Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Post, damn you.

0 views
Skip to first unread message

trippy

unread,
Feb 9, 2006, 12:57:51 AM2/9/06
to

Who do I have to blow to get some conversation here?

--
trippy
mhm31x9 Smeeter#29 WSD#30
sTaRShInE_mOOnBeAm aT HoTmAil dOt CoM

NP: "Jellyroll" -- Blue Murder

"Now, technology's getting better all the time and that's fine,
but most of the time all you need is a stick of gum,
a pocketknife, and a smile."

-- Robert Redford "Spy Game"


Shirley

unread,
Feb 9, 2006, 6:53:20 AM2/9/06
to
trippy wrote:
> Who do I have to blow to get some conversation here?


I felt like warmed over pus last night...went to bed at 9:00pm....

I am here now...how about discussing hairless animals as pets..


Take a trip into the land of Oz without being high..

Cats...

http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://209.17.131.1/images/cat/Peterbald1_b.jpg&imgrefurl=http://209.17.131.1/index.asp%3Fct%3D5%26ch%3D1%26it%3D3&h=425&w=379&sz=31&tbnid=dErVo1C6bsGckM:&tbnh=122&tbnw=108&hl=en&start=1&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dfurless%2Bcats%26svnum%3D10%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26client%3Dfirefox-a%26rls%3Dorg.mozilla:en-US:official_s%26sa%3DG

Dogs...

http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://209.17.131.1/images/cat/Peterbald1_b.jpg&imgrefurl=http://209.17.131.1/index.asp%3Fct%3D5%26ch%3D1%26it%3D3&h=425&w=379&sz=31&tbnid=dErVo1C6bsGckM:&tbnh=122&tbnw=108&hl=en&start=1&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dfurless%2Bcats%26svnum%3D10%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26client%3Dfirefox-a%26rls%3Dorg.mozilla:en-US:official_s%26sa%3DG

Guinea Pigs...

http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://209.17.131.1/images/cat/Peterbald1_b.jpg&imgrefurl=http://209.17.131.1/index.asp%3Fct%3D5%26ch%3D1%26it%3D3&h=425&w=379&sz=31&tbnid=dErVo1C6bsGckM:&tbnh=122&tbnw=108&hl=en&start=1&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dfurless%2Bcats%26svnum%3D10%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26client%3Dfirefox-a%26rls%3Dorg.mozilla:en-US:official_s%26sa%3DG

How about a chicken that is preplucked?

http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://209.17.131.1/images/cat/Peterbald1_b.jpg&imgrefurl=http://209.17.131.1/index.asp%3Fct%3D5%26ch%3D1%26it%3D3&h=425&w=379&sz=31&tbnid=dErVo1C6bsGckM:&tbnh=122&tbnw=108&hl=en&start=1&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dfurless%2Bcats%26svnum%3D10%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26client%3Dfirefox-a%26rls%3Dorg.mozilla:en-US:official_s%26sa%3DG


mimus

unread,
Feb 9, 2006, 9:48:25 AM2/9/06
to
On Wed, 8 Feb 2006 23:57:51 -0600, trippy wrote:

> Who do I have to blow to get some conversation here?

Dunno. I was reduced to pseudo- Scots gabble.

--
tinmi...@hotmail.com

smeeter 11 or maybe 12

mp 10

mhm 29x13

Whatever are we to do to show the
true harmony and peace that rule here,
somewhat disguised at the moment by
the apparent disorder now seemingly in
progress?

< Laumer

mimus

unread,
Feb 9, 2006, 9:51:04 AM2/9/06
to
On Thu, 9 Feb 2006 06:53:20 -0500, Shirley wrote:

> trippy wrote:
>
>> Who do I have to blow to get some conversation here?
>
> I felt like warmed over pus last night...went to bed at 9:00pm....
>
> I am here now...how about discussing hairless animals as pets..

"Pets" should be "pettable", rewardingly so, surely?

And doesn't that pretty much mean furry?

Shirley

unread,
Feb 9, 2006, 10:04:24 AM2/9/06
to
mimus wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Feb 2006 06:53:20 -0500, Shirley wrote:
>
>> trippy wrote:
>>
>>> Who do I have to blow to get some conversation here?
>>
>> I felt like warmed over pus last night...went to bed at 9:00pm....
>>
>> I am here now...how about discussing hairless animals as pets..
>
> "Pets" should be "pettable", rewardingly so, surely?
>
> And doesn't that pretty much mean furry?


