Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Re: Checkmate and Ragnar are HEATHENS!

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Checkmate

unread,
Jan 21, 2012, 9:32:46 PM1/21/12
to
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Checkmate!

First, check out what Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. said:

(This shit will crack you up!)


>
> It's abundantly clear that Ragnar and his gay lover Checkmate are
> heathens and sinners. Both are going to be swimming in the Lava Lakes
> one of these fine days because they mock God.
>
> The Bible is God's Word and the Bible is very clear on homosexuality,
> what it is and what the ramifications are:

The Big Book of Fair Tales isn't "God's word," you ignorant twit. Before
you start studying the bible, you might want to study how it came into
existence. A rudimentary knowledge of the history of The Big Book of
Fairy Tales would tell you it was put together by MEN... not "God". You
would also learn that the "gospels" were not written by the men purported
to have written them; most of what's written about Jesus was written 2-3
hundred years after his death; and that some very crafty Romans decided
what to put in and what to leave out, mostly for political expediency.

If you want to believe a bunch of fanciful nonsense about Noah's ark,
Adam and Eve, and all the rest... written by a bunch of uneducated,
superstitious goat herders two fucking millennia ago, be my guest, but
don't expect anyone in this day of enlightenment to accept it as any kind
of credible authority, especially the convoluted way you choose to
interpret it.



> "If a man lies with a male as he lies with a woman, both of them have
> committed an abomination." (Leviticus 20:13).
>
> This, of course, is stated in such a way as not to offend sensibilities
> but in course language what it says is this: If a man fucks another
> man's ass both of them have committed an abomination.

You'd better put on your asbestos underpants before you hit the "lava
lakes" then, because you've already stated you'd let a transsexual fuck
you in the ass, and you'd suck his dick. Sinner, REPENT!

That's the nice thing about The Big Book of Fairy Tales. Anyone is free
to interpret it in whatever way best suits their own tastes and
sensibilities. This is exactly what you've done below...


> For homosexual sodomy, then, BOTH the pitcher and the catcher are
> committing a crime against nature and God. Please note how it says
> nothing about fellatio.

You've stated previously that you'd suck a man's dick. This explains why
you've chosen to exempt that little activity from the bit about not
"lying with a man as with a woman". Since women also suck dicks, by your
own logic, for you to suck a man's dick would also be "lying with a man
as with a woman". To meander further down your twisted trail of logic,
you have already sinned as a homosexual, whether or not you've actually
sucked a man's dick. That's because The Big Book of Fairy Tales also
says that any man with lust in his heart has committed the sin of
adultery, just as if he had actually performed the deed. It stands to
reason that this admonition about adultery would also apply to
homosexuality.




> "You shall not lie with a male as with a woman. It is an abomination.
> Nor shall you mate with any animal, to defile yourself with it. Nor
> shall any woman stand before an animal to mate with it. It is
> perversion. 'Do not defile yourselves with any of these things; for by
> all these the nations are defiled, which I am casting out before you."
> (Leviticus 18:22-24).
>
> This one says pretty much the same thing as the previous verse only it's
> expanded to include bestiality.
>
> "For this reason God gave them up to vile passions. For even their women
> exchanged the natural use for what is against nature. Likewise also the
> men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust for one
> another, men with men committing what is shameful, and receiving in
> themselves the penalty of their error which was due." (Romans 1:26-27).
>
> The above is just politically correct language for men fucking men and I
> do believe "vile passions" includes a man giving a blow job to another.

Which, again, is something you said YOU would do.


> The "natural use" of the woman is to have a man copulate with her
> vagina. It would an unnatural use for a man to perform cunnilingus,
> however. Apparently there were lesbians using their vaginas unnaturally.
> I wonder if they had dildos in Old Testament times?

I'm sure they had zucchini...



> So what does this have to do with obviously female-looking trannys?
> Nothing.

"Nothing"? Let's just see about that...



> A man who just happens to pick up a hot-looking tranny in a Key West bar
> thinking she's all woman is NOT lusting after another man and has NO
> desire to fuck another man in the ass.

What about a man who "just happens" to seek out web sites featuring
transsexual MEN, and even goes as far as posting links to them on Usenet,
"Greg"?



> Try to remember the "chicks with
> dicks" part. Note how they aren't called "guys with tits".

That's what I call them, and it's probably what most people call them. I
also call them mentally ill freaks of nature.


> Note how the
> Bible doesn't even get into the whole subject of obviously attractive
> females with all the right curves who just happen to be born with a
> large clitoris aka dick. It follows that it's no abomination, not even a
> little sin to enjoy the company of a hottie tranny.

You so-called "Christians" never cease to amaze me with the lengths
you'll go to to justify your own deviant behavior while casting stones at
everyone around you. "It was a female who just happened to be born with
a large clitoris that looked like a dick!" I guess that makes you a
female too, bitch. LOL! You are one sick puppy, "Greg," and about as
perverted as they come.



> So stop it with the judgmentalism. It's very hypocritical for a gay
> couple like you two to try to tell me to remove the splinter from my eye
> while ignoring the tree trunks in your eyes.

You'd be better served to worry about the BOOT I've inserted in your
faggoty dick-loving ASS, you fucking freak.

--
Checkmate
KotAGoR XXXIV
Copyright © 2012
all rights reserved

Checkmate

unread,
Jan 22, 2012, 6:59:42 PM1/22/12
to
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Checkmate!

First, check out what Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. said:


>
> "Checkmate" <RickS...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:MPG.298623d9e...@news.alt.net...
> >>
> > More quotes from The Big Book of Fairy Tales? Why do you bother to
> > act
> > so pompous when you're out lusting after other men?
>
>
> Chicks with dicks are not men. You're just an idiot.

If they have DICKS, they're MEN! Damn, you're not only an idiot, but a
closet faggot in complete denial. Just because they "look" like a female
doesn't give you a Biblical loophole to suck their dicks or let them fuck
your fanny. You, sir, are sorely in need of redemption!

Lettuce prey...
0 new messages