-dependency and
early promiscuity. Low self- esteem is a natural by-product of being
invalidated from an early age.
Severe forms of personality damage may be later evidenced in
perfectionistic, self-hating, violent, narcissistic tendencies, and
psychopathic or dissociative disorders. (These do not all appear together
and are exhibited in varying degrees) Egotistical grandiosity is also a
symptom of early trauma that has remained unresolved. This is also
seen in some mind control victims who have been programmed into being
"super soldiers". Persons who are extremely sensitive to criticism have been
narcissistically injured and often display symptoms of grandiosity.
One element that is difficult to work with is the alien
mind-control induced amnesia of the abduction event. The compartmentalized,
dissociated memories of alien encounters are not necessarily trauma induced
as in other human inflicted trauma. This factor makes treatment difficult
unless the therapist, hypnotist or counselor is experienced in working
with such modalities.
Secret Keeping Behavior in Relationships
Unresolved emotional, mental and physical trauma of alien
abductions manifests itself in a myriad of ways. The most common is through
dysfunctional families and relationships. Dysfunctional can be defined as
any behavior that results in unhealthy relationships. Secret keeping
behavior and the covert "no talk" rule about alien encounters forces the
abductee to live a false double life. The avoidance of open and honest
communication and a natural inclination to distrust one's own feelings
thrusts the abductee into dysfunctional relating patterns.
Many abductees have coped quite well considering the forces
against them. I do not want to give the impression that all abductees are in
dysfunctional relationships, but rather the denial and enforced secrecy of
these issues are the culprit that leads to family problems.
Contrary to what one may believe, most abductees have not
undergone hypnosis to recover their memories of alien encounters. Few can
afford professional counseling or hypnosis and even if they can, they
usually avoid it because of the mainstream psychological and medical opinion
of alien abductions. Often going to such professionals who misdiagnosed
them caused greater damage to the individual.
Co-Dependency Issues and Emotional Isolation
One of the most common dysfunctional patterns is
co-dependency. This term was first coined to describe relating patterns of
spouses or close family members of alcoholics, substance abusers or child
abusers. The main tenet of co- dependent behavior is to avoid feelings and
open and honest communication. This behavior is acted out in ways
that perpetuate the abusers' addiction and maintenance of secrecy. These
behaviors include protecting the addict or abuser from his or her feelings
and avoidance of core issues.
Co-dependent persons living with abusers and addicts live
their life as if they were walking on eggshells. They live with a constant
fear or unconscious anxiety not to rock the boat or confront core issues,
which will elicit strong emotions. Very often co-dependents are people
pleasers who go to great lengths to be friendly and liked by all. The
downside of co-dependent relating is the attraction of unhealthy partners or
spouses. (This is reported in a majority of abductee relationships.)
The unhealthy aspect is the inability and avoidance of being
honest with oneself and others. This is evident by the direct avoidance of
emotional issues or the tendency to skirt around issues. It is as if they
have blinders over their eyes. Without total honesty, a lack of intimacy
ensues; creating an unfulfilling, empty relationship that perpetuates the
vicious cycle of emotional isolation.
This same theme can be addressed to abductees, who enter into
dysfunctional relationships that maintain the secrecy and denial of
abduction issues. The blinders serve the purpose of maintaining secrecy and
avoidance of the emotional pain of the core abduction issues. The deep and
sometimes dark inner truth of their experience--begging to be heard and
healed.
Multigenerational Abductions and Family Issues
Unhealthy coping skills may involve addictions of various
types. Addictions can be the abuse of any substance or repetitive behavior
that serves to keep the person in denial of unresolved psychological and
emotional issues. In this case, avoidance of abduction related trauma, pain,
terror, fear, grief, abandonment and despair of rejection.
When alien abduction occurs multigenerationally, dysfunctional
family issues are compounded. These issues comprise all levels of being;
physical, emotional, mental and spiritual. All levels must be addressed
before healing and integration can occur. I've come across professional
psychologists who claim that the majority of post traumatic
stress and dysfunctional family issues in abductees are not from alien
abductions, but from other more "easily explained" psychological theories.
That may be true in part, but in families where abductions have occurred
for several generations, the denial and trauma of hidden abductions
compounds--and even creates the dysfunctional behaviors. Resolution and
healing of alien abduction related issues can only be complete when false
and misleading psychological "swamp gas" theories are put to rest and
hopefully, disproven.
In many of Barbara's cases where many hypnotic regressions
were conducted, the therapeutic process of the individual extended into many
years. Sometimes daily phone calls were necessary to keep the client
stabilized during extreme emotional processing. Aftercare of hypnotic
regressions is necessary for the complete recovery of the abductee
especially if reality shattering trauma was uncovered.
The Alien Control Factor and The Stockholm Syndrome
The main difference between alien abduction trauma and versus
other trauma- based problems is the added factor of the aliens continued
perpetration of such victimizing activities. Not only do the aliens continue
to contact and abduct the individual, but they also will often act in ways
to prevent the abductee from getting the factual information they need to
heal from these issues. Often abductees change their attitude concerning
their abductors from anger and helplessness or critical thinking to
adoration and compliance, similar to the "Stockholm" syndrome.
UFO researchers, abduction therapists, psychological and
medical professionals dealing with abductees often overlook this alien
"control" factor. Core issues of abductees cannot fully be addressed until
the control factor of the alien presence is acknowledged. (This includes
acquisition of evidence of alien abductions.)
Health Issues of Abductees
Health issues are a frequent complaint of abductees. The most
common medical anomalies are in the area of gynecological and sexual organs,
severe back pain, miscellaneous allergies, skin rashes, autoimmune
disorders, migraines and endocrine abnormalities. Some abductees are so
affected by their health problems that they are on permanent disability, not
able to work a regular job.
I've encountered situations in which the abductee was suddenly
struck ill as a result of "alien instigated" truth detracting and spiritual
warfare tactics. Unusual health problems such as panic attacks and anxiety,
heart problems, severe back pain, migraines, nausea and extreme exhaustion
have resulted from the abductees' efforts to search for the truth of their
experiences. These blatant health issues and uncoincidental events and
accidents are not simple psychological self-sabotage, but something much
more revealing. The important point here is not the health issues
themselves, but the effects that arise as a result of abductions and "alien
manipulation".