I guess they are perfect for someone who is allergic to pet hair and
dander...
What did you think of the chicken?


mimus

unread,
Feb 9, 2006, 10:42:20 AM2/9/06
to

Didn't look. Whole thing's too gross. Seen "Sphinxes" (Egyptian hairless
cats) before.

knoxy

unread,
Feb 9, 2006, 2:24:48 PM2/9/06
to
In article <MPG.1e5495da6...@news.alt.net>, trippy,
tri...@spam.sucks says...

>
> Who do I have to blow to get some conversation here?
>
Not me, but I'll pass on the offer to rocky.

--
knoxy
mhm34x10
smeeter #6
#6 on mimus wanted poster list
Best Newbie in alt.flame 2005

"The Internet is a gateway to get on the net."
Bob Dole

trippy

unread,
Feb 9, 2006, 5:01:24 PM2/9/06
to
In article <1gy32getqs3xk$.185oitp3...@40tude.net>, mimus took the
hamburger, threw it on the grill, and I said "Oh wow"...

> On Thu, 9 Feb 2006 06:53:20 -0500, Shirley wrote:
>
> > trippy wrote:
> >
> >> Who do I have to blow to get some conversation here?
> >
> > I felt like warmed over pus last night...went to bed at 9:00pm....
> >
> > I am here now...how about discussing hairless animals as pets..
>
> "Pets" should be "pettable", rewardingly so, surely?
>
> And doesn't that pretty much mean furry?
>
>

I implemented a fluffiness test for all my pets.

Lorrill Buyens

unread,
Feb 12, 2006, 6:26:08 PM2/12/06
to
On Thu, 9 Feb 2006 16:01:24 -0600, trippy <tri...@spam.sucks>, Loyal Agent of
the alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk Illuminati, gifted us with these words
of wisdom:

>In article <1gy32getqs3xk$.185oitp3...@40tude.net>, mimus took the
>hamburger, threw it on the grill, and I said "Oh wow"...
>
>> On Thu, 9 Feb 2006 06:53:20 -0500, Shirley wrote:
>>
>> > trippy wrote:
>> >
>> >> Who do I have to blow to get some conversation here?
>> >
>> > I felt like warmed over pus last night...went to bed at 9:00pm....
>> >
>> > I am here now...how about discussing hairless animals as pets..
>>
>> "Pets" should be "pettable", rewardingly so, surely?
>>
>> And doesn't that pretty much mean furry?

>I implemented a fluffiness test for all my pets.

Before or after you send `em on a trip through the dryer?


--
Lorrill Buyens
MHM: 9x1; Smeeter: #21; WSD: #3
Alcatroll Labs; Sex, Drugs and Rock 'n' Roll Division
"I ZM NOT FIRGIT."
- The title of a thread started by an apparently
drunk Incantatrix, in aav3f

trippy

unread,
Feb 12, 2006, 7:09:38 PM2/12/06
to
In article <el1tu15ubgvv3vi4b...@4ax.com>, Lorrill Buyens
took the hamburger, threw it on the grill, and I said "Oh wow"...

> On Thu, 9 Feb 2006 16:01:24 -0600, trippy <tri...@spam.sucks>, Loyal Agent of
> the alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk Illuminati, gifted us with these words
> of wisdom:
>
> >In article <1gy32getqs3xk$.185oitp3...@40tude.net>, mimus took the
> >hamburger, threw it on the grill, and I said "Oh wow"...
> >
> >> On Thu, 9 Feb 2006 06:53:20 -0500, Shirley wrote:
> >>
> >> > trippy wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Who do I have to blow to get some conversation here?
> >> >
> >> > I felt like warmed over pus last night...went to bed at 9:00pm....
> >> >
> >> > I am here now...how about discussing hairless animals as pets..
> >>
> >> "Pets" should be "pettable", rewardingly so, surely?
> >>
> >> And doesn't that pretty much mean furry?
>
> >I implemented a fluffiness test for all my pets.
>
> Before or after you send `em on a trip through the dryer?

