Said the gramsattic halfwit.
-- Member - Liberal International This is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doc...@nl2k.ab.ca
God,Queen and country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! http://www.fullyfollow.me/rootnl2k That church which changes with the times cannot also be abiding in Christ
>"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message >news:joj853$qen$1@gallifrey.nk.ca...
>> In article <4FACD4D0.215F8...@gmail.com>,
>> Veronica Karlsson <veronica.karls...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>Rick Sabian's All-Star Canadian Assworm Zydeco Band wrote:
>>>> % put forth the notion that...
>>>> > [ 8< ]
>>>> > i wanna be , your sledge hammer
>>>> I'd rather be a hammer than a nail... yes, I would... I truly would.
>>>I'll drive you like a hammer on a bed of nails.
>Could I get a prescription for that, Doctor? And can you bill that to >Medicaid? (or whatever insurance it is...) <snickers>
That can all be arranged.
-- Member - Liberal International This is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doc...@nl2k.ab.ca
God,Queen and country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! http://www.fullyfollow.me/rootnl2k That church which changes with the times cannot also be abiding in Christ
> In article <5kg324.2bh.1...@news.alt.net>,
> Lady Pilot <time_...@break.yawn> wrote:
>>"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
>>news:joj853$qen$1@gallifrey.nk.ca...
>>> In article <4FACD4D0.215F8...@gmail.com>,
>>> Veronica Karlsson <veronica.karls...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>Rick Sabian's All-Star Canadian Assworm Zydeco Band wrote:
>>>>> % put forth the notion that...
>>>>> > [ 8< ]
>>>>> > i wanna be , your sledge hammer
>>>>> I'd rather be a hammer than a nail... yes, I would... I truly would.
>>>>I'll drive you like a hammer on a bed of nails.
>>> Get a husband woman!
>>Could I get a prescription for that, Doctor? And can you bill that to
>>Medicaid? (or whatever insurance it is...) <snickers>
> That can all be arranged.
But Doctor, don't I need a thorough examination first? How do you *know* I need a husband? Do you need to take a DNA sample first?
>"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message >news:jojrso$nub$1@gallifrey.nk.ca...
>> In article <5kg324.2bh.1...@news.alt.net>,
>> Lady Pilot <time_...@break.yawn> wrote:
>>>"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
>>>news:joj853$qen$1@gallifrey.nk.ca...
>>>> In article <4FACD4D0.215F8...@gmail.com>,
>>>> Veronica Karlsson <veronica.karls...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>Rick Sabian's All-Star Canadian Assworm Zydeco Band wrote:
>>>>>> % put forth the notion that...
>>>>>> > [ 8< ]
>>>>>> > i wanna be , your sledge hammer
>>>>>> I'd rather be a hammer than a nail... yes, I would... I truly would.
>>>>>I'll drive you like a hammer on a bed of nails.
>>>> Get a husband woman!
>>>Could I get a prescription for that, Doctor? And can you bill that to
>>>Medicaid? (or whatever insurance it is...) <snickers>
>> That can all be arranged.
>But Doctor, don't I need a thorough examination first? How do you *know* I >need a husband? Do you need to take a DNA sample first?
>LP (Can a Doctor be wrong?)
This is the 21st Century not 1930s Germany.
-- Member - Liberal International This is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doc...@nl2k.ab.ca
God,Queen and country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! http://www.fullyfollow.me/rootnl2k That church which changes with the times cannot also be abiding in Christ
The Doctor wrote:
> In article <5khvug.9r9.1...@news.alt.net>,
> Lady Pilot <time_...@break.yawn> wrote:
> >"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
> >news:jojrso$nub$1@gallifrey.nk.ca...
> >> In article <5kg324.2bh.1...@news.alt.net>,
> >> Lady Pilot <time_...@break.yawn> wrote:
>The Doctor wrote:
>> In article <5khvug.9r9.1...@news.alt.net>,
>> Lady Pilot <time_...@break.yawn> wrote:
>> >"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
>> >news:jojrso$nub$1@gallifrey.nk.ca...
>> >> In article <5kg324.2bh.1...@news.alt.net>,
>> >> Lady Pilot <time_...@break.yawn> wrote:
>> >>>Could I get a prescription for that, Doctor? And can you bill that to
>> >>>Medicaid? (or whatever insurance it is...) <snickers>
>> >> That can all be arranged.