© 1998 Eve Frances Lorgen
http://users1.ee.net/pmason/el_implications.html
ABDUCTEE BRAINWASHING?
by Donna Higbee, CHT
Attitudes appear to be changing as many abductees who have been traumatized,
physically abused and violated are now
saying that their abductors have only spiritual and/or benevolent motives
behind their actions. This growing new trend is a
concern to a number of researchers and healthcare professionals who work
with abductees.
Many abductees who once reported tremendous fear of being taken repeatedly
from their bedrooms and cars by non-human
entities are now reporting being told by these entities that it was for
their own good; that their fear was unwarranted and was
simply a product of the abductee's lack of understanding. In many cases,
abductees who accept this explanation are also led
to believe that technological advancement equals spiritual advancement.
There is no logical reasoning for this, as spiritual
advancement may run parallel to technological advancement, the two may not
proceed along together at the same pace, or
they may not run along together at all. We cannot assume that where we find
one we will find the other.
I believe the reasoning put forth by these abductees to justify abduction is
faulty. I am a hypnotherapist in Santa Barbara,
California, working with abductees. I became personally involved in this
situation when I watched two members of our
support group change their stories from one meeting to the next. These were
abductees who had been terrorized and abused
for years and had only hatred for their abductors. Suddenly, their stories
changed and they both, independently of each other,
began saying that recently they were shown that everything that had been
done to them was for their own good and facilitated
their spiritual growth.
With regards to this, Dr. Karla Turner, in a paper she presented to the
MUFON 1994 International UFO Symposium, said
the following: "It is odd, however, that such growth seems to come to
abductees only after they are aware of their
experiences. If indeed this growth is produced by the aliens, then it should
have been there long before the abductees were
conscious of their encounters, since in almost every reported case there is
evidence of alien involvement since early
childhood. The psychic increase and growth of perceptive abilities indicate
a different genesis - -- an internal evolution of
consciousness -- stemming from our need to know what is and has been done to
us and what we can do to meet the situation
in a more empowered state. Survivors of great catastrophes such as
hurricanes, earthquakes, and war may be crushed by the
impact of these events ... or they may find a new resilience, rising to the
occasion and reacting with abilities they didn't know
they possessed.
Given the vast intrusive activities of the abduction scenario, our species
may well feel such a threat or stress that a mutational
or evolutionary leap is occurring today...." If this is indeed the case,
then any spiritual growth is the abductee's own doing at a
deep level of consciousness and is not coming from an abducting entity.
There can be a number of reasons why an abductee changes his mind. One that
has been put forth a number of times is what
is termed the Stockholm Syndrome, AKA the Hostage Syndrome, where a person
who has been kidnapped or captured
eventually comes to sympathize with and even grow fond of his captors. With
some abductees, I believe that this may be
occurring. However, I think we are seeing something else happening with this
attitude change that goes beyond the easy
answer of the Stockholm Syndrome.
Because I was disturbed by the attitude change of the abductees I knew and
of many others I had been hearing about, I
wrote a letter in February to a group of abductees who were reachable
through computer online services. I also posted my
letter to a number of bulletin boards on the Internet and asked that
abductees please respond with their thoughts and feelings
about the situation. I'd like to mention a few of the points I made in my
letter and then share with all of you some of the
responses I received from people.
In my letter, I stated that by the very meaning of the word, abduction
implies being taken against one's will with no say in the
matter. It can include experiencing painful physical procedures, being lied
to and given screen memories, being mentally
terrorized, and being paralyzed, manipulated and controlled. There is
nothing spiritual about any of these things and yet the
abductors say they are highly advanced spiritual beings. It is very
interesting that these non-human entities seem to have
learned two ways to control human beings - through fear and through
acceptance. Obviously we are seeing some abductees
who are still being controlled and manipulated through fear, but we are also
seeing abductees being controlled and
manipulated through their acceptance of these entities as spiritual beings.
By accepting these beings as highly spiritual, the
abductee gives up seeking to end his abduction experiences and instead
starts to welcome them. Instead of abductees
coming into a sense of their own power as spiritual beings who do not need
to give up their free will to anyone, what we are
now seeing is a group of submissive, controlled abductees who are passively
letting the abductors do as they want with them
in the name of spiritual progress. In my opinion, anything that keeps a
person from learning the truth and from taking
responsibility for his own growth and awakening as a spiritual being is
completely unspiritual. Anything that allows the person
his free will, responsibility for his own spiritual progress and aids in the
process of discovering his true unbounded spiritual
nature is truly spiritual. I don't think it is difficult to see into which
category the abductors fall. I believe that we have spiritual
entities in our midst, beings who are assisting humans with their evolution,
but I'm quite sure that these spiritual beings are not
the same as those who are responsible for the abductions.
In my letter I also stated that the entire hybrid scenario could be a
fantastic cover for an agenda that is completely different
than we are being shown. As Dr. Karla Turner has stated in radio interviews,
it is almost as though abductees are shown the
same movies, as a cover for other motives completely unknown to us, or
possibly they are using the hybrid scenario to study
our emotions. Things should not be taken at face value when we know we are
dealing with entities who can implant thoughts
into our heads, manipulate our minds with screen memories and virtual
reality scenes, and who pass themselves off as
wonderful spiritual beings. We presently have no way to know the truth about
what is really happening.
I'd like to quote part of a letter I received from an abductee, Irene Rea in
Oregon. She writes, "One of the most frightening
aspects of this phenomenon is the abductor's ability to manipulate the
abductee's perceptions. I'm frightened by the current
trend that many abductees seem to be going through in assigning the
abductors benign motives in the spiritual growth of the
abductees and planetary healing. In my experience, the abductors have
manipulated my reality over and over. In one very
telling instance, my partner and I were abducted together. He thought he was
being wooed by a gorgeous and astoundingly
remarkable woman. My view of his experience was that he was on a table,
strapped to medical gear, and staring into the
eyes of a typical "gray." I find it even more abusive to be told by my
fellow abductees that the reason I'm experiencing these
negative experiences is because I'm somehow spiritually unadvanced....