Attention Pets:

A new test for fluffiness is now being implemented. The details will be
made available to you later. Thank you for your cooperation in this
matter.

--
trippy
mhm31x9 Smeeter#29 WSD#30
sTaRShInE_mOOnBeAm aT HoTmAil dOt CoM

NP: "Jelly Roll" -- Blue Murder

mimus

unread,
Feb 12, 2006, 11:35:28 PM2/12/06
to
On Sun, 12 Feb 2006 18:09:38 -0600, trippy wrote:

> In article <el1tu15ubgvv3vi4b...@4ax.com>, Lorrill Buyens
> took the hamburger, threw it on the grill, and I said "Oh wow"...
>
>> On Thu, 9 Feb 2006 16:01:24 -0600, trippy <tri...@spam.sucks>, Loyal Agent of
>> the alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk Illuminati, gifted us with these words
>> of wisdom:
>>
>>>In article <1gy32getqs3xk$.185oitp3...@40tude.net>, mimus took the
>>>hamburger, threw it on the grill, and I said "Oh wow"...
>>>
>>>> On Thu, 9 Feb 2006 06:53:20 -0500, Shirley wrote:
>>>>
>>>> > trippy wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> >> Who do I have to blow to get some conversation here?
>>>> >
>>>> > I felt like warmed over pus last night...went to bed at 9:00pm....
>>>> >
>>>> > I am here now...how about discussing hairless animals as pets..
>>>>
>>>> "Pets" should be "pettable", rewardingly so, surely?
>>>>
>>>> And doesn't that pretty much mean furry?
>>
>>>I implemented a fluffiness test for all my pets.
>>
>> Before or after you send `em on a trip through the dryer?
>
> Attention Pets:
>
> A new test for fluffiness is now being implemented. The details will be
> made available to you later. Thank you for your cooperation in this
> matter.

There should a dryer setting, you know, "gentle", "delicate", "cat".

trippy

unread,
Feb 13, 2006, 1:36:42 AM2/13/06
to
In article <1c7pgabvdafvu$.apcr9k2dj58b$.d...@40tude.net>, mimus took the
hamburger, threw it on the grill, and I said "Oh wow"...

> On Sun, 12 Feb 2006 18:09:38 -0600, trippy wrote:
>
> > In article <el1tu15ubgvv3vi4b...@4ax.com>, Lorrill Buyens
> > took the hamburger, threw it on the grill, and I said "Oh wow"...
> >
> >> On Thu, 9 Feb 2006 16:01:24 -0600, trippy <tri...@spam.sucks>, Loyal Agent of
> >> the alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk Illuminati, gifted us with these words
> >> of wisdom:
> >>
> >>>In article <1gy32getqs3xk$.185oitp3...@40tude.net>, mimus took the
> >>>hamburger, threw it on the grill, and I said "Oh wow"...
> >>>
> >>>> On Thu, 9 Feb 2006 06:53:20 -0500, Shirley wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> > trippy wrote:
> >>>> >
> >>>> >> Who do I have to blow to get some conversation here?
> >>>> >
> >>>> > I felt like warmed over pus last night...went to bed at 9:00pm....
> >>>> >
> >>>> > I am here now...how about discussing hairless animals as pets..
> >>>>
> >>>> "Pets" should be "pettable", rewardingly so, surely?
> >>>>
> >>>> And doesn't that pretty much mean furry?
> >>
> >>>I implemented a fluffiness test for all my pets.
> >>
> >> Before or after you send `em on a trip through the dryer?
> >
> > Attention Pets:
> >
> > A new test for fluffiness is now being implemented. The details will be
> > made available to you later. Thank you for your cooperation in this
> > matter.
>
> There should a dryer setting, you know, "gentle", "delicate", "cat".

Cats will crawl into an engine block but fight you when you try to throw
them into a dryer. Stupid animals.

Nader Rijn van Wyck

unread,
Feb 13, 2006, 2:13:18 AM2/13/06
to
"Who do I have to [censored] to get some conversation here?"