>> >But Doctor, don't I need a thorough examination first? How do you *know* I
>> >need a husband? Do you need to take a DNA sample first?
>> >LP (Can a Doctor be wrong?)
>> This is the 21st Century not 1930s Germany.
>> --
>The 1930s would be far too modern for your Victorian values!
What did 19th Centruy science know of DNA?
-- Member - Liberal International This is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doc...@nl2k.ab.ca
God,Queen and country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! http://www.fullyfollow.me/rootnl2k That church which changes with the times cannot also be abiding in Christ
The Doctor wrote:
> In article <a15cc77a-e62e-47bc-8a7e-9fbb7b233...@ec4g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>,
> solar penguin <solar.peng...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >The Doctor wrote:
> >> In article <5khvug.9r9.1...@news.alt.net>,
> >> Lady Pilot <time_...@break.yawn> wrote:
> >> >"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
> >> >news:jojrso$nub$1@gallifrey.nk.ca...
> >> >> In article <5kg324.2bh.1...@news.alt.net>,
> >> >> Lady Pilot <time_...@break.yawn> wrote:
> > > >> >>>Could I get a prescription for that, Doctor? And can you bill that
> > > >> >>>to
> > > >> >>>Medicaid? (or whatever insurance it is...) <snickers>
> > > >> >> That can all be arranged.
> > > >> >But Doctor, don't I need a thorough examination first? How do you
> > > >> >*know* I
> > > >> >need a husband? Do you need to take a DNA sample first?
> > > >> >LP (Can a Doctor be wrong?)
> > > >> This is the 21st Century not 1930s Germany.
> > > >> --
> > > >The 1930s would be far too modern for your Victorian values!
> > > What did 19th Centruy science know of DNA?
> > > --
> > About as much as 1930s science knew. Watson and Crick didn't make
> > their famous DNA discovery until the 1950s.
> > Like I said, this is all far too modern for your Victorian values
> > (e.g. "Get a husband woman!")
> Actually it was already known DNA carried genes. What Crick and Watson worked
> out was its structure which gave strong hints about its replication.
> --
True, but either way they didn't know enough to carry out DNA testing
as being suggested upthread.
April 20, 2012, 2:19 PM - No one who ever found it too difficult or embarrassing to try to stop working a project or relationship or even a joke that clearly wasn't working knows that forewarned is not forarmed.
Forwarned may be pre-corrected, however.
A researcher at the University of Arizona claims to be able to predict with 80 percent accuracy when someone is about to make a mistake in a standardized math test.
>April 20, 2012, 2:19 PM - No one who ever found it too difficult or >embarrassing to try to stop working a project or relationship or even a joke >that clearly wasn't working knows that forewarned is not forarmed.
>Forwarned may be pre-corrected, however.
>A researcher at the University of Arizona claims to be able to predict with >80 percent accuracy when someone is about to make a mistake in a >standardized math test.
Sounds like Eugenics to me.
-- Member - Liberal International This is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doc...@nl2k.ab.ca
God,Queen and country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! http://www.fullyfollow.me/rootnl2k That church which changes with the times cannot also be abiding in Christ
> >April 20, 2012, 2:19 PM - No one who ever found it too difficult or
> >embarrassing to try to stop working a project or relationship or even a joke
> >that clearly wasn't working knows that forewarned is not forarmed.
> >Forwarned may be pre-corrected, however.
> >A researcher at the University of Arizona claims to be able to predict with
> >80 percent accuracy when someone is about to make a mistake in a
> >standardized math test.
> Sounds like Eugenics to me.
> --
It might sound like that to you. But that's because you're not smart
enough to understand it.
>> >April 20, 2012, 2:19 PM - No one who ever found it too difficult or
>> >embarrassing to try to stop working a project or relationship or even a joke
>> >that clearly wasn't working knows that forewarned is not forarmed.
>> >Forwarned may be pre-corrected, however.
>> >A researcher at the University of Arizona claims to be able to predict with
>> >80 percent accuracy when someone is about to make a mistake in a
>> >standardized math test.
>> Sounds like Eugenics to me.
>> --
>It might sound like that to you. But that's because you're not smart
>enough to understand it.
Based on genetics?
-- Member - Liberal International This is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doc...@nl2k.ab.ca
God,Queen and country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! http://www.fullyfollow.me/rootnl2k That church which changes with the times cannot also be abiding in Christ