Another letter from an abductee, Dana Buyers of Los Angeles, California: "We
are nothing more to these beings than a crop
to be harvested. They terrorized me, hurt me and nearly ruined my health. An
abuser is an abuser. I don't care what planet
they come from or how intelligent they claim to be. So when I get the
impulse from them to start thinking that they aren't so
bad after all and are just pursuing some noble purpose that we can't
understand, I show them in my mind all that they have
done to me and I say "get real," there is no way that I'm ever going to
change my mind. These aliens are dangerous, don't
ever believe them."
And a letter from abductee Amy Hebert of Carrollton, Texas: "As a
facilitator of an abductee support group, I have
observed abductees' reactions change from deep contempt and anger toward
their abductors to acceptance and complete
surrender. Some abductees express years and years of anger and confusion,
then suddenly announce they don't think the
aliens are really so bad after all and may actually represent some type of
spiritual experience. These reactions seem quite
surprising, considering the levels of anger and humiliation the abductee
expressed only a week before. Could these new
feelings be due to the resolution of the individual's long-term hatred and
resentment toward the abductors? Or, could this be
yet another example of alien manipulation? According to Dr. Karla Turner,
aliens have been known to lie to abductees for
their own purposes and all abductions take place in an alien-controlled
environment. These alien-human hate-love
relationships seem to reflect alien control more than any spiritually
fulfilling promise for humankind. After all, kidnapping and
forcing someone to be a guinea pig can hardly be considered spiritual."
I want to give one last letter I received from a man who is in training as a
body-centered psychotherapist, Mark Richards of
Boston, Massachusetts. He writes, "It's of little doubt that the internal
confusion and pain resulting from one or more
abduction experiences results in some form of compensation. Just as 'screen
memory' tends to re-shape the horrific
experience into more palatable images, it's possible that this same
re-shaping occurs at many other levels, notwithstanding the
body's cellular memory. Given the infinite variety and creativity of the
whole mind, how is it that hypnotic recollections of the
victims, often including deeply felt sensory experiences, have such striking
parallels? Could it be that a 'cult' of some type is
forming and having influence upon the story? ... Culture and historical
factors may strongly influence what comes forth. Here
in our technological, educated and motive culture, when something doesn't
make sense in our head, we switch to 'faith,' to a
spirituality of some sort. Once this switch occurs, we have a 'cult,' and in
the case of abductees as a group, a 'cult'-ure built
around technological unknowns. Perhaps all semblance of reason is not lost,
just put on hold for a while as the body
(collective and individual) tries to make some sense out of stuff that
cannot possibly find correlation. This trend among the
abductee community has not been so named, perhaps out of the same denial
which seems to be increasingly prevalent in the
various stories .. stories that have begun to shift in character and
substance. Now abduction is no longer a horrible violation
but a necessary component of a great plan. Now the aliens who are beaming
into our bedrooms are no longer uninvited
violators of the human story, but welcome harbingers of our 'salvation.' The
parallels between various religious mythological
systems and the growing abductee community are striking. They spring from
the same set of unknowns, growing in the fertile
ground of fear and imagination, a set of ideas concerning the history,
purpose and future of the human race."
http://www.visitations.com/ufofiles/abductions/abduction3.htm
Also read_The Threat_ by David Jacobs.
Does *any* of this sound like the aliens have humankind's best interests at
heart? The aliens are here for their own self-interest, and likely need
something from humankind in order to save themselves -- and without any
regard, respect, compassion or consideration to humankind or their well
being whatsoever. If the aliens were here to help mankind, then why abduct
and abuse people and insist on complete secrecy for their abuse? They
surely know they're hurting people, but the aliens simply *don't care*.
And thank you, Dr. Jacobs, Bud Hopkins and others. You're right, and have
been right all along.
Something wicked and evil this way has come.
Gr
Gr
Fahrvergnugen) wrote:
Gr
wrote:
Government corruption serves the alien agenda.
The cover up is maintained by MKULTRA and mind control.
NSA MKULTRA declassified documents:
List of MKULTRA Unclassified Documents
(including subprojects)
http://www.nemasys.com/rahome/library/programming/mkultra.shtml
This information was transcribed from faxes and brochures which are
available from the National Security
Archive.
Please note that the documents listed are only those requested by John
Marks for research purposes. Some of
the information in the released documents has been verified, other
information has not. Also please note that
there have been some transciption errors.
About the Archive Library
The National Security Archive
Gelman Library, The George Washington University
2130 H Street, N.W., Suite 701
Washington, D.C. 20037
Phone: 202/994-7000
Fax: 202/994-7005
nsar...@gwis2.circ.gwu.edu
http//www.seas.gwu.edu/nsarchive. html
The National Security Archive is a non-governmental research institute
and library that collects and publishes
declassified documents obtained through the U.S. Freedom of Information
Act, a public interest law firm
defending and expanding public access to government information through
the FOIA, and an indexer and
publisher of the documents in books, microfische, and electronic
formats.
The National Security Archive was founded in 1985 by a group of
journalists and scholars who had obtained
documentation under the FOIA and sought a centralized repository for
these materials. Over the past twelve
years, the Archive has become the world's largest non-governmental
library of declassified documents.
This is the inventory list of donated materials in the National
Security Archive's collection, from John Marks'
FOIA request results which he used to do research for his book The
Search For The Manchurian Candidate:
The CIA and Mind Control, The Secret History of the Behavioral
Sciences. (1979) W. W. Norton,
published as Norton paperback in 1991, ISBN 0-393-30794-8).