Plenty of conversation going on here. Join the crusade to Wipe out
Perkoff. there is a worthy cause for anyone.

mimus

unread,
Feb 13, 2006, 4:56:26 PM2/13/06
to

Who?

dave hillstrom

unread,
Feb 13, 2006, 5:02:49 PM2/13/06
to
On Mon, 13 Feb 2006 02:13:18 -0500, Squi...@webtv.net (Nader Rijn van
Wyck) spewed in alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk:

>"Who do I have to [censored] to get some conversation here?"
>
>Plenty of conversation going on here. Join the crusade to Wipe out
>Perkoff. there is a worthy cause for anyone.

not even close to as useful as a wipe out bowtie & tom bishop campaign.
--
dave hillstrom
"Quotes can't be forced. They just come to you, like diarrhea."
- dave hillstrom mhm15x4

dave hillstrom

unread,
Feb 13, 2006, 5:03:23 PM2/13/06
to
On Mon, 13 Feb 2006 16:56:26 -0500, mimus <tinmi...@hotmail.com> spewed
in alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk:

>On Mon, 13 Feb 2006 02:13:18 -0500, Nader Rijn van Wyck wrote:
>
>> "Who do I have to [censored] to get some conversation here?"
>>
>> Plenty of conversation going on here. Join the crusade to Wipe out
>> Perkoff. there is a worthy cause for anyone.
>
>Who?

you really do not want to know. really.

SCRUFF

unread,
Feb 13, 2006, 6:03:51 PM2/13/06
to

"Nader Rijn van Wyck" <Squi...@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:3598-43F...@storefull-3211.bay.webtv.net...

> "Who do I have to [censored] to get some conversation here?"
>
> Plenty of conversation going on here. Join the crusade to Wipe out
> Perkoff. there is a worthy cause for anyone.
Speak for yourself numbnut. I don't want Steven gone any more
than I want you gone. Meany.


dave hillstrom

unread,
Feb 13, 2006, 6:47:11 PM2/13/06
to
On Mon, 13 Feb 2006 18:03:51 -0500, "SCRUFF" <Get@Grip> spewed in
alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk:

i want ~all~ of you fuckers gone. i want usenet all to myself! goddamn
infestation of microencephalics... <grumble> <grumble>

Aratzio

unread,
Feb 13, 2006, 8:41:14 PM2/13/06
to
On Mon, 13 Feb 2006 17:02:49 -0500, dave hillstrom <Da...@MeOw.OrG> got
double secret probation because:

>On Mon, 13 Feb 2006 02:13:18 -0500, Squi...@webtv.net (Nader Rijn van
>Wyck) spewed in alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk:
>
>>"Who do I have to [censored] to get some conversation here?"
>>
>>Plenty of conversation going on here. Join the crusade to Wipe out
>>Perkoff. there is a worthy cause for anyone.
>
>not even close to as useful as a wipe out bowtie & tom bishop campaign.

<pouts>
what happened to the exterminate Ratz pogrom?

--

alt.hackers.malicious - Wanker Stomping Award - 2005

alt.usenet.kooks - Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker - May, 2005
alt.usenet.kooks - Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker - Jan, 2006

alt.usenet.kooks - Hammer of Thor - July, 2005

alt.flame - Worst Flame War - 2005

David Formosa (aka ? the Platypus) on 10-22-2005
Message-Id: <slrndlk3ae....@dformosa.zeta.org.au>
"But it is not isolated AUK has a massive impact the rest of usenet."

mimus

unread,
Feb 13, 2006, 9:35:58 PM2/13/06
to
On Mon, 13 Feb 2006 18:47:11 -0500, dave hillstrom wrote:

> On Mon, 13 Feb 2006 18:03:51 -0500, "SCRUFF" <Get@Grip> spewed in
> alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk:
>
>>"Nader Rijn van Wyck" <Squi...@webtv.net> wrote in message
>>news:3598-43F...@storefull-3211.bay.webtv.net...
>>
>>> "Who do I have to [censored] to get some conversation here?"
>>>
>>> Plenty of conversation going on here. Join the crusade to Wipe out
>>> Perkoff. there is a worthy cause for anyone.
>>
>>Speak for yourself numbnut. I don't want Steven gone any more
>>than I want you gone. Meany.
>
> i want ~all~ of you fuckers gone. i want usenet all to myself! goddamn
> infestation of microencephalics... <grumble> <grumble>

Whuh yuh pruh?