INVENTORY: CIA Behavior Experiments Collection (John Marks Donation)
Date Range: 1940s-1970s
Box #1 - Artichoke Documents--MKULTRA DOCS 1-57
Burch, Dr. Neil/LSD and the Air Force: Smithsonian: Index and
Institutional Notifications
Subproject 1: MKULTRA: Plants Isolation and Characterization of Rivea
Corymbosa
Subproject 2: MKULTRA: Drugs
Subproject 3: MKULTRA: Testing
Subproject 4: MKULTRA: Mulholland's Manual
Subproject 5a: MKULTRA
Subproject 5b: MKULTRA: Denver University Hypnosis
Subproject 6: MKULTRA: Testing of Plants by HEF
Subproject 7: MKULTRA: Funding; ONR Probably Abramson
Subproject 8: MKULTRA: Boston Psychopathic Hospital
Subproject 9: MKULTRA: Depressants, Schizophrenics, Alcoholics
Subproject 10: MKULTRA: Personality Assessment
Subproject 11: MKULTRA: Botanicals Popkin (Documents and articles on
Luis Angel Castillo)
Subproject 12: MKULTRA: Financial Records
Subproject 13: MKULTRA: CIA Support to Fort Detrick
Subproject 14: MKULTRA: Paying Bureau of Narcotics for White
Subproject 15: MKULTRA: Magic Support; Mulholland Supplement
Subproject 16: MKULTRA: Testing Apartment Rental
Subproject 17: MKULTRA: LSD Studies of [excised] University
Subproject 19: MKULTRA: Magic Manual
Subproject 20: MKULTRA: Synthesis Derivative of Yohimbine Hydrochloride
Subproject 21: MKULTRA: Defector Study: originally Drug Study
Subproject 22: MKULTRA: William Cook and Co. Research: Amanita
Muscaria, Rivea Corymbosa
Subproject 26: MKULTRA: Pfeiffer, Finances
Subproject 27: MKULTRA: ONR Funding, LSD Research
Subproject 28: MKULTRA: Pfeiffer
Subproject 30: MKULTRA: Fort Detrick (1)
Subproject 30: MKULTRA: Fort Detrick (2)
Subproject 30: MKULTRA: Fort Detrick (3)
Subproject 31: MKULTRA: Manufacture of Drugs by Pellow Wease Chemical
Co.
Subproject 32: MKULTRA: Collection of Plants
Subproject 33: MKULTRA: Collection of 400 for SUBPR #27
Subproject 34: MKULTRA: More Support to Magic
Subproject 35: MKULTRA: Georgetown Hospital: Geschichter
Subproject 36: MKULTRA: Cuba Chapter Conference, Consultant, Subproject
involving getting a man on a
diverted freighter
Subproject 37: MKULTRA: Collection of Botanicals
Subproject 38: MKULTRA
Subproject 39: MKULTRA: Iowa State Hospital (and Ionia)
Subproject 40: MKULTRA: Funding, Probably Abrams LSD Research
Box #2
Subproject 42: MKULTRA: Safehouse Chapter 7: MKULTRA Interview Notes
White, George Hunter Dope
Traffickers' Nemesis
Subproject 43: MKULTRA: Combination drug, Hypnosis, Sensory Deprivation
Subproject 44: MKULTRA: Testing of Aromatic Amines at University of
Illinois
Subproject 45: MKULTRA: Knockout, Stress, Cancer
Subproject 46: MKULTRA: Rochester LSD Drugs
Subproject 47: MKULTRA: Pfeiffer Atlanta
Subproject 47: MKULTRA: (1) Pfeiffer Atlanta/Bordertown
Subproject 48: MKULTRA: HEF Cornell Relationship: Artichoke Team
Proposals and Reports
Subproject 49: MKULTRA: Hypnosis at [excised] University
Subproject 50: MKULTRA: CIA Imprest Fund for $500
Subproject 51: MKULTRA: (1) Moore Collecting Botanicals
Subproject 52: MKULTRA: (2) Moore Collecting Botanicals
Subproject 53: MKULTRA: (3) Moore Collecting Botanicals
Subproject 53: MKULTRA: Review Pharmacological lit.
Subproject 54: MKULTRA: Brain Concussion
Subproject 55: MKULTRA: Unwitting Drug Tests at [excised] University
Subproject 56: MKULTRA: Studies on Alcohol, Stanford Medical school
Subproject 57: MKULTRA: Sleep and Insomnia at GW: MKULTRA: Lloyd Gould
Subproject 57: MKULTRA: Sleep
Box # 3
C-30 Project MUDHEN Jack Anderson
MKULTRA --To File: Massachusetts (Bibliographic Citations, articles on
mind control experiments in
Massachusetts): John Jacobs' Kentucky
Subproject 58: MKULTRA: J. P. Morgan and Co. (see Wasson file) Agency
Policy and Conferences
Subproject 59: MKULTRA: Unwitting Drug Tests at University of Maryland
Subproject 60: MKULTRA: Human Ecology
Subproject 61: MKULTRA
Subproject 62: MKULTRA: Consulting Work in Isolation/Electric Shock/CNS
Drugs
Subproject 63: MKULTRA: (1) Drugs and Alcohol (Butler)
Subproject 64: MKULTRA: Drugs
Subproject 65: MKULTRA: Hungarian Refugees
Subproject 66: MKULTRA: Alcohol and Drug Study
Subproject 67: MKULTRA: CIA Use of Institutes Facilities -- University
of Indiana
Subproject 69: MKULTRA: Rutgers
Subproject 70: MKULTRA: "Knockout"
Subproject 71: MKULTRA: Dr. Wallace Chan at Stanford University Testing
Drugs
Subproject 72: MKULTRA: Testing Drugs for Effects on Central Nervous
System
Subproject 73: MKULTRA: University of Kentucky: Narcotics Farms,
Narco-Hypnosis
Subproject 74: MKULTRA: Small HEF Subproject (1)
Subproject 74: MKULTRA: Small HEF Subproject (2)
Subproject 75: MKULTRA: Mass. Mental Health (by Project number of
master list)
Subproject 77: MKULTRA: Biological Lab (1)
Subproject 78: MKULTRA: Biological Lab (2)
Subproject 78: MKULTRA: Biological Lab (3)
Subproject 78: MKULTRA: Biological Lab (4)
Subproject 78: MKULTRA: Biological Lab (5)
Subproject 78: MKULTRA: Biological Lab (6)
Box # 4
Document Indexes, Abstracts, and Documents
Subproject 79: MKULTRA: Cutout for Funding Research of a "sensible
nature"
Subproject 80: MKULTRA
Subproject 81: MKULTRA: Cornell--Extension of Hinkle--Wolf
Subproject 82: MKULTRA: Hungarian Refugees
Subproject 83: MKULTRA: Graphology Journal and Cover
Subproject 84: MKULTRA: Hypnosis Work
Subproject 85: MKULTRA: Stanford Medical School
Subproject 86: MKULTRA: Stanford Medical School: Telecontrol
Subproject 87: MKULTRA: Hyper -Allergic Substances
Subproject 88: MKULTRA: Cultural Appraisal
Subproject 89: MKULTRA: Hungarian Repatriation
Subproject 90: MKULTRA: MIT--A. J. Wiener
Subproject 91: MKULTRA: Drug Testing and Screening of Animals
Subproject 92: MKULTRA: Teaching Machine for Foreign Languages
Subproject 93: MKULTRA: Toxin Study--Cuba Chapter
Subproject 94: MKULTRA
Subproject 95: MKULTRA: Osgood
Subproject 96: MKULTRA: George Kelly
Subproject 97: MKULTRA: Schizophrenics Psychotherapy
Subproject 98: MKULTRA: Mass Conversion Study: Queens College
Subproject 99: MKULTRA: Optics mixed with Biological Warfare--Cuba
Chapter
Subproject 100: MKULTRA: CBW Penn State
Subproject 101: MKULTRA: Biophysics of Central Nervous System
Subproject 102: MKULTRA: Adolescent Gangs
Subproject 103: MKULTRA: Children's Summer Camps
Subproject 104: MKULTRA: Sabotage of Petroleum
Subproject 105: MKULTRA: CBW, Disease
Subproject 106: MKULTRA: Electrodes, Russian Study
Subproject 109: MKULTRA: Drugs-CBW Testing
Subproject 110: MKULTRA: CBW MKNAOMI
Subproject 112: MKULTRA: Vocational Studies in Children
Subproject 113: MKULTRA: Gas Sprays and Aerosols
Subproject 114: MKULTRA: Alcohol Study
Subproject 115: MKULTRA: Mentally Disturbed and Environment
Subproject 116: MKULTRA: Lab
Subproject 117: MKULTRA: Cultural Influences on Children
Subproject 118: MKULTRA: Microbiology--Penn State
Subproject 119: MKULTRA: Telecontrol--Texas Christian
Subproject 120: MKULTRA Drug Research
Subproject 121: MKULTRA: Witch Doctor study-Dr. Raymond Prince-- McGill
University
Subproject 122: MKULTRA: Study of Neurokinin
Subproject 123: MKULTRA: African Attitude Study
Subproject 124: MKULTRA: African Attitude Study
Subproject 125: MKULTRA: CO2 and Acid Base Research
Subproject 126: MKULTRA: Work on Placebos and Drugs
Subproject 127: MKULTRA: Disaster/Stress Study
Subproject 128: MKULTRA: Rapid Hypnotic Induction
Subproject 130: MKULTRA: Personality Theory, David Saunders/William
Thetford; Columbia Univ.
Box # 5
Subproject 131: MKULTRA
Subproject 132: MKULTRA: Safe House -- Not San Francisco
Subproject 133: MKULTRA: Safe House -- Not San Francisco
Subproject 134: MKULTRA: Correlation Of Physique and Personality done
by Haronian in New Jersey --
Human Ecology
Subproject 135: MKULTRA: Testing on Volunteers
Subproject 136: MKULTRA: ESP Research
Subproject 137: MKULTRA: Handwriting Analysis, Dr. Klare G Toman-HEF
Subproject 139: MKULTRA: Bird Disease Studies at Penn State
Subproject 140: MKULTRA: human Voluntary Drug Testing
Subproject 141: MKULTRA: Unknown
Subproject 142: MKULTRA: Unknown
Subproject 143: MKULTRA CBW/Bacteria University of Houston
Subproject 144: MKULTRA
Subproject 145: MKULTRA
Subproject 146: MKULTRA
Subproject 147: MKULTRA: Psychometric Drugs THC
Subproject 148: MKULTRA: (1) Marijuana Research
Subproject 148: MKULTRA: (2) Marijuana Research
Subproject 149: MKULTRA: George White and Federal Bureau of Narcotics
MKULTRA APE A and B--Funding Mechanisms for MKULTRA
ARTICHOKE Docs 38-461 (2)
ARTICHOKE Docs 156-199
ARTICHOKE Docs 200-310 (1)
ARTICHOKE Docs 200-310 (2)
ARTICHOKE Docs 200-310 (1)
ARTICHOKE Docs 200-310 (2)
ARTICHOKE Docs 311-340
ARTICHOKE Docs 362-388
ARTICHOKE Docs 388-461
MKSEARCH 7
MKSEARCH 6 (continuation of MKULTRA 62)
MKSEARCH 2 (continues BW Lab, MKULTRA 78)
MKSEARCH Docs S-2 (BW Lab)
MKSEARCH Docs S-8 (Phase out of work done on schizophrenics probably by
Pfeiffer)
MKSEARCH Docs S-7
MKSEARCH Basic Documents
Unlabeled Accordion File--primarily MKULTRA: Subproject 42
Unlabeled Accordion File--Financial records, checks
Box # 6
MKSEARCH 6 Discontinuation of Geschichter Fund for Medical Research
MKSEARCH 2
MKSEARCH 5
MKSEARCH S-14
MKSEARCH 6 - MKACTION
MKSEARCH 4 - Bureau of Narcotics Safehouse
MKSEARCH 3 - Testing at Vacaville, Hamilton
MKSEARCH S-3 Vacaville (1)
MKSEARCH S-3 Vacaville (2)
Lexington: Air Force: Alcohol: Amnesia: Animals: David Anthony:ARPA
Subproject 107: MKULTRA: American Psychological Association: Army
Testing: Assassination: Raymond A.
Bauer: Berlin Poison Case: Biometric Lab: Biophysical Measurements:
Beecher (Henry K.): Brainwashing
ARTICHOKE Docs 59-155: Bordentown New Jersey Reformatory: Boston
Psychopathic
(Hyde-Massachusetts Mental Hospital): Brain Studies: Brainwashing (1):
Brainwashing (2): Project Calling Card:
John Marks Chapter 6 Conclusions: Chadwell, W.H.: CBW Work File: Dr.