dave hillstrom

unread,
Feb 13, 2006, 11:02:42 PM2/13/06
to
On Mon, 13 Feb 2006 17:41:14 -0800, Aratzio <a6ah...@sneakemail.com>
spewed in alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk:

>On Mon, 13 Feb 2006 17:02:49 -0500, dave hillstrom <Da...@MeOw.OrG> got
>double secret probation because:
>
>>On Mon, 13 Feb 2006 02:13:18 -0500, Squi...@webtv.net (Nader Rijn van
>>Wyck) spewed in alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk:
>>
>>>"Who do I have to [censored] to get some conversation here?"
>>>
>>>Plenty of conversation going on here. Join the crusade to Wipe out
>>>Perkoff. there is a worthy cause for anyone.
>>
>>not even close to as useful as a wipe out bowtie & tom bishop campaign.
>
><pouts>
>what happened to the exterminate Ratz pogrom?

its in the same place my AUK award is.

Lionel

unread,
Feb 13, 2006, 11:20:23 PM2/13/06
to
Kibo informs me that dave hillstrom <Da...@MeOw.OrG> stated that:

>On Mon, 13 Feb 2006 17:41:14 -0800, Aratzio <a6ah...@sneakemail.com>
>spewed in alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk:
>
>>On Mon, 13 Feb 2006 17:02:49 -0500, dave hillstrom <Da...@MeOw.OrG> got
>>double secret probation because:
>>
>>>On Mon, 13 Feb 2006 02:13:18 -0500, Squi...@webtv.net (Nader Rijn van
>>>Wyck) spewed in alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk:
>>>
>>>>"Who do I have to [censored] to get some conversation here?"
>>>>
>>>>Plenty of conversation going on here. Join the crusade to Wipe out
>>>>Perkoff. there is a worthy cause for anyone.
>>>
>>>not even close to as useful as a wipe out bowtie & tom bishop campaign.
>>
>><pouts>
>>what happened to the exterminate Ratz pogrom?
>
>its in the same place my AUK award is.

Your arse?
--
W
. | ,. w , "Some people are alive only because
\|/ \|/ it is illegal to kill them." Perna condita delenda est
---^----^---------------------------------------------------------------

Aratzio

unread,
Feb 13, 2006, 11:19:18 PM2/13/06
to
On Mon, 13 Feb 2006 23:02:42 -0500, dave hillstrom <Da...@MeOw.OrG> got
double secret probation because:

>On Mon, 13 Feb 2006 17:41:14 -0800, Aratzio <a6ah...@sneakemail.com>
>spewed in alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk:
>
>>On Mon, 13 Feb 2006 17:02:49 -0500, dave hillstrom <Da...@MeOw.OrG> got
>>double secret probation because:
>>
>>>On Mon, 13 Feb 2006 02:13:18 -0500, Squi...@webtv.net (Nader Rijn van
>>>Wyck) spewed in alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk:
>>>
>>>>"Who do I have to [censored] to get some conversation here?"
>>>>
>>>>Plenty of conversation going on here. Join the crusade to Wipe out
>>>>Perkoff. there is a worthy cause for anyone.
>>>
>>>not even close to as useful as a wipe out bowtie & tom bishop campaign.
>>
>><pouts>
>>what happened to the exterminate Ratz pogrom?
>
>its in the same place my AUK award is.

Held hostage for a Doc Flonkenstein bubblegum card?

Wavy G

unread,
Feb 14, 2006, 4:38:47 AM2/14/06
to
The results are in...Lionel, you are NOT the father!

>Kibo informs me that dave hillstrom <Da...@MeOw.OrG> stated that:
>
>>On Mon, 13 Feb 2006 17:41:14 -0800, Aratzio <a6ah...@sneakemail.com>
>>spewed in alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk:
>>
>>>On Mon, 13 Feb 2006 17:02:49 -0500, dave hillstrom <Da...@MeOw.OrG> got
>>>double secret probation because:
>>>
>>>>On Mon, 13 Feb 2006 02:13:18 -0500, Squi...@webtv.net (Nader Rijn van
>>>>Wyck) spewed in alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk:
>>>>
>>>>>"Who do I have to [censored] to get some conversation here?"
>>>>>
>>>>>Plenty of conversation going on here. Join the crusade to Wipe out
>>>>>Perkoff. there is a worthy cause for anyone.
>>>>
>>>>not even close to as useful as a wipe out bowtie & tom bishop campaign.
>>>
>>><pouts>
>>>what happened to the exterminate Ratz pogrom?
>>
>>its in the same place my AUK award is.
>
>Your arse?