Wallace Chan: Cold War Late
1953-1955 (1): Cold War Late 1953-1955 (2): Communist Control
Techniques VII: Cold War Docs (1)
(Project Artichoke, Bluebird): Cold War Docs (2): Control of Behavior
--General: Cybernetics: Defectors:
University of Denver: Destruction of Files: Diseases: Drug Research and
Operations Diseases: Drug Research
and Operations: Drugs: Documents ARTICHOKE: Drugs: ARTICHOKE: Drugs:
ARTICHOKE (2): Drugs:
Subprojects
Box # 7
Ethics: Federal Penitentiary -- Atlanta: Fisher Scientific Company:
Flickering Lights: FOIA Important Documents
(FOIA correspondence and Court DocumeRnts for suit against the
CIA):Freedom of Info Act requests (1):
Freedom of Info Act requests (2): Foreign Countries: Heath: Foreign
Liaison: Friends of McGill University, Inc.:
Ft. Detrick: Joan Gavin: Genetics: George Washington University:
Geschichter Fund: Unlabeled File
--MKULTRA Subprojects: Government Agencies: Graduate students:
Grifford: Handwriting Hardenberg:
Hearings: Hinkle: History: Hospitals: Hungarian Projects: (Defectors,
Refugees): Edward Hunter: Hypnosis
50-53: Hypnosis, Cold War period: Hypnosis - Literature: Hypnosis
Hypnosis - C I:: Hypnosis Documents (1):
Subproject ARTICHOKE: Hypnosis Documents (2): Subproject ARTICHOKE:
Hypospray: Inspector
General: University of Illinois: Internal Revenue Service: Iowa State
Hospital, Ionia State Hospital, Michigan:
Ittleson Foundation: IVY Research Lab: Johns Hopkins University: Juicy
Quotes: Lyman Kirkpatrick: John Lilly:
Lovell Chemical Company: Lovell: Lowinger: LSD - Counterculture: LSD -
(Old Sandoz File): LSD (1): LSD
(2)
Box # 8
Magic: Mulholland: George Merck: University of Minnesota:
Miscellaneous: MKDELTA: ARTICHOKE
Docs/Clips: MKDELTA Subprojects: James A. Moore: MKNOOM: Mulholland:
Mushrooms -- Chapter 8:
Naval Research, Military Side -- Chapter 14: Oatis Case:
Often/Chickwit: Ohio State University: Operation
Paperclip: Organizational Structure: ORD: World War II: Martin Orne:
Parapsychology (Limited discussion on
EMR research also): The Application of Tesla's Technology in Today's
World
Box # 9
(Original Box 13-- not copied as of 7/2/93) Press Conferences (Excerpts
from documents): Pfeiffer Subproject
47: Penn State (clippings): Placebos: Pfeiffer, Carl C.: Pharmaceutical
Houses: Polygraph: POW: Prince-- Witch
Doctor Study: Prisoners -- Documents Prisoners-Mental Patients
(clippings): Private Company: Programming:
Prouty: Psychological Assessment: Research and Development Study by
Edgewood Arsenal: Personality
Assessment -- OSS (Clippings, Book Chapters, Interview Notes):
Psychical Research Foundation:
Psycho-Pharmacology: Psychosurgery: Psychosurgery (2) (clippings): Max
Rinkel: Public Health Service: Puerto
Rican Study: Recent Agency Policy on Experimentation: Recent Events in
Defense Department (Includes
document from Siemmer): Project Revere: RHIC-Edom Files (Clippings):
Chapter 7 -- Safehouse (draft
manuscript?): Safehouse Working File (personal notes): Safehouses
(Documents): Schein (clipping): Schultes
(clippings, notes): Sensory Deprivation (primary clippings): Schultes
(clippings, notes): Chapter 7 --
Safehouses-- clippings
Box # 10
CIA Behavior Modification Reports: Side Tone Delay Device II:
Incapacitation -- Non-Lethal: 4 Assessment:
Sleep Knockout Drug (clippings): Alexander H. Smith (clippings): Soil
Microbiology: Sonics: Stanford: Team
Exp. 1: Technical Assistance: ARTICHOKE: Technologies: Toxic Psychic
States: Ultra Sonics/Sonics:
Tradecraft: Universities (clippings): Wasson, Robert Gordon (notes,
clippings): Wendt: White TD Docs: Harold
Wolff (clippings): Documents to File (miscellaneous topics)
Box # 11
Sleep Learning: Interrogation: Electric Fish and Animal Radar 1/3:
Electric Fish and Animal Radar 2/3: Electric
Fish and Animal Radar 3/3: Plants, Sleep Machine, ESB and Sleep,
Biocommunications and Bioelectronics:
History of Program: Animal ESB: Toxicity in mice 1/4: Toxicity in mice
2/4: Toxicity in mice 3/4: Toxicity in mice
4/4
Gr
Government corruption serves the alien agenda.
Gr
Fahrvergnugen) wrote:
>John MKULTRA Lilly's "Cosmic Coincidence Control"
> http://www.johnclilly.com/
>"In the province of the mind, there are no limits."
Government corruption serves the alien agenda.
Gr
wrote:
>Gr wrote:
Government corruption serves the alien agenda.
Gr
<nos...@newsranger.com> wrote:
>UFOs and the National State
>Richard Dolan <key...@rochester.rr.com>
Government corruption serves the alien agenda.
The cover up and The National Security State is maintained by NSA MKULTRA
mind contol and brain washing.
hughe
Gr
>Example: Just like this person does, Same shit different day
You're paranoid.
David Patrick
On Fri, 5 Jul 2002, Gr wrote:
> On Thu, 04 Jul 2002 11:49:08 -0400, hughe <hu...@frontiernet.net> wrote:
>
> >David Patrick wrote:
> >
> >> Another repost by Flaffer.
> >>
> >> It's rather pointless to try and rebut an introduction to a book. Only a
> >> discussion about the actual cases in depth would be worthwhile.
> >>
> >> I ask you again to discuss the two cases I have researched : The
> >> Rendlesham incident and the Berkshire Triangle case. Do you have nothing
> >> yourself to say about them?
> >>
> >> David Patrick
> >>
> >>
> >
> >He wont reply, Only posts others work. Then claims its his own.