Hi, Lionel. It's me, Wavy. How've you been, brah?

Real Friendly Neiborhood Vote Ranger

unread,
Feb 14, 2006, 4:46:56 AM2/14/06
to

"Wavy G" <Worlds...@Chosen1.org> wrote in message
news:b893v15f8gu6632mt...@4ax.com...

Lionel is not in. He chases the Vietnamine arse to the Ho-She-Mean City. Who
are you? Does he know who you are?


Lionel

unread,
Feb 14, 2006, 7:57:44 AM2/14/06
to
Kibo informs me that Wavy G <Worlds...@Chosen1.org> stated that:

Hey Wavy, nice to hear from you.

>How've you been, brah?

I've been good, thanks. Too busy to spend much time on Usenet,
unfortunately. How've you been?

Wavy G

unread,
Feb 14, 2006, 11:05:18 AM2/14/06
to
The results are in...Lionel, you are NOT the father!

>Kibo informs me that Wavy G <Worlds...@Chosen1.org> stated that:
>
>>The results are in...Lionel, you are NOT the father!
>>
>>>Kibo informs me that dave hillstrom <Da...@MeOw.OrG> stated that:
>>>
>>>>On Mon, 13 Feb 2006 17:41:14 -0800, Aratzio <a6ah...@sneakemail.com>
>>>>spewed in alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk:
>>>>
>>>>>On Mon, 13 Feb 2006 17:02:49 -0500, dave hillstrom <Da...@MeOw.OrG> got
>>>>>double secret probation because:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Mon, 13 Feb 2006 02:13:18 -0500, Squi...@webtv.net (Nader Rijn van
>>>>>>Wyck) spewed in alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>"Who do I have to [censored] to get some conversation here?"
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Plenty of conversation going on here. Join the crusade to Wipe out
>>>>>>>Perkoff. there is a worthy cause for anyone.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>not even close to as useful as a wipe out bowtie & tom bishop campaign.
>>>>>
>>>>><pouts>
>>>>>what happened to the exterminate Ratz pogrom?
>>>>
>>>>its in the same place my AUK award is.
>>>
>>>Your arse?
>>
>>Hi, Lionel. It's me, Wavy.
>
>Hey Wavy, nice to hear from you.
>
>>How've you been, brah?
>
>I've been good, thanks. Too busy to spend much time on Usenet,
>unfortunately. How've you been?

Did you remember the time I peed on your flowers? That was funny,
yes? Well, see you later.

Daedalus

unread,
Feb 14, 2006, 1:33:46 PM2/14/06
to
On Tue, 14 Feb 2006 11:05:18 -0500, Wavy G <Worlds...@Chosen1.org>,
wrote:

What kind of flowers?

Jade


dave hillstrom

unread,
Feb 14, 2006, 7:11:11 PM2/14/06
to
On Tue, 14 Feb 2006 13:33:46 -0500, Daedalus <ja...@netkooks.org> spewed in
alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk:

soggy ascii flowers. ew.

dave hillstrom

unread,
Feb 14, 2006, 7:12:15 PM2/14/06
to
On Thu, 9 Feb 2006 09:48:25 -0500, mimus <tinmi...@hotmail.com> spewed in
alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk:

>On Wed, 8 Feb 2006 23:57:51 -0600, trippy wrote:
>
>> Who do I have to blow to get some conversation here?
>
>Dunno. I was reduced to pseudo- Scots gabble.

isnt that something used by the judge in a courtroom?

mimus

unread,
Feb 14, 2006, 9:22:20 PM2/14/06
to
On Tue, 14 Feb 2006 19:12:15 -0500, dave hillstrom wrote:

> On Thu, 9 Feb 2006 09:48:25 -0500, mimus <tinmi...@hotmail.com> spewed in
> alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk:
>
>>On Wed, 8 Feb 2006 23:57:51 -0600, trippy wrote:
>>
>>> Who do I have to blow to get some conversation here?
>>
>>Dunno. I was reduced to pseudo- Scots gabble.
>
> isnt that something used by the judge in a courtroom?