>
> Government corruption serves the alien agenda.
(a lot snipped) None of which is relevant to the fact that all Flaffer
does is keep those pathetic little lists he fantasizes about using to get
the military to lock us all up, while reposting loads of files culled
(probably without permission) from several years old UFO newsletters and
websites.
The fact that he can't debate the facts of any case shows that he doesn't
fully understand what he is reposting.
Never has he posted a case he himself has investigated. He attacks others
for not doing their own research but he clearly has never done any
himself.
David Patrick
Mantismind
spsp...@reading.ac.uk says...
Speaks Out" could possibly be one of his sheeples. He posted it before when he
was posting as UFOs Today. It was written by Cynthia Butler but he didn't use
her name this time.
Here was my reply to "An Abductee Speaks Out." I hope he forwards it to Cindy
since it could be very helpful. Perhaps he could provide a little "hot-tub"
therapy for her and her husband. Might be relaxing for all concerned.
In article <2RYJ8.20318$15....@www.newsranger.com>, nos...@newsranger.com
says...
>
>An Abductee Speaks Out//ETs are "real"!!
>
>An Abductee Speaks Out
>
<snip>
>and I'm very selective about who I do share it with,
Usenet is certainly selective, only millions of people view Usenet posts. By
the way, may I ask what it is that you share?
<snip>
>in people's back yards. <-------This is is definitely the most posted topic
in AAR
> you hit the nail on the head. My husband, -- but my husband is the one who
>gets "turned off", he's the one to admit he has no control over any of it and
>is impotent
Bummer
<snippage>
>I don't think he could face Deborah Lindemann
Why, Does she "turn him back on?????" (What a trollop)
<snippery>
>the most disturbing part of the experience [is] our minds.
Well, they say it all starts in the mind, you know.
<quicky snip>
>we aren't already doing their bidding in every way
The Lindemann's? Maybe you should try a foursome :)
<Menage a snip>
>I firmly believe that we don't see them unless they want us to. They
>show themselves at times they feel we are dangerously close to convincing
>ourselves they don't exist.
Well, just give them a call, maybe they prefer the phone variety.
<fore-snip>
>They want us to know, and it's no accident [.] Examine they way they act!
They sound a little kinky for my taste.
<missionary snip>
>Las Vegas strip in your backyard!
Sounds more tasteful than that sort of club, at least they come to your house.
<S&M snip>
>Don't believe it for a moment. However, the viewing is for the chosen. Fear
>is the controlling factor. They want us to know, they want us fearful, and I
>find that very ominous.
Next time, you probably ought to be more selective with your partners.
Sometimes, group stuff gets to be a bit over-the-edge, especially when you get
into THAT type of scene.
<group snip>
>The scientists, the governments, the investigators, the contactees and
>abductees need to get together and pool their information and then make it
>available to everyone. Please!
Well, I would have to think about that one. Seems like quite an array of folks
to become intimately involved with. If I were you, I'd stick with the
Lindemanns. (Mantis whispers: Good luck with your husband's "little problemo")
>
>By CYNTHIA BUTLER
__________
"You say you think that nuking the al-Aqsa Mosque and replacing it with a new
Temple on the Mount will NOT result in Jesus, my one and only child of my
eternally Virgin Bridge, floating down from the clouds to save all Fundies?
Guess Again, Heretic!!" - God [As revealed to Mantisprophet]
William Mullin
The troll known as Jerry Kolnick is spreading disinformation again.
Robert ASF.
But William we all knew that...
Fun with Frager FAQ!
Frager is loved whereever he goes. The following is from the
Frager FAQ that another newsgroup maintained.
Begin quote:
Q: Is he a real doctor?
A: He is not listed in the American Medical Association
Directory. His name has been checked against a database of all people
receiving professional type journals in the United States and Canada. His
name does not appear anywhere. When asked to show his credentials, he
ignores the request.
Likewise, when given factual information rebutting his "ideas", he
ignores it, and claims it does not exist.
Q: Is his point of view valid?
A: Who knows? When asked to substantiate any of his theories, he
ignores the request or complains that someone is interfering with his
freedom of speech.
Q: Who is crossposting to all of these newsgroups?
A: He also cross-posts to *many* different groups.
Q: Has he ever broken the law?
A: That is a question that is open to some debate. In March or
April, he posted an article from the Washington Post which was about
Ritalin -- however, he changed many of the sentences and words around,
added some stuff of his own, and made it have an anti-med bias that the
original article didn't have. The Washington Post investigated, his
internet provider kicked him off, and I don't know if anything ever
happened legally or not. Is it a crime to use a copyright in this manner?
Ask a real lawyer.
End quote.
Frager is generally loved where ever he goes.
* Here are a few articles that Frager hated and that quote him
properly:
Art Wholeflaffer A. S. A. " <smcq...@cyberhighway.net>
Alias:
"Dr. Richard X. Frager " <smq...@cyberhighway.net>
Alias:
"Dr. Richard X. Frager " <nare...@aracnet.com>
* Is world famous and knowledgeable in all fields!
For those interested in having disinformation spread at your next
pary, I thought you might be interested in this tidbit of info from the
Dr. Dink.
(From Message-Id: <5s6ek4$nv8$1...@spitting-spider.aracnet.com>)
" Mr. <snip> and Dr. R. X. Frager are both very public figures"
"Mr. <snip> and Dr. R. X. Frager are always ready and willing to speak to
the public in any forum. Both Dr. R. X. Frager and Mr. <snip> have
addressed large groups of people on various subjects regarding the
intricacies of Law, Medicine, Democracy and the Corporate-Dominated Global
Economy."
So, when the good doctor finishes with brain surgery, he lectures
on the intricacies of Law, Medicine, Democracy, and the
Corporate-Dominated Global Economy. Gad, he is not only a skilled
surgeon, but a practising lawyer, political scientist, and economist!
* Regarding his critics:
"...I support their democratic rights to post their point-of-view,
we only wish they would temper it with a little compassion and concern as
we have done"
And, we all know that Dr. Dink is the most compassionate human dead.
Regarding his vast staff of people:
"For the record, my Secretary has received many obscene and
asinine phone calls."
If she works for Dr. Dink, she probably enjoys the abuse.