Only if someone's been kilt.

dave hillstrom

unread,
Feb 14, 2006, 9:33:34 PM2/14/06
to
On Mon, 13 Feb 2006 20:19:18 -0800, Aratzio <a6ah...@sneakemail.com>
spewed in alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk:

>On Mon, 13 Feb 2006 23:02:42 -0500, dave hillstrom <Da...@MeOw.OrG> got
>double secret probation because:
>
>>On Mon, 13 Feb 2006 17:41:14 -0800, Aratzio <a6ah...@sneakemail.com>
>>spewed in alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk:
>>
>>>On Mon, 13 Feb 2006 17:02:49 -0500, dave hillstrom <Da...@MeOw.OrG> got
>>>double secret probation because:
>>>
>>>>On Mon, 13 Feb 2006 02:13:18 -0500, Squi...@webtv.net (Nader Rijn van
>>>>Wyck) spewed in alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk:
>>>>
>>>>>"Who do I have to [censored] to get some conversation here?"
>>>>>
>>>>>Plenty of conversation going on here. Join the crusade to Wipe out
>>>>>Perkoff. there is a worthy cause for anyone.
>>>>
>>>>not even close to as useful as a wipe out bowtie & tom bishop campaign.
>>>
>>><pouts>
>>>what happened to the exterminate Ratz pogrom?
>>
>>its in the same place my AUK award is.
>
>Held hostage for a Doc Flonkenstein bubblegum card?

if it were only that simple...

dave hillstrom

unread,
Feb 14, 2006, 9:34:12 PM2/14/06
to
On Tue, 14 Feb 2006 21:22:20 -0500, mimus <tinmi...@hotmail.com> spewed
in alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk:

>On Tue, 14 Feb 2006 19:12:15 -0500, dave hillstrom wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 9 Feb 2006 09:48:25 -0500, mimus <tinmi...@hotmail.com> spewed in
>> alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk:
>>
>>>On Wed, 8 Feb 2006 23:57:51 -0600, trippy wrote:
>>>
>>>> Who do I have to blow to get some conversation here?
>>>
>>>Dunno. I was reduced to pseudo- Scots gabble.
>>
>> isnt that something used by the judge in a courtroom?
>
>Only if someone's been kilt.

youre fired.

mimus

unread,
Feb 14, 2006, 9:41:04 PM2/14/06
to
On Tue, 14 Feb 2006 21:34:12 -0500, dave hillstrom wrote:

> On Tue, 14 Feb 2006 21:22:20 -0500, mimus <tinmi...@hotmail.com> spewed
> in alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk:
>
>>On Tue, 14 Feb 2006 19:12:15 -0500, dave hillstrom wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, 9 Feb 2006 09:48:25 -0500, mimus <tinmi...@hotmail.com> spewed in
>>> alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk:
>>>
>>>>On Wed, 8 Feb 2006 23:57:51 -0600, trippy wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Who do I have to blow to get some conversation here?
>>>>
>>>>Dunno. I was reduced to pseudo- Scots gabble.
>>>
>>> isnt that something used by the judge in a courtroom?
>>
>>Only if someone's been kilt.
>
> youre fired.

A setup line like that makes you a coconspirator.

Aratzio

unread,
Feb 14, 2006, 10:02:10 PM2/14/06
to
On Tue, 14 Feb 2006 21:33:34 -0500, dave hillstrom <Da...@MeOw.OrG> got
double secret probation because:

>On Mon, 13 Feb 2006 20:19:18 -0800, Aratzio <a6ah...@sneakemail.com>
>spewed in alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk:
>
>>On Mon, 13 Feb 2006 23:02:42 -0500, dave hillstrom <Da...@MeOw.OrG> got
>>double secret probation because:
>>
>>>On Mon, 13 Feb 2006 17:41:14 -0800, Aratzio <a6ah...@sneakemail.com>
>>>spewed in alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk:
>>>
>>>>On Mon, 13 Feb 2006 17:02:49 -0500, dave hillstrom <Da...@MeOw.OrG> got
>>>>double secret probation because:
>>>>
>>>>>On Mon, 13 Feb 2006 02:13:18 -0500, Squi...@webtv.net (Nader Rijn van
>>>>>Wyck) spewed in alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk:
>>>>>
>>>>>>"Who do I have to [censored] to get some conversation here?"
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Plenty of conversation going on here. Join the crusade to Wipe out
>>>>>>Perkoff. there is a worthy cause for anyone.
>>>>>
>>>>>not even close to as useful as a wipe out bowtie & tom bishop campaign.
>>>>
>>>><pouts>
>>>>what happened to the exterminate Ratz pogrom?
>>>
>>>its in the same place my AUK award is.
>>
>>Held hostage for a Doc Flonkenstein bubblegum card?
>
>if it were only that simple...

I suppose you have a Doc Flonk bubblegum card, poseur.

Wavy G

unread,
Feb 14, 2006, 11:26:59 PM2/14/06
to
The results are in...dave hillstrom, you are NOT the father!

_______________
|teehee! i love |
| you all. |
|___________ ___|
\
() /
/||\/
. . . / ||
W ,` ` ~( )
. | ,. w , //
\|/ \|/ |\
---^----^'------------------------------------------------------

±

unread,
Feb 15, 2006, 4:37:09 AM2/15/06
to
mimus wrote:
>
> Whuh yuh pruh?

Fruh guh kruh?

>
> --
> tinmi...@hotmail.com
>
> smeeter 11 or maybe 12
>
> mp 10
>
> mhm 29x13
>
> Whatever are we to do to show the
> true harmony and peace that rule here,
> somewhat disguised at the moment by
> the apparent disorder now seemingly in
> progress?
>
> < Laumer


--
http://www.bedoper.com/snuh

*********************************************************************
* GEORGE BUSH WIPES HIS ASS WITH THE ____________ *
* CONSTITUTION AGAIN! / / \ *
* __ __ __ _ | WE | ( ) | *
* | | / \ | | | | | THE |\__ / *
* | |__ | () | | |__ |_| |PEOPLE | *
* |_____| \__/ |_____| (_) |________| *
* *
*********************************************************************
* BTW, George Bush's head looks like a chimp. *
* *
* .-"-. _________________________________ *
* _/.-.-.\_ / \ *
* ( o o ) | Executive Privilege r0><3r$!!! | *
* |/ " \| _-_ \_ _____________________________/ *
* \ .0 ./ | / | / *
* \ / / / |/ *
* /`"""`--/ / / *
* / / *
* / ' ./ *
* | \_____/ *
* *
*********************************************************************
WTF is Fred Ziffel?


-------
/ \
/ \ /-----\
| (@) | | SnuH |
| (O) | \_ ___/
| / | ||
| \ /_ / //
\ \____/ / /
\ /
\_____,

Daedalus

unread,
Feb 15, 2006, 9:24:03 AM2/15/06
to
On Tue, 14 Feb 2006 19:11:11 -0500, dave hillstrom <Da...@MeOw.OrG>,
wrote:

Alas, to kill an unliving thing.

Jade


Daedalus

unread,
Feb 15, 2006, 9:26:02 AM2/15/06
to
On Tue, 14 Feb 2006 23:26:59 -0500, Wavy G <Worlds...@Chosen1.org>,
wrote:


Those look like Chrysanthemums.

And your pee defies physics!

Jade

Wavy G

unread,
Feb 15, 2006, 12:49:55 PM2/15/06
to
The results are in...Daedalus, you are NOT the father!

No, it doesn't. If you "point" it properly, and if there's enough
force behind it, (ei: you have a lot of pee in your bladder), you can
acheive an "arc" as shown above.


>
>Jade
>
>

Daedalus

unread,
Feb 15, 2006, 1:11:12 PM2/15/06
to
On Wed, 15 Feb 2006 12:49:55 -0500, Wavy G <Worlds...@Chosen1.org>,
wrote:

I have witnessed the pee arc. I know the pee arc can be done. You
appear to be portraying a pee zag.

Jade

Wavy G

unread,
Feb 15, 2006, 1:35:12 PM2/15/06
to

Well, it's difficult to properly display a "pee arc" due to the
constraints of the ASCII-based medium, sheesh.


>Jade
>
>

0 new messages