But, we need not fear his leaving us:
"...Dr. R. X. Frager will be here for as long as you need us; and
considering the massive amount of encouraging letters we get, that will be
a very long time."
So, keep those cards and letters coming folks.
(End article)
Begin article:
Art Wholeflaffer A. S. A. " <smcq...@cyberhighway.net>
Alias:
"Dr. Richard X. Frager " <smq...@cyberhighway.net>
Alias:
"Dr. Richard X. Frager " <nare...@aracnet.com>
He really is a doctor, at least according to him.
Begin quoted article
Message-Id: <5rc917$qqu$4...@spitting-spider.aracnet.com>)
"Larry Rogers" <larry_...@dg.com> wrote:
>This from an Imposter posing as a Dr. I am telling you now Frager. I am
>going to look into the laws.........
>Cheers, Larry
I absolutely demand an apology Larry. Secondly, please apologize to the
whole group. If not, you will have exposed yourself as an absolute LIAR.
Again, please apologize to me personally and the group as a whole.
Dr. R. X. Frager
(End quoted article)
Gee, Art, if Larry was incorrect, why are you no longer using the
title Doctor?
Unfortunately, Dr. Dink canceled several articles, including,
presumeably, the one in which he admits that he was lying and isn't a
doctor. (End article)
Begin article:
Art Wholeflaffer A. S. A. " <smcq...@cyberhighway.net>
Alias:
"Dr. Richard X. Frager " <smq...@cyberhighway.net>
Alias:
"Dr. Richard X. Frager " <nare...@aracnet.com>
Art is not only a surgeon but does research on women!
(Message-Id: <5rk3j9$cjg$1...@spitting-spider.aracnet.com>)
(Begin Quote)
My own research also verifies this statistic. Although I would say almost
100% of the hundreds of women I have met in my life, outside of work, will
ask me that quesion. It is a shame that all women think about is status,
money, and clothes.
Dr. R. X. Frager
(End Quote)
Yep, ladies, when you are with Art, alias Dr. Frager, no matter
how difficult it is, please keep your mind on him.
(End article)
Begin article:
Art Wholeflaffer A. S. A. " <smcq...@cyberhighway.net>
Alias:
"Dr. Richard X. Frager " <smq...@cyberhighway.net>
Alias:
"Dr. Richard X. Frager " <nare...@aracnet.com>
Just to show everyone that Dr. Dink is not only compassionate in
our newsgroups but a world famous researcher, here is an article about his
research into women's brains.
(Message-Id: <5rk1c5$c6s$3...@spitting-spider.aracnet.com>)
(Begin quote)
Most women in this country have their brains between their
legs, which is almost okay if they have decent legs.
Dr. R. X. Frager
(End quote)
I'm beginning to think we should complain to the Good Dr. Dink's
secretary that all his most compassionate articles are going to other
newsgroups!
(End article)
Dr. R. X. Frager the Debunker
From: ra_f...@alcor.concordia.ca (Robert ASF.)
Newsgroups: alt.paranet.ufo,alt.alien.visitors,alt.paranet.abduct,
alt.alien.research,alt.conspiracy
Subject: DOC FRAGER the Debunker! Re: The coming and going of visitors on
Date: 31 Aug 2000 07:11:29 GMT
Message-ID: <8ol0f1$d40$3...@newsflash.concordia.ca>
On Wed, 30 Aug Sir Arthur Wholeflaffer A.S.A. wrote:
Truly amazing! The doc has begun to debunk the nuts!
snip
>We need more information.
A skeptic demands more information
snip
>Alien are NOT Gods by any stretch of the imagination.
Doc debunks one theory!
snip
>We must not upset the apple cart.
A demand to respect the status quo!
snip
>I don't expect that to happen any time soon.
snip
Doc expressing disbelief!
end repost
* Doc Learns words do have meaning.
The doc used to call Doug Weller the Penultimate liar. Which is
very true. Doc changed it as soon as i mentioned that the word Penultimate
means "next to last."
Doc used to call me AS-Wipe, until i pointed out with his last
intials being A.S.A., people might think he was talking about himself!
* I must be doing something right, The dok has put me first on his
"enemies list for rounding up!
From: ra_f...@alcor.concordia.ca (Robert ASF.)
Newsgroups: alt.paranet.ufo,alt.alien.visitors,alt.alien.research,
alt.paranet.abduct
Subject: Re: Why is everyone attacking artwholeflaffer?
Date: 10 Jan 2001 17:39:37 GMT
Message-ID: <93i6op$jr8$1...@newsflash.concordia.ca>
On Wed, 10 Jan <artwhol...@my-deja.com> wrote:
sniping part of the article
>Again, ASF-Wipe is a troubled person
Why yes i do cause you trouble.
>with a checkered past who may be considered
I play chess...
>a "threat" to our new world order.
Hey Michael! Are *you* considered a "threat"... I thought not!
Gee doc that was sweet of you to say so. Thanks for making my day!
> His name
>has been placed in a special "round-em-up"
>section when "we" with the help of our
>off-world-friends run the show.
Oh no not another list! 800 or so by last count...
end repost
Just Thought I Should Mention It
hughe
Mantismind wrote:
Mantis, You are a sick puppy LMAO
hughe
Gr wrote:
> On Fri, 05 Jul 2002 00:05:41 -0400, hughe <hu...@frontiernet.net> wrote:
>
>
>>Example: Just like this person does, Same shit different day
>>
>
> You're paranoid.
>
>>Gr wrote:
>>
>>
>>>On Thu, 04 Jul 2002 11:49:08 -0400, hughe <hu...@frontiernet.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
Doesnt sound like I am! Anyone else think I am?
And I was proven correct on my last post I see :)
Rr
NSA/ECHELON knew about 9-11 and let all those people die
>
>
Rr
Rr
Mantismind
Rr
Koyaanisqatsi Fahrvergnugen
> > What Are They?
> > By Richard M. Dolan
> > ©2002 all rights reserved
> > http://keyholepublishing.com/What%20Are%20They.htm
> Wormholes, anyone?
>
> Get some education before you flaunt your
> ignorance.
By all means, do "enlighten us," Craig.
-=[snip]=-